scholarly journals Bone Sarcoma Of The Pelvis: A Multicentric Retrospective Study Of One Hundred-Fourteen Cases

Author(s):  
Habib Nouri ◽  
Hassan Makhlouf ◽  
Mahmoud Ben Maitigue ◽  
Lassaad Hassini ◽  
Ahmed Msekni ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The aim of this study was to assess the oncologic outcome of pelvic bone sarcomas (PBS) and to identify prognosis factors.Methods: We report a multicentric cohort of patients treated for a PBS from 2000 to 2020. Data from 12 hospitals were analysed. Patients treated for primary PBS were included. Alive patients with less than 6 months of follow up were excluded. The primary outcome was survival.Results: One hundred and fourteen patients (67 males and 48 females) were reviewed with a mean follow up of 32±46,5 (1 to 216) months. The mean patient and doctor diagnosis delays were respectively 8,5±10,2 (1 to 60) and 3±4,3 (0 to 24) months. Sixty-eight patients (59,6%) died after a mean time from diagnosis of 15,9±22,8 (1 to 120) months. The overall survival rates at 5 and 10 years were respectively 38,4% and 27,6%. Chondrosarcoma histological type (HR=3,64), metastasis (HR=3,55) and surgery (HR=0,12) were identified as significant survival factors. Surgery was also associated to a decreased risk of metastasis (OR=0,03, 95% CI: 0,01 – 0,1). Among the 76 patients (66,7%) who underwent surgery, local recurrence was observed in 19 patients (25%) with a mean time from surgery to onset of 11,05 (±17,5) months. Conclusions: This nation-wide20-year-cohort study shows that surgery is the most effective treatment option in PBS regardless the histological type of the tumour. Efforts have to be done to decrease the diagnosis delay in order to start treatment when surgery is still feasible.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 559-559 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Knopf ◽  
Sheikh Usman Iqbal ◽  
Stephen F Thompson ◽  
Elisabetta Malangone ◽  
Magdaliz Gorritz-Kindu ◽  
...  

559 Background: The increase in survival seen in recent years in patients with mCRC has been attributed to improvements in treatments, including the introduction of targeted biologic agents. The objectives of this retrospective, observational study are to investigate recent treatment patterns in US mCRC patients and examine real-world survival outcomes. Methods: Data were obtained from a large U.S. database (SDI/IMS Health) of mCRC patients diagnosed from January 1, 2004 to June 30, 2011, ≥18 y at diagnosis, and who received chemotherapy and/or biologic treatment. Complete follow-up was defined as those who either died before June 2011 or who had at least 1 claim within 30 days of June 30, 2011. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to determine overall survival (OS) from the date of mCRC diagnosis. Results: 1,066 stage IV mCRC patients with complete follow-up were identified (57.5% male; mean age, 61.6 y). Approximately 80% were diagnosed with mCRC after 2006; 51.7% had liver metastases. The most common 1L, 2L, and 3L regimens were FOLFOX plus bevacizumab (34.52%), FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab (21.83%), and irinotecan plus cetuximab (15.83%), respectively. A total of 445 patients died during the study period, yielding a mortality rate of 41.74%. Mean time from diagnosis to first treatment was 3.31 months (SD=7.13). All patients received 1L therapy; OS from diagnosis was 35.77 months (95% CI: 32.57-38.10); 5-year survival was approximately 28%. After 1L, 591/1066 (55%) patients went on to receive 2L therapy; for these patients, median survival from diagnosis was 37.13 months (95% CI: 34.07-40.43) and 5-year survival was approximately 25%. After 2L, 278/591 (47%) patients received 3L therapy; for these patients, median survival from diagnosis was 38.10 months (95% CI: 34.83-43.13); 5-year survival was approximately 25%. Conclusions: In this study, OS (35.77 months) was longer than for other mCRC observational studies that have reported survival from start of treatment, but is more comparable when the ~3 months from diagnosis to start of treatment are not included. Addition of targeted agents and novel chemotherapy has prolonged OS in mCRC patients. Because of poor 5-year survival rates, the need for additional agents in later lines of therapy still exists.


