scholarly journals PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA KELAS X SMA MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STUDENT FACILITATOR AND EXPLAINING (SFE) DAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KONVENSIONAL PADA MATERI TRIGONOMETRI

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Stela Ruhulessin ◽  
Tanwey Gerson Ratumanan ◽  
Hanisa Tamalene

This study aims to determine whether there are differences in learning outcomes of class X students of SMA 12 Ambon using cooperative learning model Student Facilitator and Explaining (SFE) and conventional learning models on trigonometric material. The type of research is experimental research (Experimental Research) with the Post-Test Only Control Group Design. The analysis technique is descriptive statistical analysis and inferential test statistics consisting of normality test data, homogeneity test and hypothesis test. The data are processed using SPSS version 20.0. The results of this study are (1) there are differences in learning outcomes using the cooperative learning model Student Facilitator and Explaining and conventional learning models, which shows that the value of  t_hitung  3.1128 is greater than the value of t_tabel  2.0003 and the value of Sig. (2-tailed) smaller than the value of alpha 0.05 which is 0.002; (2) learning outcomes of students who use the cooperative learning model Student Facilitator and Explaining type are better when compared to those using conventional learning models

Author(s):  
Firmansyah Nur Utomo ◽  
Agus Efendi ◽  
Endar Supri Wihidayat

<p>This study aims to find out (1) whether there are differences in learning outcomes in the application of learning models Problem Based Learning in Group Investigation with conventional learning models; (2) Are there differences in student learning activeness in the application of learning models Problem Based Learning in Group Investigation with conventional learning models (3) Is the application of learning models Problem Based Learning in Integrated Group Investigation more effective than conventional learning. This study used the quasi-experimental design method with a pretest-posttest control group design model. The population in this study were students of X Axioo class and X RPL B of SMK Negeri 5 Surakarta. The sample used was 70 people. The sampling technique used is total sampling. Data collection techniques using pretest-posttest and observation sheet. The data analysis technique used is balanced test, normality test, homogeneity test, and hypothesis test. The results of the study are as follows. First, there are differences in learning outcomes between learning models of Problem Based Learning in conventional Group Investigation and Learning. Second, there are differences in learning activeness between learning models of Problem Based Learning in conventional Group Investigation and Learning. Third, the effectiveness of the learning model of Problem Based Learning in Group Investigation is higher than conventional Learning in improving learning outcomes.</p><strong>Keywords: </strong>Problem Based Learning, Group Investigation, Conventional Learning, Learning Outcomes, Activity


Author(s):  
Nora Mawinda ◽  
Zulkifli Naansah ◽  
Hanesman Hanesman

The problem in this study is the low learning outcomes achieved by students on the subjects of Basic Electrical and Electronics which is below the minimum completeness criteria (KKM) set a school that is 75 This is presumably because they are learning is often used during the learning model is applied directly proven yet effective. The purpose of this research is to reveal how much influence the Jigsaw cooperative learning model to study the results of class X students on subjects TAV Basic Electricity and Electronics. This research is an experimental study with a draft Post-test only control group design. The sample were students of class X TAV at SMK 1 Padang Academic Year 2014 / 2015. Class experiment is treated using Jigsaw Cooperative Learning Model and the control group is a class that uses the direct teaching model. The data is taken from the test results in the form of learning about the objective as many as 31 items. Data were analyzed manually to test for normality, homogeneity testing, and hypothesis testing. The result of the calculation hypothesis at significance level α = 0.05 was found that t count> t table is 3.35> 1.670. The results of these tests give an interpretation that H0 is rejected and H1 is accepted, this means that on average significantly experimental class learning outcomes greater than the average control class learning outcomes.  Key words :   Models of Learning, Jigsaw, Learning Direct, Post-test only control group design, Learning outcomes, Experimental, and Control.


