scholarly journals Effects of Modification of Pain Protocol on Incidence of Post Operative Nausea and Vomiting

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 505-511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ran Schwarzkopf ◽  
Nimrod Snir ◽  
Zachary T. Sharfman ◽  
Joseph B. Rinehart ◽  
Michael-David Calderon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Care ◽  
Postoperative Nausea ◽  
Total Joint Replacement ◽  
Postoperative Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Improve Patient Care ◽  
Immediate Release ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Management Protocol ◽  
Post Operative Nausea

Background: A Perioperative Surgical Home (PSH) care model applies a standardized multidisciplinary approach to patient care using evidence-based medicine to modify and improve protocols. Analysis of patient outcome measures, such as postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), allows for refinement of existing protocols to improve patient care. We aim to compare the incidence of PONV in patients who underwent primary total joint arthroplasty before and after modification of our PSH pain protocol. Methods: All total joint replacement PSH (TJR-PSH) patients who underwent primary THA (n=149) or TKA (n=212) in the study period were included. The modified protocol added a single dose of intravenous (IV) ketorolac given in the operating room and oxycodone immediate release orally instead of IV Hydromorphone in the Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU). The outcomes were (1) incidence of PONV and (2) average pain score in the PACU. We also examined the effect of primary anesthetic (spinal vs. GA) on these outcomes. The groups were compared using chi-square tests of proportions. Results: The incidence of post-operative nausea in the PACU decreased significantly with the modified protocol (27.4% vs. 38.1%, p=0.0442). There was no difference in PONV based on choice of anesthetic or procedure. Average PACU pain scores did not differ significantly between the two protocols. Conclusion: Simple modifications to TJR-PSH multimodal pain management protocol, with decrease in IV narcotic use, resulted in a lower incidence of postoperative nausea, without compromising average PACU pain scores. This report demonstrates the need for continuous monitoring of PSH pathways and implementation of revisions as needed.

scholarly journals Re-Print-A Comparison between Conventional Throat Packs and Pharyngeal Placement of Tampons in Rhinology Surgeries.

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 01-07
Author(s):  
Hasan Alansari
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Nausea ◽  
Postoperative Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
The Other ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Visual Analog Scales ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Impact Scale ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Spss Software ◽  
Post Operative Nausea

Objective: the aim is to evaluate the incidence of postoperative throat pain, nausea and vomiting in patients that have been packed with either conventional gauze or pharyngeal tampons. Methods: We included adult patients who were booked for a rhinology surgery that needed throat packs. They were allocated into two groups, pharyngeal tampons, and conventional ribbon gauze. They were then assessed using visual analog scales and Post-operative nausea and vomiting impact scale respectively in the 1st, 4th, and 24th hour. Data was analyzed using SPSS software version 25. Results: There is evidence to suggest that using pharyngeal tampons reduces the mean VAS score at 4 hours compared to using Gauze. [t87=3.294, p=0.001), the is no statistical evidence that show a difference in the other Visual analogue scores or post-operative nausea and vomiting scores. Conclusion: The study shows that the use of pharyngeal tampons is associated with decreased pain scores, however, it also shows that there no difference in postoperative nausea and vomiting.

scholarly journals Comparison of the Efficacy of Metoclopramide Versus Dexamethasone for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea Vomiting during General Anesthesia

2021 ◽  
pp. 163-168
Author(s):  
Sunil Arjan ◽  
Naila Zahoor ◽  
Kenza Nadeem ◽  
Farah Liaquat ◽  
Tariq Hussain Mughal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Postoperative Nausea ◽  
Postoperative Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Post Operative Nausea ◽  
Group D ◽  
Male To Female

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy of Metoclopramide versus Dexamethasone for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting during general anesthesia. Study Design:This is a Randomized control trial (RCT) study. Setting: Study carried out at Department of Anaesthesiology, Surgical Intensive Care Unit and Pain Management, Clinic, Dow University of Health Sciences and  Dr. Ruth Pfau  Hospital Karachi, from December 2018 to June 2019. Materials and Methods:110 patients undergoing elective surgeries, who fulfilled the inclusion criteria and gave informed consent were included in the study. They were randomly assigned to either group M or group D, with 55 patients in each group. All patients were then administered either intravenous dexamethasone (8mg) in group D or intravenous metoclopramide (10mg) in group M at the time of induction of anesthesia. The main outcome measure was postoperative nausea and vomiting, at the end of 6th hour postoperatively. The SPSS version 21 was applied to the data. Results: Majority of the patients 66 (60%) were of age 35 years or less. Mean age of the patients was 35.09±11.55 years. There were more females than males, with male to female ratio being 1:1.03. Overall, in patients receiving metoclopramide, 12(21.8%)  had postoperative nausea and vomiting, while in patients who received dexamethasone, only 4 (7.3%) patients had post-operative nausea and vomiting. When comparing two groups, there was statistically significant (p= 0.02) reduced postoperative nausea/vomiting among those patients who had received intravenous dexamethasone. Conclusion: Intravenous dexamethasone is more effective than Metoclopramide in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients during general anesthesia.

