scholarly journals SIKAP ORGANISASI KEMASYARAKATAN ISLAM TERHADAP UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 17 TAHUN 2013 TENTANG ORGANISASI KEMASYARAKATAN DAN PERPU NOMOR 2 TAHUN 2017 (Perspektif Studi Kebijakan Dakwah)

2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 108
Author(s):  
Muhammad Abdul Azis
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
State Government ◽  
Real Life ◽  
The State ◽  
New Order ◽  
Freedom Of Association ◽  
Reform Era ◽  
The Future ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

<p><em>Freedom of association, assembly and expression is a part of human rights guaranteed by the 1945 Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia. This freedom also includes the propagation of religious teachings as an ideology for transformation to real life. For Muslims, especially da'i certainly have great ideals for the realization of a prosperous fair society that is directed by Allah SWT. It can be fought, one of which can be through social organization.During the 72 years of independent Indonesia, several regulations issued by the government to regulate the system and mechanisms of mass organizations have added controversy to Islamic mass organizations. In the new order, some organizations threatened to be dissolved and not recognized for rejecting the sole principle of Pancasila. The dynamic continues until the reform era. This can be an afterthought for the da'wah perpetrators, especially those who take the path of the organization to pay more attention to the basic aspects of administrative formation with respect to the state / government, because it will subsequently be very influential on the sustainability of da'wah in the future.</em></p>

scholarly journals Problematika Peraturan Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2017 tentang Organisasi Masyarakat

2019 ◽  
pp. 226-237
Author(s):  
Rezki Robiatul Aisyiah Ismail
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Social Organization ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Community Organization ◽  
Community Organizations ◽  
The State ◽  
Freedom Of Association ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

Indonesia is a democratic constitutional state set forth in article 1 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia, as a legal state for running a state and protection of human rights under the law. One of them is in Article 28 E Paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia which states that everyone has the right to freedom of association, assembly, and expression. The regulation concerning the Organization of the Community is in fact set out in Law No. 17 of 2013 on Community Organizations. Community organization is an organization founded and formed by the community voluntarily based on the similarity of aspirations, wills, needs, interests, activities and objectives to participate in development in order to achieve the objectives of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia based on Pancasila. Community organizations may be in the form of two, incorporated and non-legal entities. The Government issued a Regulation in Lieu of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 Year 2017 on the amendment to Law No. 17 of 2013 on Social Organization and then with the Regulation of Lieu of the Law the government made a policy that the Government in this case gave authority to the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights Asasi Manusia dissolved social organization which contradict with principle of Pancasila one of them is Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia discussion Government Regulation of society organization still has weakness substantially. Government regulation in lieu of laws of community organizations in order to reinforce the principle of contrarius actus is not appropriate because it has actually attached to government officials without the need to be affirmed in the legislation.

scholarly journals Implementation of Normative Intelligence Policy In Immigration View

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-116
Author(s):  
Olyvia Sindiawaty ◽  
Mercy Marvel
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
State Government ◽  
The State ◽  
Government Agencies ◽  
Immigration Enforcement ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
State Security ◽  
The Future ◽  
Definition Of

Intelligence Policy has often been heard in the realm of law, especially with government agencies held in Indonesia. One of them is the immigration agency, which is under the auspices of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights. The implementation of the policy is still minimal, although in fact it is contained in article 1 of Law No. 6 of 2011 number 30, as well as article 74. There are still many that need to be addressed, both in the applicable legal rules and with implementation in the field. The fact that sometimes the Immigration Officer is sometimes mixed in its own definition of intelligence and oversight. Are they the same or different and how to distinguish the two. Recognizing the fact that immigration is increasingly compacted by traffic activities in and out of foreigners and citizens and their supervision, a qualified intelligence is needed in maintaining the upholding of the country's sovereignty. It is an obligation, especially for immigration to safeguard the country as stated in the immigration function, is part of the affairs of the state government in providing Immigration services, law enforcement, state security, and community welfare development facilitators. Therefore, immigration should take part in enforcing supervision and security of the state in the field of law. Immigration intelligence which is under the auspices of the Directorate of Intelligence and immigration enforcement should need to be developed more thoroughly as a whole. So, it is hoped that in the future the Indonesian state will have total sovereignty over the country and its own people.

scholarly journals Rechtsvacuum Phenomenon in Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 51 of 2020 related to Passport Renewal Period to 10 Years

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-58
Author(s):  
Fachrizza Sidi Pratama
Keyword(s):  
State Government ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
The State ◽  
Government Regulations ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
Renewal Period ◽  
Law Regulation ◽  
Laws And Regulations

Legislation is one of the legal products issued by the state government component. In this case, the laws and regulations include the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia year 1945, the Decree of the People's Consultative Assembly, The Law / Regulation of the Government In lieu of Laws, Government Regulations, Presidential Regulations, and Local Regulations. As for its application, the rules have levels in the arrangement, where there are sections that explain macro and its derivatives that are narrowing down to the implementing regulations. The levels of the rules must be complete because each of them has its own function.  Meanwhile, in this journal, there will be a discussion on the phenomenon of legal vacancies in the case study of Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 51 of 2020 related to the Period of Extending Passports to 10 Years, where in the issuance of government regulations have not been included implementing regulations that will regulate how the implementation of government regulations in the field.  