1996 ◽  
Vol 114 (6) ◽  
pp. 1298-1302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Flávio Xavier ◽  
Lucélia de Azevedo Henn ◽  
Oliveira Marja ◽  
Luciane Orlandine

The frequency of smoking among patients with primary lung cancer diagnoses admitted to the Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA) during the 1980's was investigated. The objective of this study was to analyze cigarette consumption patterns through the number of cigarettes smoked per day and the age at which smoking began, correlating this data to the overall survival rate and histological type of the lung cancer. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed patients with primary lung cancer diagnosed at the HCPA between January 1980 and December 1989. All patients considered underwent follow-up for at least three years. Patient information was obtained either from the hospital's records or by contacting patients via letter or phone. Results: More than 90 percent of the patients were smokers or had smoked previously; most had started smoking before the age of 20.The overall 24-month survival rate after diagnosis varied depending on whether the patient had smoked less than 40 cigarettes per day or not. The percentage of smokers and non-smokers was established for each histological type, with the bronchoalveolar adenocarcinoma type showing the highest percentage of non-smokers (40 percent). Conclusion:The overall survival rates of patients with lung cancer was related to the number of cigarettes smoked, and not to the fact of the patient having smoked or not.The number of smokers among patients with lung cancer was not so high only for the bronchoalveolar adenocarcinoma histological type.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dario Regis ◽  
Andrea Sandri ◽  
Ingrid Bonetti

Reconstruction of severe pelvic bone loss is a challenging problem in hip revision surgery. Between January 1992 and December 2000, 97 hips with periprosthetic osteolysis underwent acetabular revision using bulk allografts and the Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage (APC). Twenty-nine patients (32 implants) died for unrelated causes without additional surgery. Sixty-five hips were available for clinical and radiographic assessment at an average follow-up of 14.6 years (range, 10.0 to 18.9 years). There were 16 male and 49 female patients, aged from 29 to 83 (median, 60 years), with Paprosky IIIA (27 cases) and IIIB (38 cases) acetabular bone defects. Nine cages required rerevision because of infection (3), aseptic loosening (5), and flange breakage (1). The average Harris hip score improved from 33.1 points preoperatively to 75.6 points at follow-up (P<0.001). Radiographically, graft incorporation and cage stability were detected in 48 and 52 hips, respectively. The cumulative survival rates at 18.9 years with removal for any reason or X-ray migration of the cage and aseptic or radiographic loosening as the end points were 80.0% and 84.6%, respectively. The use of the Burch-Schneider APC and massive allografts is an effective technique for the reconstructive treatment of extensive acetabular bone loss with long-lasting survival.


2016 ◽  
Vol 124 (2) ◽  
pp. 403-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshinori Hasegawa ◽  
Takenori Kato ◽  
Yoshihisa Kida ◽  
Motohiro Hayashi ◽  
Takahiko Tsugawa ◽  
...  

OBJECT The aim of this study was to explore the efficacy and safety of stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with facial nerve schwannomas (FNSs). METHODS This study was a multiinstitutional retrospective analysis of 42 patients with FNSs treated with Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) at 1 of 10 medical centers of the Japan Leksell Gamma Knife Society (JLGK1301). The median age of the patients was 50 years. Twenty-nine patients underwent GKS as the initial treatment, and 13 patients had previously undergone surgery. At the time of the GKS, 33 (79%) patients had some degree of facial palsy, and 21 (50%) did not retain serviceable hearing. Thirty-five (83%) tumors were solid, and 7 (17%) had cystic components. The median tumor volume was 2.5 cm3, and the median prescription dose to the tumor margin was 12 Gy. RESULTS The median follow-up period was 48 months. The last follow-up images showed partial remission in 23 patients and stable tumors in 19 patients. Only 1 patient experienced tumor progression at 60 months, but repeat GKS led to tumor shrinkage. The actuarial 3- and 5-year progression-free survival rates were 100% and 92%, respectively. During the follow-up period, 8 patients presented with newly developed or worsened preexisting facial palsy. The condition was transient in 3 of these patients. At the last clinical follow-up, facial nerve function improved in 8 (19%) patients, remained stable in 29 (69%), and worsened in 5 (12%; House-Brackmann Grade III in 4 patients, Grade IV in 1 patient). With respect to hearing function, 18 (90%) of 20 evaluated patients with a pure tone average of ≤ 50 dB before treatment retained serviceable hearing. CONCLUSIONS GKS is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with either primary or residual FNSs. All patients, including 1 patient who required repeat GKS, achieved good tumor control at the last follow-up. The incidence of newly developed or worsened preexisting facial palsy was 12% at the last clinical follow-up. In addition, the risk of hearing deterioration as an adverse effect of radiation was low. These results suggest that GKS is a safe alternative to resection.


Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 1985-1985 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan K. Burnett ◽  
M. Baccarani ◽  
Peter Johnson ◽  
John Yin ◽  
Andrew Saunders ◽  
...  