A Review of Ondansatron Versus Other Antiemetics in Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting

2001 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 10-13
Author(s):  
Lynn Sealey
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Nausea ◽  
Research Study ◽  
Postoperative Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Not Given ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Considerable Cost ◽  
Recovery Unit ◽  
Post Operative Nausea ◽  
Cost Implications

AbstractThe workload of the recovery unit can be considerably increased by patients suffering post operative nausea and vomiting (PONV). The unit can often become blocked by patients too sick to discharge back to the main ward. Via a review of the literature and a small research study in the authors own recovery ward, it was concluded that PONV causes patients to stay in recovery longer. In fact the study reveals of those patients who did not receive an antiemetic perioperatively, 31% suffered PONV and those who had PONV spent 29 minutes longer in recovery.Despite ondansatron being one of the most expensive drugs, it was only successful in 81% of cases. However those people who did receive ondansatron, spent an average of 8 minutes less time in recovery, compared with those who were not given it. These findings potentially have considerable cost implications, relevant in todays current climate of economy saving strategies. These findings and their implications are discussed.

scholarly journals Post operative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: comparison of prophylactic effect of dexamethasone with ondansetron

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 60-64
Author(s):  
M Younus Ali ◽  
Raihan Uddin ◽  
Amirul Islam ◽  
Mustafa Kamal ◽  
SM Rafiqul Islam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Postoperative Nausea ◽  
Vital Signs ◽  
Postoperative Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Prophylactic Use ◽  
Group B ◽  
Post Operative Nausea

Background Postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia are an unpleasant,distressing effects. Prophylactic use of dexamethesone reducing this effects. Objective This study was designed to compare of dexamethasone and ondansetron for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods Sixty patients who underwent laparoscopic cholesystectomy were randomly allocated into two groups. Group A(n=30) patients received 8mg dexamehtasone intravenously and Group B(n=30) patients received 8mg ondansetron intravenously one minute before induction of anaesthesia. All patients received standard general anaesthesia.Perioperative vital signs and postoperative nausea and vomiting were recorded. Results The incidence of nausea was 13.4% in group A, 16.7% in group B(p>0.05) and vomiting was 6.6% in Group A, 13.4% in group B(p>0.05). The difference among the groups was not statistically significant. Conclusion Intravenous dexamethasone was better to ondansetron in prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/jbsa.v24i2.19803 Journal of Bangladesh Society of Anaesthesiologists 2011; 24(2): 60-64

scholarly journals Addition of Dexamethasone to Prophylactic Granisetron in Children Undergoing Ocular Surgeries – A Randomised Controlled Double-Blind Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (01) ◽  
pp. 12-16
Author(s):  
Koilada Shiv Kumar ◽  
Rajan Anand ◽  
Debasis Bagchi
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Nausea ◽  
Postoperative Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Fisher Exact Test ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Paediatric Age ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Post Operative Nausea

BACKGROUND Postoperative nausea and vomiting are highly prevalent after ophthalmic surgeries in the paediatric age group. In this randomised, double-blind prospective clinical trial, we studied and compared the efficacy of granisetron and combination of granisetron with dexamethasone to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting after paediatric ocular surgeries. METHODS Sixty paediatric patients (06 - 12 yrs. of age) undergoing elective ocular surgeries were randomly allocated to one of the two groups of 30 patients each. Group (G) received granisetron 40 mcg kg–1 intravenously as a bolus before induction of anaesthesia. Group (G + d) received granisetron 40 mcg kg–1 & dexamethasone 0.1 mg kg–1 intravenously as a bolus before induction. Student t-test, Fisher exact test were used wherever applicable for statistical analysis using SPSS version 15.0. RESULTS A complete response (defined as no post-operative nausea and vomiting and no need for another rescue antiemetic) was achieved in 63.3 % of patients who received granisetron alone and in 96.7 % of patients who received granisetron plus dexamethasone. We found nil difference in complications between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS We found that addition of dexamethasone to granisetron is more effective and beneficial than granisetron alone in preventing postoperative emesis in 1st 24 hours. KEYWORDS Post-Operative Nausea and Vomiting, Anaesthesia, Granisetron, Dexamethasone

scholarly journals Evaluation of the efficacy of Granisetron over Droperidol in the prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting following open Cholecystectomy

