scholarly journals The Effect of Chitosan Nanoparticle as A Final Irrigation Solution on The Smear Layer Removal, Micro-hardness and Surface Roughness of Root Canal Dentin

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-26
Author(s):  
Diatri Nari Ratih ◽  
Raras Ajeng Enggardipta ◽  
Aqilla Tiara Kartikaningtyas
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Chitosan Nanoparticles ◽  
Lower Surface ◽  
Smear Layer ◽  
Micro Hardness ◽  
Canal Irrigation ◽  
Layer Removal ◽  
Root Canal Irrigation ◽  
Root Canal Dentin

Background: Root canal irrigation is one of the most important stages during root canal treatment. One of the requirements of root canal irrigation material is that it can eradicate the smear layer but does not alter the physical properties of the root canal dentin. Objective: To investigate the effect of chitosan nanoparticle as a final irrigation solution on the smear layer removal, micro-hardness and surface roughness of root canal dentin. Methods: Seventy-two premolars used in this study and divided by three evaluations, namely smear layer removal, micro-hardness and surface roughness. Each study used 24 teeth and was assigned randomly into three groups of eight teeth. Group-1, final irrigation with 17% EDTA; group-2, with 0.2% chitosan nanoparticles; group-3, with 2.5% NaOCl. Specimens were evaluated for smear layer removal, micro-hardness and surface roughness using a Scanning Electron Microscope, Vickers hardness tester and surface roughness measuring instrument, respectively. Data obtained from smear layer removal evaluation were statically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U and data from micro-hardness and surface roughness were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test. Results: Final irrigation using 0.2% chitosan nanoparticles produced similar smear layer removal than 17% EDTA (P>0.05), but it was greater than 2.5% NaOCl (P<0.05). Chitosan had higher micro-hardness and lower surface roughness than EDTA (P<0.05), but it was the same as 2.5% NaOCl (P>0.05). Conclusion: Final irrigation using 0.2% chitosan nanoparticles had the same effect on smear layer removal compared to 17% EDTA; however, 0.2% chitosan produced higher micro-hardness and lower surface roughness of root canal dentin than 17% EDTA.

scholarly journals In Vitro Evaluation of Different Irrigation Protocols on Intracanal Smear Layer Removal in Teeth with or without Pre-Endodontic Proximal Wall Restoration

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 3325
Author(s):  
Naji Kharouf ◽  
Eugenio Pedullà ◽  
Giusy Rita Maria La Rosa ◽  
Frédéric Bukiet ◽  
Salvatore Sauro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Smear Layer ◽  
Canal Irrigation ◽  
Layer Removal ◽  
Apical Level ◽  
Root Canal Irrigation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Sonic Activation

To investigate the influence of pre-endodontic coronal wall restoration on smear layer removal during different root canal irrigation strategies, single-root premolars were prepared with a mesio-occlusal cavity. Half were left untreated (G1), while the mesial walls of the remaining half were reconstructed using a resin composite (G2). The specimens were divided into control (ctrl) groups, which used the conventional needle irrigation method, and four experimental subgroups according to irrigation strategy: Sonic activation using the Endoactivator, sonic activation using the EQ-S, mechanical activation using the XP-Endo finisher, and ultrasonic activation using the EndoUltra. Smear layer removal was assessed through SEM and the results were statistically analyzed. At the coronal and middle thirds, no significant difference (p > 0.05) was detected for G1 and G2, except for the control subgroups (G1ctrl vs G2 ctrl) at the middle third. At the apical third, the smear layer removal was significantly greater for G2 than G1. In G1, both at the middle and apical level, EQ-S and EndoUltra showed greater smear layer removal (p < 0.05) compared to the others G1 subgroups. In G2, at the apical level, the EQ-S and EndoUltra were the most effective in smear layer removal. Pre-endodontic coronal wall restoration may improve the smear layer removal during root canal irrigation.

scholarly journals The differences in root canal smear layer removal between 6,25% pineapple (Ananas comocus L. Merr.) peel extract and 17% Ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid

2019 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 122
Author(s):  
Nirawati Pribadi ◽  
Karlina Samadi ◽  
Meliavita N. K. Astuti ◽  
Hendy J. Kurniawan ◽  
Adelina K. Tandadjaja ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acetic Acid ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Smear Layer ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Canal Irrigation ◽  
Layer Removal ◽  
Root Canal Irrigation ◽  
Group I ◽  
Pineapple Peel ◽  
Peel Extract