Abstract Outcomes for elderly patients with AML are almost uniformly poor, and it has been shown (Wheatley et al., Blood2005, 106(11) 199a) that patients with adverse cytogenetics have a particularly poor prognosis. Additionally, a large proportion of such patients are considered not to be fit for intensive chemotherapy (Juliusson et al, Leukemia, 2006 (20): 42–7), and given best supportive care, or low-dose Ara-C. The NCRI AML14 trial observed no remissions in 18 patients with adverse cytogenetics treated with Ara-C, and no remissions in 20 patients treated with hydroxyurea. We present here a combined analysis of the BIOV-121 Study, and the UWCM-0001 study. Both studies were for untreated patients over 65 years of age who were not considered fit for chemotherapy. The treatment comprised clofarabine 30mg/m2 on days 1–5 repeated after 28–42 days for up to 3 courses. The primary endpoints were overall response (CR, CRi or PR) and safety. Patients: A total of 95 patients were recruited, of whom 95 received clofarabine 30mg/m2. Twenty-six patients (27%) had adverse cytogenetics. Results: 10/26 patients (38%) achieved either CR or CRi. With a median follow-up of 10 months (range 2–17 months), 1 year survival is 20%, with 19/26 patients having died. At most recent follow-up, 4/10 patients achieving CR or CRi are still alive in remission. Discussion: The remission rate of 38% seen with clofarabine compares favourably, not only with traditional non-intensive approaches (which have failed to induce any remissions in similar sized cohorts), but also to the 42% remission rate seen in patients treated with intensive daunorubicin/Ara-C based chemotherapy in the NCRI AML14 trial. One year survival rates are also encouraging, at 20% compared to 0%, 5% and 23% for patients treated with Ara-C, supportive care, and intensive chemotherapy respectively. Exploratory comparisons of survival between the 30mg clofarabine patients and the three treatment regimens give highly significant survival advantages compared to Ara-C and HU (p=0.0001, p=0.004 respectively) and no significant difference between clofarabine and DA (p=1.0), although confidence intervals in this case are wide. Conclusions: Clofarabine has the ability to induce remissions in patients with adverse cytogenetics, unlike Ara-C and supportive care, and survival in this group is improved. Remission rates and survival are similar to those seen for patients treated with intensive chemotherapy. Clofarabine is clearly worthy of further investigation, and may provide an important treatment option for high risk patients with AML.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1707-1707
Author(s):  
Maria F Tanaka ◽  
Elias Jabbour ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Sherry Pierce ◽  
Richard Champlin ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1707 BACKGROUND: Treatment of pts with higher-risk MDS revolves around AHSCT and HMA. Although AHSCT is thought to be the only curative approach for pts with MDS, only a small percentage of pts are appropriate candidates and this procedure carries significant morbidity and mortality rates. We wanted to assess outcomes in pts with higher risk MDS treated with AHSCT or HMA. To study this, we performed a retrospective analysis comparing the outcome of pts with previously untreated MDS who received AHSCT or HMA therapy at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC). METHODS: From a database of pts with MDS who received AHSCT (N=152) at MDACC between 01/1988 and 04/2008, we selected those with untreated MDS prior to receiving the transplant. A total of 53 (29%) pts were identified. We compared them with a control group of 40 pts treated with HMA among 1748 referred to MDACC. All controls were selected to match at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: 1) age, 2) year of diagnosis, 3) percentage of blasts at the time of diagnosis, 4) IPSS cytogenetic risk, and 5) time from diagnosis to treatment. The primary endpoint was survival. RESULTS: A total of 53 pts with untreated MDS who received AHSCT and 40 pts treated with HMA were identified (Table 1). Median age was 51 (range 20–62) and 54 (range 38–79) years for pts treated with AHSCT or HMA respectively. There were more pts greater than 60 years old in the HMA group compared to those in the AHSCT group (58% vs. 1% p>0.001). The median follow up time was 64 months. Donors were HLA matched related (n=37), matched unrelated (n=11), 1 antigen mismatched related (n=4) or 1 antigen mismatched unrelated (n=1). Of the 40 pts treated with HMA, 31 were evaluable for response; of those 31, 19 (61%) responded, 16 (52%) achieving a complete response. The median survival was 26 and 25 months for pts receiving AHSCT or HMA, respectively (p=0.41) (Figure 1). The 8-year overall survival rates for pts receiving AHSCT or HMA were 24% and 23% respectively. CONCLUSION: AHSCT did not offer a significant survival improvement in a retrospective analysis of pts with MDS. Treatment with a HMA offers an adequate alternative in older patients or those who cannot tolerate or receive an AHSCT and should be used as a bridge in younger pts who are candidates for AHSCT Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2005 ◽  
Vol 44 (05) ◽  
pp. 185-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Wieler ◽  
S. Birtel ◽  
E. Ostwald-Lenz ◽  
K. P. Kaiser ◽  
H. P. Becker ◽  
...  

