scholarly journals PENGARUH PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TWO STAY TWO STRAY TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR DASAR LISTRIK DAN ELEKTRONIKA KELAS X TEKNIK ELEKTRONIKA SMK NEGERI 1 BUKITTINGGI

Author(s):  
Siti Maisyarah Arza ◽  
Nelda Azhar ◽  
Ika Parma Dewi

   This study aims to determine the influence of cooperative learning model two stay two stray learning outcomes in electrical and electronics elementary subjects of x class students majoring in electronics engineering at SMK Negeri 1 Bukittinggi. This type of research is an experimental with intact group comparison design.The research sample is class X TE 2A as experiment class using cooperative learning model Two Stay Two Stray and class X TE 2B as control class using Problem Based Learning model. Technique of collecting data from post-test every meeting in experiment class and control class, then analyzed for homogeneity test, normality test and hypothesis test. From the experimental class research results obtained an average value of 81,13 while the control class get an average value of 74,06. The result of hypothesis calculation at significant level α = 0,05 got tcount> ttable that is 2,996> 1,697, because big tcount of ttable, null hypothesis (H0) rejected and alternative hypothesis (Ha) accepted. Can be concluded means at the real level, this study shows that, there is influence of positive learning outcomes between the use of cooperative learning model type Two Stay Two Stray with the model of Problem Based Learning in Electrical and Electronics Elementary students X class students majoring in electronics  engineering at SMK Negeri 1 Bukittinggi. So the results of student learning Two Stay Two Stray  can increase the learning outcomes of students and made student more active on study.Keywords: Learning Outcomes , Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS), Poblem Based Learning (PBL).

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elmina S. Panjaitan ◽  
Sahyar .

ABSTRACT The objective of this research was to analysis the Cooperative Learning Model to student’s learning outcomes by using cooperative learning model Group Investigation type to conceptual knowledge. In experimental class used cooperative learning model GI type while in the control class used conventional learning model. In each class used pre-test and post-test, after that was done the data analysis technique like average value, standard deviation, normality test, homogeneity test, hypothesis test. The results were showed the increasing of student learning outcomes that used model GI type in conceptual knowledge with post-test value was higher 78.37 in the class experiment than 69.68 in the control class, the active of students and then the conceptual knowledge when the model of GI type were happened. From the research get the conclusion that there was effect of Cooperative learning model Group Investigation type to conceptual knowledge students. Key word : Cooperative, Group Investigation, Conceptual Knowledge, Student’s Learning Outcome.


Author(s):  
Elmizal Elmizal ◽  
Thamrin Thamrin ◽  
Hanesman Hanesman

        The problem in this study is the low average learning outcomes of learners on the subjects of Electrical Engineering is under the Learning Completeness (KB) which has been established SMKN 5 Padang is 75. There are 48.15% 1E1, 61.29 1E2 and 65.62% 1E3. This study aims to determine the comparative application of cooperative learning model type Think Pair Share and Problem Based Learning on student learning outcomes on the subjects Electrical Engineering class X Audio Video Technique at SMKN 5 Padang. The type of this research is experimental design with intact grup comparison design. The sample of this research is 1E1 A class as experiment class I using Think Pair Share and class 1E3 B as experiment class II using Problem Based Learning model. Data collection techniques were obtained from post-test in experimental class I and II, than analyzed for homogeneity test, normality test and hypothesis test. This research results the average value of students using cooperative learning model Think Pair Share type (80,27) is higher then using Problem Based Learning model that is (74,13). The result of hypotehesis calculation at significant level α = 0,05, obtained t count > t table that is 2,580> 2,045, because tcount is bigger than ttable, hil n hypothesis (Ho) rejected and alternative hypothesis (Ha) accepted.  Keywords: Think Pair Share model, Problem Based Learning model, Experimental, Learning Outcomes,  Experiments.


Author(s):  
Wonang Saputra ◽  
Thamrin Thamrin ◽  
Almasri Almasri

The problem in this study is the low average learning outcomes of students on subjects Applying Digital Engineering Basics is under the Minimum Criterion of completeness which has been established SMKN 1 Batipuh is 75. This study aims to determine the effect of application of Team Assisted Individualization model to learning outcomes on subjects Applying Digital Engineering Basics in Audio Video Techniques department at SMKN 1 Batipuh. The type of this research is experimental research with pre experimental design with intact group comparison design. The sample of research is class X TAV 2A as experiment class using Team Assisted Individualization model and class X TAV 2B as control class using direct learning model. Data is collected  from post-test in the experimental class and control class, then analyzed for homogeneity, normality and hypothesis test. From the experimental class results obtained an average value of 80.71, while the control class gets an average value of 75.79. The result of hypothesis calculation at significant level α = 0,05 got tcount> ttable that is 2,442 > 2,056, because big tcount of ttable, null hypothesis (H0) rejected and alternative hypothesis (Ha) accepted.itCan be concluded mean at the real level, this research shows that, there is work on of student learning result which signifikan between usage of Team Assisted Individualization type with direct learning model on subjects Applying Digital Engineering Basics of student of Audio Video Technique at SMKN 1 Batipuh. So the Team Assisted Individualization learning model is better than the direct learning model. Keywords: Applying Digital Engineering Basics, Team Assisted Individualization model, direct learning model, pre experimental design, learning outcomes.


