scholarly journals PENGEMBANGAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KREATIF DAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIS MAHASISWA MELALUI METODE DISKUSI

2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
La Moma

Abstrak: Tujuan penelitian adalah untuk mengetahui seberapa besar kontribusi perkuliahan kajian matematika sekolah 1 dengan metode diskusi terhadap pengembangan kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis dan kemampan pemecahan masalah mahasiswa pada level KAM (atas, sedang, rendah). Penelitian ini merupakan tipe penelitian kuasi eksperimen. Sampel pada penelitian ini terdiri 89 orang mahasiswa semester 1 tahun pada Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika yang mewakili mahasiswa level tinggi, sedang, dan rendah. Data diperoleh lewat tes, sedang analisis data dilakukan lewat uji t dan anava dua jalur. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) ada perbedaan pencapaian KBKM mahasiswa antara kelas eksperimen dan kelas kontrol; (2) ada perbedaan pencapaian KPMM mahasiswa antara kelas eksperimen dan kelas kontrol; (3) tidak terdapat interaksi antara pembelajaran dan KAM mahasiswa terhadap kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis; dan (4) tidak ada interaksi antara pembelajaran dan mahasiswa terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis. DEVELOPING MATHEMATICAL CREATIVE THINKING AND PROBLEM SOLVING ABILITY THROUGH DISCUSSION METHOD Abstract: This study is aimed at determining the contribution of generative learning model using discussion method to the development of creative thinking ability and mathematics problem solving at different levels (high, medium, low). This study is a quasi-experimental research involving 89 first semester mathematics students represesenting different levels. Data were collected through test and analyzed using t-test, and two-way ANOVA. The results of the study are: (1) the creative thinking ability of students in experiment class and that of students in controll class are different, (2) the KPMM of experiement class and that of control class are different, (3) learning and KAM level have no correlation with creative thinking ability, and (4) learning and KAM level have no correlation mathematics problem solving ability. Keywords: Creative thinking ability, mathematics problem solving, discussion method

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 229
Author(s):  
Ika Silfiana Arifatul Khoiriyah ◽  
Kartika Yuni Purwanti

The creative Thinking Ability in Elementary School Mathematics Problem Solving. The purpose of this research is how to know the quality of learning used and how to find out the creative thinking ability in student problem solving. The subjects of this classroom action research were all fourth grade students of SDN Candirejo 01, West Ungaran District, Semarang Regency, 2020/2021 academic year. This research is a qualitative research. The results of this research indicate that 1) The learning quality shows good; 2) The creative thinking ability in solving mathematical problems is analyzed by paying attention to 3 criteria, such as fluency, flexibility, and novelty. Based on the discussion that has been done by researchers on 10 research subjects.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-44
Author(s):  
Abdul Ma'arif ◽  
Syaiful Syaiful ◽  
Muhammad Haris Effendi Hasibuan

Problem-solving skill is required by students and a target in studying mathematics. However, the problem-solving skill of Indonesian students are lacking. One effort that can be done is applying the Model of Learning Cycle 5E.  This research discussed the influence of the implementation of the learning cycle model on mathematics problem-solving skill viewed from students’ adversity quotient. This research used a quantitive approach, quasi-experimental study. The subjects were the 8th Grade students of SMP IT Ash-Shiddiiqi Jambi, consisting of two experiment classes and one control class. The instruments were post-test and adversity quotient questionnaire modified by Stoltz and had been validated by experts. Data analysis was conducted by Two-Way ANOVA. The results showed that there was no interaction between the learning cycle 5E model and mathematics problem-solving skill. This finding indicates that the model of learning cycle 5E affects problem-solving skills and can be applied to students with all types of adversity quotient.