This study aims to examine the effect of reciprocal instruction and interpersonal intelligence on student learning outcomes. This research was conducted on UHO PGSD students who programmed the subject of Social Sciences elementary school in 2018/2019. This study used a quasiexperimental method, with a non-equivalent post-test control group design. The research sample was taken with simple random techniques. The experimental class and the control class each consisted of 47 students. The experimental class is taught with reciprocal learning models while the controls are traditional learning models. Each class was taken 27% or 26 students from each class as a sample. The sample determination was based on the division of high and low interpersonal intelligence, each of 27% of the total population. So that the total sample as a whole is 52 students. Before being given treatment, the two classes were first given an interpersonal intelligence questionnaire to obtain high and low intelligence data. Data on learning outcomes are obtained through multiple choice form tests. Before use, the questionnaire instrument and the test were first validated by content and constructs by education and psychology experts. then an empirical test is carried out, the result is a validity value of 0.91 and a reliability of 0.93. The research data were analyzed by descriptive and inferential analysis. Hypothesis testing is carried out with 2 way ANOVA. Then the normality and homogeneity tests were carried out as a prerequisite test for the hypothesis test. Furthermore, if there is interaction, further testing is carried out with the HSD test to find out the main effects of the treatment. Data processing results of this study were carried out with the help of the SPSS 20. The results showed that there were differences in student learning outcomes taught by reciprocal and traditional models. Furthermore, there is an interaction between learning models and interpersonal intelligence. Students who have high interpersonal intelligence have better learning outcomes than students who have low interpersonal intelligence. Thus it can be concluded that students who have high interpersonal intelligence taught by reciprocal models have better learning outcomes than students taught with traditional models


2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Kusumadyahdewi Kusumadyahdewi

<p>Purpose of this research is to understand the differences of learning outcomes using Cooperative learning model type TAl (Team Assisted Individualization) and STAD (Student Team Achievement Division) on the subject Accounting, Social Sciences Education Department of Tarbiyah and Teaching Sciences of Maulana Malik lbrahim State Islamic University of Malang. This research using Experimental research design Quasi Experiment, and the model using Pre-Test and Post-Test Control Group Design. Population of this research is all students of first semester Year 2013/2014, and the sample are class A as the experiment group who using TAI model and class B as the control group who study using STAD model. There are two instruments in this research, such as treatment instrument and measurement instrument. Researcher used hypothesis test to know the differences of learning outcomes, t-test in which previously conducted the prerequisite test analysis which consist of normality test, homogeneity test, and the equality test of average initial ability of student. Result of this research shows the difference of average mark in cognitive aspects in these classes is not significant but the average mark TAI class higher than STAD class, but there is a significant difference in psychomotor aspects in these classes. It can be showing the average mark of TAI also higher than STAD.</p><p>Keywords: Learning Outcomes, Cooperative Learning Model type TAI, STAD</p>


Author(s):  
Devi Sriwahyuningsih ◽  
Sukainil Ahzan ◽  
Lalu Habiburrahman

[Title: The Effect of Cooperative Learning Model Type Make A Match with One Physical Ranking Game Toward Student Motivation and Learning Outcomes]. This study aims to determine the effect of cooperative learning model type make a macth with ranking one physical game on student motivation and learning outcomes. This research is quasi-experiment with pretest-posttest control group design. Population in this research is all students of class VII SMPN 2 Dompu which amounted to 124 people. Research sample consists of two classes that are class VII A which amounted to 30 people as control class and class VII B totalling 30 people as experimental class taken using random sampling technique. The results showed that homogeneity test and normality of learning motivation data and student learning outcomes were normally distributed and variance of both homogeneous data. This data is then analyzed using t-test, obtained tcount for learning motivation is 2,318 and ttable 2,002 or can be written mathematically is tcount> ttabel. While the learning results obtained tcount = 4.152 and ttabel = 2.002 or can be written mathematically is tcount> ttable at 5% significant level. The results of this study indicate that there is the influence of cooperative learning model type make a macth with ranking one physical game of student motivation and learning outcomes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 88-100
Author(s):  
Risa Novita Wati ◽  
Adeng Pustikaningsih

