scholarly journals THE EFFECT OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING MODEL OF NUMBER HEAD TOGETHER (NHT) TYPE ASSISTED ANIMATION ON STUDENT’S LEARNING OUTCOMES OF X CLASS SMA 2 LINTONGNIHUTA A.Y. 2014/2015

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy Alretni Mendrofa ◽  
Jonny H. Panggabean

ABSTRACT Aims of study to determine the effect of cooperative learning model of NHT type to learning outcomes of students in  subject matter  optical geometry in high school N 2 Lintongnihuta A.Y. 2014/2015.Kind of this research is quasi experimental. The population in this research were all students of class X Semester II SMA N 2 Lintongnihuta which consists of two classes. Sampling was done by purposive research by using two existing classes, namely class X Mia 2 were 26students as experimental class and the class X Mia 1 amounted to 30 students as the control class. The instrument used is a cognitive test in the form of multiple choice question number 20 and observation sheet of student’s activity. Experimental class was given treatment by cooperative learning model of  NHT type and grade control with conventional learning. Before being given different treatment performed pretest, which is the average value of the experimental class pretest 48.65 with a standard deviation  11.45 and the average value of the control class pretest 48.67 with a standard deviation 14.07. Second class pretest data testing showed that both classes of data were normally distributed and homogeneous. The test results obtained pretest tcount<ttable (0.0057 <2,14) then H0 is received, it means the ability of students' initial experimental class and control class alike. Then given treatment that is experimental class with cooperative learning model of NHT type and grade control with conventional learning models. During thelearning processinthe experimental classlearning activities of studentsincreased, the meetingI59.79%, 72.07%meetingIIandIIImeeting of75.30%.After the study was completed, given postest with an average 66.53 for experimental class with a standard deviation 11.64 and 48.66 with the control class standard deviation 14.07. On testing normality and homogeneity of data obtained postest that both classes of data were normally distributed and homogeneous. The data processing postest obtained that tcount= 5.1 and ttable = 2.14, so that t count > t table (5.1> 2.14) then Hareceived means there is influence of cooperative learning model of NHT type to students learning outcomes  in optic geometry material to X class SMA N 2 Lintongnihuta A.Y. 2014/2015. Keywords: Cooperative learning model of NHT type , animation, learning outcome, activity.

Author(s):  
Dyan Novi Rezki Situmorang ◽  
Wanapri Pangaribuan

AbstrakJenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian quasi eksperimen. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas X semester genap SMK Swasta Imelda Medan Tahun Ajaran 2019/2020. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan mengambil 2 kelas, yaitu kelas X TITL 1 sebagai kelas eksperimen dan kelas X TITL 2 sebagai kelas kontrol, yang masing-masing kelas berjumlah 28 orang siswa. Instrument yang digunakan untuk mengetahui hasil belajar siswa adalah tes hasil belajar dalam bentuk pilihan berganda dengan jumlah soal 30 butir. Hasil pengujian pretest sebelum diberi perlakuan yang berbeda, yaitu skor rata-rata di kelas eksperimen  (47) dengan standar deviasi 8,50 dan skor rata-rata di kelas kontrol (44,45) dengan standar deviasi 7,75. Pada pengujian data pretest kedua kelas diperoleh bahwa data kedua kelas berdistribusi normal dan homogen yang berarti memiliki kemampuan awal yang sama. Kemudian diberi perlakuan yaitu kelas eksperimen diajarkan dengan pembelajaran menggunakan model kooperatif tipe Team Game Tournament (TGT) dan kelas kontrol diajar dengan pembelajaran menggunakan model ekspositori. Setelah pembelajaran selesai diberikan posttest, diperoleh nilai posttest dengan hasil rata-rata kelas eksperimen (88,78) dengan standar deviasi 4,06 dan kelas kontrol (81,55) dengan standar deviasi 4,17. Dari hasil pengolahan data posttest diperoleh bahwa thitung=  6,40 dan ttabel = 1,67. Sehingga thitung > ttabel.Sehingga Ha diterima yaitu Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Team Game Tournament (TGT)memberikan hasil belajar pada pelajaran dasar dan pengukuran listrik yang lebih tinggi daripada pembelajaran menggunakan model ekspositori pada siswa kelas X TITL SMK Swasta Imelda Medan.Kata Kunci: Pembelajaran Tipe Team Game Tournament, Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif AbstractEnglish translation. This type of research is quasi experimental research. The population in this study is all students of class X even semester of Imelda Medan Private Vocational School Year 2019/2020. Sampling is done by taking 2 classes, namely class X TITL 1 as an experimental class and class X TITL 2 as a control class, each of which totals 28 students. The instrument used to find out student learning outcomes is a test of learning results in the form of multiple choices with the number of questions 30 points. Pretest test results before being given different treatments, namely the average score in the experimental class (47) with a standard deviation of 8.50 and the average score in the control class (44.45) with a standard deviation of 7.75. In the pretest data test both classes it was obtained that the data of both classes are normal and homogeneous distribution which means it has the same initial capabilities. Then given the treatment that experimental classes are taught by learning using a cooperative model type Team Game Tournament (TGT) and control classes are taught by learning using an expository model. After the learning was completed, posttest scores were obtained with the average results of experimental classes (88.78) with a standard deviation of 4.06 and control classes (81.55) with a standard deviation of 4.17. From the results of posttest data processing obtained that thitung = 6.40 and ttabel = 1.67. So thitung > ttabel. So ha accepted, namely the Cooperative Learning Model Type Team Game Tournament (TGT) provides learning outcomes on basic lessons and higher electrical measurements than learning using the expository model in students of class X TITL SMK Swasta Imelda Medan.  Keywords: Team Game Tournament Type Learning, Cooperative Learning Model


