scholarly journals Perbandingan Model Pembelajaran Discovery Learning dan Talking Stick terhadap Hasil Belajar

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-81
Author(s):  
Zainal Arifin

Based on the statement of the problem how the comparison of students learning out comes used Learning model Discovery Learning and Talking Stick. Cooperative Learning model Discovery Learning and Talking Stick are one of model that are usually used in the mathematic Learning the advantage of them are can stimulate the development ability to think creatively and comprehensive, and stimulate student in order to more achre study. The purpose of this research was to know what it is there or no the comparison cooperative learning model Discovery Learning and Talking Stick of learning out come. The kind of this research was quantitative research with using the true experimental design post-test only control design. Before The researcher analysis data, I used the normality test and homogeneity test hypothesis test in data’s analysis. From the analysis result obtained the average value of class that was given cooperative Learning model type Talking Stick (control class) was higher than average role of class that was given cooperative learning model Discovery Learning (experiment class) by using the 5% error test then obtained -0,74<1.68, so t count t-table. The conclusion Ho was accepted, it mean that there was comparison cooperative Learning model Discovery Learning and Talking Stick to learning outcome.

Author(s):  
Aprayanti Nasution ◽  
Nelda Azhar ◽  
Sukaya Sukaya

The problem of the research is the low learning results of the students on the subjects of computer systems of SMK Negeri 5 Padang. This is due to several factors one of which is the method or strategy learning that is less innovative. The purpose of the research is to know the difference of result the study by using cooperative learning model of type Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) on the subjects of a computer system class X TKJ of  SMK Negeri 5 Padang. This type of research is experimental. Where is to take the sampling by using random sampling technique. As the experimental class is class X TKJ A which will be treated by using cooperative learning model type STAD and control class is X TKJ B which will be treated by using inquiry model of learning. The technique of collecting data from post test, then analyzed for homogeneity test, normality test and hypothesis test. From the experimental class research results get the average value 82, 29, while the control class gets an average value of 76.93. The result of hypothesis calculation at significant level α = 0,05 got  thitung> ttabel  that is (2,182> 2,056) Because thitung  is bigger than ttabel hence hypothesis (H0) rejected and hypothesis (Ha) accepted. From the calculation of the learning result Gain where O1 is the average of the experimental class and O2 is the control class, the percentage of learning result is increased by 6.79%. It can be concluded that by using cooperative learning model of Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) type has an effect on student learning result which proves from improvement of learning result. Keyword    : Learning Resultss, Cooperative Learning Model TypeSTAD, Inquiry Learning Model.


2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elmina S. Panjaitan ◽  
Sahyar .

ABSTRACT The objective of this research was to analysis the Cooperative Learning Model to student’s learning outcomes by using cooperative learning model Group Investigation type to conceptual knowledge. In experimental class used cooperative learning model GI type while in the control class used conventional learning model. In each class used pre-test and post-test, after that was done the data analysis technique like average value, standard deviation, normality test, homogeneity test, hypothesis test. The results were showed the increasing of student learning outcomes that used model GI type in conceptual knowledge with post-test value was higher 78.37 in the class experiment than 69.68 in the control class, the active of students and then the conceptual knowledge when the model of GI type were happened. From the research get the conclusion that there was effect of Cooperative learning model Group Investigation type to conceptual knowledge students. Key word : Cooperative, Group Investigation, Conceptual Knowledge, Student’s Learning Outcome.


Author(s):  
Siti Maisyarah Arza ◽  
Nelda Azhar ◽  
Ika Parma Dewi

   This study aims to determine the influence of cooperative learning model two stay two stray learning outcomes in electrical and electronics elementary subjects of x class students majoring in electronics engineering at SMK Negeri 1 Bukittinggi. This type of research is an experimental with intact group comparison design.The research sample is class X TE 2A as experiment class using cooperative learning model Two Stay Two Stray and class X TE 2B as control class using Problem Based Learning model. Technique of collecting data from post-test every meeting in experiment class and control class, then analyzed for homogeneity test, normality test and hypothesis test. From the experimental class research results obtained an average value of 81,13 while the control class get an average value of 74,06. The result of hypothesis calculation at significant level α = 0,05 got tcount> ttable that is 2,996> 1,697, because big tcount of ttable, null hypothesis (H0) rejected and alternative hypothesis (Ha) accepted. Can be concluded means at the real level, this study shows that, there is influence of positive learning outcomes between the use of cooperative learning model type Two Stay Two Stray with the model of Problem Based Learning in Electrical and Electronics Elementary students X class students majoring in electronics  engineering at SMK Negeri 1 Bukittinggi. So the results of student learning Two Stay Two Stray  can increase the learning outcomes of students and made student more active on study.Keywords: Learning Outcomes , Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS), Poblem Based Learning (PBL).


