Covid-19 on Routine Testing In Eclampsia: A Duo Complication to Look out for in Pregnancy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pradip Kalsar ◽  
Shreya Datta ◽  
Arbabasu Kalsar ◽  
Andrew Marvin Kanyike
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Activity ◽  
Rapid Test ◽  
Conscious State ◽  
Nasopharyngeal Swab ◽  
Treatment Unit ◽  
Transabdominal Ultrasonography ◽  
Elevated Liver Enzymes ◽  
Clonic Seizures ◽  
Adverse Pregnancy ◽  
Amniotic Membranes

Abstract Background: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes including preeclampsia. COVID-19 and pre-eclampsia have overlapping clinical features therefore challenging to differentiate. Since COVID-19 is not routinely tested among pregnant women, it’s prudent to test it among patients presenting with Pre-eclampsia-Eclampsia. Case Presentation: A 23 year old female Gravida 1 Para 0 at 36 weeks and 5 days of amenorrhea presented at Mal Super Specialty Hospital as a referral in a semi-conscious state after a severe attack of tonic-clonic seizures. Detailed history from the husband was insignificant except for a persistent cough for the last 7 days. She had denied any visual changes, headaches or vaginal discharge. Physical examination revealed a tachycardia (150 bpm), elevated blood pressure (187/111 mmHg), a tachypnea (36 breaths/minute) and SPO2 of 94% at room air. Routine COVID-19 Rapid test turned positive, and the urine dipstick was +3. Additional tests revealed a leukocytosis and elevated liver enzymes. Chest radiograph revealed prominent interstitial markings and a bedside transabdominal ultrasonography showed a live single intrauterine fetus in cephalic presentation with normal cardiac activity and movements. A diagnosis of a prime gravida with eclampsia and COVID-19 was made. She was managed with intravenous labetalol, she had already received a loading dose of IV Magnesium sulphate and we administered two maintenance doses during monitoring. Within an hour of admission, she had a spontaneous rupture of the amniotic membranes, with meconium stained liquor (grade 2), and the fetal heart rate (148 beats per minute) was reassuring. She had an uncomplicated vaginal delivery of a live male newborn. Shortly after delivery, she developed slight respiratory distress and significant fluid overload that was managed with furosemide. A COVID-19 RT-PCR came back negative for the neonate and positive for the mother. She was shifted to the COVID-19 treatment unit and contact limited with the child. She was kept on a course of tablets Ivermectin, zinc, vitamin C, a montelukast, azithromycin, metronidazole and injectable pantoprazole. They were discharged on day 15 after recovery with a negative COVID nasopharyngeal swab. Conclusion: A diagnosis of pre-eclampsia-Eclampsia should prompt testing for COVID-19.

scholarly journals SARS-CoV-2 in peritoneal swabs from asymptomatic patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasim AlAradi ◽  
Rawan A Rahman AlHarmi ◽  
Mariam AlKooheji ◽  
Sayed Ali Almahari ◽  
Mohamed Abdulla Isa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Fluid ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Rapid Test ◽  
Nasopharyngeal Swab ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Protective Measures ◽  
The Public ◽  
Asymptomatic Patients ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Viral Transfer

Abstract This is a case series of five patients with acute abdomen requiring surgery who tested positive for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and were asymptomatic, with the purpose of detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in peritoneal fluid. Nasopharyngeal swab was done as a prerequisite for admission or prior to admission as part of random testing. Two methods of viral testing were employed: Xpert® Xpress SARS-CoV-2 (rapid test) and real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Either or both tests were done, with the former performed for patients requiring surgery immediately. Surgery was performed within 24–36 h from admission. Peritoneal fluid swabs were obtained for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 using RT-PCR test. Swabs were immediately placed in viral transfer media and delivered to the public health laboratory in an ice bag. SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in peritoneal swabs. Due to the limited number of patients, further studies are required; yet, protective measures should still be taken by surgeons when dealing with COVID-19 cases.

scholarly journals Rapid and Sensitive Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Using Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats

Biomedicines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jen-Hui Tsou ◽  
Hongjie Liu ◽  
Sanford A. Stass ◽  
Feng Jiang
Keyword(s):  
Uv Light ◽  
Receptor Gene ◽  
Rna Extraction ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Rapid Test ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Sensitive Detection ◽  
Nasopharyngeal Swab ◽  
M Gene ◽  
Single Temperature