Background: The smear layer is attached to dentine and occludes the orifice and, consequently, must be removed in order to improve the success of inroot canal treatment. The ideal irrigation material removes both the organic and inorganic smear layers. Ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid (EDTA) is one of the most commonly used root canal irrigation materials, but removes only inorganic smear layer. To overcome this problem, Pineapple (Ananas comosus L. Merr.) peel extract, which contains saponins, bromelain, polyphenol and flavonoid, is used during root canal irrigation. Purpose: The study aimed to analyze the difference in smear layer removal between the use of 6.25% pineapple peel extract and 17% EDTA. Methods: 27 samples of mandibular premolar teeth with straight root canals were divided randomly into three groups (n = 9) and subsequently prepared using protaper. Irrigation was performed on the control group (aquadest), group I (17% EDTA) and group II (6.25% pineapple peel extract). The samples were dried, temporarily compressed and cut horizontally from the apical to the coronal. Samples were fixed with holder before the smear layer was observed through a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The resulting data was analyzed by means of an ANOVA test. Results: The highest score of root canal hygiene was recorded by group II, followed by group I and, finally, the control group. There were significant differences between the groups (p< 0.000). Conclusion: 6.25% pineapple peel extract produces a higher smear layer removal effect than 17%EDTA on the apical 1/3 of the root canal.

scholarly journals In Vitro Evaluation of Antibacterial Properties and Smear Layer Removal/Sealer Penetration of a Novel Silver-Citrate Root Canal Irrigant

Materials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riccardo Tonini ◽  
Massimo Giovarruscio ◽  
Fabio Gorni ◽  
Andrei Ionescu ◽  
Eugenio Brambilla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid ◽  
Antibacterial Properties ◽  
Phosphate Buffer Solution ◽  
Smear Layer ◽  
Tetrazolium Salt ◽  
Apical Portion ◽  
Layer Removal ◽  
Root Canal Irrigation ◽  
Group I

This study aimed at evaluating the efficacy of a novel silver-citrate root canal irrigation solution (BioAKT) on smear layer removal, sealer penetration after root canal instrumentation and antibacterial activity. Single-root teeth were endodontically treated, sealed with an epoxi-amine resin sealer and irrigated using: Group I: 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl); Group II: silver-citrate solution (BioAKT); Group III: phosphate buffer solution (PBS); Group IV: 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). Smear layer removal and silver deposition at the coronal, middle and apical portion of each canal were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS). Sealer penetration into dentinal tubules at coronal, middle and apical portion was assessed through dye-assisted confocal microscopy (CSM). Both SEM and CSM micrographs were evaluated by two examiners (κ = 0.86), who were blind to the irrigation regimens; scores were given according to the degree of penetration of the sealer. Data analysis included Pearson’s x2 and Sidak’s multiple comparisons. Dentin discs were polished and sterilized. Enterococcus faecalis biofilms were grown using a continuous-flow bioreactor under anaerobic conditions for 72 h. Specimens were irrigated with the tested solutions, and bacterial viability was assessed using a tetrazolium salt assay (MTT). Statistical analysis included one-way ANOVA and Student’s post-hoc t-test (p < 0.05). BioAKT and EDTA were the most efficient solutions both in removing the smear layer and allowing sealer penetration. However, at the apical portion BioAKT performed significantly better compared to EDTA both in smear layer removal and sealer penetration (p < 0.05). BioAKT and NaOCl showed comparable antibacterial effect (p = 0.53). In conclusion, BioAKT represents a suitable smear layer removal agent, which allows for reliable sealer penetration at the apical portion of the root canal system and offers significant antibacterial properties.

scholarly journals A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of different root canal irrigation regimens

2006 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 235-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chaves Medici Mônika ◽  
Izabel Cristina Fröner
Keyword(s):  
Sodium Hypochlorite ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Ricinus Communis ◽  
Smear Layer ◽  
Electron Microscopic ◽  
Canal Irrigation ◽  
Root Canals ◽  
Root Canal Irrigation ◽  
Microscopic Evaluation ◽  
Scanning Electron