JMS SKIMS ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-14
Author(s):  
Abdul Qayoom Lone ◽  
Shruti Sharma ◽  
Mohamad Ommid ◽  
Showkat H Nengroo ◽  
Imtiyaz Naqash
Keyword(s):  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Postoperative Nausea ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Postoperative Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Physical Status ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Post Operative Nausea ◽  
To Receive

BACKGROUND: Post operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) continue to be frequent occurrences, even when conventional antiemetics are prophylactically used. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of Granisetron over Droperidol in the prevention of PONV in patients undergoing elective open cholecystectomy under general anesthesia. MATERIAL & METHODS: In this double blind randomized study, 100 adult patients with physical status ASA I and II, (age, 20-60 years), were randomly allocated into two groups, X or Y, to receive either injection Granisetron hydrochloride (3 mg i/v) or Droperidol (2.5 mg i/v), 5 min prior to induction of general anesthesia. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was recorded every six hourly for a period of 24 hour after the surgery. RESULTS: 6 (12%) patients in the granisetron group and 20 (40%) patients in the Droperidol group reported an emetic episode, (p = 0.002); the incidence of PONV in the total 24 hr period after the surgery, 54% in the granisetron group and 76% in Droperidol group (p = 0.022) CONCLUSIONS: It was found that granisetron is superior to Droperidol in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. JMS 2011;14(1):11-14

scholarly journals The effect of low dose midazolam in addition to ondansetron on post-operative nausea and vomiting in laparoscopic cholecystectomy – a comparative study

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-12
Author(s):  
MM Masum-Ul Haque ◽  
Montosh K Mondal ◽  
S Afroz ◽  
SS Akhter ◽  
Abdul Hye ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Postoperative Nausea ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Postoperative Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Group Iv ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Group Iii ◽  
Group I ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
Post Operative Nausea

Background Nausea, retching and vomiting are among the most common postoperative complaints. Premedication with low dose midazolam in addition to ondansetron is more effective in controlling postoperative nausea and vomiting. Objectives This study was designed to observe the effect of low dose midazolam 7.5mg in addition to ondansetron 4mg on postoperative nausea and vomiting in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods 100 patients of ASA grade I and II, age range 30-50 years and weight 50-70 kg were randomly selected by a blind envelop method. They were equally divided into four groups of 25 patients in group each. Group I received vitamin, Group II ondansetron 8mg, Group III ondansetron 8mg and midazolam 7.5mg and Group IV ondansetron 4mg and midazolam 7.5 mg orally one hour before operation. In the recovery room occurrence of nausea and vomiting was assessed for 24 hours. Results The incidence of nausea was in vitamin Group I 64%, in ond8 group II 32%, in ond8+mid7.5 group III 24% and in ond4+mid7.5 group IV 24%. The incidence among the groups was highly significant (p=0.008). The incidence of vomiting was in vitamin Group I 16%, in ond8 group II 16%, in ond8+mid7.5 group III 8% and in ond4+mid7.5 group IV 8%. The difference among the groups were not significant (p=0.808). Conclusion Low dose midazolam 7.5mg in addition to ondansetron 4mg is more effective in controlling postoperative nausea and vomiting in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/jbsa.v24i1.19793 Journal of Bangladesh Society of Anaesthesiologists 2011; 24(1): 8-12

scholarly journals A Comparative Study Between Palonosetron and Granisetron to Prevent Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 118-123
Author(s):  
SMA Taher ◽  
Jamil Raihan ◽  
M Abu Zahid ◽  
AK Azad ◽  
MI Alam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
General Anaesthesia ◽  
Postoperative Nausea ◽  
Postoperative Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Economic Effects ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Peritoneal Closure ◽  
Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Elective Procedure ◽  
Post Operative Nausea

Post operative nausea and vomiting is a frequent complication following general anaesthesia and surgery. There is frequently the case of great distress to patient and it is often the worst memory, uncomfortable of their hospital stay. Prolonged post operative nausea and vomiting may cause unexpected physical, metabolic, psychological and economic effects on the patients which slow down their recovery and reduce their confidence in future surgery and anaesthesia. In the present study, we have the incidence of post operative nausea and vomiting in sixty (60) patients undergoing for elective procedure under general anaesthesia. The patients were randomly divided into two groups (group- P, group- G) of thirty (30) patients each.The Patients of group ‘P’ were received intravenous Inj. Palonosetron 75μg and group ‘G’ received intravenous Inj. granisetron 2.5mg (2.5ml) bolus over 30 second just before peritoneal closure. Both group received a standard general anaesthesia. Postoperative analgesia was provided with per rectal diclofenac suppository (50mg) and Inj. Ketorolac Tromethamine 30mg 8 hourly. In the recovery, postoperative room occurrence of nausea and vomiting was assessed for 24 hours. The incidence of post operative nausea and vomiting was reduced in both groups significantly but comparison between these two groups for prevention of PONV(postoperative nausea and vomiting) following elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery is similar. Palonosetron has more prolonged effect than granisetron. There was no evidence of any adverse side effects and whole of the post operative period was smooth.TAJ 2011; 24(2): 118-123