Rapid and accurate detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is essential for controlling the pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based technique is the standard test for detection of SARS-CoV-2, which, however, requires complicated sample manipulation (e.g., RNA extraction) and is time-consuming. We previously demonstrated that clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) could precisely detect Human papillomavirus and somatic mutations of Epidermal growth factor receptor gene and Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog gene in plasma. The objective of this study was to develop CRISPR as a rapid test for sensitive detection of SARS-CoV-2. We first combined reverse transcription-isothermal recombinase polymerase amplification and CRSIPR to detect SARS-CoV-2 in genomic RNA of cells infected with the virus. The CRISPR assay with guide RNA against the M gene of SARS-CoV-2 had a sensitivity of 0.1 copies per µL for detection of the virus. We then used the CRSIPR assay to directly analyze raw SARS-CoV-2 samples. The CRISPR assay could sensitively detect SARS-CoV-2 in one hour without RNA extraction. This assay can be performed at a single temperature and with minimal equipment. The results were immediately visualized either by a UV light illuminator or paper strips. The diagnostic value of the test was confirmed in nasopharyngeal swab specimens. Altogether, we have developed a rapid CRISPR test for sensitive detection of SARS-CoV-2.

scholarly journals Urinary Prolactin as a Reliable Marker for Preeclampsia, Its Severity, and the Occurrence of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes

2008 ◽  
Vol 93 (7) ◽  
pp. 2492-2499 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfredo Leaños-Miranda ◽  
Janeth Márquez-Acosta ◽  
Guadalupe María Cárdenas-Mondragón ◽  
Zarela Lizbeth Chinolla-Arellano ◽  
Roxana Rivera-Leaños ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gestational Hypertension ◽  
High Serum ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Healthy Pregnancy ◽  
Elevated Liver Enzymes ◽  
Mild Preeclampsia ◽  
Adverse Pregnancy ◽  
Cross Sectional Design ◽  
Reliable Marker

Abstract Context: It has been proposed that preeclampsia may result from of an imbalance in angiogenic factors. Although prolactin (PRL) is mainly related to lactation, it is also involved in other biological functions, including angiogenesis. Objective: Our objective was to determine the relationship among preeclampsia, serum and urinary PRL (uPRL) levels, and excretion of antiangiogenic PRL fragments in urine. Study design: Using a cross-sectional design, uPRL and serum PRL levels, and the presence of PRL isoforms were determined in 546 pregnant women: 207 healthy pregnant, 124 with gestational hypertension, 48 with mild preeclampsia, and 167 with severe preeclampsia (sPE). Results: uPRL concentrations were significantly (P < 0.001) higher in preeclampsia (11.99 ng/mg creatinine) than in healthy pregnancy (0.20 ng/mg creatinine) and gestational hypertension (0.19 ng/mg creatinine), and were even higher in sPE compared with mild preeclampsia (21.20 vs. 2.77 ng/mg creatinine, respectively; P < 0.001). Antiangiogenic PRL fragments (14–16 kDa) were detected in 21.6% of urine samples from women with sPE but in none from other groups. Patients with hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelet count syndrome, and/or eclampsia, placental abruption, acute renal failure, and pulmonary edema exhibited highest uPRL concentrations (P ≤ 0.028) and frequency of antiangiogenic PRL fragments in urine (P ≤ 0.036). High-serum PRL levels were associated with sPE independently of gestational age, proteinuria, and prolactinuria (P = 0.032). Conclusions: Preeclampsia is characterized by increased uPRL excretion. uPRL concentrations and their isoforms appear to be suitable markers to assess the severity of preeclampsia and occurrence of adverse outcomes. PRL and and/or its isoforms might be involved in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia.

scholarly journals Clinical evaluation of the Roche/SD Biosensor rapid antigen test with symptomatic, non-hospitalized patients in a municipal health service drive-through testing site

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zsὁfia Iglὁi ◽  
Jans Velzing ◽  
Janko van Beek ◽  
David van de Vijver ◽  
Georgina Aron ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Viral Load ◽  
Rapid Test ◽  
Contact Tracing ◽  
Gene Copy ◽  
Nasopharyngeal Swab ◽  
List Type ◽  
Antigen Test ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Outbreak Management ◽  
Testing Site