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-123
Author(s):  
Priskila Rosdiana Sipayung ◽  
◽  
Regina Sipayung ◽  
Dyan Wulansari Hutahaean ◽  
Darinda Sofia Tanjung ◽  
...  

This study aims to determine the effect of giving rewards on learning outcomes in fifth grade mathematics subjects at SDN 094097 Simpang Pongkalan Tongah. The research method used is an experimental method with quantitative research. To obtain the necessary data in the form of a test with a total of 40 questions. The research at SDN 094097 Simpang Pongkalan Tongah in class V was carried out from 10 to 11 May 2021. The number of research samples was 16 students based on the saturated sample technique. The results of statistical calculations show that the ability of students in answering post-test questions with the reward method is included in the very good category with an average value of 84.06 in the very good category. Meanwhile, the students' ability to answer the post-test questions with the demonstration method was included in the good category with an average value of 70.31 in the good category. This study used the normality test with the results of 0.200> 0.05. Then the homogeneity test with a significance value of 0.344 > 0.05. Furthermore, hypothesis testing is to compare the value of tcount with ttable. Obtained the value of tcount = 4.111 while ttable = 1.746. Because tcount > ttable (4.111 > 1.746) then Ha is accepted and Ho is rejected. Through the t test, it can be concluded that there is a significant effect between giving rewards to learning outcomes. Keywords: Giving Rewards, Mathematics, Learning Outcomes


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Stela Ruhulessin ◽  
Tanwey Gerson Ratumanan ◽  
Hanisa Tamalene

This study aims to determine whether there are differences in learning outcomes of class X students of SMA 12 Ambon using cooperative learning model Student Facilitator and Explaining (SFE) and conventional learning models on trigonometric material. The type of research is experimental research (Experimental Research) with the Post-Test Only Control Group Design. The analysis technique is descriptive statistical analysis and inferential test statistics consisting of normality test data, homogeneity test and hypothesis test. The data are processed using SPSS version 20.0. The results of this study are (1) there are differences in learning outcomes using the cooperative learning model Student Facilitator and Explaining and conventional learning models, which shows that the value of  t_hitung  3.1128 is greater than the value of t_tabel  2.0003 and the value of Sig. (2-tailed) smaller than the value of alpha 0.05 which is 0.002; (2) learning outcomes of students who use the cooperative learning model Student Facilitator and Explaining type are better when compared to those using conventional learning models


Author(s):  
Nurina Kurniasari Rahmawati ◽  
Iip Ripati Hanipah

This research is to prove whether the learning result of Student Mathematics with cooperative learning model of TPS type is better than the result of student learning of Mathematics with STAD type cooperative learning model on tangent material of circle. The population is the students of State Junior High School 1 East Cikarang. The sample was taken by using cluster random sampling technique from the population by randomized method, ie students of class VIII F and class VIII G as many as 60 students. The analysis test is done by normality test and homogeneity test. Normality test using Lilliefors test and Homogeneity test using Fisher test. While the hypothesis test using t-test. Based on the calculation obtained data that Lilliefors model of cooperative learning model type TPS Lhitung = 0.0954 and for Ltabel = 0.161 (0.0954 < 0.161) and for cooperative learning model type STAD = 0.1266 and for Ltabel = 0.161 (0, 1266 < 0.161), so it can be concluded that the cooperative learning model of TPS type and STAD type cooperative learning model come from the normally distributed population. Homogeneity test using Fisher test obtained Fhitung = 1.15 and Ftabel = 1.86 (1.15 < 1.86) so that TPS and STAD homogen. Hypothesis testing obtained thitung = 2.388 and ttable = 1.651. Because thitung > ttable then H0 is rejected. The conclusion of this research is there are difference of mathematics learning result of students using cooperative learning model of TPS type and mathematics learning result of students using STAD type cooperative learning model in tangent circle material in class VIII SMPN 1 Cikarang East Bekasi.