Author(s):  
Luh Putu Widya Adnyani ◽  
Indra Kurniawan ◽  
Ek Ajeng Rahmi Pinahayu

The aim of this research is knowing whether research instrument is feasible or no to get data of research. The instrument of this research is logical mathematics quotient test with 25 problems in multiple choice and mathematics problem solving test with 4 questions in essay.  Testing the appropriateness of instrument of logical mathematics intelligence consist of content validity, level of problem difficulties, power differentiator, and reliability. Meanwhile, testing the appropriateness of instrument of mathematics problem solving use content validity. The validator for both of logical mathematics intelligence test and mathematics problem solving test is expert judgement. There are 39 students of Senior High School as respondent who are joining instrument try out. The results of appropriateness of instrument show: 1) there are 25 questions of logical mathematics quotient instrument which are feasible to take research data, and 2) instrument of mathematics problem solving in linier equation system material is feasible to use with some revisions from expert judgment.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 308
Author(s):  
Veronika Yusnita Andriani Prastika ◽  
Riyadi Riyadi ◽  
Siswanto Siswanto

This research aims to 1) which learning model that supports students’ creative thinking ability whether discovery, CORE, or conventional learning model, 2) which model that supports creative thinking ability the most to high, moderate, and low level students, 3) know if there is interaction between learning model and students’ logical mathematical intelligence, and creative thinking ability. This is a quasi-experimental research with the population of eighth graders of junior high schools in Madiun Regency. The research design used a group pretest-posttest control design. The sample was determined using stratified cluster random sampling. This research uses two-way unequal ANOVA. This research concluded that 1) students’ creative thinking skill is developed better using Discovery than CORE and conventional learning model, 2) students with high logical mathematical intelligence have higher creative thinking ability than those with moderate and low logical mathematical intelligence,3) there is no interaction between learning model and logical mathematical intelligence with creative thinking ability.Keywords: Creative Thinking; Learning Model; Logical Mathematical Intelligence. AbstrakTujuan dari penelitan ini untuk mengetahui 1) model pembelajaran manakah yang memberikan kemampuan berpikir kreatif yang lebih  antara model pembelajaran discovery learning, CORE atau konvensional, 2) manakah yang memberikan kemampuan berpikir kreatif yang lebih baik siswa yang memiliki kecerdasan logis matematis tinggi, sedang, atau rendah, 3) apakah terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan keceredasan logis matematis dengan kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa. Metode yang digunakan pada penelitian adalah eksperimen semu, dengan populasi siswa kelas VIII SMP N Se-Kabupaten Madiun. Desain penelitian menggunakan group pretest-posttest control design Pemilihan sampel dengan menggunakan stratified cluster random sampling. Teknik analisis penelitian ini menggunakan anava dua jalan dengan sel tak sama. Kesimpulan pada penelitian ini 1) kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa yang kenai model discovery learning lebih baik daripada model pembelajaran CORE dan konvensional, 2) Kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa yang memiliki kecerdasan logis matematis tinggi lebih baik daripada siswa yang memiliki kecerdasan logis matematis sedang dan rendah, , 3) tidak ada interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan kecerdasan logis matematis dengan kemampuan berpikir kreatif.Kata kunci: Berpikir kreatif; kecerdasan logis matematis; model pembelajaran.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-78
Author(s):  
Heko Akbar Ahmad ◽  
Desy Hanisa Putri ◽  
Connie Connie

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan bagaimana efektivitas penggunaan model open-ended problem terhadap  kemampuan berpikir kreatif dan kemampuan pemecahan masalah. Jenis penelitian ini adalah Pre Experimental Design dengan tipe one group pretest postest design. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap kemampuan berpikir kreatif  (thitung = 31,47 lebih besar dari ttabel = 1,69) dan kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa (thitung = 4, 95 lebih besar dari ttabel = 1,69) yang diajarkan menggunakan model open-ended problem   untuk variabel kemampuan berpikir kreatif dan  variabel kemampuan pemecahan masalah. Dengan hasil uji N-gain sebesar 0,74 untuk kemampuan berpikir kreatif dan 0,63 untuk uji N-gain pada kemampuan pemecahan masalah sehingga dapat disimpulkan bahwa model open-ended problem  efektif diterapkan pada kemampuan berpikir kreatif dan kemampaun pemecahan maalah siswa. Kata kunci : Open-Ended Problem, Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif, Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah This research was aimed to explain how the effectiveness of using the open-ended problem model  on creative thinking skills and problem solving abilities. The type of this research was Pre Experimental Design with one group pretest posttest design. The results showed that there was a significant effect on creative thinking skills (tcount = 31.47 which is greater than ttable = 1.69) and students' problem solving abilities (tcount = 4, 95 which is greater than ttable = 1.69), who were taught to use the open-ended problem model for creative thinking ability variables and problem solving ability variables. With the results of the N-gain test of 0.74 for the creative thinking skills and 0.63 for the N-gain test on problem solving abilities, it can be concluded that the open-ended problem model is effectively applied to creative thinking skills and students' problem solving abilities. Keywords: Open-Ended Problem, Creative Thinking Skills, Problem Solving Ability 