scholarly journals State Use Provisions for Patent Law, and Expropriations: Some Comparative Law Guidelines for South Africa during the Covid-19 Crisis and Beyond

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. 1-35
Author(s):  
Mikhalien Du Bois
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
State Government ◽  
Patent Law ◽  
The State ◽  
Patent Owner ◽  
Canadian Law ◽  
Patent Rights ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
Suitable Framework

This article views section 4 of the Patents Act 57 of 1978 against section 25 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 and Article 31 of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights of 1994 (hereafter TRIPS). The purpose is to find a suitable framework for the state/government use/utilisation of patented products or processes for public purposes. A comparison is done with the Crown use provisions in United Kingdom, Australian and Canadian law to find a suitable approach to questions relating to remuneration for state use, the prior negotiations requirement set by Article 31 of TRIPS, and the public purposes and exclusive patent rights that would be included under state use. The COVID-19 international pandemic has caused a state of national disaster in South Africa, which is exactly the kind of situation of extreme urgency envisioned by the exception in Article 31 of TRIPS, which permits the state use of patents without requiring prior negotiations with the patent owner. In the battle against COVID-19 and its concomitant fallout, the South African government (and authorised private parties) would be permitted to utilise patent rights without explicit authorisation from the patent owner and without prior negotiations, but subject to the payment of reasonable remuneration by the government and other terms and conditions as agreed upon or as determined by a court. This may include making (manufacturing), using, exercising, and importing patented products (for example, personal protective equipment, pharmaceuticals, ventilators and diagnostic tests) deemed necessary in the fight against COVID-19. Foreign jurisdictions considered in this article indicate that section 4 of the Patents Act 57 of 1978 may certainly benefit from an update to provide detailed guidance on the state use of patented products or processes for public purposes. In the interest of a timeous offensive against the COVID-19 virus, the patent provisions need a speedy update to allow state use compliant with TRIPS and the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996.

scholarly journals Derogation of Human Rights and Freedoms in RNM during the State of Emergency Caused by COVID-19

SEEU Review ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-42
Author(s):  
Abdulla Azizi
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Survey Methods ◽  
The State ◽  
International Standards ◽  
European Convention ◽  
State Of Emergency ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
Territory Government ◽  
Restrictive Measures

AbstractConsidering that in times of state of emergency or civil emergency (such as the pandemic caused by COVID 19), governments in many countries around the world have restricted human rights and freedoms through legally binding government decrees. These restrictive measures increasingly raise dilemmas about their effect and possible violations by the government of international norms guaranteeing human rights. The paper aims to analyze whether these restrictive measures set out in the decisions of the Government of the Republic of Northern Macedonia (RNM) are in compliance with the derogations allowed under the European Convention on Human Rights and Freedoms (ECHR) and the positive laws in power. In the framework of this paper is analyzed whether these measures have the sole purpose of protecting the health of citizens or not.The work is limited in terms of time (as long as the state of emergency lasted three months) and territory (government decrees with the force of law).Descriptive, historical, analytical, comparative and citizen survey methods are used in this paper.Government decrees have been analyzed in order to assess whether they were prudent, in accordance with international standards and consequences that they have caused to citizens.The conclusions provide data on whether the management of the situation has been appropriate or not and to what extent it has been effective, as well as how much it has been within the international framework and how they have affected the quality of life of citizens.

scholarly journals PENGUATAN PENGATURAN HAK ANAK BERDASARKAN KONSTITUSI DAN PERBANDINGAN KONSTITUSI DIBERBAGAI NEGARA

AN-NISA ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 372-383
Author(s):  
Ismail Aris
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Child Protection ◽  
The State ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Constitutional Rights ◽  
Constitutional Protection ◽  
Rights Of The Child ◽  
The Future ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Right

This article shows that the constitution or the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia can not be regarded as children's constitution which adopts the principles of child protection under the Convention on the Rights of the Child. It also shows that Indonesia is not serious about the theme of child protection discourse such as Ecuador, Egypt, Finland and South Africa in protecting, fulfilling and respecting and explicitly specifying the rights of children in its constitution. Based on the argument above, it is very urgent for Indonesia to do constitutionalism the rights of the child. Based on the principles that adopted by the convention on the right of the child as a solution as an effort to save and protect the rights of the child from negligence and neglect of the State to protect and fulfill the human rights and constitutional rights of the child. The effort of constitutionalism is also considered as a strengthening effort in the formation of legislation in the future as well as the basis or test stone of the Constitutional Court in handling the future judicial review of the Law which violates the norm on the protection of children's rights under the Constitution. In addition, it is urgent for constitutionalism and incorporates the idea of constitutional complaints in the Constitutional Court through the Constitution. Thus, as a basis for constitutional protection of the child if the State has neglect to protect the human rights and constitutional rights of the child by conducting constitutional complaint in the Constitutional Court, in order for the State to fulfill its constitutional obligations which have been regulated under the constitution.

