scholarly journals TEORI-TEORI EKONOMI POLITIK INTERNASIONAL DALAM PERBINCANGAN: ALIRAN DAN PANDANGAN

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Maiwan
Keyword(s):  
International Relations ◽  
Global Economy ◽  
International Political Economy ◽  
Modern World ◽  
Trade Theory ◽  
Dual Economy ◽  
Political Relations ◽  
Liberal Trade ◽  
Hegemonic Stability ◽  
Economics And Politics

This article briefly describes some of the major theories of international political economy, namely: Liberal Trade Theory; Nationalist trade theory; The theory of "Dual Economy"; Theory of the Modern World System (MWS); Hegemonic stability theory. Each of these theories has shown an important aspect of economic and political relations. In addition to having the advantages of each, above theories also opened the weaknesses of another theory, allowing us to see the extent of his power in explaining trends in today's global economy. Each theory has its contextual truth respectively. In addition, any such theory can not stand alone. We need elements of each other's views to be aware of the complex relationship between economics and politics. In international relations the interrelationship or interplay between economic factors with the political factor is absolute.

States and the future of global finance

1992 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Helleiner
Keyword(s):  
Political Economy ◽  
International Trade ◽  
International Relations ◽  
International Finance ◽  
International Economics ◽  
Global Economy ◽  
International Political Economy ◽  
Financial Sector ◽  
Global Finance ◽  
The Future

One of the central objectives of the field of international political economy (IPE) in the last 20 years has been to introduce insights from the field of international relations into the study of global economic affairs. Although this effort has been largely successful in the study of international trade, much less attention has been focused on the financial sector of the global economy. Seemingly highly technical and arcane, the study of international finance has been left largely to specialists in international economics, financial journalists, and international financial practitioners.

scholarly journals Introduction to the Thematic Articles: Hegemonic Rivalry: Past and Future

2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 381
Author(s):  
Christopher Chase-Dunn
Keyword(s):  
Economic Integration ◽  
Global Economy ◽  
International Political Economy ◽  
Current Level ◽  
Modern World ◽  
World War ◽  
Market Expansion ◽  
Long Run ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
Peace And War

The international political economy has experienced a sequence of economic booms and busts, as well as periods of relative peace and world war, for the last 500 years. Capitalist industrialization has expanded productivity and integrated everlarger numbers of people into a single global economy in waves of industrialization and market expansion. These waves have been repeatedly punctuated by world wars. The current level of economic integration, and other factors, cause many students of the global system to argue that the periodic outbreak of world wars is over. This book focuses on both long run trends and recent developments in the modern world-system, and their implications for the future of humankind. Will the cycles of boom bust, peace and war continue? Or have long terms trends (or recent changes) altered the nature of thesystem sufficiently such that these oscillations will cease, or take a less destructive form?

The Study of Money

2000 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 407-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Kirshner
Keyword(s):  
Political Economy ◽  
International Relations ◽  
Global Economy ◽  
International Political Economy ◽  
Material Interests ◽  
Point Of Departure

Monetary phenomena define the contours of the contemporary global economy. This is a recent development, and it will transform the study of international political economy (IPE). Two excellent new books,The Geography of Money, by Benjamin Cohen, andMad Money, by Susan Strange, will frame, support, and provide the point of departure for scholars addressing this vital question. Ultimately, however, and perhaps necessarily, these books raise more questions than they answer. But they do suggest in which direction the most promising avenues of investigation point—toward the study of the unique interconnections between the ideas, material interests, and institutions associated with the management of money. Those relationships are profoundly consequential for politics and demand the renewed attention of contemporary scholars of international relations and political economy.

Feminist Security Studies and Feminist International Political Economy: Considering Feminist Stories

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (02) ◽  
pp. 430-434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine Allison
Keyword(s):  
Political Economy ◽  
International Relations ◽  
Global Economy ◽  
International Political Economy ◽  
Security Studies ◽  
Gender Violence ◽  
Political Economies ◽  
Global And Local

In reflecting upon the divergence of Feminist Political Economy (FPE) and Feminist Security Studies (FSS) one feels puzzled and perhaps even a little embarrassed. How could such a schism occur and be sustained for seemingly so long? This divergence certainly did not appear to characterize the founding of feminist International Relations (IR) when scholars such as Cynthia Enloe (1983, 1989) and Ann Tickner (1992) were attentive to both dimensions and carefully connected issues of gender to the global economy and to understandings of security and militarism. Moreover, to my mind, there is no immediate epistemological or ontological schism between FSS and FPE of the sort that has characterized other feminist divides. The security studies/International Political Economy (IPE) split seems to be more one of empirical focus that does not require a painstaking and perhaps ultimately futile attempt to suture the feminist IR body back together. Indeed, recent and highly illuminating work on the connections between gender violence and global and local political economies (Meger 2014; True 2012a) would suggest no reason why we should not simply press ahead with the task of reconnection and driving feminist IR forward to new and insightful places.

scholarly journals BRICS and a new model of hegemonic stability

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 294-309
Author(s):  
Stanislav Tkachenko ◽  
◽  
William Coyle ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Global Economy ◽  
International Political Economy ◽  
Developing Economies ◽  
Political Process ◽  
State Control ◽  
Theoretical Perspectives ◽  
International Trading ◽  
Common Interests ◽  
Near Future ◽  
Hegemonic Stability