Summary:Aim: For the surgical therapy of differentiated thyroid cancer precise guidelines are applied by the German medical societies. In a retrospective multicenter study, we investigated the following issues: Are the current guidelines respected?. Is there a difference concerning the surgical radicalism and the outcome?. Does the perioperative morbidity increase with the higher radicalism of the procedure?. Patients, methods: Data gained from 102 patients from 17 regional referral hospitals who underwent surgery for thyroid cancer and a following radioiodine treatment (mean follow up: 42.7 [24-79] months) were analyzed. At least 71 criterias were analyzed in a SPSS file. Results: 46.1% of carcinomas were incidentally detected during goiter surgery. The thyroid cancer (papillary n = 78; follicular n = 24) occurred in 87% unilateral and in 13% bilateral. Papillary carcinomas <1 cm were detected in 25 cases; in five of these cases (20%) contralateral carcinomas <1 cm were found. There were significant differences concerning the surgical radicalism: a range from hemithyroidectomy to radical thyroidectomy with lateral neck dissection. Analysis of the histopathologic reports revealed that lymph node dissection was not performed according to guidelines in 55% of all patients. The perioperative morbidity was lower in departments with a high case load. The postoperative dysfunction of the recurrent laryngeal nerve (mean: 7.9% total / 4.9% nerves at risk) variated highly, depending on differences in radicalism and hospitals. Up to now these variations in surgical treatment have shown no differences in their outcome and survival rates, when followed by radioiodine therapy. Conclusion: Current surgical regimes did not follow the guidelines in more than 50% of all cases. This low acceptance has to be discussed. The actual discussion about principles of treatment regarding, the socalled papillary microcarcinomas (old term) has to be respected within the current guidelines.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Naomi Vather-Wu ◽  
Matthew D. Krasowski ◽  
Katherine D. Mathews ◽  
Amal Shibli-Rahhal

Background: Expert guidelines recommend annual monitoring of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD) and maintaining 25-OHD ≥30 ng/ml in patients with dystrophinopathies. Objective: We hypothesized that 25-OHD remains stable and requires less frequent monitoring in patients taking stable maintenance doses of vitamin D. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study, using the electronic health record to identify 26 patients with dystrophinopathies with a baseline 25-OHD ≥30 ng/mL and at least one additional 25-OHD measurement. These patients had received a stable dose of vitamin D for ≥3 months prior to their baseline 25-OHD measurement and throughout follow-up. The main outcome measured was the mean duration time the subjects spent with a 25-OHD ≥30 ng/mL. Results: Only 19% of patients dropped their 25-OHD to <  30 ng/ml, with a mean time to drop of 33 months and a median nadir 25-OHD of 28 ng/mL. Conclusions: These results suggest that measurement of 25-OHD every 2–2.5 years may be sufficient in patients with a baseline 25-OHD ≥30 ng/mL and who are on a stable maintenance dose of vitamin D. Other patients may require more frequent assessments.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Guoqiang Ma ◽  
Chaoan Wu ◽  
Miaoting Shao

AbstractSeveral authors have suggested that implants can be placed simultaneously with onlay bone grafts without affecting outcomes. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to answer the following clinical questions: (1) What are the outcomes of implants placed simultaneously with autogenous onlay bone grafts? And (2) is there a difference in outcomes between simultaneous vs delayed placement of implants with autogenous onlay bone grafts? Databases of PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar were searched up to 15 November 2020. Data on implant survival was extracted from all the included studies (single arm and comparative) to calculate point estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and pooled using the DerSimonian–Laird meta-analysis model. We also compared implant survival rates between the simultaneous and delayed placement of implants with data from comparative studies. Nineteen studies were included. Five of them compared simultaneous and delayed placement of implants. Dividing the studies based on follow-up duration, the pooled survival of implant placed simultaneously with onlay grafts after <2.5 years of follow-up was 93.1% (95% CI 82.6 to 97.4%) and after 2.5–5 years was 86% (95% CI 78.6 to 91.1%). Implant survival was found to be 85.8% (95% CI 79.6 to 90.3%) with iliac crest grafts and 95.7% (95% CI 83.9 to 93.0%) with intra-oral grafts. Our results indicated no statistically significant difference in implant survival between simultaneous and delayed placement (OR 0.43, 95% 0.07, 2.49, I2=59.04%). Data on implant success and bone loss were limited. Data indicates that implants placed simultaneously with autogenous onlay grafts have a survival rate of 93.1% and 86% after a follow-up of <2.5 years and 2.5–5years respectively. A limited number of studies indicate no significant difference in implant survival between the simultaneous and delayed placement of implants with onlay bone grafts. There is a need for randomized controlled trials comparing simultaneous and delayed implant placement to provide robust evidence.


