scholarly journals Pharmacogenetic score predicts overall survival, progression-free survival and platinum sensitivity in ovarian cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (14) ◽  
pp. 995-1010
Author(s):  
Sara Gagno ◽  
Michele Bartoletti ◽  
Chiara Romualdi ◽  
Elena Poletto ◽  
Simona Scalone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Germ Line ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Prognostic Score ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Estrogen Activity ◽  
The Impact

Aim: To define the impact of polymorphisms in genes involved in platinum-taxane and estrogen activity in the outcome of platinum-based treated ovarian cancer patients (OCP). Patients & Methods: Two hundred and thirty OCP were analyzed for 124 germ-line polymorphisms to generate a prognostic score for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and platinum-free interval (PFI). Results: ABCG2 rs3219191D>I, UGT1A rs10929302G>A and UGT1A rs2741045T>C polymorphisms were significantly associated with all three parameters (OS, PFS and PFI) and were used to generate a score. Patients in high-risk group had a poorer OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.8; 95% CI: 1.3–2.7; p = 0.0019), PFS (HR: 2.0; 95% CI: 1.4–2.9; p < 0.0001) and PFI (HR: 1.9; 95% CI: 1.4–2.8; p = 0.0002) compared with those in low-risk group. Conclusion: The prognostic-score including polymorphisms involved in drug and estrogen pathways stratifies OCP according to OS, PFS and PFI.

Delays from neoadjuvant chemotherapy to interval debulking surgery and survival in ovarian cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (10) ◽  
pp. 1554-1561
Author(s):  
Ying L Liu ◽  
Qin C Zhou ◽  
Alexia Iasonos ◽  
Olga T Filippova ◽  
Dennis S Chi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Debulking Surgery ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Interval Debulking Surgery ◽  
The Impact

IntroductionDelays from primary surgery to chemotherapy are associated with worse survival in ovarian cancer, however the impact of delays from neoadjuvant chemotherapy to interval debulking surgery is unknown. We sought to evaluate the association of delays from neoadjuvant chemotherapy to interval debulking with survival.MethodsPatients with a diagnosis of stage III/IV ovarian cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy from July 2015 to December 2017 were included in our analysis. Delays from neoadjuvant chemotherapy to interval debulking were defined as time from last preoperative carboplatin to interval debulking >6 weeks. Fisher’s exact/Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare clinical characteristics. The Kaplan–Meier method, log-rank test, and multivariate Cox Proportional-Hazards models were used to estimate progression-free and overall survival and examine differences by delay groups, adjusting for covariates.ResultsOf the 224 women, 159 (71%) underwent interval debulking and 34 (21%) of these experienced delays from neoadjuvant chemotherapy to interval debulking. These women were older (median 68 vs 65 years, P=0.05) and received more preoperative chemotherapy cycles (median 6 vs 4, P=0.003). Delays from neoadjuvant chemotherapy to interval debulking were associated with worse overall survival (HR 2.4 95% CI 1.2 to 4.8, P=0.01), however survival was not significantly shortened after adjusting for age, stage, and complete gross resection, HR 1.66 95% CI 0.8 to 3.4, P=0.17. Delays from neoadjuvant chemotherapy to interval debulking were not associated with worse progression-free survival (HR 1.55 95% CI 0.97 to 2.5, P=0.062). Increase in number of preoperative cycles (P=0.005) and lack of complete gross resection (P<0.001) were the only variables predictive of worse progression-free survival.DiscussionDelays from neoadjuvant chemotherapy to interval debulking were not associated with worse overall survival after adjustment for age, stage, and complete gross resection.

scholarly journals Comparison of the survival outcomes of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in treatment of early-stage ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Qingduo Kong ◽  
Hongyi Wei ◽  
Jing Zhang ◽  
Yilin Li ◽  
Yongjun Wang
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Review Manager ◽  
Early Stage Ovarian Cancer