A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND STUDY OF PALONOSETRON COMPARED WITH ONDANSETRON IN PREVENTING POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING AFTER MODIFIED RADICAL MASTECTOMY SURGERY.

2021 ◽  
pp. 72-74
Author(s):  
Anusha K ◽  
Sherin bright
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Postoperative Nausea ◽  
Radical Mastectomy ◽  
Postoperative Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Post Operative Nausea

BACKGROUND : Palonosetron is a new potent 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 antagonist. Although used for chemo induced emesis, data is lacking for PONV. The high incidence of nausea and vomiting after breast surgery is well documented. This study compared the effects of i.v.ondansetron and palonosetron administered at the time of induction for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in these high-risk patients . The aim was to compare Onda METHODS : nsetron 8 mg and Palonosetron 0.075mg administered intravenously for prevention of post operative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing modied radical mastectomy 24 hours postoperatively, by a randomised , controlled, double blind study. 70 female non smoking patients scheduled for elective modied radical mastectomy were, allocated randomly into 2 groups . Patients received either Palonosetron 0.075mg (GROUP P ) or ondansetron 8mg ( GROUP O ) intravenously, immediately before induction of general anaesthesia. The occurence of nausea, vomiting, retching, need for rescue antiemetics and side effects were monitored for a period of 24 hours after surgery. The compete response rate and overall PONV for 0 - 24 hours were calculated. The demographic prole of the patients were comparable. The RESULTS : incidence of a complete response (no PONV, no rescue antiemetics ) during 0 - 24 hours in post operative period was signicantly high in GROUP P ( 85.7% vs 62.9%, p=0.02) than GROUP O. The incidence of nausea was signicantly low in GROUP P ( 14.3% vs 37.1%). There was no statistically signicant difference between the 2 groups in vomiting, retching, side effects and need for rescue antiemetics. Thus overall PONV was low in GROUP P (14.3% vs 37.1% p = 0.02 statistically signicant.) We conclude that Palonosetron 0.075mg was more effective for preventing PONV in patients undergoing modied radical mastectomy surgery

scholarly journals Pengaruh Terapi Komplementer Akupresur terhadap Mual Muntah Pasca Operasi di RSUD Dr. H. Abdul Moeloek Provinsi Lampung

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 382
Author(s):  
El Rahmayati ◽  
Anggi Irawan ◽  
Tumiur Sormin
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Nausea ◽  
Complementary Therapies ◽  
Postoperative Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Bivariate Analysis ◽  
Control Group ◽  
P Value ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Post Operative Nausea

<p class="Normal1">Postoperative Nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common complication after surgery.The incidence of postoperative nausea vomiting is approximately 30% of all patients undergoing inpatient surgery and 70% of cases occur within the first 24 hours. One of nausea and vomiting treatment is non-pharmacological therapies with complementary acupressure therapy. Furthermore, the research was conducted to determine the effect of acupressure complementary therapies against postoperative nausea and vomiting.The research was Quasi-Experimental research design Non-equivalent Control Group, the sampling technique used purposive sampling technique. Based on results of sample calculation used amounted to 22 respondents, consisting of 11 experimental groups and 11 control groups. Collecting data was used questionnaire and analyzed using univariate and bivariate analysis by Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney with α values (&lt;0.05).The results showed the difference in score of nausea and vomiting the first and second measurements in the control group given a placebo action is 0.91 with a p-value (0.26). Nausea and vomiting difference in scores obtained before and after acupressure complementary therapies in the experimental group was 2:18 with a p-value (0.004). As well as the difference in scores obtained post-operative nausea and vomiting in the control group and the experiment is 1:27 with the p-value (0.009). The above statistical test results can be concluded that there was the effect of complementary acupressure therapy on postoperative nausea vomiting. Based on the conclusion of the research, the authors suggest that complementary acupressure therapy can be applied as a companion therapy and it is expected that nursing staff can learn complementary acupressure therapy.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document