scholarly journals Vaping and subsequent comorbidities potentially associated with increased mortality and more severe illness in COVID-19: a narrative review

2021 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cigarette Smoking ◽  
Health Risks ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Severe Illness ◽  
Protective Effects ◽  
Cigarette Use

Introduction: COVID-19 (or COVID) is a highly virulent viral disease which more frequently presents severe infection in specific populations, such as the elderly, patients with hypertension, patients with respiratory disease, and patients who smoke. The effects vaping (i.e., an electronic cigarette or JUUL device) has on COVID progression remains unclear, because there is an information paucity correlating e-cigarette use and COVID. This review sought to identify links between vape use and COVID severity via literature review. Additionally, because there is more widespread information about cigarette smoking than about vaping, this review sought to illustrate commonalities between smoking and vaping. If smoking and vaping are deemed near-identical practices, then it is possible the effects of smoking on human health and on COVID disease could be comparable in vaping. Methods: Several searches were performed on PubMed with MeSH headings and JSTOR between 17 December 2020 and 22 December 2020. Search results were excluded if they were not trials or controlled clinical trials, if the articles were not about COVID, if the articles were about smoking behaviors or habits, or if the articles were not related to vaping or smoking. Key findings were summarized and tabled based on relevance, substantiability, and applicability to COVID. Results: Multiple sources viewed smoking and vaping as equal risk factors for COVID disease, whereas other sources viewed the two as unique risk factors. Because of this controversy, it is challenging to view the two practices as similar enough to pose equivalent risks for COVID. Both practices pose significant health risks to its users, but these health risks are unique to each practice. Discussion: There are several limitations which exacerbate ambiguity—(1) it is unclear how harmful smoking is for COVID patients, because several publications found smoking may have protective effects; (2) few older patients vape, but yet most severe COVID cases occur in older populations; (3) older patients and impoverished patients show a statistically significant risk for severe COVID disease independent of other factors; (4) vaping is a relatively new practice, and there are few patients who self-report long-term e-cigarette use or long-term adverse effects as a result thereof. Conclusion: Although vaping may present serious health risks, clinically, it is uncertain how significantly vaping affects COVID disease, especially when compared against cigarette smoking. More research is needed on both the effects of vaping on COVID and the likeness of vaping versus smoking.

scholarly journals 699 Sleep Health Traits and COVID-19: Mortality Risk from the UK Biobank

SLEEP ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 44 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. A273-A273
Author(s):  
Xi Zheng ◽  
Ma Cherrysse Ulsa ◽  
Peng Li ◽  
Lei Gao ◽  
Kun Hu
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Sleep Apnea ◽  
Sleep Duration ◽  
Sex Education ◽  
Mortality Risk ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Severe Illness ◽  
Uk Biobank ◽  
Sleep Health ◽  
The Uk

