scholarly journals Problem-based learning model on mathematical analytical thinking ability and science process skills

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 385-398
Author(s):  
Syaiful Syaiful ◽  
Kamid Kamid ◽  
Dwi Agus Kurniawan ◽  
Wahyu Adi Pratama

This research serves as a reference for teachers to implement problem-based learning models on analytical thinking skills and science process skills in mathematics subjects. This research examines the differences and relationships between students' analytical thinking skills and science process skills with problem-based learning models in mathematics. The sample of this research consisted of 180 students. This research is a quantitative study with a questionnaire as the instrument. The obtained data were analyzed using the t-test and correlation test. The results showed a significant difference between analytical thinking skills and students' science process skills, especially on the indicators of Observation and Classification at SMPN 35 Batanghari and SMPN 8 Batanghari students who applied the problem-based learning model in mathematics. Furthermore, it was found that there was a relationship between analytical thinking skills and science process skills because students with analytical thinking skills possessed better science process skills in problem-based learning models in mathematics subjects.

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
Fajrul Wahdi Ginting ◽  
Nurdin Bukit

The Purpose of The study: science process skills and logical thinking ability of students who use inquiry learning model training using PhET media; science process skills and logical thinking ability of students who use conventional learning model; and the difference science process skills and logical thinking ability of students to use learning model Inquiry Training using PhET media and conventional learning models. This research is a quasi experimental. Sample selection is done by cluster random sampling are two classes of classes VIII-E and class VIII-B, where the class VIII-E is taught by inquiry training model using media PhET and VIII-B with conventional learning model. The instrument used consisted of tests science process skills such as essay tests and tests of the ability to think logically in the form of multiple-choice tests. The data were analyzed using t test. The results showed that physics science process skills use Inquiry Training models using PhET media is different and showed better results compared with conventional learning model, and logical thinking skills students use Inquiry Training model using PhET media is different and show better results compared with conventional learning, and there is a difference between the ability to think logically and science process skills of students who use Inquiry Training model using PhET media and conventional learning models.


2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 55
Author(s):  
Ferawati Hutapea ◽  
Motlan .

The purpose of research are 1). To know are differences in science process skills of students with the applied of inquiry training learning model and direct instruction learning models, 2). To know are differences in science process skills of students who has high critical thinking ability and the  critically low ability, 3). To know the interaction inquiry training learning model and critical thinking ability toward students science process skills. The samples in this research conducted by cluster random sampling and  as many as two class , the first class (X-I) as experiment applied Inquiry Training learning model and the second class (X-2) as control class applied Direct Intruction learning model. The instrument used in this research is tests science process skills and critical thinking skills in the form of description and observation sheets science process skills. From these results it can be concluded that: 1) there are differences in students science process skills with applied inquiry training model and direct intruction model, 2) science process skills of students with high critical thinking ability is better than the science process skills of students with the ability to think critically low, and 3) the interaction inquiry training learning model and critical thinking ability toward the science process skills.


Author(s):  
Desi Susanty ◽  
Abdurahman Adisaputera ◽  
Anita Yus

This study aims to determine: (1) To determine the differences in students' creative thinking skills in writing free poetry between students who are taught with the synectic learning model compared to the reciprocal learning model; (2) To determine the differences in students' creative thinking skills in writing free poetry between students who have high learning interest compared to low learning interest; and (3) to determine the interaction between learning models and interest in learning in influencing students' creative thinking abilities in writing free poetry. This research was conducted at SDN 112320 Aek Kota Batu. The research method used is a quantitative method with a 2x2 experimental design. Data collection techniques used questionnaires and tests. The data analysis technique in this study used the Two Way Anova test. The results showed that: (1) There is a significant difference in the average creative thinking ability of students who are taught with the synectic model compared with the average thinking ability of students taught with the reciprocal model (Fcount = 11.664 and sig. 0.001 < 0.05) ; (2) The average creative thinking ability of students who have high learning interest is higher than the average creative thinking ability of students who have low learning interest (Fcount = 12.165 and sig. 0.001 < 0.05); and (3) There is an interaction between learning models and interest in learning in influencing students' creative thinking abilities (Fcount = 7.054 and sig. 0.011 < 0.05).


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erwinsyah Satria

This classroom action research was motivated by the students’ lowscience process skills and cognitive learning outcome in naturalscience. One of the reasons is the lack of teachers’ ability in choosingappropriate learning models and using of science props in natural sciencelearning. Thus, the implementation of the Problem Based Learning modelwith science props to students of class IV SD Negeri 15 Surau GadangSiteba Padang is one of the ways to solve this problem. The objective ofthis research is to describe the improvement of the students’ scienceprocess skills and cognitive learning outcome in natural science in classIV at SD Negeri 15 Surau Gadang Siteba Padang by using ProblemBased Learning model with science props. The instruments of thisresearch were the observation sheets of students’ science process skillsand teachers’ activities and the test sheets of students’ cognitive learningoutcome. The results showed that there was a significant improvementof students’ science process skills and cognitive learning outcome innatural science class IV by using Problem Based Learning model withscience props from the first cycle to the second cycle.