Abstract Background Laparoscopy has been widely used for patients with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (eEOC). However, there is limited evidence regarding whether survival outcomes of laparoscopy are equivalent to those of laparotomy among patients with eEOC. The result of survival outcomes of laparoscopy is still controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis is to analyze the survival outcomes of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in the treatment of eEOC. Methods According to the keywords, Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched for studies from January 1994 to January 2021. Studies comparing the efficacy and safety of laparoscopy versus laparotomy for patients with eEOC were assessed for eligibility. Only studies including outcomes of overall survival (OS) were enrolled. The meta-analysis was performed using Stata software (Version 12.0) and Review Manager (Version 5.2). Results A total of 6 retrospective non-random studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results indicated that there was no difference between two approaches for patients with eEOC in OS (HR = 0.6, P = 0.446), progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.6, P = 0.137) and upstaging rate (OR = 1.18, P = 0.54). But the recurrence rate of laparoscopic surgery was lower than that of laparotomic surgery (OR = 0.48, P = 0.008). Conclusions Laparoscopy and laparotomy appear to provide comparable overall survival and progression-free survival outcomes for patients with eEOC. Further high-quality studies are needed to enhance this statement.

Prognostic Relevance of Celiac Lymph Node Involvement in Ovarian Cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alejandra Martínez ◽  
Cristophe Pomel ◽  
Thomas Filleron ◽  
Marjolein De Cuypere ◽  
Eliane Mery ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Oncologic Outcome ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Disease Spread ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Increased Risk

ObjectiveThe aim of the study was to report on the oncologic outcome of the disease spread to celiac lymph nodes (CLNs) in advanced-stage ovarian cancer patients.MethodsAll patients who had CLN resection as part of their cytoreductive surgery for epithelial ovarian, fallopian, or primary peritoneal cancer were identified. Patient demographic data with particular emphasis on operative records to detail the extent and distribution of the disease spread, lymphadenectomy procedures, pathologic data, and follow-up data were included.ResultsThe median follow-up was 26.3 months. The median overall survival values in the group with positive CLNs and in the group with negative CLNs were 26.9 months and 40.04 months, respectively. The median progression-free survival values in the group with metastatic CLNs and in the group with negative CLNs were 8.8 months and 20.24 months, respectively (P = 0.053). Positive CLNs were associated with progression during or within 6 months after the completion of chemotherapy (P = 0.0044). Tumor burden and extensive disease distribution were significantly associated with poor progression-free survival, short-term progression, and overall survival. In multivariate analysis, only the CLN status was independently associated with short-term progression.ConclusionsDisease in the CLN is a marker of disease severity, which is associated to a high-risk group of patients with presumed adverse tumor biology, increased risk of lymph node progression, and worst oncologic outcome.

G-8 Geriatric Screening Tool Independently Predicts Progression-Free Survival in Older Ovarian Cancer Patients Irrespective of Maximal Surgical Effort: Results of a Retrospective Cohort Study

Gerontology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Katharina Anic ◽  
Sophie Birkert ◽  
Mona Wanda Schmidt ◽  
Valerie Catherine Linz ◽  
Anne-Sophie Heimes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Global Health ◽  
Screening Tool ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Geriatric Screening ◽  
The Impact

<b><i>Background:</i></b> We evaluated the prognostic impact of various global health assessment tools in patients older than 60 years with ovarian cancer (OC). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> G-8 geriatric screening tool (G-8 score), Lee Schonberg prognostic index, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) were determined retrospectively in a consecutive cohort of elderly patients with OC. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses and Kaplan-Meier method were performed to analyze the impact of the preoperative global health status on survival. <b><i>Results:</i></b> 116 patients entered the study. In multivariate analysis adjusted for clinical-pathological factors, only the G-8 score retained significance as a prognostic parameter of progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.970; 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.056–3.677]; <i>p</i> = 0.033). Fifty-six patients were classified as G-8-nonfrail with an increased PFS compared to 50 G-8-frail patients (53.4% vs. 16.7%; <i>p</i> = 0.010). A higher CCI was associated with decreased PFS (45.1% vs. 22.2%; <i>p</i> = 0.012), but it did not influence the risk of recurrences or death (<i>p</i> = 0.360; <i>p</i> = 0.111). The Lee Schonberg prognostic index, the ECOG, and age were not associated with survival. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The G-8 score independently predicted PFS in elderly OC patients regardless of maximal surgical effort. Thus, it could be useful to assess surgical treatment based on frailty rather than age alone.

scholarly journals Correlation of PKM2 and CD44 Protein Expression with Poor Prognosis in Platinum-Treated Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Retrospective Study