2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 297
Author(s):  
Sari’ah Sari’ah ◽  
Saiful Prayogi ◽  
Sukainil Ahzan

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of cooperative learning model of group investigation type against scince generic skills of students. This research was a quasi-experimental. The population in the study was a grade VIII MTS Nurul Falah NW Lajut with 36 students. Sampling was derived by random sampling where the 16 students of VIII A as on experimental class and VIII B as a control class with 20 students.Based on pretest data analysis, obtained an average value of 31,25 experimental class and control class was 42,2.Posttest analysis showed an average grade of 65,75 experimental and control class was 61,6.  The data analysis technique was t-test. It show t- test= 5,80 and t-table = 1,67. Because of  t-count is greater than the  t- table, it can be concluded that there were the effect of cooperative learning model of group investigation generic against science skills of student.


2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Henny Rukmanasari Hasibuan ◽  
Purwanto .

ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh model pembelajaran discovery learning terhadap hasil belajar siswa kelas X pada materi pokok Listrik Dinamis. Jenis penelitian ini adalah quasi experiment. Populasi dalam penelitian adalah seluruh siswa kelas X yang terdiri dari 8 kelas. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan cara cluster random sampling dengan mengambil 2 kelas secara acak yaitu kelas X-5 sebagai kelas eksperimen dan kelas X-6 sebagai kelas kontrol. Instrumen yang digunakan adalah tes hasil belajar yang telah divalidasi dalam bentuk pilihan berganda sebanyak 20 soal. Hasil penelitian diperoleh nilai rata-rata pretes kelas eksperimen 33,06 dan kelas kontrol 32,78. Kemudian diberikan perlakuan yang berbeda, kelas eksperimen dengan model pembelajaran discovery learning dan kelas kontrol dengan model pembelajaran konvensional. Setelah pembelajaran selesai diberikan, diperoleh postes dengan nilai rata-rata kelas eksperimen 75,69 dan kelas kontrol 69,86. Hasil uji t dengan taraf signifikasi 0,05 bahwa secara signifikan ada perbedaan akibat pengaruh model pembelajaran discovery learning terhadap hasil belajar siswa pada materi pokok Listrik Dinamis di kelas X. Kata kunci : model pembelajaran discovery learning dan hasil belajar siswa.   ABSTRACT This research aimed to know the effect of discovery learning model on students learning outcomes in the subject matter dynamical electricity in class X. The type of research was quasi-experimental. The population were the tenth grade students consisting of 8 classes. The samples collection done by means of cluster of random sampling by taking 2 class at random that is class X-5 as experiment class and class X-6 as control class. The instruments used were test of learning outcomes that have been validated in the form of option as much as 20 questions. The research result obtained average value of experiment pretest class 33,06 and the control class 32,78. Then given different treatment, experiment class with discovery learning and control class with conventional of models. After learning is completed, obtained postest the average value of experiment class 75,69 and control class 69,86. The results of t one party with the level significance in 0,05 obtained there is difference of students’ learning outcomes due to the effect of discovery learning in the subject matter listrik dinamis in class X. Keywords: Discovery learning model, and learning outcome.  