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1132.3-1133
Author(s):  
G. Jurado Quijano ◽  
L. Fernández de la Fuente Bursón ◽  
B. Hernández-Cruz ◽  
P. Muñoz Reinoso ◽  
V. Merino Bohóquez ◽  
...  

Background:Rituximab (RTX) is a monoclonal antibody against the CD20 B cell antigen that has been used successfully in recent years for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It is an effective drug that reaches survival rates of 60% at 5 years of treatment as reflected in the British experience. However, survival in Spanish patients is unknown.Objectives:To study the survival of RTX treatment and the characteristics of patients with RA treated with the drug since its commercialization in Spain.Methods:Observational, retrospective and analytical study of a cohort of patients with RA treated with at least one dose of RTX. We reviewed the medical records of all patients with RA from January 2007 to June 2017. A total of 178 previous defined variables were collected, highlighting data about treatment (use of RTX, associated conventional synthetic disease modifying drugs [FAMEsc], doses of corticosteroids [GC] used) and activity indices. Descriptive statistics were performed (median and the 25th and 75th percentiles are shown). The comparative analysis was done with χ2 and U of Mann Whitney for categorical variables and paired sign rank test or Student’s t for continuous. Survival Kaplan Mayer curves were constructed. The study was carried out in accordance with the standards of our Clinical Research Ethics Committee.Results:A total of 54 patients were analyzed. 74% (n = 40) of them were women, the age was 61.2 years (51.0 - 67.4). 74% (n = 40) presented some type of relevant comorbidity. Its RA was FR + in 96% (n = 52) and ACCP + in 78% (n = 42) of the cases, with an evolution time of 9.3 years (3.5-19, 2), and with radiographic erosions in up to 63% (n = 34). At the time of the start of the RTX, 100% of the patients (n = 54) received some FAMEsc, and 33 (61%) were treated with prednisone; the daily dose of prednisone was 9 (6-12) mg. The baseline DAS28-VSG was 5 (4.1 - 6.0). The duration of the follow-up was 56.6 (29.3-92.1) months. Patients received a mean of 5 (1-6) cycles of RTX at a dose of 1000 mg on days 0 and 15 in most cases. The final DAS28-VSG was 2.6 (2.1 - 4.0), p = 0.00001 compared to baseline. The delta between baseline and final DAS was -2.36 (-0.55 - -3.1). At the end of the RTX treatment, the EULAR response rate was good in 64% (n = 25), reaching remission in 17 (31%) of the patients, and moderate response in 21% (n = 8) of them (Figure 1). Only 2 (4%) patients were treated with GCC at the end of the follow-up, p<0,00001 compared to baseline. The daily dose of PDN at the end of follow-up was 6 mg in a case and 12 mg in the other, p=00001 compared to baseline. At the end of the follow-up 24%of the patients (n = 13) changed or discontinued the drug: 9 changed due to secondary failure, 2 suspended due to adverse events, 1 due to death due to prior neoplastic process and 1 due to complete disease remission. Survival at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 years was 92%, 92%, 82% 78%, 75%, 75% and 65% respectively; with a mean survival rate of 90 months (Figure 1).Conclusion:The results of our analysis show that patients with RA undergoing RTX treatment have adequate control of disease activity and drug survival rates, like published data. RTX treatment allowed stopped GCC treatment in 31 cases (90%).References:[1]Oldroyd AGS, et al. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018 Jun 1;57(6):1089-1096.Disclosure of Interests:Gonzalo Jurado Quijano: None declared, Lola Fernández de la Fuente Bursón: None declared, Blanca Hernández-Cruz Speakers bureau: Sociedad Española de Reumatología, Abbvie, Roche, Bristol, MSD, Lilly, Pfizer, Amgen, Sanofi, Consultant of: Abbvie, Lilly, Sanofi, STADA, UCB, Amgen, Grant/research support from: Fundación para la Investigación Sevilla, Junta de Andalucía, Fundación Andaluza de Reumatología, Paloma Muñoz Reinoso: None declared, Vicente Merino Bohóquez: None declared, José Javier Pérez Venegas: None declared


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document