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 1013
Author(s):  
Chara Papadaki ◽  
Stavroula Manolakou ◽  
Eleni Lagoudaki ◽  
Spyros Pontikakis ◽  
Despo Ierodiakonou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Protein Expression ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Protein Levels ◽  
Low Expression

CD44, a surface marker for cancer stem cells, interacts with PKM2, a key regulator of aerobic glycolysis, and enhances the glycolytic phenotype of cancer cells leading to antioxidant protection and macromolecules’ synthesis. To clarify the clinical importance of this “cross-talk” as a mechanism of drug resistance, we assessed the expression both of PKM2 and of CD44 in cancer cells of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) treated with platinum-based treatment. One hundred and seventy-one patients with EOC were assessed for PKM2mRNA expression and PKM2 and CD44 proteins detection. Associations with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed with Kaplan–Meier and adjusted Cox regression models. PKM2mRNA and protein as well as CD44 protein were detectable in the majority of patients. Positive correlation between PKM2 and CD44 protein expression was observed (Spearman rho = 0.2, p = 0.015). When we used the median to group patients into high versus low expression, high PKM2mRNA and protein levels were significantly associated with lower progression-free survival (PFS; p = 0.003 and p = 0.002, respectively) and shorter overall survival (OS; p ≤ 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). However, high CD44 protein expression was significantly correlated only with shorter OS (p = 0.004). Moreover, patients with both high PKM2 and CD44 protein levels experienced shorter PFS and OS (p = 0.007 and p = 0.003, respectively) compared to patients with low expression of both proteins. Finally, higher PKM2mRNA and protein expression as well as CD44 protein expression (HR: 2.16; HR: 1.82; HR: 1.01, respectively) were independent prognostic factors for decreased median OS (mOS), whereas only PKM2 protein expression (HR: 1.95) was an independent prognostic factor for decreased median PFS (mPFS). In conclusion, PKM2 expression is a negative prognostic factor in EOC patients, but the interaction between CD44 and PKM2 that may be implicated in EOC platinum-resistance needs further investigation.

Does endometriosis have an effect on the survival of women with synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer?

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 185-193
Author(s):  
Engin Celik ◽  
Hale Goksever Celik ◽  
Hamdullah Sozen ◽  
Semen Onder ◽  
Merve Baktiroglu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Detrimental Effect ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Pathological Characteristics

Purpose: Synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer is defined as the concurrent presence of ovarian cancer with endometrial cancer. We aimed to evaluate whether there is an effect of endometriosis on progression-free survival and overall survival of women with synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer. We also compared these findings with the patients having endometrial-only tumors and ovarian-only tumors. Methods: The patients who underwent surgery for endometrioid or clear-cell endometrial-only tumors and/or ovarian-only tumors and synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer between 2005 and 2016 were included in this cohort study. The effect of the presence of endometriosis on progression-free survival and overall survival in these women who met the criteria was determined using statistical methods. Women were also compared regarding their demographic, clinical, and pathological characteristics. Results: A total of 176 patients were included in this study. All histology types of tumors located in endometrium or ovary were endometrioid or clear-cell cancer. Endometriosis was present in 62 patients (35.2%), whereas adenomyosis was present in 44 patients (25%). Endometriosis was diagnosed more frequently in women with ovarian-only tumors and synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer than those with endometrial-only tumors (59.2% vs 5.7%, p < 0.001 and 45.7% vs 5.7%, p < 0.001, respectively). The patients with endometriosis showed no significantly longer progression-free survival and overall survival (hazard ratio = 1.70; 95% confidence interval = 0.48–6.03; p = 0.408 and hazard ratio = 1.67; 95% confidence interval = 0.30–9.44; p = 0.562, respectively). The presence of endometriosis was a stronger predictor for progression-free survival and overall survival comparing with the presence of adenomyosis. Conclusion: The women with synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer should be informed that endometriosis has no detrimental effect on progression-free survival and overall survival.

scholarly journals A descriptive report of outcomes of primary mucinous ovarian cancer patients receiving either an adjuvant gynecologic or gastrointestinal chemotherapy regimen