The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of endodontic irrigants in removing the smear layer from instrumented root canal walls using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). The endodontic irrigants used were: 1% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl); 1% NaOCl mixed to 17% EDTAC; 2% chlorhexidine gel; and Ricinus communis gel. Photomicrographs of the middle and apical thirds were evaluated with the aid of the Fotoscore - v. 2.0 software. The results indicated that the mixture of sodium hypochlorite and EDTAC completely removed the smear layer from dentinal walls. The other endodontic irrigants were not as efficient in cleansing the root canals.

scholarly journals Effect of different irrigant solutions on microhardness and smear layer removal of root canal dentin

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hebatalla E. Kandil ◽  
Ahmed H. Labib ◽  
Hatem A. Alhadainy
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
Smear Layer ◽  
Layer Removal ◽  
Root Canal Dentin

scholarly journals Comparison Between Different Endodontic Irrigating Protocols In Smear Layer Removal From Radicular Dentin

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (15) ◽  
pp. 38
Author(s):  
Ramona Vlad ◽  
Monika Kovacs ◽  
Dragos Sita ◽  
Mihai Pop
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
Endodontic Treatment ◽  
Smear Layer ◽  
Friedman Test ◽  
Cleaning Efficiency ◽  
Layer Removal ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
System Data ◽  
Root Canal Dentin ◽  
Level Of Significance

The aim of our study was to measure the cleaning efficiency of irrigating solutions used during endodontic treatment regarding smear layer removal from the root canal dentin walls. Ethylenediaminotetraacetic acid (EDTA) 17%, citric acid (CA) 10% and sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) 2,5 % solutions were tested as final irrigating solutions. The study was conducted on extracted teeth, divided in four groups according to the irrigation protocol used. The specimens were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy and the amount of smear layer present at apical, middle and coronal level was recorded, based on a scoring system. Data were statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Friedman test and the level of significance was set at p<0.05. In the coronal and middle segments of dental roots we noticed no statistically significant difference between EDTA and CA in smear layer removing capacity. Final irrigation with 17% EDTA proved to be more efficient than 10% CA and 2,5% NaOCl in smear layer removal at apical level of the root canal, with p<0.05 (p=0.042), which is an important area for disinfection in endodontic treatment.

scholarly journals Investigation of the effects of different chelating solutions on the microhardness and surface roughness of root canal dentin

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-29
Author(s):  
Celalettin Topbaş ◽  
Özkan Adıgüzel ◽  
Özlem Çölgeçen
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid ◽  
Micro Hardness ◽  
Dentin Surface ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Diamond Saw ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Root Canal Dentin ◽  
Roughness Measurements

Introduction: The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of different chelating solutions on microhardness and surface roughness of root canal dentin. Methodology: The crowns of sixty recently extracted maxillary central incisors were separated by diamond burs from the cemento-enamel junction. Roots are divided longitudinally into two pieces with diamond saw. The obtained samples were embedded in autopolymeric-acrylic and the dentin-surfaces of the teeth were grounded. Micro-hardness and surface-roughness measurements were carried out before the chelating processes. First group, the specimens were treated with gel-formed 17% Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid [EDTA] (JE), second group, specimens were treated with 17% Liquid-formed EDTA (LE), third group, specimens were treated with 20% Citric acid (CA), and the last group specimens were treated with 7% Maleic acid (MA) for 120 seconds. After application of the chelating agents, micro-hardness and surface-roughness measurements of all samples were performed again. The difference between the initial and final measurements was calculated and statistically analyzed. One Way Analysis of Variance ANOVA was used for statistical-analysis and statistically significant difference was observed between the groups (p <0.05). Results: According to the test results, the microhardness of LE was statistically equal to that of JE and caused the least decrease in micro-hardness, SA decreased micro-hardness more than LE and JE, and MA decreased dentin micro-hardness more than all other solutions. And surface-roughness results are: MA increased surface-roughness more than other groups, SA and JE less roughened the dentin surface than MA, and there was no significant difference between the two solutions, LE caused less increase in dentin surface roughness compared to all solutions. Conclusions: Besides the use of EDTA and SA, the clinical use of MA can be considered, and it should also be noted that EDTA differs in terms of surface roughness between liquid and gel forms.   How to cite this article: Topbaş C, Adıgüzel Ö, Çölgeçen Ö. Investigation of the effects of different chelating solutions on the microhardness and surface roughness of root canal dentin. Int Dent Res 2019;9(1):22-9.   Linguistic Revision: The English in this manuscript has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English.

