Suggestions to the article: Visualizing Collaboration Characteristics and Topic Burst on International Mobile Health Research (Preprint)
UNSTRUCTURED The article published on 5 June 2018 is well-written and of interest, but remains several questions that are required for clarifications, such as (1) the logical growth curve and the inflection point applied to Figure 2 did not explain the source of theory in literature; (2) the 27 keywords with a frequency not less than 10 and burst strength not less than 2 were not consistent with those extracted from the article shown in Multimedia Appendix 7; and (3) the computation of burst strength for keywords is unclear and requires further interpretations. We obtained the original data from the article and verified (1) the equation of the growth curve and the determination of inflection point on a given ogive curve; (2) the visualization of 23 keywords can be on a dashboard using the temporal bar graph to display; and (3) the computation of burst strength for keywords should be explained further in the article. We found that the equation fitting to the cumulative number of publications over years since 1997 is somewhat different from ours, though the inflection point is identical; (2) the visualization combined with other valuable information on topic bursts is merit good for applications in bibliographic studies; (3) the burst strength combined with frequency and burst coefficient through a formula(=ln(sqrt(frequency × burst coefficient)+1) can be applied to future studies. The three ways to solve the questions in the article provide deeper insights into the bibliometric analysis and make the data easier and clearer to understand.