BRICS as a forum of the largest developing economies is at the center of the global contem- porary political process. There are ongoing debates for more than a decade on the reasons for the establishment and the ways of assessing the efficiency of BRICS. Two major theoretical perspectives in the international political economy (IPE), namely economic nationalism and liberalism, have opposing views on many aspects of these debates. They emphasize the search for common interests, which places the five BRICS states into a single forum, and find a lack of shared values/interests, which inevitably leads to a collapse of the forum in the near future. This article puts forward the following hypothesis: the original willingness of BRICS members to transform the architecture of international finances to the profit of developing nations has been replaced recently by a desire to preserve some of the attractive features of todays’ global economy (low trade barriers, monetary stability, and free movement of investment) in the context of the decline of US hegemony. Today, BRICS member states share China’s intention to ensure the liberal nature of the international trading system while strengthening state control of public life according to the “embedded liberalism” model. To substantiate the hypothesis, the authors apply ideas from the neo-Marxist school of IPE, which is currently experiencing its renaissance.

Gender and International Relations: A Global Perspective and Issues for the Caribbean

1998 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 211-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Byronm ◽  
Diana Thorburn
Keyword(s):  
International Relations ◽  
Global Economy ◽  
International Political Economy ◽  
Global Perspective ◽  
International Policy ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
Caribbean Women ◽  
The Caribbean ◽  
And Gender ◽  
Theoretical Foundations

In this paper we discuss the relatively recent integration of feminist thinking in the discipline of International Relations. We argue that the theoretical foundations of International Relations are still primarily based on traditional male–female dichotomies, particularly that of separate public and private spheres. By extension, women are largely excluded from state power and decision making. The state is itself gendered. The growing recognition of the links between the global economy and gender forces us to engage with International Relations in foreign and international policy. In this article we look at feminist interpretations of three main International Relations areas: international security, human rights, and international political economy and their implications for gender policies in the Caribbean. We also look at the contributions of Caribbean women to the international feminist agenda and suggest a research agenda for ongoing feminist theorizing in the discipline of International Relations.

Globalization and interconfessional communications

2001 ◽  
pp. 13-17
Author(s):  
Serhii Viktorovych Svystunov
Keyword(s):  
21St Century ◽  
Global Economy ◽  
Modern World ◽  
The World ◽  
Target Set ◽  
Almost All ◽  
Over Time ◽  
Rapid Appearance

In the 21st century, the world became a sign of globalization: global conflicts, global disasters, global economy, global Internet, etc. The Polish researcher Casimir Zhigulsky defines globalization as a kind of process, that is, the target set of characteristic changes that develop over time and occur in the modern world. These changes in general are reduced to mutual rapprochement, reduction of distances, the rapid appearance of a large number of different connections, contacts, exchanges, and to increase the dependence of society in almost all spheres of his life from what is happening in other, often very remote regions of the world.

Peculiarities of Modern Dynamics of the Global Economy

2010 ◽  
pp. 78-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Klinov
Keyword(s):  
Economic Growth ◽  
Economic Development ◽  
Business Cycles ◽  
Global Economy ◽  
Long Waves ◽  
Rapid Expansion ◽  
Business Taxation ◽  
Modern World ◽  
China And India ◽  
World Economic

Rates and factors of modern world economic growth and the consequences of rapid expansion of the economies of China and India are analyzed in the article. Modification of business cycles and long waves of economic development are evaluated. The need of reforming business taxation is demonstrated.

Rising Inequality in the New Global Economy

2006 ◽  
pp. 84-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Birdsall
Keyword(s):  
Developing Countries ◽  
Global Economy ◽  
Slow Growth ◽  
Global Markets ◽  
Modern World ◽  
Government Programs ◽  
Poor Countries

Reasons of high inequality in the modern world are considered in the article. In developing countries it interacts with underdeveloped markets and inefficient government programs to slow growth, which in turn slows progress in reducing poverty. Increasing reach of global markets makes rising inequality more likely and deepens the gap between rich and poor countries. Because global markets work better for the already rich, we should increase the representation of poor countries in global fora.

The crisis of multilateralism and EU–Russia cooperation

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-57
Author(s):  
FRANCO BRUNI ◽  
Keyword(s):  
International Relations ◽  
Careful Consideration ◽  
Modern World ◽  
Multiple Methods ◽  
The Us ◽  
Good For ◽  
East West ◽  
The Eu

The article is devoted to problems in relations between the EU and Russia. Multiple methods are considered that are aimed at solving the problem of multilateralism in current conditions. The author selected and studied specific documents on essential aspects that are devoted to this topic. Studying the arising problems requires careful consideration since, in the modern world, cooperation between global actors such as the EU and Russia cannot be ignored. Despite all the challenges faced by the parties in their fields, all difficulties are conquerable, and the article provides specific methods for its solving. The article discusses some aspects and problems that require particular attention from specialists in this field. The author concludes that strong US–EU coalition could seem more coherent with history and with the traditional East–West divide. However, the recent evolution of the US attitude towards international relations weakens the probability of such coalition and its perceived payoffs. A more or less defensive Russia–China coalition has been tried with limited results; moreover, if it were possible and probable, the two western players would change their strategy to prevent it or to contain its depth. In fact, we live in a world where many talks of a serious possibility of G2 governance, a peculiar type of coalition where the US and China keep hostile and nationalistic attitudes but join forces to set the global stage in their favor, pursuing a qualitatively limited but quantitatively rich payoff. In such world, as a counterpart of this payoff, both the divided Europe and the economically much smaller Russia would lose power and suffer several kinds of economic disadvantages. Therefore, Greater Europe would be good for Russia and for the EU as well.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document