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 904-909
Author(s):  
Brooke A Schlappe ◽  
Qin C Zhou ◽  
Roisin O'Cearbhaill ◽  
Alexia Iasonos ◽  
Robert A Soslow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Clinical Criteria ◽  
Kaplan Meier

ObjectiveWe described progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with primary mucinous ovarian cancer receiving adjuvant gynecologic versus gastrointestinal chemotherapy regimens.MethodsWe identified all primary mucinous ovarian cancer patients receiving adjuvant gynecologic or gastrointestinal chemotherapy regimens at a single institution from 1994 to 2016. Gynecologic pathologists using strict pathologic/clinical criteria determined diagnosis. Adjuvant therapy was coded as gynecologic or gastrointestinal based on standard agents and schedules. Clinical/pathologic/treatment characteristics were recorded. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for continuous variables, and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. Progression-free and overall survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, applying landmark analysis.ResultsOf 62 patients identified, 21 received adjuvant chemotherapy: 12 gynecologic, 9 gastrointestinal. Median age (in years) at diagnosis: 58 (range 25–68) gynecologic cohort, 38 (range 32–68) gastrointestinal cohort (p=0.13). Median body mass index at first post-operative visit: 25 kg/m2(range 18–31) gynecologic cohort, 23 kg/m2(range 18–31) gastrointestinal cohort (p=0.23). History of smoking: 6/12 (50%) gynecologic cohort, 3/9 (33%) gastrointestinal cohort (p=0.66). Stage distribution in gynecologic and gastrointestinal cohorts, respectively: stage I: 9/12 (75%) and 3/9 (33%); stage II: 2/12 (17%) and 1/9 (11%); stage III: 1/12 (8%) and 5/9 (56%) (p=0.06). Grade distribution in gynecologic and gastrointestinal cohorts, respectively: grade 1: 8/12 (67%) and 1/9 (13%); grade 2/3: 4/12 (33%) and 7/9 (88%) (p=0.03). Three-year progression-free survival: 90.9% (95% CI 50.8% to 98.7 %) gynecologic, 53.3% (95% CI 17.7% to 79.6%) gastrointestinal. Three-year overall survival: 90.9% (95% CI 50.8% to 98.7%) gynecologic, 76.2% (95% CI 33.2% to 93.5%) gastrointestinal.ConclusionOngoing international collaborative research may further define associations between chemotherapy regimens and survival.

Ovarian Cancer: Sites of Recurrence

2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (9) ◽  
pp. 1590-1596 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pascale Amate ◽  
Cyrille Huchon ◽  
Anne Lucie Dessapt ◽  
Chérazade Bensaid ◽  
Jacques Medioni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
International Federation ◽  
Peritoneal Recurrence ◽  
Disease Spread ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Tertiary Teaching ◽  
The Impact

IntroductionImproved knowledge of recurrence sites after contemporary surgical management of ovarian cancer is needed.Material and MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients managed for epithelial ovarian or tubal cancer with surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2009, in a tertiary teaching hospital. The site of first recurrence was recorded. Univariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with site-specific recurrence. Overall survival and progression-free survival were computed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and log-rank tests were performed to assess the impact on survival of the variables of interest.ResultsRecurrences were noted in 3 (20%) of 15 International Federation of Gynecologists and Obstetricians stage I to IIa patients and 36 (62.1%) of 58 International Federation of Gynecologists and Obstetricians IIb to IV patients, and the median progression-free survival was 21.6 (2.5–71) and 19.3 (1.8–67.6) months, respectively. In the advanced-disease group, 75% of recurrences involved the peritoneum and 40% were confined to the peritoneum; peritoneal recurrences developed at both treated and untreated sites. Peritoneal recurrence was associated with greater initial peritoneal involvement (Sugarbaker score, 12.1 ± 8.2 vs 7.1 ± 7.4; P = 0.01) and residual postoperative tumor. Nodal recurrences were noted in 38% of all recurrences, usually in combination with peritoneal recurrence and in the abdominal territories. Isolated distant metastasis was a rare mode of recurrence (8%).ConclusionsThe peritoneum is the main recurrence site in both early and advanced ovarian cancer. Initial disease spread and extent of surgery are associated with the recurrence risk. This article supports the view that more attention should be directed toward extensive treatment of the peritoneum.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document