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Istikomah Istikomah ◽  
Basori Basori ◽  
Cucuk Budiyanto

Problem-based learning is characterized by the existence of a real problem as the context wherein students learn critical thinking skills, problem-solving, and knowledge acquisition. The concept of critical thinking gains popularity to help students obtain the ability to conduct fact analysis, support opinion with an argument, and problem-solving. The majority of Indonesian vocational school students, however, have difficulty in developing critical thinking skills and problem-solving. This research was purportedly designed to evaluate the differences of students' critical thinking ability in response to the application of various problem-based learning model namely Fishbone diagram, problem-based learning model, and expository learning model. A quasi-experimental design was applied to assess students' critical thinking. The findings indicate that there was a significant difference in students' critical thinking ability responding to the learning models. In summary, the research proposes the problem-based learning as an alternative learning model to improve student’s critical thinking ability.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-179
Author(s):  
Theodora Sarlotha Nirmala Manu ◽  
Fransina Th. Nomleni

The purpose of this research is to determine: (1) the difference of the science process skills of students learning using group workshop method with students using the discussion method; (2) differences in the condition above, after the ability of creative thinking covariable is controlled; and (3) the contribution of creative thinking covariable towards the science process skills of students. This experimental research used the post-test only control group design, with the population of 210 students of grade XI SMA Negeri 7 Kota Kupang. The total samples were 140 students, distributed in 2 experimental classes and 2 control classes. The data was collected by observing the science process skills using creative thinking skill test. The data were analyzed in descriptive and inferential statistics using one-way covariance analysis (Anacova). The result indicated that: (1) there was a significant difference of science process skills between the students learning using the group workshop method with students learning using the discussion method with an F value of 50,964; p ≤ 0.05.; (2) Having controlled the student’s creative thinking ability, there was a significant difference between student’s science process skills among students who enrolled in group workshop method with the students enrolled in the discussion method; where F=17.822; p ≤ 0,05. (3) Creative thinking ability contributed to the science process skills with the coefficient of determination equals to r2=(0,430)2 = 0,185 or 18,5%. The results indicate that the application of group workshop methods has positive effect on improving students' science process skills and creative thinking skills.


GANEC SWARA ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 270
Author(s):  
KUSMIANTI KUSMIANTI

   The purpose of this research is to analyze: (1) the difference of critical thinking skills (CTS) and science process skills(SPS) between student’s group who are managed with hypothetical inquiry model and conventional learning model, (2) the difference of critical thinking skills (CTS) between student’s group who are managed with hypothetical inquiry model and conventional learning model, (3) the difference of science process skills (SPS) between student’s group who are managed with hypothetical inquiry model and conventional learning model.    This research is quasi experiments with post-test only control group design factorial 2x1. Data of critical think skill are collected by using test and data of science process skillscollected by using test and observation. Data analyzed by using descriptive analyze and one way MANOVA.It is found: (1) there is significant difference of critical thinking skills (CTS) and science process skills(SPS) between student’s group who are managed with hypothetical inquiry model and conventional learning model (F=59,161; p<0,05), (2) there is significant difference of critical thinking skills (CTS) between student’s group who are managed with hypothetical inquiry model and conventional learning model(F=22,219; p<0,05), (3) there is significant difference of science process skills (SPS) between student’s group who are managed with hypothetical inquiry model and conventional learning model (F=113.559; p<0,05).


Author(s):  
Sartika Sepriyani ◽  
Rayandra Asyhar ◽  
Asrial Asrial

The ability to solve problems is a skill that students need to have in dealing with various problems in life. This study aims to determine the effect of problem based learning models; cognitive styles and interaction between both factors on science learning outcomes of students in class VII of MTs 2 Tanjung Jabung Timur in academic year 2015/2016. This research was conducted with a quasi-experimental research method by applying a 2 × 2 factorial design. The study sample consisted of an experimental class of 30 students and a control class of 29 students. Data collection was conducted using two types of instruments, namely the Group Embedded Figures Test (GEFT) to measure students cognitive styles and students' learning outcomes test in essay forms. The Problem Based Learning model affect the learning outcomes, there is significant difference in science learning outcomes between students who have Cognitive field dependent (FD) style that is taught by the Problem Based Learning model and students who have Cognitive FD style that is taught by conventional learning models. The results show that the value of the experimental class post-test is higher than that of the control class. In short, the experimental class with the application of the Problem Based Learning model in the learning process provides higher learning outcomes than that of the conventional models.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document