Abstract Introduction While there is emerging evidence for acute sleep disruption in the aftermath of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), it is unknown whether sleep traits contribute to mortality risk. In this study, we tested whether earlier-life sleep duration, chronotype, insomnia, napping or sleep apnea were associated with increased 30-day COVID-19 mortality. Methods We included 34,711 participants from the UK Biobank, who presented for COVID-19 testing between March and October 2020 (mean age at diagnosis: 69.4±8.3; range 50.2–84.6). Self-reported sleep duration (less than 6h/6-9h/more than 9h), chronotype (“morning”/”intermediate”/”evening”), daytime dozing (often/rarely), insomnia (often/rarely), napping (often/rarely) and presence of sleep apnea (ICD-10 or self-report) were obtained between 2006 and 2010. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to adjust for age, sex, education, socioeconomic status, and relevant risk factors (BMI, hypertension, diabetes, respiratory diseases, smoking, and alcohol). Results The mean time between sleep measures and COVID-19 testing was 11.6±0.9 years. Overall, 5,066 (14.6%) were positive. In those who were positive, 355 (7.0%) died within 30 days (median = 8) after diagnosis. Long sleepers (>9h vs. 6-9h) [20/103 (19.4%) vs. 300/4,573 (6.6%); OR 2.09, 95% 1.19–3.64, p=0.009), often daytime dozers (OR 1.68, 95% 1.04–2.72, p=0.03), and nappers (OR 1.52, 95% 1.04–2.23, p=0.03) were at greater odds of mortality. Prior diagnosis of sleep apnea also saw a two-fold increased odds (OR 2.07, 95% CI: 1.25–3.44 p=0.005). No associations were seen for short sleepers, chronotype or insomnia with COVID-19 mortality. Conclusion Data across all current waves of infection show that prior sleep traits/disturbances, in particular long sleep duration, daytime dozing, napping and sleep apnea, are associated with increased 30-day mortality after COVID-19, independent of health-related risk factors. While sleep health traits may reflect unmeasured poor health, further work is warranted to examine the exact underlying mechanisms, and to test whether sleep health optimization offers resilience to severe illness from COVID-19. Support (if any) NIH [T32GM007592 and R03AG067985 to L.G. RF1AG059867, RF1AG064312, to K.H.], the BrightFocus Foundation A2020886S to P.L. and the Foundation of Anesthesia Education and Research MRTG-02-15-2020 to L.G.

scholarly journals Long-term survival after Carpentier-Edwards Perimount aortic valve replacement in Western Denmark: a multi-centre observational study

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lytfi Krasniqi ◽  
Mads P. Kronby ◽  
Lars P. S. Riber
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Valve Prosthesis ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Background This study describes the long-term survival, risk of reoperation and clinical outcomes of patients undergoing solitary surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with a Carpentier-Edwards Perimount (CE-P) bioprosthetic in Western Denmark. The renewed interest in SAVR is based on the questioning regarding the long-term survival since new aortic replacement technique such as transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR) probably have shorter durability, why assessment of long-term survival could be a key issue for patients. Methods From November 1999 to November 2013 a cohort of a total of 1604 patients with a median age of 73 years (IQR: 69–78) undergoing solitary SAVR with CE-P in Western Denmark was obtained November 2018 from the Western Danish Heart Registry (WDHR). The primary endpoint was long-term survival from all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints were survival free from major adverse cardiovascular and cerebral events (MACCE), risk of reoperation, cause of late death, patient-prothesis mismatch, risk of AMI, stroke, pacemaker or ICD implantation and postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF). Time-to-event analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meier curve, cumulative incidence function was performed with Nelson-Aalen cumulative hazard estimates. Cox regression was applied to detect risk factors for death and reoperation. Results In-hospital mortality was 2.7% and 30-day mortality at 3.4%. The 5-, 10- and 15-year survival from all-cause mortality was 77, 52 and 24%, respectively. Survival without MACCE was 80% after 10 years. Significant risk factors of mortality were small valves, smoking and EuroSCORE II ≥4%. The risk of reoperation was < 5% after 7.5 years and significant risk factors were valve prosthesis-patient mismatch and EuroSCORE II ≥4%. Conclusions Patients undergoing aortic valve replacement with a Carpentier-Edwards Perimount valve shows a very satisfying long-term survival. Future research should aim to investigate biological valves long-term durability for comparison of different SAVR to different TAVR in long perspective.

scholarly journals When Scarcity Meets Disparity: “Resources Allocation and COVID-19 Patients with Diabetes”

2021 ◽  
pp. 193229682199111
Author(s):  
Jacob M. Appel
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Resource Allocation ◽  
Life Expectancy ◽  
Ethical Challenge ◽  
Severe Illness ◽  
Resources Allocation ◽  
Economic Disparity ◽  
Patients With Diabetes ◽  
Current Stage