This study aims to: find out the differences in learning outcomes of Basic Accounting in X Graders at SMK Negeri 1 Depok Academic Year 2018/2019 before and after the application of the Jigsaw Cooperative Learning Models. This research is a Quasi-Experimental study. Data collection techniques using simple random sampling for the selection of control classes and experimental classes that will be drawn randomly. The subjects of this study were students of class X AKL 1 and X AKL 3 at SMK Negeri 1 Depok. The design of data collection in this study uses the Pretest-posttest control group design model. Data analysis was performed using descriptive analysis and hypothesis testing. The results of the study are: (1) the pre-test learning outcomes in the control class obtained an average value of 71.376, the highest value of 90 and the lowest value of 50. While the pre-test scores in the experiment class obtained an average value of 71.8, the highest value of 90 and the lowest value of 50 (2) post-test learning outcomes in the control class obtained an average value of 71.433, the highest value of 83 and the lowest value of 60. While the post-test in the experiment class obtained an average of 80.733 with the highest value of 90 and the lowest value of 67. (3) Based on the results of the t-test that is 6.122 ≥ 2.00172 or tcount ttable on the results of the post-test of the experiment group and the control group, it can be concluded that there are significant differences between the results of the control class and the experiment class so that there is a significant increase the application of Cooperative Learning Models in Jigsaw type in Basic Accounting subjects to the learning outcomes of X Accounting Graders. Keywords: Jigsaw, Learning Outcomes, Basic Accounting


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-32
Author(s):  
Sahabuddin Sahabuddin ◽  
Muhammad Yunus ◽  
Muhammad Nur

Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan tujuan untuk mengetahui adanya perbedaan motivasi dan hasil belajar peserta didik dengan membandingkan penggunaan model pembelajaran kooperatif team quiz dan TGT pada mata pelajaran IPS kelas IV di SD Negeri Lakkang. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah quasi experimental nonequivalent control group design. Teknik penentuan sampel pada penelitian ini menggunakan purposive sampling. Uji validitas butir soal berdasarkan penilaian para ahli (judgement expert) dan uji reliabilitas Cronbach Alpha. Teknik analisis yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini meliputi uji normalitas, uji homogenitas, uji keefektifan, uji perbandingan keefektifan model pembelajaran, dan uji keunggulan dengan menggunakan pengolahan SPSS versi 25.0. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa motivasi dan hasil belajar peserta didik yang menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif team quiz lebih tinggi dibanding dengan peserta didik yang menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif TGT. Hal ini ditunjukkan dengan hasil uji setelah perlakuan posttest dengan uji Manova. Data setelah perlakuan posttest dengan uji Manova menunjukkan bahwa nilai signifikansinya lebih kecil alfa (0,05) yaitu sebesar 0,001 sehingga H0 ditolak. Maka dari itu, dapat disimpulkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan rata-rata kemampuan kedua kelas terhadap motivasi belajar dan hasil belajar peserta didik setelah diberikan perlakuan. Dengan demikian, peserta didik yang menggunakan penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif team quiz memiliki rata-rata nilai posttest lebih tinggi yaitu 85,35 dibanding peserta didik yang menggunakan penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif TGT yang mempunyai jumlah rata-rata nilai posttest sebanyak 80,05. This research was conducted with the aim of knowing the differences in students' motivation and learning outcomes by comparing the use of the team quiz and TGT cooperative learning models in social studies subjects for class IV at SD Negeri Lakkang. The method used in this study was a quasi-experimental nonequivalent control group design. The sampling technique in this study used purposive sampling. The validity tes of the items based on the assessment of experts (expert judgment) and Cronbach Alpha reliability test. The analytical techniques of data used in this study include normality test, homogeneity test, effectiveness test, comparative test of the effectiveness of learning models, and superiority test using SPSS version 25.0 processing. The results showed that the motivation and learning outcomes of students who used the team quiz cooperative learning model were higher than those of students who used the TGT cooperative learning model. This is indicated by the test results after posttest treatment with the Manova test. The data after posttest treatment with the Manova test showed that the significance value was smaller than alfa (0.05), which was 0.001 so that H0 was rejected. Therefore, it can be concluded that there is a difference in the average ability between the two classes on learning motivation and student learning outcomes after the treatment was given. Thus, students who use the application of the team quiz cooperative learning model have a higher average posttest score of 85.35 than students who use the application of the TGT cooperative learning model who have an average posttest score of 80.05.


