Automatic Medical Robot

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (VI) ◽  
pp. 3162-3166
Author(s):  
Prof. Shefali V. Kamble
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Disease ◽  
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Work Load ◽  
Respiratory Pathogen ◽  
Hospital Treatment ◽  
Oxygen Level ◽  
Medical Robot ◽  
Seriously Ill

The COVID-19 is the infectious disease caused by the coronavirus which is a respiratory pathogen. Most people (about 80%) recover from the disease without needing hospital treatment. About 20% of those who get COVID-19 become seriously ill and require oxygen, with 5% becoming critically ill and needing intensive care. Complications leading to death may include respiratory failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), etc. To have a solution on this we are getting treatment from doctors, nurses and they are doing their best. But sometimes this is causing problem as they cannot give attention to each and every patient because of work load. On this situation. To help society, to help people we have a product which we can use as an attendee to the patient. This product can help patient to get his/her medications and syrups on time and majorly helps to the Covid-19 suffering patient to control patient’s oxygen level.

scholarly journals Clinical efficacy of hydroxychloroquine in patients with covid-19 pneumonia who require oxygen: observational comparative study using routine care data

BMJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. m1844 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthieu Mahévas ◽  
Viet-Thi Tran ◽  
Mathilde Roumier ◽  
Amélie Chabrol ◽  
Romain Paule ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Treatment Group ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Routine Care ◽  
Hospital Treatment ◽  
Control Group

Abstract Objective To assess the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine in patients admitted to hospital with coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19) pneumonia who require oxygen. Design Comparative observational study using data collected from routine care. Setting Four French tertiary care centres providing care to patients with covid-19 pneumonia between 12 March and 31 March 2020. Participants 181 patients aged 18-80 years with documented severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pneumonia who required oxygen but not intensive care. Interventions Hydroxychloroquine at a dose of 600 mg/day within 48 hours of admission to hospital (treatment group) versus standard care without hydroxychloroquine (control group). Main outcome measures The primary outcome was survival without transfer to the intensive care unit at day 21. Secondary outcomes were overall survival, survival without acute respiratory distress syndrome, weaning from oxygen, and discharge from hospital to home or rehabilitation (all at day 21). Analyses were adjusted for confounding factors by inverse probability of treatment weighting. Results In the main analysis, 84 patients who received hydroxychloroquine within 48 hours of admission to hospital (treatment group) were compared with 89 patients who did not receive hydroxychloroquine (control group). Eight additional patients received hydroxychloroquine more than 48 hours after admission. In the weighted analyses, the survival rate without transfer to the intensive care unit at day 21 was 76% in the treatment group and 75% in the control group (weighted hazard ratio 0.9, 95% confidence interval 0.4 to 2.1). Overall survival at day 21 was 89% in the treatment group and 91% in the control group (1.2, 0.4 to 3.3). Survival without acute respiratory distress syndrome at day 21 was 69% in the treatment group compared with 74% in the control group (1.3, 0.7 to 2.6). At day 21, 82% of patients in the treatment group had been weaned from oxygen compared with 76% in the control group (weighted risk ratio 1.1, 95% confidence interval 0.9 to 1.3). Eight patients in the treatment group (10%) experienced electrocardiographic modifications that required discontinuation of treatment. Conclusions Hydroxychloroquine has received worldwide attention as a potential treatment for covid-19 because of positive results from small studies. However, the results of this study do not support its use in patients admitted to hospital with covid-19 who require oxygen.

scholarly journals Cardiac biomarkers in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dilip Jayasimhan ◽  
Simon Foster ◽  
Catherina L. Chang ◽  
Robert J. Hancox
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Cardiac Dysfunction ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Troponin I ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cardiac Injury ◽  
Cardiac Biomarkers ◽  
Risk Of Death

Abstract Background Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the intensive care unit. Biochemical markers of cardiac dysfunction are associated with high mortality in many respiratory conditions. The aim of this systematic review is to examine the link between elevated biomarkers of cardiac dysfunction in ARDS and mortality. Methods A systematic review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and CENTRAL databases was performed. We included studies of adult intensive care patients with ARDS that reported the risk of death in relation to a measured biomarker of cardiac dysfunction. The primary outcome of interest was mortality up to 60 days. A random-effects model was used for pooled estimates. Funnel-plot inspection was done to evaluate publication bias; Cochrane chi-square tests and I2 tests were used to assess heterogeneity. Results Twenty-two studies were included in the systematic review and 18 in the meta-analysis. Biomarkers of cardiac stretch included NT-ProBNP (nine studies) and BNP (six studies). Biomarkers of cardiac injury included Troponin-T (two studies), Troponin-I (one study) and High-Sensitivity-Troponin-I (three studies). Three studies assessed multiple cardiac biomarkers. High levels of NT-proBNP and BNP were associated with a higher risk of death up to 60 days (unadjusted OR 8.98; CI 4.15-19.43; p<0.00001). This association persisted after adjustment for age and illness severity. Biomarkers of cardiac injury were also associated with higher mortality, but this association was not statistically significant (unadjusted OR 2.21; CI 0.94-5.16; p= 0.07). Conclusion Biomarkers of cardiac stretch are associated with increased mortality in ARDS.