The COVID-19 pandemic raised distinct challenges in the field of scarce resource allocation, a long-standing area of inquiry in the field of bioethics. Policymakers and states developed crisis guidelines for ventilator triage that incorporated such factors as immediate prognosis, long-term life expectancy, and current stage of life. Often these depend upon existing risk factors for severe illness, including diabetes. However, these algorithms generally failed to account for the underlying structural biases, including systematic racism and economic disparity, that rendered some patients more vulnerable to these conditions. This paper discusses this unique ethical challenge in resource allocation through the lens of care for patients with severe COVID-19 and diabetes.

scholarly journals Risk Factors for Bullying Victimization in Children with Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1)

Children ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 145
Author(s):  
Peter L. Stavinoha ◽  
Cody Solesbee ◽  
Susan M. Swearer ◽  
Steven Svoboda ◽  
Laura J. Klesse ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Neurofibromatosis Type 1 ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Significant Risk Factor ◽  
Neurofibromatosis Type ◽  
Parent Report ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Bullying Victimization ◽  
Adhd Symptoms

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is an autosomal disorder associated with numerous physical stigmata. Children with NF1 are at known risk for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), academic struggles, and significant social difficulties and adverse social outcomes, including bullying victimization. The primary aim of this study was to identify risk factors associated with bullying victimization in children with NF1 to better inform clinicians regarding targets for prevention and clinical intervention. Children and a parent completed questionnaires assessing the bully victim status, and parents completed a measure of ADHD symptoms. Analyses were completed separately for parent-reported victimization of the child and the child’s self-report of victimization. According to the parent report, results suggest ADHD symptoms are a significant risk factor for these children being a target of bullying. Findings for academic disability were not conclusive, nor were findings related to having a parent with NF1. Findings indicate the need for further research into possible risk factors for social victimization in children with NF1. Results provide preliminary evidence that may guide clinicians working with children with NF1 and their parents in identifying higher-risk profiles that may warrant earlier and more intensive intervention to mitigate later risk for bullying victimization.

scholarly journals E-cigarettes: no smoke without fire?

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Daniels ◽  
C. Cosma ◽  
A. Llewellyn ◽  
D. Banks ◽  
H. Morris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cigarette Smoking ◽  
National Health ◽  
Working Party ◽  
Cigarette Use ◽  
Dual Use ◽  
Common View ◽  
Potential Impact ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Relapse Rates

Abstract Smoking was one of the biggest preventable killers of the 20th century, and it continues to cause the death of millions across the globe. The rapid growth of the e-cigarette market in the last 10 years and the claims that it is a safer form of smoking, and can help with smoking cessation, have led to questions being raised on their possible impact to society, the health of the population and the insurance industry. Recent media attention around the possible health implications of e-cigarette use has also ensured that this topic remains in the public eye. The e-cigarette working party was initiated by the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries’ Health and Care Research Sub-Committee in July 2016, with the primary objective of understanding the impact of e-cigarettes on life and health insurance. In this paper, we have looked at all areas of e-cigarette usage and how it relates to insurance in the UK market. In particular, we have covered the potential risks and benefits of switching to e-cigarettes, the results of studies that have been published, the potential impact on underwriting and claims processes and the potential impact on pricing (based on what modelling is possible with the data available). Research in this area is still in its infancy and data are not yet mature, which makes predicting the long-term impact of e-cigarette smoking extremely challenging, for example, there are no studies that directly measure the mortality or morbidity impact of long-term e-cigarette use and so we have had to consider studies that consider more immediate health impacts or look more simply at the constituents of the output of an e-cigarette and compare them to that of a cigarette. The data issue is further compounded by the findings of studies and the advice of national health authorities often being conflicting. For example, while National Health Service England has publicly stated that it supports the growth of e-cigarette usage as an aid to reduce traditional smoking behaviour, the US Food and Drug Administration has been much more vocal in highlighting the perceived dangers of this new form of smoking. Users’ behaviour also adds complexity, as dual use (using both e-cigarettes and cigarettes) is seen in a high percentage of users and relapse rates back to cigarette smoking are currently unknown. Having talked to a number of experts in the field, we have discovered that there is certainly not a common view on risk. We have heard from experts who have significant concerns but also to experts who do believe that e-cigarettes are far safer than tobacco. We have purposefully considered conflicting evidence and have consulted with various parties so we can present differing points of view, thereby ensuring a balanced, unbiased and fair picture of our findings is presented. The evidence we have reviewed does suggest that e-cigarettes are a safer alternative to traditional smoking, but not as safe as non-smoking. There are no large, peer-reviewed, long-term studies yet available to understand the true impact of a switch to e-cigarette use, so currently we are unable to say where on the risk spectrum between cigarette smoking and life-time non-smoking it lies. We do not yet understand if the benefits seen in the studies completed so far will reduce the risk in the long term or whether other health risks will come to light following more prolonged use and study. This, coupled with concerns with the high proportion of dual use of cigarettes and e-cigarettes, relapse rates and the recent growth in medical problems linked with e-cigarette use, means that we need to wait for experience to emerge fully before firm conclusions can be drawn. Although we have presented a view, it is vitally important that our industry continues to monitor developments in this area and fully considers what next steps and future actions may be required to ensure our position reflects the potential benefits and risks that e-cigarette use may bring. We feel that the time is right for a body such as the IFoA to analyse the feasibility of collecting the necessary data through the Continuous Mortality Investigation that would allow us to better analyse the experience that is emerging.