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-68
Author(s):  
Ika Rosenta Purba

This study aims to determine student learning outcomes using the cooperative learning model type TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) on ecosystem material in SMA Negeri 6 Pematangsiantar. This research was conducted on February-March 2019 in class X (1st) SMA Negeri 6 Pematangsiantar. The population in this study was class X SMA Negeri 6 Pematangsiantar with 9 classes. The sampling method is Cluster Random Sampling, and get class X-1 as an experimental class and class X-5 as a control. The results of the analysis of the mean value of the pre-test of the control class = 38.38, the experimental class = 52.66 and the average value of the post-test of the control class = 59.75, the experimental class = 79.66. The results of the standard deviation analysis of the control class pretest = 13,886, the experimental class = 9,468 and the posttest standard deviation of the control class = 14,458, the experimental class = 6,454. The results of the hypothesis analysis (t test) were obtained t-count = 6.985 and t-table =1.99. Based on the results of research and analysis it can be concluded that the cooperative learning model of the TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) type is better for improving learning outcomes compared to conventional learning on ecosystem material in class X SMA Negeri 6 Pematangsiantar


2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 92
Author(s):  
Dede Parsaoran Damanik ◽  
Jelita Panjaitan ◽  
Ika Trisni Simangunsong

This study aims at determining the significant influence of the NHT (Numbered Head Together) Cooperative Learning Model assisted by Mind Mapping on physics learning outcomes in the dynamic electric subject matter of class XII semester I students of SMK YAPIM TARUNA Sei Rotan. This type of research is a quasi experiment. The population in this study is all students of class XII SMK IAP YAPIM TARUNA. Sampling was done by cluster random sampling technique, then obtained class XII-1 = 35 people as an experimental class taught using the NHT (Numbered Head Together) Cooperative Learning model assisted by Mind Mapping and class XII-2 = 35 people as control classes taught by the Direct Learning model. This research instrument consisted of 25 multiple choice questions with 5 options (a, b, c, d, and e) which had previously been tested to determine the validity, reliability, level of difficulty and distinguishing power of the test. From the results of the study, an average value of experimental class pretest of 32.18 with a standard deviation of 9.49 and an average value of pretest of 31.18 with a standard deviation of 10.96 was obtained. From the results of the two-party t test obtained t count = 0.49 and t table = 1.99, because t count ˂ t table (0.49 <1.99) this shows that the initial ability of the two classes is the same. Then a different treatment was given. After the learning ended, posttest was done with the average value of the experimental class 73.18 with a standard deviation of 10.37 and the average value of the Control class 56.54 with a standard deviation of 11.94. The results of one-party t test obtained the price of tcount = 7.44 and ttable = 1.67 at the significant level α = 0.05 and dk = 86, because tcount ˃ ttable (7.44 ˃ 1.67), this shows that there is a significant influence significant NHT (Numbered Head Together) Cooperative learning model aided by Mind Mapping on physics learning outcomes on the subject matter of Dynamic Electricity


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 161
Author(s):  
Maria Sisilia ◽  
Jamaluddin Sakung ◽  
Irwan Said

The aim of this study is to determine the learning outcomes of students in the class which is treatedwith the cooperative learning model Jigsaw whether it is better than the untreated class on chemicalequilibrium topic. This study is a quasi-experimental research design with Non Randomized Pretest-posttest control group design. The population in this study is 245 students of class XI MIA withacademic year 2014/2015, from 8 classes. The sample in this study class XI MIA 5 (n = 32) as anexperimental class while class XI MIA 6 (n = 32) as a control class. The analysis of data obtained inthe experimental class, X1 1 valueis 79.66 with a standard deviation = 9.41. In the control class, X2valueis 70.03 with a standard deviation = 11.13. The result of hypothesisis found that tcalculated>ttable(5.53 > 1.67) with a significance level (α = 0.05) and degrees of freedom = 62. This shows that H0 isrejected and H1 is accepted. Therefore, it can be concluded that student learning outcomes in class which is treated using the cooperative learning model Jigsaw is better than the untreated class on chemicalequilibrium topic.