AbstractBackgroundRapid detection of infectious individuals is essential in stopping the further spread of SARS-CoV-2. Although rapid antigen test is not as sensitive as the gold standard RT-PCR, the time to result is decreased by day(s), strengthening the effectiveness of contact tracing.MethodsThe Roche/SD Biosensor lateral flow antigen rapid test was evaluated in a mild symptomatic population at a large drive through testing site. A second nasopharyngeal swab was directly tested with the rapid test on site and results were compared to RT-PCR and virus culture. Date of onset and symptoms were analysed using data from a clinical questionnaire.ResultsWe included 970 persons with complete data. Overall sensitivity and specificity were 84.9% (CI95% 79.1-89.4) and 99.5% (CI95% 98.7-99.8) which translated into a positive predictive value of 97.5% (CI95% 94.0-99.5) under the current regional PCR positivity of 19.2%. Sensitivity for people with high loads of viral RNA (ct <30, 2.17E+05 E gene copy/ml) and who presented within 7 days since symptom onset increased to 95.8% (CI95% 90.5-98.2). Band intensity and time to result correlated strongly with viral load thus strong positive bands could be read before the recommended time. Around 98% of all viable specimen with ct <30 were detected successfully indicating that the large majority of infectious people can be captured with this test.ConclusionAntigen rapid tests can detect mildly symptomatic cases in the early phase of disease thereby identifying the most infectious individuals. Using this assay can have a significant value in the speed and effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 outbreak management.SummaryPeople with early onset and high viral load were detected with 98.2% sensitivity.97% of individuals in which virus could be cultured were detected by the rapid test.This test is suitable to detect mild symptomatic cases.

scholarly journals Transient gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia: Two case reports and literature review on the need for stringent monitoring

2021 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nnabuike C. Ngene ◽  
Ghadah Daef
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Count ◽  
Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Gestational Hypertension ◽  
Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Induction Of Labour ◽  
Rapid Review ◽  
Foetal Death ◽  
Elevated Liver Enzymes ◽  
Hospital Bed ◽  
Adverse Pregnancy

Transient gestation hypertension is a contributor to adverse pregnancy outcomes particularly when it progresses to pre-eclampsia (PE). This requires frequent monitoring. We illustrate the need for stringent monitoring of gestational hypertension, transient gestational hypertension (TGH) and PE without severe features and conducted a brief rapid review of the literature. Two cases are presented: Firstly, a 25-year-old primigravida at 30 gestational weeks who had an isolated TGH with high blood pressure (BP) of 141/87 mmHg, which was not investigated. Four weeks later, she presented with a BP of 202/128 mmHg, imminent eclampsia and intrauterine foetal death and had an uncomplicated induction of labour and delivered a 1400 g macerated male stillborn. Secondly, a 30-year-old primigravida at 30 gestational weeks who developed PE but her monitoring was compromised initially by inadequate healthcare capacity including unavailability of hospital bed-space for inpatient care and later by poor clinic attendance as a result of poor finances. At 32 gestational weeks, she presented with decreased foetal movement and was diagnosed as haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelet count (HELLP) syndrome and intrauterine foetal death. She was stabilised, had induction of labour and delivered a 1400 g male macerated stillborn. Thereafter, the need for her to go home to complete the cultural burial rites of her baby and the pressure from her workplace resulted in an inadequate postpartum follow-up care. In conclusion, transient gestational hypertension is associated with adverse maternal and foetal outcomes, including foetal demise. Unavailability of hospital bed-space and poor personal finances interfere with stringent monitoring of hypertensive disorders and can be associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Stringent laboratory monitoring in these cases is defined by the authors as testing at least blood levels of serum Creatinine, Haemoglobin concentration, Alanine transaminase and Platelet count (abbreviated as ‘CHAP’) weekly.

scholarly journals Diagnostic Value of IGFBP-1 Rapid Test and Combined IGFBP-1-AFP in Vaginal Fluid from Premature Rupture of Amniotic Membranes

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aryati Aryati ◽  
Lulut Kusumawati ◽  
Agus Sulistyono
Keyword(s):  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Vaginal Discharge ◽  
Rapid Test ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Vaginal Fluid ◽  
Premature Rupture ◽  
Paper Test ◽  
Rapid Tests ◽  
Litmus Paper ◽  
Amniotic Membranes

Objective: To compare the diagnostic value of IGFBP-1 and combined IGFBP-1-AFP rapid tests in diagnosing premature rupture of membranes (PROM). Method: This study was conducted in Dr. Soetomo Hospital in Surabaya from July to November 2013. The subjects were 52 pregnant women with presumed PROM diagnosis, which was recorded by clinical data and sampling of vaginal discharge swab. The diagnostic value was obtained by comparing the results of IGFBP-1 and combinated IGFBP-1-AFP rapid tests by standard PROM examination namely vaginal pooling, litmus paper test and ferning test. Result: A difference between the diagnostic value of IGFBP-1 and combined IGFBP-1-AFP rapid tests in diagnosing PROM was shown, where the sensitivity and specificity of IGFBP-1 rapid test was 85% and 95%, compared to combined IGFBP-1-AFP rapid test, which was 91% and 95%. The correlation coefficient of combined IGFBP-1-AFP rapid test with standard PROM examination (r=0.841, p=0.000) was higher than the correlation coefficient of IGFBP-1-AFP rapid test with standard PROM examination (r=0.772, p=0.000). Conclusion: Combined IGFBP-1-AFP rapid test has a better diagnostic value than IGFBP-1 rapid test alone. Keywords: combined IGFBP-1-AFP, IGFBP-1, PROM

scholarly journals Head-to-head comparison of SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detecting rapid test with self-collected anterior nasal swab versus professional-collected nasopharyngeal swab