scholarly journals Associations Between Peer Use, Costs and Benefits, Self-Efficacy, and Adolescent E-cigarette Use

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristine Durkin ◽  
Desireé N Williford ◽  
Nicholas A Turiano ◽  
Melissa D Blank ◽  
Paul T Enlow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cigarette Smoking ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Adolescent Medicine ◽  
Public High Schools ◽  
Cigarette Use ◽  
Costs And Benefits ◽  
Tailored Interventions ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Peer Use

Abstract Objective Prior research identified peer use as a salient risk factor of adolescent electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use, but has not expanded on the mechanisms of this association. Methods Participants were 562 adolescents recruited from rural and suburban public high schools and an adolescent medicine clinic in the mid-Atlantic United States. Participants completed a packet of questionnaires that assessed demographics, substance use, expectations about the consequences of e-cigarette use, and perceptions of their own self-efficacy to resist using e-cigarettes. We estimated a series of mediation models using the MODEL INDIRECT command in MPLUS statistical software. In all models, significance of indirect effects from peer e-cigarette use to self-reported e-cigarette use were tested via two variables: (a) expected costs, (b) benefits of e-cigarette use, and (c) the perceived self-efficacy of the individual to refrain from e-cigarette use. Results Adolescents with more peers using e-cigarettes were more likely to have ever used an e-cigarette and perceived greater benefits and fewer costs, which was associated with a reduced self-efficacy to refrain from e-cigarette smoking (Model 1). Those with more peers using e-cigarettes were more likely to be currently using e-cigarettes themselves because they perceived greater benefits and fewer costs, which was associated with a reduced self-efficacy to refrain from e-cigarette smoking (Model 2). Conclusion Peer use, self-efficacy to resist use, and expectations of cost and benefits of e-cigarette use should be considered as possible targets when devising tailored interventions and policies to prevent or reduce negative health consequences of long-term e-cigarette use.

Long Term Follow-Up of Pediatric Sickle Cell Disease Patients with Conditional Velocities on Transcranial Doppler (TCD).