2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elmina S. Panjaitan ◽  
Sahyar .

ABSTRACT The objective of this research was to analysis the Cooperative Learning Model to student’s learning outcomes by using cooperative learning model Group Investigation type to conceptual knowledge. In experimental class used cooperative learning model GI type while in the control class used conventional learning model. In each class used pre-test and post-test, after that was done the data analysis technique like average value, standard deviation, normality test, homogeneity test, hypothesis test. The results were showed the increasing of student learning outcomes that used model GI type in conceptual knowledge with post-test value was higher 78.37 in the class experiment than 69.68 in the control class, the active of students and then the conceptual knowledge when the model of GI type were happened. From the research get the conclusion that there was effect of Cooperative learning model Group Investigation type to conceptual knowledge students. Key word : Cooperative, Group Investigation, Conceptual Knowledge, Student’s Learning Outcome.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 80-88
Author(s):  
Halisa Aprilia ◽  
Avelius Dominggus Sore

Abstrak: The formulation of the problem in this study is whether there is an effect of the Application of the Group Investigation Type Cooperative Learning Model to the learning outcomes of Grade VIII students on Employment Materials in SMP Negeri 1 Sekadau Hulu Academic Year 2015/2016 ?. There are two variables in this study, namely the cooperative learning model type investigation group as independent and learning outcomes as the dependent variable. This study uses quantitative methods of experimental research design with the design of True Experimental Design Pre-test form Post-test Control Group Design. Hypothesis test results show tcount> t table or 22.91 ˃ 2.001, so Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted. This means that there is a significant influence on the application of the Group Investigation Type Cooperative Learning Model to the learning outcomes of Grade VIII students on Employment Materials.Keywords: Cooperative Learning Model Group Investigation Type Of Student Learning OutcomesAbstrak: Rumusan masalah dalam penelitian ini adalah apakah terdapat pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Group Investigation terhadap hasil belajar siswa kelas VIII Pada Materi Ketenagakerjaan di SMP Negeri 1 Sekadau Hulu Tahun Pelajaran 2015/2016?. Terdapat dua variabel dalam penelitian ini yaitu model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe group investigation sebagai independen dan hasil belajar sebagai variabel dependen.Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kuantitatif bentuk penelitian eksperimen dengan desain True Experimental Design bentuk Pre-test Post-test Control Group Design.Hasil uji hipotesis menunjukan nilai thitung > ttabel atau 22,91 ˃ 2,001, sehingga Ho ditolak dan Ha diterima. Hal ini berarti terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan dari Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Group Investigation terhadap hasil belajar siswa kelas VIII Pada Materi KetenagakerjaanKata Kunci: Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Group Investigation Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 225-235
Author(s):  
Dwi Desi Hariyani Putri ◽  
Nurul Kemala Dewi ◽  
Awal Nur Kholifatur Rosyidah

This study aims to describe the influence of the cooperative learning model team quiz type on the mathematics learning outcomes of fourth-grade students of SD Negeri 20 Ampenan. This type of research is quantitative research. The research method used is Quasi Experiment with research design Nonequivalent Control Group Design. Learning outcomes taken in this study are in three domains, namely cognitive, affective, and psychomotor. The instrument in this study has passed two stages of testing, namely the expert validator test and field testing. The conclusion is drawn by the results of hypothesis testing with pretest and posttest giving questions after being treated with a cooperative learning model type team quiz. Before testing the hypothesis, a prerequisite or parametric test is carried out, namely the Normality Test and the Homogeneity Test. The results of hypothesis testing using the independent sample t-test with the help of SPSS version 16 show the t-count value of 6,979 ≥ t-table 2,021 at a significant level of 5% with df = 67, then Ha is accepted and Ho is rejected, that is, there is an effect on student learning outcomes with the use of cooperative learning model type team quiz. Simple Linear regression test results of 86% with very good interpretation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document