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas K. Lindner ◽  
Olga Nikolai ◽  
Franka Kausch ◽  
Mia Wintel ◽  
Franziska Hommes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Point Of Care ◽  
Rapid Test ◽  
High Viral Load ◽  
Ease Of Use ◽  
Healthcare Personnel ◽  
Nasopharyngeal Swab ◽  
Swab Sample ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Percent Agreement ◽  
Accuracy Study

AbstractBackgroundTwo antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs) are now approved through the WHO Emergency Use Listing procedure and can be performed at the point-of-care. However, both tests use nasopharyngeal (NP) swab samples. NP swab samples must be collected by trained healthcare personnel with protective equipment and are frequently perceived as uncomfortable by patients.MethodsThis was a manufacturer-independent, prospective diagnostic accuracy study with comparison of a supervised, self-collected anterior nose (AN) swab sample with a professional-collected NP swab sample, using a WHO-listed SARS-CoV-2 Ag-RDT, STANDARD Q COVID-19 Ag Test (SD Biosensor), which is also being distributed by Roche. The reference standard was RT-PCR from an oro-/nasopharyngeal swab sample. Percent positive and negative agreement as well as sensitivity and specificity were calculated.ResultsAmong the 289 participants, 39 (13.5%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR. The positive percent agreement of the two different sampling techniques for the Ag-RDT was 90.6% (CI 75.8-96.8). The negative percent agreement was 99.2% (CI 97.2-99.8). The Ag-RDT with AN sampling showed a sensitivity of 74.4% (29/39 PCR positives detected; CI 58.9-85.4) and specificity of 99.2% (CI 97.1-99.8) compared to RT-PCR. The sensitivity with NP sampling was 79.5% (31/39 PCR positives detected; CI 64.5-89.2) and specificity was 99.6% (CI 97.8-100). In patients with high viral load (>7.0 log 10 RNA SARS-CoV2/swab), the sensitivity of the Ag-RDT with AN sampling was 96% and 100% with NP sampling.ConclusionSupervised self-sampling from the anterior nose is a reliable alternative to professional nasopharyngeal sampling using a WHO-listed SARS-CoV-2 Ag-RDT. Considering the ease-of-use of Ag-RDTs, self-sampling and potentially patient self-testing at home may be a future use case.

scholarly journals High performances of a novel antigen detection test on nasopharyngeal specimens for SARS-CoV-2 infection diagnosis: a prospective study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Courtellemont ◽  
jerome Guinard ◽  
Clemence Guillaume ◽  
Susanna Giache ◽  
Vincent Rzepecki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prospective Study ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Rapid Test ◽  
Threshold Value ◽  
Public Health Issue ◽  
Nasopharyngeal Swab ◽  
Specificity And Sensitivity ◽  
Asymptomatic Patients

Introduction The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has become a major public health issue worldwide. Developing and evaluating rapid and easy-to-perform diagnostic tests is an absolute priority. The current prospective study was designed to assess diagnostic performances of an antigen-based rapid detection test (COVID-VIRO) in a real-life setting. Methods Two nasopharyngeal specimens of symptomatic or asymptomatic adult patients hospitalized in the Infectious Diseases Department or voluntarily accessing the COVID-19 Screening Department of the Regional Hospital of Orleans, France, were concurrently collected. COVID VIRO diagnostic specificity and sensitivity were assessed in comparison to real-time reverse transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) results. A subgroup of patients underwent an additional oropharyngeal and/or a saliva swab for rapid testing. Results 121 patients already having a confirmed infection and 127 patients having no evidence of recent or ongoing infection were enrolled, for a total of 248 couple of nasopharyngeal swab specimens. Overall COVID-VIRO sensitivity was 96.7% (IC: 93.5%-99.9%). In asymptomatic patients, patients having symptoms for more than 4 days and those having a RT-qPCR Cycle threshold value >32, sensitivity was of 100%, 95.8% and 96.9% respectively. The concordance between RT-qPCR and COVID VIRO rapid test was 100% for the 127 patients with no SARS-CoV-2 infection. Conclusion COVID-VIRO test had 100% specificity and above 95% sensitivity, better than WHO recommendations (specificity ≥97-100%, sensitivity ≥80%). These rapid tests are particularly interesting for large-scale screening in Emergency Department, low resource settings and airports.