scholarly journals Collective aeromedical evacuations of SARS-CoV-2-related ARDS patients in a military tactical plane: a retrospective descriptive study

2021 ◽  
pp. bmjmilitary-2021-001876
Author(s):  
Thibault Martinez ◽  
K Simon ◽  
L Lely ◽  
C Nguyen Dac ◽  
M Lefevre ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Selection Criteria ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Descriptive Study ◽  
Military Aircraft ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
The Military

After the appearance of the COVID-19 pandemic in France, MEROPE system was created to transform the military tactical ATLAS A400M aircraft into a flying intensive care unit. Collective aeromedical evacuations (aero-MEDEVAC) of patients suffering from SARS-CoV-2-related acute respiratory distress syndrome was performed from June to December 2020. A total of 22 patients were transported during seven missions. All aero-MEDEVAC was performed in safe conditions for patients and crew. No life-threatening conditions occurred during flight. Biohazard controls were applied according to French guidelines and prevented crew contamination. Thanks to rigorous selection criteria and continuous in-flight medical care, the safe transportation of these patients was possible. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first description of collective aero-MEDEVAC of these kinds of patients using a tactical military aircraft. We here describe the patient’s characteristics and the flight’s challenges.

Nursing Management of Prone Positioning in Patients With COVID-19

2020 ◽  
pp. e1-e9
Author(s):  
Filippo Binda ◽  
Federica Marelli ◽  
Alessandro Galazzi ◽  
Riccardo Pascuzzo ◽  
Ileana Adamini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Rescue Therapy ◽  
Prone Positioning ◽  
Improvement Project

Background At the height of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, Italy had the highest number of deaths in Europe; most occurred in the Lombardy region. Up to 4% of patients with COVID-19 required admission to an intensive care unit because they developed a critical illness (eg, acute respiratory distress syndrome). Numerous patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome who had been admitted to the intensive care unit required rescue therapy like prone positioning. Objectives To describe the respiratory management of and the extensive use of prone positioning in patients with COVID-19 at the intensive care unit hub in Lombardy, Italy. Methods A total of 89 patients (67% male; median age, 59 years [range, 23-80 years]) with confirmed COVID-19 who were admitted between February 23 and March 31, 2020, were enrolled in this quality improvement project. Results Endotracheal intubation was required in 86 patients (97%). Prone positioning was used as rescue therapy in 43 (48%) patients. Significantly more younger patients (age ≤ 59 years) were discharged alive (43 of 48 [90%]) than were older patients (age ≥ 60 years; 26 of 41 [63%]; P &lt; .005). Among the 43 patients treated with prone ventilation, 15 (35% [95% CI, 21%-51%]) died in the intensive care unit, of which 10 (67%; P &lt; .001) were older patients. Conclusions Prone positioning is one strategy available for treating acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with COVID-19. During this pandemic, prone positioning can be used extensively as rescue therapy, per a specific protocol, in intensive care units.

scholarly journals Challenges in the delivery of critical care in India during the COVID-19 pandemic

2020 ◽  
pp. 175114372095259
Author(s):  
Bharath Kumar Tirupakuzhi Vijayaraghavan ◽  
Sheila Nainan Myatra ◽  
Meghena Mathew ◽  
Nirmalyo Lodh ◽  
Jigeeshu Vasishtha Divatia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Respiratory Tract ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Upper Respiratory Tract ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Upper Respiratory

Coronavirus disease 2019 cases in India continue to increase and are expected to peak over the next few weeks. Based on some projection models, India is expected to have more than 10 million cases by September 2020. The spectrum of disease can vary from mild upper respiratory tract symptoms to life-threatening acute respiratory distress syndrome and multi-organ failure requiring intensive care. Even if less than 5% of patients require critical care services, this will still rapidly overwhelm the healthcare system in a country, where intensive care services and resources are scarce and unevenly distributed. In this perspective article, we highlight the critical care preparedness of India for the pandemic and the associated challenges.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document