Author(s):  
Arie Purwa Kusuma ◽  
Ayunitis Khoirunnisa

This study was conducted to determine whether the results of learning mathematics learners on the material to build a flat quadrilateral taught using Make a Match learning model is better than the TGT learning model. The sample was taken using cluster random sampling. The analysis test is done by normality test and homogeneity test. Normality test using Lilliefors test and Homogeneity test using Fisher test. Hypothesis test using t-test. Based on the calculation concluded the type of Make a Match cooperative learning model and TGT type cooperative learning model come from the normally distributed population. Homogeneity test using Fisher test can be concluded cooperative learning model type Make a Match and cooperative learning model type TGT same or homogeneous. Based on the hypothesis test, Ho is rejected. In conclusion, the result of learning mathematics of learners using Make a Match learning model is better than TGT learning model.  


GERAM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-137
Author(s):  
Meidawati Suswandari

This study aims to determine the effect of the scientific approach through the zoom meeting application on the learning activeness of students at Palur 3 Elementary School. The research method uses quantitative research. The research design used a pre post test from the control class and the experimental class. The independent variable in this study is a scientific approach through the zoom meeting application. The dependent variable in this study is student learning activeness. The research was conducted in grade V of the 3 Palur Elementary School. The data collection tool used was a questionnaire. The data analysis technique uses the analysis prerequisite test which includes the normality test and the homogeneity test which is then followed by the hypothesis test (t-test) using SPSS. The results showed that the scientific approach through the Zoom meeting media influenced the learning activeness of the fifth grade students of SD Negeri 3 Palur. This can be seen from the results of the analysis test using the Paired Sample Test, the tcount was 9,143 with Sig 2 tailed of 0,000 with a t-table value of 2.101, indicating that tcount> ttable was 9.143> 2.101.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Siti Khadijah ◽  
Masganti Sit ◽  
Sapri Sapri

<p><em>The purpose of this study was to find out: (1) determine the effect of flannel board media on children's cognitive abilities in RA Jam'iyyatush Shoolihiin, (2) determine the effect of blackboard media on children's cognitive abilities in RA Jam'iyyatush Shoolihiin, (3) find out the differences in media influence flannel board with whiteboard media on children's cognitive abilities at RA Jam'iyyatush Shoolihiin.</em><em>This type of research is quantitative research with Quasi Experimental Design. The sampling technique uses simple random with lottery techniques. Data collection instruments using experiments. And data analysis techniques using statistical tests, namely normality test, homogeneity test and hypothesis testing using t-test. </em><em>The results showed that: (1) There was the influence of the flannel board media on the cognitive</em><em> </em><em>abilities of children in RA Jam'iyyatush Shoolihiin, this was seen from t</em><em> </em><em>count</em><em> </em><em>&gt; t</em><em> </em><em>table, namely 8,1832</em><em> </em><em>&gt; 1,68830 (2) There was no effect of the whiteboard media on cognitive abilities of children in RA Jam'iyyatush Shoolihiin, seen from t</em><em> </em><em>count &lt;</em><em> </em><em>t</em><em> </em><em>table, ie 1.0563 &lt;</em><em> </em><em>1.68830, (3) There is a difference in the influence of flannel board media with whiteboard media on children's cognitive abilities in RA Jam'iyyatush Shoolihiin, seen From the post-test hypothesis test of the two classes with t</em><em> </em><em>count</em><em> </em><em>&gt; t</em><em> </em><em>table which is 7.68493&gt; 1.68830.</em><em></em></p>


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elma Agustiana ◽  
Fredi Ganda Putra ◽  
Farida Farida

The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is a difference in the average implementation of learning model, intellectual, repetition (AIR) with lesson study approach to the problem solving ability of mathematical learners. This research is a quantitative research type of quasi experiment. Data analysis technique using normality test with Liliefors test and homogeneity test with Barlett test. Hypothesis test using one-way ANOVA test with unequal cells. The result of this research is there is influence of learning model of Auditory, intellectually, Repetition (AIR) with lesson study approach to math problem solving ability. Based on the results of further test using scheffe test, the result shows that AIR learning model with lesson study approach gives better result than AIR and conventional learning model, and AIR learning model is better than conventional learning model.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document