scholarly journals Potential of mangrove (Acanthus Ilicifolius) leave extract as an alternative root canal irrigation in removing smear layer (in-vitro study)

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 2869-2874
Author(s):  
Dennis D ◽  
Winda Fatika Sari ◽  
Trimurni Abidin ◽  
Widi Prasetia
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
Negative Control ◽  
Smear Layer ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Kappa Statistics ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Canal Irrigation ◽  
Root Canal Irrigation ◽  
Acanthus Ilicifolius ◽  
Control Samples

Factor that should be considered in the use of irrigation is the loss of the smear layer on root canal walls. Therefore the prepared root canal can be irrigated using materials, such as EDTA 17% and 2,5% NaOCl and of extract Acanthus ilicifolius 7,5% and 10%. To determine the potential of extract Acanthus ilicifolius leaves as an alternative of root canal irrigation in removing smear layer at a concentratiom of 7,5% and 10%. The type of this study is a laboratory experimental with post-test only control group design. The total sample is 24 teeth samples that have been prepared and irrigated consisting of four groups. 6 samples for irrigation 7,5% extract Acanthus ilicifolius, 6 samples for irrigation 10% extract Acanthus ilicifolius, 6 positive control samples for combination 2,5% NaOCl and EDTA 17%, and 6 negative control samples. Shooting tool used to observe the cleanliness level in the walls of the root canal is a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). Data were analyzed using Kappa statistics, followed by Kruskal wallis analysis test and continued with Mann-Whitney analysis. Acanthus ilicifolius 7.5% and 10% extracts can remove the smear layer when compared with the negative control group. The combination of 2.5% NaOCl and 17% EDTA is better in smear layer removal compared to 7.5% and 10% Acanthus ilicifolius extracts. Acanthus ilicifolius was able to clean the smear layer on the root canal and can be used as an alternative root canal irrigation.

scholarly journals Quantitative Assessment of Root Canal Roughness with Calcium-Based Hypochlorite Irrigants by 3D CLSM

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 409-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliana Santos Oliveira ◽  
Walter Raucci Neto ◽  
Natália Spadine de Faria ◽  
Fernanda Silva Fernandes ◽  
Carlos Eduardo Saraiva Miranda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
Laser Scanning ◽  
Laser Scanning Microscopy ◽  
Ultrastructural Changes ◽  
Confocal Laser ◽  
Saline Control ◽  
Calcium Hypochlorite ◽  
Canal Irrigation ◽  
Root Canal Irrigation ◽  
Root Canal Dentin

Chemical solutions play important roles in endodontic treatment and promote ultrastructural changes in dentin surface. The aim of this study was to quantify root canal roughness at different concentrations of calcium hypochlorite (Ca(OCl)2) and sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Fifty-two human mandibular premolars were sectioned and randomly organized into thirteen groups (n=8): saline (control); 1%, 2.5% and 5% NaOCl; 1%, 2.5% and 5% Ca(OCl)2; the hypochlorite groups were further divided into with or without EDTA. The chlorine concentrations of the different solutions were measured by iodine titration (%). The superficial roughness (Sa) was quantified by CLSM. Ca(OCl)2 presented substantial decrease in chlorine concentration that differed from the package indication, but without compromising the dentin ultrastructure changes. There were no significant differences in dentin roughness between Ca(OCl)2 or NaOCl at all studied concentrations. The combination with EDTA provided similar roughness values among the solutions (p>0.05). The 5% Ca(OCl)2 and NaOCl solutions significantly increased dentin roughness and did not differ from the EDTA association (p>0.05). Ca(OCl)2 promoted similar dentin roughness as the NaOCl at the same concentrations and combined with EDTA. It may be concluded that Ca(OCl)2 modified the root canal dentin roughness similarly to NaOCl, at the same concentrations and EDTA combinations used in this study. Ca(OCl)2 and NaOCl, both at 5%, significantly altered dentin roughness, overcoming EDTA association, thus Ca(OCl)2 concentrations ranging from 1% to 2.5% may be suitable solutions for root canal irrigation protocols.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document