scholarly journals Development of the intellectual capital of an enterprise as a competitive advantage in production management

2021 ◽  
Vol 188 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 134-140
Author(s):  
Olga Voronkova ◽  
◽  
Olga Stepanenko ◽  
Nazim Balamirzoev ◽  
Svetlana Makarenko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Competitive Advantage ◽  
Intellectual Capital ◽  
Production Management ◽  
Intangible Assets ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Theoretical Studies ◽  
Competitive Advantages ◽  
Industrial Management ◽  
Key Factor ◽  
Strategic Success

The main purpose of the study is to investigate the development of the intellectual capital of an enterprise as a competitive advantage of industrial management. Taking into consideration theoretical studies and overviews of the experience of Russian firms today, it can be stated that Russian businesses are primarily based on the current conditions for the survival of companies, rather than on generating potential business opportunities, which does not lead to the creation of intangible assets and the formation of intellectual capital. At the same time, the majority of managers share the opinion of scientists that the formation and creation of the intellectual capital of an organization is a key factor in ensuring the company’s strategic success. A business that pays more attention to the growth of intellectual resources and production of intangible assets has greater competitive advantages. Based on the findings of different empirical studies, it can be argued that the organization’s management perceives intellectual capital as a component that ensures success, competitive advantage, and, ultimately, the company’s economic development.

The Contribution of Marketing 3.0 for the Strategic Management of Competitive Advantages of Organizations

2018 ◽  
pp. 342-358
Author(s):  
Maria Beatriz Marques
Keyword(s):  
Strategic Management ◽  
Competitive Advantage ◽  
Conceptual Model ◽  
Customer Loyalty ◽  
Intellectual Capital ◽  
Intangible Assets ◽  
Competitive Advantages ◽  
Digital World ◽  
Spiritual Nature

The main objective of this chapter is to analyze the concept of competitive advantage of organizations from the study and valuation of their intangible assets. The evolution of marketing is analyzed from the materiality of the commercial transactions of purchase and sale of products and services, to the intangible aspects inherent to the transactional process, based on intellectual capital and values of spiritual nature. In the context of a new cosmogony, the authors conclude on the deciding role of the intangible assets of organizations in order to create their competitive advantage, based on the concepts of value, satisfaction, trust, and customer loyalty. They conclude with a proposal of a conceptual model for the sustainability of organizations in the transition from the traditional to the digital world.

scholarly journals Structural capital and its importance for the intellectual capital of an organization

e-mentor ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 92 (5) ◽  
pp. 61-68
Author(s):  
Mirosław Wójcik ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Competitive Advantage ◽  
Intellectual Capital ◽  
Intangible Assets ◽  
Knowledge Gap ◽  
Strategic Factor ◽  
Structural Capital ◽  
Strategic Value ◽  
Internal Structures ◽  
Key Factor ◽  
Strategic Role

This article aims to confirm the thesis that structural capital (SC) is a framework for intellectual capital (IC) in an organization, which allows proper configuration of intangibles. Therefore, in the resource-based view, it determines its strategic character. Realizing such a goal, the author pays attention to the nature of relations and connections of individual components of IC, indicating that the SC is the key factor creating intangible assets of the organization as a source of gaining competitive advantage. The reason for taking up this issue is that, despite years of discussion in the field of IC, there are still unanswered questions concerning the management of an organization’s IC, especially its planning and development. The defined knowledge gap concerns the source of strategic characteristics of IC, which, according to the resources-based view, are its rarity, originality, and the inability to be substituted or copied. The ability to shape the strategic value of intangibles makes this source itself a strategic resource and identifying it can change the way we understand IC. To achieve the paper’s aim and fill the knowledge gap, the author asks whether SC can provide the characteristics of IC mentioned above and whether the strategic character of IC can be achieved independently of SC. The review and theoretical considerations are based on the analysis of the literature on IC and selected issues that are not directly related to IC, but of which the subject touches on the intangible assets commonly considered to be components of IC, such as the issue of functional stupidity, knowledge management, or resource theory. As a result of the analysis of features and characteristics of SC, the author concludes that SC is responsible for the efficient use of relational capital and human capital potential and thus is a strategic factor shaping IC as a source of achieved competitive advantage. The topic has important practical implications because by confirming the strategic role of SC, indicates the sources of effective creation of IC and its potential. The discussion also identifies directions for further research on this issue, especially the operationalization of IC and its analysis in organizations’ internal structures.