scholarly journals Parlamentārās kontroles īstenošanas īpatnības un problēmjautājumi Covid-19 pandēmijas laikā

2021 ◽  
pp. 467-473
Author(s):  
Aleksandrs Kuzņecovs ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Legal Liability ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
State Of Emergency ◽  
Rapid Spread ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

Due to rapid spread of Covid-19 worldwide, Latvian government declared the state of emergency. This decision was adopted by the parliament in order to contain the virus and undertake all the necessary measures to prevent its further spread. At the same time, it is clear that government’s actions undertaken within the state of emergency mostly remain unchecked. The absence of any legal basis for the parliament to extend their oversight during the state of emergency makes role of the parliament in these circumstances unclear. The current position of the parliament precludes political and legal liability over the executive and their officers. Lack of the delegated legislative and human rights restriction clause applicable specifically during the state of emergency raises questions regarding powers of the government and parliamentary control during the state of emergency. The article explores the possible solutions to rectify such flaws in the legal system of the Republic Latvia

scholarly journals Analysis of Revocation of Land Rights by the Government Reviewed from the Concept of Loss

Cepalo ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 63
Author(s):  
Natasha Marcella Geovanny ◽  
Marchelina Theresia ◽  
Devina Felicia Widjaja
Keyword(s):  
Land Tenure ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
The State ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Social Functions ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

The control of land by the state is stated in Article 33 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (UUD 1945). Based on this article, it means that the State has authority over land tenure, this encourages the writing of a journal on the application of social functions and the determination of compensation that occurs in the land sector. This research was conducted because the authors see that there are still many disputes related to the implementation of the social function itself and the application of the determination of compensation as stipulated in the provisions relating to this matter it is caused because the application in real life has not been running optimally. This study aims to find out how the government’s authority should be for land tenure and its relation to social functions and the determination of compensation. The location used as a case study is located in Batu Jaya Village, Tangerang City. Data collection is done by interviewing several related parties and also conducting a literature study by finding sources related to government authority over land tenure, the concept of social functions, and the determination of compensation. The results of this study indicate that the government has the power to grant land rights and revoke land rights in the public interest.

Assessing Indonesia’s Capacity for Preventing Mass Atrocities

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 415-439
Author(s):  
Ririn Tri Nurhayati
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Regime Change ◽  
Central Government ◽  
Human Rights Violations ◽  
New Order ◽  
The Future ◽  
The Government ◽  
Governmental Institutions ◽  
Relevant Factors

Abstract With the pervasive violations of human rights, including mass atrocities, which happened during the authoritarian New Order administration, the literature on human rights in Indonesia has often been highly critical of the regimes’ human rights record. Indonesia’s regime change in 1998 brought in a more optimistic outlook; successive regimes have shown a stronger commitment to respecting human rights. However, the government still faces challenges in protecting such rights, and in acknowledgement and resolving past gross human rights violations. Consequently, future mass atrocities may not be readily avoided. This study aims to explore Indonesia’s capacity for avoiding future atrocities by evaluating three relevant factors: the influence of the interest-based arguments of the central government elites, the extent to which the idea of ‘sovereignty as responsibility’ has spread among Indonesian governmental institutions, and the role of non-state actors. All of these factors shape Indonesia’s capacity to respond to and prevent any occurrence of mass atrocities in the future.

scholarly journals Board Communities in Formation of Qanun Regional in Aceh Parliament

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-39
Author(s):  
S. Amirulkamar ◽  
Ismail
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
The State ◽  
General Election ◽  
Government Official ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
Unitary State ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
Government Authority

The Government system of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia according to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia recognizes and respects special or special regional government units (Special in the Religious Field, Special in the Field of Education and Special in the Customary Field) regulated by Constitution. In this case the Regional People's Representative Council (DPRD), which is abbreviated as DPRD, but names Aceh as a Provincial Region in the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia system based on the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and the title of elected government official will be determined by the DPRA after the 2009 general election. This is only a change in the legal nomenclature with the status remains in the position of Aceh Privileges. This long journey is the existence of the Council community in the formation of the Regional Qanun in the Aceh Parliament in the form of a legislative body as one of the tools of the DPRA that manages the formation of the Regional Qanun which is carried out jointly with the Regional Head. This is done with the delegation of government authority to the Regional Regions as a political tool in the struggle for human rights and the rights of social aspirations, as well as the Aceh People's Representative Council or the Aceh DPR as a nomenclature of legislative institutions in regions that have legitimated importance in governance. The regulation of laws and regulations in Indonesia as a constitutional basis for the 1945 Constitution of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia article 18B paragraph (1) states that "the State recognizes and respects special or special regional government units that are regulated by laws invite.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document