Author(s):  
Ayu Eka Putri ◽  
Edidas Edidas ◽  
Ika Parma Dewi

The problem in this study is the low learning outcomes of students on Digital Simulation subjects in SMK N 3 Pariaman. This study aims to determine the effect of learning outcomes by using Active Learning model Practice Rehearsal Pairs type with direct learning models on subjects Digital Simulation class X TKJ odd semester SMK N 3 Pariaman Year Teaching 2017/2018. This type of research uses the Quasi Eksperimental design. Sampling using Probability Sampling technique, The sample of research is class X TKJ B as experiment class using Active Learning model of Practice Rehearsal Pairs type and class X TKJ A as control class using direct learning model. Data collection technique from post-test in experiment and control class, then analyzed for homogeneity test, normality test and hypothesis test. From the experimental class research results obtained an average value of 86.88, while the control class gets an average value of 78.28. Result of hypothesis calculation at significant level α = 0,05 got titung> ttable that is 3,780> 1,678, because big tcount of ttable, hil n hypothesis (H0) rejected and alternative hypothesis (Ha) accepted. Can be concluded mean at the real level, this research shows that, there is influence of student learning outcomes between the use of Active Learning model of Practice Rehearsal Pairs type with direct learning model on Digital Simulation subjects of class X TKJ in SMK N 3 Pariaman. The use of Practice Rehearsal Pairs model has a significant influence on the improvement of Digital Simulation learning outcomes.Keywords: Active Learning, Practice Rehearsal Pairs, Learning Outcomes, Digital Simulation


Author(s):  
Aprayanti Nasution ◽  
Nelda Azhar ◽  
Sukaya Sukaya

The problem of the research is the low learning results of the students on the subjects of computer systems of SMK Negeri 5 Padang. This is due to several factors one of which is the method or strategy learning that is less innovative. The purpose of the research is to know the difference of result the study by using cooperative learning model of type Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) on the subjects of a computer system class X TKJ of  SMK Negeri 5 Padang. This type of research is experimental. Where is to take the sampling by using random sampling technique. As the experimental class is class X TKJ A which will be treated by using cooperative learning model type STAD and control class is X TKJ B which will be treated by using inquiry model of learning. The technique of collecting data from post test, then analyzed for homogeneity test, normality test and hypothesis test. From the experimental class research results get the average value 82, 29, while the control class gets an average value of 76.93. The result of hypothesis calculation at significant level α = 0,05 got  thitung> ttabel  that is (2,182> 2,056) Because thitung  is bigger than ttabel hence hypothesis (H0) rejected and hypothesis (Ha) accepted. From the calculation of the learning result Gain where O1 is the average of the experimental class and O2 is the control class, the percentage of learning result is increased by 6.79%. It can be concluded that by using cooperative learning model of Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) type has an effect on student learning result which proves from improvement of learning result. Keyword    : Learning Resultss, Cooperative Learning Model TypeSTAD, Inquiry Learning Model.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Stela Ruhulessin ◽  
Tanwey Gerson Ratumanan ◽  
Hanisa Tamalene

This study aims to determine whether there are differences in learning outcomes of class X students of SMA 12 Ambon using cooperative learning model Student Facilitator and Explaining (SFE) and conventional learning models on trigonometric material. The type of research is experimental research (Experimental Research) with the Post-Test Only Control Group Design. The analysis technique is descriptive statistical analysis and inferential test statistics consisting of normality test data, homogeneity test and hypothesis test. The data are processed using SPSS version 20.0. The results of this study are (1) there are differences in learning outcomes using the cooperative learning model Student Facilitator and Explaining and conventional learning models, which shows that the value of  t_hitung  3.1128 is greater than the value of t_tabel  2.0003 and the value of Sig. (2-tailed) smaller than the value of alpha 0.05 which is 0.002; (2) learning outcomes of students who use the cooperative learning model Student Facilitator and Explaining type are better when compared to those using conventional learning models