scholarly journals Multicenter evaluation of the Panbio™ COVID-19 Rapid Antigen-Detection Test for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paloma Merino-Amador ◽  
Jesús Guinea ◽  
Irene Muñoz-Gallego ◽  
Patricia González-Donapetry ◽  
Juan-Carlos Galán ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Viral Load ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Rapid Test ◽  
Antigen Detection ◽  
Nasopharyngeal Swab ◽  
Diagnostic Strategy ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
University Hospitals ◽  
Kappa Score

AbstractThe standard RT-PCR assay for COVID-19 is laborious and time-consuming, limiting the availability of testing. Rapid antigen-detection tests are faster and less expensive; however, the reliability of these tests must be validated before they can be used widely. The objective of this study was to determine the reliability of the PanbioTM COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device (PanbioRT) (Abbott) for SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal swab specimens. This was a prospective multicenter study in ten Spanish university hospitals of patients from hospital units with clinical symptoms or epidemiological criteria for COVID-19. Patients whose onset of symptoms or exposure was more than 7 days earlier were excluded. Two nasopharyngeal exudate samples were taken to perform the PanbioRT and a diagnostic RT-PCR test. Among the 958 patients studied, 359 (37.5%) were positive by RT-PCR and 325 (33.9%) were also positive by the PanbioRT. Agreement was 95.7% (kappa score: 0.90). All 34 false-negative PanbioRT results were in symptomatic patients, with 23.5% of them at 6–7 days since the onset of symptoms and 58.8% presenting CT >30 values for RT-PCR, indicating a low viral load. Overall sensitivity and specificity for the PanbioRT were 90.5% and 98.8%, respectively. The PanbioRT provides good clinical performance as a point-of-care test, with even more reliable results for patients with a shorter clinical course of the disease or a higher viral load. While this study has had a direct impact on the national diagnostic strategy for COVID-19 in Spain, the results must be interpreted based on the local epidemiological context.

scholarly journals Time scale performance of rapid antigen testing for SARS-COV-2: evaluation of ten rapid antigen assays

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zakarya Abusrewil ◽  
Inas M Alhudiri ◽  
Hamza Kaal ◽  
Salah Edin El Meshri ◽  
Fawzi O Ebrahim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Symptom Onset ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Rapid Test ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Molecular Diagnostic ◽  
Nasopharyngeal Swab ◽  
Viral Loads ◽  
Biotechnology Research ◽  
Antigen Tests

Background: There is a great demand for more rapid tests for SARS-COV-2 detection to reduce waiting time, boost public health strategies for combating disease, decrease costs, and prevent overwhelming laboratory capacities. This study was conducted to assess the performance of 10 antigen-based rapid assays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal swab specimens. Methods: We analyzed 231 nasopharyngeal samples collected from October 2020-December 2020, from suspected COVID-19 cases and contacts of positive cases at Biotechnology Research Center laboratories, Tripoli, Libya. The performance of 10 COVID-19 Ag rapid test devices (Fluorecare, ESPLINE, RapiGen, Abbott Panbio, Flowflex, Acon, Assut Europe, Orient Gene, CerTest, Bioperfectus, AMP) for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigen was compared to RT-qPCR. Results: Among the 108 positive samples detected by RT-qPCR, the COVID-19 antigen (Ag) tests detected 83, giving a sensitivity of 76.85% (95% CI, 67.75- 84.43). 161 patients were symptomatic. The median cycle threshold was 25. The mean duration from symptom onset was 6.6 plus/minus 4.3 days. Sensitivity and specificity during the first 6 days of symptoms and in samples with high viral loads ct<25, was 96.4%. No false positives were detected by any of the Ag tests utilized in this study. False negative samples had a median Ct of 34 and average duration of onset of symptoms of 11.3 days (range=5-20). Conclusions: Rapid antigen test diagnosis has high sensitivity and specificity in early disease when patients present less than 7 days of symptom onset. Patients are encouraged to test as soon as they get COVID-19 related symptoms within 1 week and to seek medical advice within 24 hrs. if they develop disturbed smell/taste. The use of rapid antigen tests is important for controlling COVID-19 pandemic and reducing burden on molecular diagnostic laboratories.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document