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 270-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madihah Khalid ◽  
Supiah Saad ◽  
Siti Rafiah Abdul Hamid ◽  
Muhammad Ridhuan Abdullah ◽  
Hasniza Ibrahim ◽  
...  

In recent years, calls to nurture and teach creativity from an early age in schools has intensified. Creativity is something regular in the teaching of arts subjects but is not a common feature in teaching science, technology, engineering and mathematics subjects. However, what really matters, is how the subject is being taught. This research aimed to foster creativity through the teaching of mathematics via problem solving that challenges the solving of problems in a creative manner, which is defined as creative problem solving. This quasi-experimental study investigates changes in students learning of mathematics via creative problem solving. Altogether, 172 Form 1 students forming treatment and comparison groups from four schools in Gombak District area, Malaysia were involved. A mixed qualitative and quantitative data were collected to investigate the effect of the 3 cycles of creative problem solving lessons implemented. Instruments used were Torrance Test of Creative Thinking, a mathematics problem solving test and creativity checklist. This paper will only present the quantitative data obtained. Results show statistically significant increases in scores for most categories of creativity and problem solving tests. This research brought together teachers and researchers in trialling creative problem solving to teach mathematics, to achieve the enhancement of students’ creative thinking and problem solving skills. This coincided with the introduction of Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Menengah with new emphasis to strengthen the quality of science, technology, engineering and mathematics education in general, where higher-order thinking reforms are emphasized.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-154
Author(s):  
Umar Soleh ◽  
Ferry Ferdianto ◽  
Setiyani Setiyani

The purpose of this research is to know the relationship of Group Investigation model with creative thinking ability and problem solving ability. Model Group Investigation is a group-based learning model where students are given opportunities to discuss, think critically, and be responsible for the learning. The research method used is experimental method, with sampling technique used is Purposive Sample. The instrument used in this research is the observation sheet of student activity, the question of creative thinking ability and the problem solving test problem. The test used is Pearson Product Moment correlation test, ANOVA Factorial test, and uji t. The results of this study are: (1) student activity in learning mathematics by using Group Investigation model overall percentage reaches 65,6% and included in good category; (2) there is correlation of Group Investigation model with creative thinking ability; (3) there is correlation of Group Investigation model with problem solving ability; (4) there is a correlation of Group Investigation model with creative thinking ability and problem-solving ability; (5) there is difference of average ability of creative thinking and problem solving ability between experiment class student and control class student, with mean value of experiment class is 76,60 whereas mean value of control class is 68,57.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 261-272
Author(s):  
Ari Septian ◽  
Rani Sugiarni ◽  
Erma Monariska

Students' low creative thinking skills and difficulty in drawing graphs from the given algebraic equations are the background of this study. The purpose of this study was to determine the mathematical creative thinking abilities between Android-based GeoGebra and ordinary learning. This study also investigated students’ responses to the application of Android-based GeoGebra. The research method used was quasi-experimental with a nonequivalent group pretest-posttest design. The instruments were a creative thinking test and a questionnaire. The subjects of this study were students of one of the junior high school in Cianjur selected by purposive sampling technique. The studied material was the quadratic equations as a part of algebra. The gain index data analysis technique used was the normality test and the Mann Whitney test while the questionnaire data responses were analyzed through the average percentage of students’ answers. As a result, the students' mathematical creative thinking ability with Android-based GeoGebra was better than ordinary learning. Also, the students provided positive responses to the application of Android-based GeoGebra.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document