Creating competitive advantage through network ties, entrepreneurial orientation and intellectual capital

2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chih-Hsing (Sam) Liu
Keyword(s):  
Competitive Advantage ◽  
Intellectual Capital ◽  
Entrepreneurial Orientation ◽  
Competitive Advantages ◽  
Organizational Capital ◽  
Network Ties ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Political Ties ◽  
Managerial Ties ◽  
Business Ties

PurposeThis study attempts to explore how a cultural and creative firm's competitive advantages can be maintained through the accumulation of intellectual capital and entrepreneurial orientation. Another goal of this study is to identify the different mechanisms of network ties to explore the interrelationships between organizational capital and competitive advantage in the context of Taiwan and China.Design/methodology/approachStudy 1 and study 2 settings are applied, and 786 samples (i.e., 418 samples from Taiwan and 368 samples from China) are used to examine the proposed model.FindingsStudy 1 reveals that entrepreneurial orientation may influence the organization capital through human capital and social capital, which discloses the mutual relationships of intellectual capital. Further, the results of study 2 confirm the mediating role of intellectual capital that links the relationships between entrepreneurial orientation and competitive advantage. Specifically, this study also discovered that firms with more network or political ties (e.g. the Chinese samples) and business ties (e.g. the Taiwanese samples) tend to amplify the effects of organizational capital on competitive advantage.Practical implicationsAccording to our empirical results, cultural and creative managers should build a learning mechanism to encourage and develop entrepreneurial orientation and intellectual capital capacities and to provide means of understanding of customers' changing expectations. Hence, in enhancing entrepreneurial orientation and intellectual capital cultural and creative firms can develop a competitive advantage over competitors. Our findings also offer new insight to support further studies of the benefits of managerial ties for firms operating in Guanxi cultural settings in Chinese contexts.Originality/valueMost previous studies on tourism strategies have disregarded the impacts and different roles of government (e.g. political ties) and business (e.g. business ties) forces on cultural and creative firms' competitive advantages, suggesting a need to address social network issues in response to dynamic tourism environments. Therefore, this study examines differences in network ties and the differences observed between China and Taiwan in the context of Chinese cultural and creative firms.

scholarly journals The relationship between investments in lean practices and operational performance

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 406-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Onofrei ◽  
Jasna Prester ◽  
Brian Fynes ◽  
Paul Humphreys ◽  
Frank Wiengarten
Keyword(s):  
Competitive Advantage ◽  
Intellectual Capital ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Least Square ◽  
Operational Performance ◽  
Complex Relationship ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Synergetic Effects ◽  
Knowledge Based ◽  
Lean Practices

PurposePrior research has shown that operational intellectual capital (OIC) and investments in lean practices (ILP) lead to better operational performance. However, there have been no empirical studies on the synergetic effects between OIC components and ILP. More specifically, the question – can the efficacy of ILP be increased through OIC? – has not been studied. Accordingly, the purpose of this paper is to report the empirical results of potential synergetic effects between OIC, as a knowledge-based resource, and ILP.Design/methodology/approachThe empirical data used for this study were drawn from the fifth round of the Global Manufacturing Research Group survey project (with data collected from 528 manufacturing plants). The hypotheses are empirically tested using three ordinary least square (OLS) models.FindingsThe authors’ findings highlight the importance of leveraging a system of complementary knowledge-based resources (OIC dimensions) and addresses the need for the reformulation of lean theory in terms of the emergent knowledge-based view of the firm. The results facilitate greater understanding of the complex relationship between ILP and operational performance. Building on the contribution of Menoret al.(2007), the authors argue that OIC represents a strategic knowledge-based resource that is valuable, hard to imitate or substitute and, when leveraged effectively, generates superior operational and competitive advantage.Practical implicationsFrom a managerial standpoint, this study provides guidelines for managers on how to leverage OIC to enhance the efficacy of ILP. The authors argue that firms consider investing in OIC to increase the return from ILP, which, in turn, will enhance their operational performance and provide competitive advantage. The authors findings provide strong evidence of the importance of human, social and structural capital to enhance the efficacy of ILP.Originality/valueThis is the first research paper that extends the application of the intellectual capital theory in lean literature, and argues that the OIC contributes to the efficacy of ILP. The analysis facilitates greater understanding of the complex relationship between OIC dimensions, ILP and operational performance.