Author(s):  
P. Sultan Mustika ◽  
Hanesman Hanesman ◽  
Sukaya Sukaya

The problem in this study is the low average student learning outcomes in the Elementary Electrical and Electronics subjects is under the completeness of Learning (KB) which has been established SMK Negeri 1 Kinali is 75. This study aims to determine the influence of cooperative learning model type Assisted Team Individualization with Problem Based Learning learning model on learning outcomes in Electrical and Electronics Elementary subjects of X class students majoring in audio video engineering at SMK Negeri 1 Kinali. This type of research is an experimental research with Post-Test Design Only Group Design. The research sample is class X TAV.1 as experiment class using Team Assisted Individualization and class X TAV.2 model as control class using Problem Based Learning model. Technique of collecting data from post-test every meeting in experiment class and control class, then analyzed for homogeneity test, normality test and hypothesis test. From the experimental class research results obtained an average value of 83.57, while the control class get an average value of 76.67. The result of hypothesis calculation at significant level α = 0,05 got tcount> ttable that is 6,24> 1,674, because big tcount of ttable, null hypothesis (H0) rejected and alternative hypothesis (Ha) accepted. Can be concluded means at the real level, this study shows that, there is influence of positive learning outcomes between the use of cooperative learning model type Assisted Individualization Team with the model of Problem Based Learning in Electrical and Electronics Elementary students X class students majoring in audio video engineering at SMK Country 1 Kinali. So the results of student learning Team Assisted Individualization better in comparison with the results of student learning Problem Based Learning.. Keywords: Team Assisted Individualization, Problem Based Learning, Post-Test Only Group Design, Learning Outcomes, Experiments, Controls.


Author(s):  
Palupi Palupi ◽  
Nelda Azhar ◽  
Almasri Almasri

The problem in this study is the low average learning outcomes of students on subjects Applying Electric and Electronics Engineering Basics is under the Minimum Criterion of completeness (KKM) which has been established SMKN 5 Padang is 75. This study aims to determine the effect of application of learning models Contextual Teaching & Learning and Problem Base Learning model on student learning outcomes on subjects Applying Electric and Electronics EngineeringBasics of students Audio Video Techniques at SMKN 5 Padang 2017/2018. The type of this research is experimental research with Pre experimental design with NonProbability Sampling design. The sample of research is class 1E 1B as experiment class using Contextual Teaching & Learningmodel and class 1E 1A as control class using Problem Base Learning model. Data collection techniques from post-test in the experimental class and control class, then analyzed for homogeneity test, normality test and hypothesis test. From the experimental class research results obtained an average value of 82.47, while the control class gets an average value of 77.88 with more influence6 %. The result of hypothesis calculation at significant level α = 0,05 got count> ttable that is 2,869>1,696, because big count of ttable, null hypothesis (Ho) rejected and alternative hypothesis (Ha) accepted. Can be concluded mean at the real level, this research shows that, there is influence of student learning result which signifikan between usage model ofContextual Teaching & Learning type with Problem Base Learning model on subjects Applying Electric and Electronics Engineering Basics of student of Audio Video Technique at SMKN 5 Padang. So the Contextual Teaching & Learninglearning model is gives better than results to the Problem Base Learning.Keywords : Learning outcomes, Model of Learning,Contextual Teaching & Learning, Problem Base Learning.


Author(s):  
Mustafa Mustafa ◽  
Legiman Slamet ◽  
Nelda Azhar

The problem in this study is the low average learning outcomes of learners on Electrical and Electronics Elementary subjects is under the Minimum Criteria of completeness (KKM) that has been established SMK Negeri 1 Lembah Melintang is 75. This study aims to determine the influence of the use of Pictorial Riddlemethod with Cooperative learning on student learning outcomes in Electrical and Electronics Elementary subjects in class X TAV SMK Negeri 1 Lembah Melintang. This type of research is experimental research with Postest Only Control Design. The research sample is XTAV2 class as experiment class using Pictorial Riddle Method and XTAV1 class as control class using Cooperative learning. Technique of collecting data from final test in experiment class and control class, then analyzed for homogeneity test, normality test and hypothesis test. From the experimental class research results obtained an average value of 83.22, while the control class get an average value of 75.83. Result of hypothesis calculation at significant level α = 0,05 got tcount> ttable that is 3,2> 1,674, because big tcount of ttable, null hypothesis (H0) rejected and alternative hypothesis (H1) accepted. Can be concluded mean at the real level, this research shows that, there is influence of positive student learning result between the use of Pictorial Riddle Method with Cooperative learning on Electrical and Electronics Elementary subjects in class X TAV SMK Negeri 1 Lembah Melintang Pasaman Barat. Then the Pictorial Riddle Method is better compared to direct learning.Keywords: Riddle Pictorial Method, Cooperative Learning, Learning Outcomes, Experiments, Controls.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-81
Author(s):  
Zainal Arifin

Based on the statement of the problem how the comparison of students learning out comes used Learning model Discovery Learning and Talking Stick. Cooperative Learning model Discovery Learning and Talking Stick are one of model that are usually used in the mathematic Learning the advantage of them are can stimulate the development ability to think creatively and comprehensive, and stimulate student in order to more achre study. The purpose of this research was to know what it is there or no the comparison cooperative learning model Discovery Learning and Talking Stick of learning out come. The kind of this research was quantitative research with using the true experimental design post-test only control design. Before The researcher analysis data, I used the normality test and homogeneity test hypothesis test in data’s analysis. From the analysis result obtained the average value of class that was given cooperative Learning model type Talking Stick (control class) was higher than average role of class that was given cooperative learning model Discovery Learning (experiment class) by using the 5% error test then obtained -0,74<1.68, so t count t-table. The conclusion Ho was accepted, it mean that there was comparison cooperative Learning model Discovery Learning and Talking Stick to learning outcome.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document