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 2338-2338
Author(s):  
Lena Coïc ◽  
Suzanne Verlhac ◽  
Emmanuelle Lesprit ◽  
Emmanuelle Fleurence ◽  
Francoise Bernaudin
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Color Doppler ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Biological Data ◽  
Treatment Intensification ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Abnormal TCD defined as high mean maximum velocities &gt; 200 cm/sec are highly predictive of stroke risk and justify long term transfusion program. Outcome and risk factors of conditional TCD defined as velocities 170–200 cm/sec remains to be described. Patients and methods Since 1992, 371 pediatric SCD patients (303 SS, 44 SC, 18 Sß+, 6 Sß0) were systematically explored once a year by TCD. The newborn screened cohort (n=174) had the first TCD exploration between 12 and 18 months of age. TCD was performed with a real-time imaging unit, using a 2 MHz sector transducer with color Doppler capabilities. Biological data were assessed at baseline, after the age of 1.5 years and remotely of transfusion or VOC. We report the characteristics and the outcome in patients (n=43) with an history of conditional TCD defined by mean maximum velocities ranging between 170 and 200 cm/s in the ACM, the ACA or the ICA. Results: The mean follow-up of TCD monitoring was 5,5 years (0 – 11,8 y). All patients with an history of conditional doppler were SS/Sb0 (n=43). Mean (SD) age of patients at the time of their first conditional TCD was 4.3 years (2.2) whereas in our series the mean age at abnormal TCD (&gt; 200 cm/sec) occurrence was 6.6 years (3.2). Comparison of basal parameters showed highly significant differences between patients with conditional TCD and those with normal TCD: Hb 7g4 vs 8g5 (p&lt;0.001), MCV 82.8 vs 79 (p=0.047). We also had found such differences between patients with normal and those with abnormal TCD (Hb and MCV p&lt; 0.001). Two patients were lost of follow-up. Two patients died during a trip to Africa. Conditional TCD became abnormal in 11/43 patients and justified transfusion program. Mean (SD) conversion delay was 1.8 (2.0) years (range 0.5–7y). No stroke occurred. 16 patients required a treatment intensification for other indications (frequent VOC/ACS, splenic sequestrations): 6 were transplanted and 10 received HU or TP. Significant risk factors (Pearson) of conversion to abnormal were the age at time of conditional TCD occurrence &lt; 3 y (p&lt;0.001), baseline Hb &lt; 7g/dl (p=0.02) and MCV &gt; 80 (p=0.04). MRI/MRA was performed in 31/43 patients and showed ischemic lesions in 5 of them at the mean (SD) age of 7.1 y (1.8) (range 4.5–8.9): no significant difference was observed in the occurrence of lesions between the 2 groups. Conclusions This study confirms the importance of age as predictive factor of conditional to abnormal TCD conversion with a risk of 64% when first conditional TCD occured before the age of 3 years. TCD has to be frequently controled during the 5 first years of life.

scholarly journals Long-term Functional Outcomes and Predictors of Shunt-Dependent Hydrocephalus After Treatment of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms in the BRAT Trial

Neurosurgery ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 76 (5) ◽  
pp. 608-615 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hasan A. Zaidi ◽  
Andrew Montoure ◽  
Ali Elhadi ◽  
Peter Nakaji ◽  
Cameron G. McDougall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Intraventricular Hemorrhage ◽  
Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Intraparenchymal Hemorrhage ◽  
Fisher Grade ◽  
Shunt Dependency

Abstract BACKGROUND: Acute hydrocephalus is a well-known sequela of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Controversy exists about whether open microsurgical methods serve to reduce shunt dependency compared with endovascular techniques. OBJECTIVE: To determine predictors of shunt-dependent hydrocephalus and functional outcomes after aneurysmal SAH. METHODS: A total of 471 patients who were part of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial from 2003 to 2007 were retrospectively reviewed. All variables including demographic data, medical history, treatment, imaging, and functional outcomes were included as part of the trial. No additional variables were retrospectively collected. RESULTS: Ultimately, 147 patients (31.2%) required a ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) in our series. Age, dissecting aneurysm type, ruptured vertebrobasilar aneurysm, Fisher grade, Hunt and Hess grade, admission intraventricular hemorrhage, admission intraparenchymal hemorrhage, blood in the fourth ventricle on admission, perioperative ventriculostomy, and hemicraniectomy were significant risk factors (P &lt; .05) associated with shunt-dependent hydrocephalus on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, intraventricular hemorrhage and intraparenchymal hemorrhage were independent risk factors for shunt dependency (P &lt; .05). Clipping vs coiling treatment was not statistically associated with VPS after SAH on both univariate and multivariate analyses. Patients who did not receive a VPS at discharge had higher Glasgow Outcome Scale and Barthel Index scores and were more likely to be functionally independent and to return to work 72 months after surgery (P &lt; .05). CONCLUSION: There is no difference in shunt dependency after SAH among patients treated by endovascular or microsurgical means. Patients in whom shunt-dependent hydrocephalus does not develop after SAH tend to have improved long-term functional outcomes.