Driving the internet and e-business technologies to generate a competitive advantage in emerging markets

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 389-423
Author(s):  
Gamal Mohamed Shehata ◽  
Mohammed A. Montash
Keyword(s):  
Emerging Markets ◽  
Competitive Advantage ◽  
Quantitative Research ◽  
Emerging Market ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Competitive Advantages ◽  
Mena Region ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Major Market

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to develop and empirically examine a comprehensive model that attempts to identify the factors that explain competitive advantage of implementing electronic business (e-business) in an emerging market. It seeks to fulfill an inevitable lack of conducting rigorous and intensive empirical studies on the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region in which the internet use and e-business applications are on the rise. Design/methodology/approach This research is descriptive in nature where a quantitative research methodology is deployed. Data are collected using both interviews and e-survey for a sample of 302 Egyptian companies serving in diverse industries. A multivariate partial least squares technique is employed to analyze the collected data. Findings This study explores various e-business modes and applications widely employed in the MENA region. It also addresses a set of e-business-driven competitive advantages that are mainly generated from supportive ICT environment, major market forces and strategic opportunities, and at last, from electronically driven customers’ relationship initiatives. A number of e-business barriers are claimed to moderate the relationship between those forces and the resulting competitive advantages. Research limitations/implications Although this research main framework incorporates important variables based on theoretical and empirical foundations, integrating other factors may extend understanding of how these factors, independently and/or interactively, explain the adoption of e-business and its merit to create distinctive competitive advantage. Practical implications This work helps managers and e-business experts alike to comprehend the ways through which firms target the applications of e-business technologies to realize a competitive edge in MENA region. It also helps practitioners and professionals comprehend the interrelationship between the type of forces drive e-business based competitive position and key barriers that deteriorate such a connection in emerging markets. Originality/value A model that enables scholars to better understanding the e-business phenomenon in MENA market is developed and validated. This model rests on e-business experts’ perspectives, reflections and it is evidently substantiated by past works in the areas.

An Efficiency Model for Assessing Intellectual Capital

2021 ◽  
pp. 84-91
Author(s):  
Aleksey Myasoedov
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Capital ◽  
Intangible Assets ◽  
Knowledge Society ◽  
Favorable Effect ◽  
Sustainable Competitive Advantage ◽  
Economic Wealth ◽  
Tangible Assets ◽  
Key Factor ◽  
Essential Resource ◽  
Knowledge Intensive

Today we live in a knowledge society, a society shaped by the information revolution and developed by communication technologies. At the dawn of the new era, the concept of intellectual capital was first used to explain the importance of intellectual resources - such as information, knowledge, and experience - in the modern economy. Today, intellectual capital is a key factor in the company's profitability and has become an essential resource for creating economic wealth. In this environment, intellectual capital and intangible assets are fundamental to success. Intellectual capital consists of intangible assets that, when properly used, become a source of sustainable competitive advantage. To create value, the components of intellectual capital must interact. The assessment of intellectual capital is an important activity for any organization operating in a competitive market, and involves the achievement of intangible assets, but at a lower cost. The interest in measuring intellectual capital was caused by the fact that accounting, as it is currently practiced, has largely lost its information capacity as enterprises have become more and more knowledge-intensive. Traditional valuation methods based on accounting principles, where the value of a company's assets is a fraction of the value, have systematically undervalued companies. The existence of non-financial standards is critical to the company's value creation, as the accounting rules, under constant review, were originally developed for tangible assets, which are a source of wealth in the industrial period. In the literature, the assessment of intellectual capital is considered in different ways, with many approaches developed over time based on research and research, most of which are aimed at improving the performance of an organization, measured by different tools. This article is a synthesis of the most well-known models used to evaluate intellectual capital and its subsequent implementation in the case of Company X. The results obtained confirm the hypothesis that the intellectual capital of a company has a favorable effect on the results of the organization's activities and may indicate future competitiveness.

scholarly journals Bridging Intellectual Capital and SMEs Internationalization through the Lens of Sustainable Competitive Advantage: A Systematic Literature Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 2510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena-Mădălina Vătămănescu ◽  
Elena-Alexandra Gorgos ◽  
Alexandru Mihai Ghigiu ◽  
Monica Pătruț
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Competitive Advantage ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Intellectual Capital ◽  
Mixed Methods Research ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Interdisciplinary Studies ◽  
Sustainable Competitive Advantage ◽  
Integrative Research ◽  
New Research

The aim of the current paper is advance a comprehensive framework meant to bridge three major concepts, namely intellectual capital (IC), the internationalization process of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and the achievement of sustainable competitive advantage. The paper stresses upon a managerial perspective within the internationalization context, investigating the human, structural and relational capital apposite to managers or entrepreneurs. By directly addressing the relationships among the constructs, the endeavor is complementary to previous systematic reviews on similar topics which tangentially discuss the conceptual triad and thus proposes an integrative research agenda for future interdisciplinary studies straddling the fields of management, business, entrepreneurship and sustainability. In terms of methodology, a systematic literature review was envisaged, by applying a stepwise approach and multifold criteria. Over 100 scientific articles published in peer-reviewed journals were scrutinized and considered in the analysis. The literature review revealed that conceptual papers in the field are scarce despite the variety of their aims and approaches. The quantitative-based empirical studies prevail over the qualitative ones, while mixed methods research designs are scant. In terms of content, the extant studies fall short to advance research and structural models testing and assessing the specific relations among constructs and avail new research avenues focused on the underlying processes of SMEs internationalization by means of intellectual capital harnessing and sustainable competitive advantage achievement.

scholarly journals Intellectual capital in the public sector

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 267-281
Author(s):  
Sandra Bailoa
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
Intellectual Capital ◽  
Intangible Assets ◽  
Production Factor ◽  
Competitive Advantages ◽  
Capital Theory ◽  
The Public ◽  
Structural Capital ◽  
Public Commitment ◽  
Capital Services

The Intellectual Capital theory emerged mainly from analyses and observations in business sector based on the growing importance of intellectual capital as a production factor and on its contribution to create value and competitive advantages. The importance of managing intellectual capital is also recognized in public organizations although the theory reveals differences in application to the public sector and is less developed in this environment. In fact, most methodologies to manage intellectual capital were developed in the business area and research at public sector level did not verify the same attention. In literature it is possible to realize that although there are some studies that analyse the management of intellectual capital in the public sector, there are few studies that suggest methodologies specific to this sector. Thus, this article aims to discuss the main aspects about the applicability of intellectual capital theory to the public sector and to propose a taxonomy of intangible assets appropriate to this sector through critical review of main contributions of literature. The analysis allowed finding several arguments that justify the application of the theory to public sector. It also allowed suggesting a classification of intellectual capital based on the intangible assets considered relevant to public sector namely the set of the followed categories: Human capital, Structural capital, Relational capital, Services capital and Public Commitment capital.

scholarly journals Openness to co-creation as a method of reducing the complexity of the environment and dynamizing companies’ competitive advantages

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 880-896 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Adamik ◽  
Michał Nowicki ◽  
Katarzyna Szymańska
Keyword(s):  
Competitive Advantage ◽  
Survey Research ◽  
Business Processes ◽  
Customer Relationships ◽  
Competitive Advantages ◽  
Review Of Literature ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Key Factor ◽  
The Creation ◽  
A Company

Abstract Openness is an expression of an enterprise’s ability to adapt to changing environment conditions and its ability to cooperate with different types of partners. A given company’s openness shows its readiness for the creation of dynamics of many business processes, including the creation of its competitive advantage. Due to the nature of today’s enterprises’ environment, mainly its “high velocity” & “complexity” attributes, openness of companies has to be multifaceted. Organization-customer relationships, called co-creation, are one of such facets. The capacity for effective co-creation gives a company the ability to gain a competitive advantage along with the chance for its permanent dynamization and sustainability. The main purpose of the paper is to present the framework and algorithm of co-creation as a method of reducing the complexity of the environment and dynamizing companies’ competitive advantages. A review of literature in the areas of open organization, open culture, partnership, co-creation, and competitive advantage provides a basis for understanding the process of co-creation. Collected data show that the activity of enterprises in this process is a key factor in the reduction of complexity of a company’s environment and an important stimulator of the dynamization of a company’s competitive advantage. The authors’ own CATI questionnaire survey research conducted in Poland showed the level of preparation Polish SMEs have to co-create.

scholarly journals The Legitimacy of Clustered Firms: A Dynamic Perspective

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-166
Author(s):  
Sze-Ting Chen ◽  
◽  
Ren-Cheng Zhang ◽  
Kai Yin Allison Haga
Keyword(s):  
Competitive Advantage ◽  
Industrial Structure ◽  
Environmental Changes ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Absorption Capacity ◽  
Competitive Advantages ◽  
Institutional Legitimacy ◽  
Dynamic Perspective ◽  
Positive Effect ◽  
Gain Access

A country’s competitive advantage is often characterized on a specific industry in which firms are drastically inclined to clustering together. The previous literature has limited discussion on how the clustered firms through constantly renovate their own abilities and by complying with the institutional legitimacy to gain recognition and support among the other members of the cluster so that they can gain access to cluster’s resources to create and maintain its competitive advantage. Although there are researches focusing on how industrial structure help clustered firms to generate competitive advantages, some empirical studies show that in a fast-changing environment, firms usually fail to adapt to sudden policy or technological changes. Thus, based on dynamic absorption capacity and institutional legitimacy, this study seeks to explore how the clustered firms absorb, learn, integrate and exploit new abilities continuously, as well as develop and utilize external knowledge and capabilities to adapt to rapid environmental changes. In addition, emerging economies have attracted an increasing amount of attention because of rapidly expanding economies and rapid-growth markets provide tremendous business opportunities, especially the China which affects many countries’ economies in the word. The results of this study express that the dynamic absorptive capabilities have positive effect on a clustered firm’s performance, but if a clustered firm always conform to institutional legitimacy which will result in performance dilemma, which is different from other previous research.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document