scholarly journals Smoking, diabetes, blood hypertension: possible etiologic role for Peyronie’s disease? Analysis in 279 patients with a control group in Sicily

2015 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlo Pavone ◽  
Francesco D’Amato ◽  
Nino Dispensa ◽  
Federico Torretta ◽  
Carlo Magno
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cigarette Smoking ◽  
Outpatient Clinic ◽  
Erectile Function ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Peyronie’S Disease ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Peyronie's Disease

Objective: To assess the proportion of patients with Peyronie’s Disease (PD) and the possible association with its potential risk factors in the general population of the central and western Sicily in our weekly andrological outpatient clinic. Materials and methods: We recruited a sample of 279 consecutive patients consulting our andrological outpatient clinic. Two arms were created: the first one composed by PD patients (men with symptoms suggestive for PD), the second one composed by patients with other andrological diseases (control arm). For each patient we evaluated the age, cigarette smoking, diabetes, blood hypertension and erectile function. In the PD arm we administered validated questionnaires to determine the erectile function status by the International Index of Erectile Function 5 (IIEF-5) and the pain status during erection by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). A univariate analysis was conducted using R software. Results: We enrolled 279 consecutive patients. The number of PD patients was 97 (34,7%). The univariate analysis showed a correlation between PD and cigarette smoking (p = 0.0242), blood hypertension (p &lt; 0.001), erectile dysfunction (p &lt; 0.001). No significant association was observed between diabetes and PD (p = 0.358). The median age of PD arm was 60 years and the median age of the control arm was 63,5 years; therefore the median age of PD arm resulted lower than the median age of the control arm (p = 0,031). Conclusions: Peyronie’s disease is more common than we might think; furthermore it can be diagnosed among young patients. According to our results, cigarette smoking and blood hypertension may be considered statically significant risk factors for developing PD. On the contrary diabetes seems not to be a risk factor for PD. According to our results PD should be sought also in young patients. Further studies are necessary to confirm that removing the indicated risk factors may reduce the incidence of PD.

scholarly journals Risk factors for preoperative and postoperative late seizure in supratentorial meningiomas

2019 ◽  
pp. 316-321
Author(s):  
Rahsan Kemerdere ◽  
Mehmet Yigit Akgun ◽  
Orkhan Alizada ◽  
Sureyya Toklu ◽  
Burak Tahmazoglu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Skull Base ◽  
Surgical Complications ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Significant Risk Factor ◽  
Binary Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Seizure Outcome ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Introduction. Seizure following meningioma surgery is common and management may be challenging. Identifying risk factors may help physicians to initiate optimal medical management. The aim of this study is to report seizure outcome and risk factors for perioperative seizure. Materials and Methods. Sixty-three adult patients who underwent supratentorial meningioma resection were included, and perioperative data and long-term follow-up were provided in this retrospective study. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors for perioperative seizure and postoperative late seizure. Results. The results showed that 20 (37.1 %) patients had preoperative seizure and 10 (50 %) patients were seizure free at the long-term follow-up. Absence of headache was associated with preoperative seizure (p=0.002) while presence of early seizure was significant predictor for postoperative late seizure (p=0.03). Although not significant, occurrence of surgical complications (p=0.08) and non-skull base location (p=0.06) tended toward being a significant risk factor for postoperative late seizure. Conclusion. Presence of early seizures, surgical complications and locations out of skull base may direct postoperative anti-epileptic treatment to decrease seizure incidence which, indeed, increases quality of life for patients with meningioma.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document