TAMAN VOKASI ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fauzie Khorniawan ◽  
Arief Bintoro Johan

The purpose of research to find out the results of class X student of SMK Piri 1 Yogyakarta Semester 1 2014/2015 academic year using cooperative learning model Numbered Head Together (NHT). In a comparative study to determine the results of class X class students of SMK Piri 1 Yogyakarta between TP 1 and TP 2 by using cooperative learning model and conventional learning.Descriptive research results indicate student learning outcomes between experimental and control classes classes before their treatment an average value of 5.7 while the experimental class posttest control class 4.8. After an average value treatment experimental classes and control classes had increased to 7.3 while the experimental class to control class 5.4. Of hypothesis test using the self-obtained results of pre-test Thitung< T tabel=1,148 <2.037 with significance level of 5%. Results posttest price Thitung> Ttabel = 2,434 >2.037 with significance level of 5%. There is an increase in Thitung> Ttabel = 2.268 >2.037 with significance level of 5%. Hypothesis test with criteria reject Ho and Ha received. 


2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Siti Zaitun Hasibuan ◽  
Abd. Hakim Siregar

This study aims to determine the significant effect of the result cooperative learning model  to the student’s learning result in the main subject second semester X “Dynamic Power” Class in SMA Negeri 1 Rantau Selatan T.P 2013/2014.  This research is quasi experimental. The  population in this research was all students in class X which consists of 10 classes. With random cluster sampling technique was chosen class X-2 and X-1 as an experimental class and control class. Instrument were contain of multiple-choice tests and observation sheet test have been conducted to measure the student’s learning outcames. Research’s design is Control Group Pretest-Postest Design. Average data of pre-test experimental class and control class was 47.5 and 51.56. In both classes of the test data obtained pretest that both classes of data are normally distributed and homogeneous. T-test result of pretest obtained t <t table -0,04 <1.99, then Ho is accepted means the ability of the students at the beginning of the second class of the same. Then given treatment that is experimental class with cooperative learning model STAD and a control class with conventional learning models. The posttest average yield experimental class and control class is 70.5 dan 61.5. In both classes of the test data obtained posttest that both classes of data are normally distributed and homogeneous. T test results obtained t> t table 3.09> 1.99 then the Ha was accepted that no significant influence cooperative learning model STAD to the student learning outcomes. Keywords   : Cooperative type STAD, activity, learning results


2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Warmita Oktami ◽  
Nurdin Siregar

This study aims to determine the effect of Cooperative Learning Model Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) based on the concept map learning outcomes of students in the subject matter Dynamic Electricity second semester of class X SMA Negeri 1 of Academic Year 2013/2014. This research is quasi-experimental. The study population was all students of class X which consists of 4 classes. Random cluster sampling technique was used to select class experimental class and control class. Instrument in this research is multiple-choice test has tested the validity testing to measure learning outcomes. Average data pretest experimental classes and control classes are 27.43 and 27.57. In both classes, the pretest data are normally distributed (which Lhitung <Ltabel) and homogeneous (where Fhitung <F table). T-test result of pretest shows that t <t table (-0.052 <1.997), then Ho is accepted, means the ability of the students at the beginning of the second class are the same. Then treatment was given that is experimental class with cooperative learning model Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) and class-based Concept Map control with conventional learning models. After completion of the study, the data obtained with the posttest average yield grade experimental and control classes are 75.57 and 63.72. In both classes of the test data obtained posttest that both classes of data are normally distributed and homogeneous. T test results obtained t> t table (6.48> 1.669) then H is accepted, that reveal an influence of cooperative learning model Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) based on the concept map learning outcomes of students. Keywords :    Physics, Cooperative Type STAD, Concept Map, Learning Results.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 168-171
Author(s):  
Nurhijrah Nurhijrah ◽  
Paulus H. Abram ◽  
Sitti Aminah

This study aimed to describe the effect of cooperative learning model STAD type based on mind mapping toward students’ learning outcomes on chemical bond material in 10th Grade SMA Negeri 1 North Parigi. This type of research was quasi experiment with a non-randomized pretest posttest control group design. Sampling was done based on special considerations (purposive sampling). The sample used in this study were students of class X Science 1 as the experimental class (n = 22) and class X Science 2 as the control class (n = 23). The results of data analysis obtained the average value ( ) of the experimental class was 72.18 with a standard deviation of 13.12, while  of the control class was 66.21 with a standard deviation of 10.04. The results of hypothesis testing with one-party t-test statistics (right party) obtained a value of tcount = 6.03 and ttable = 1.68 with a significant level of ( ) = 0.05 and dk = 43. This indicated that H0 was rejected and H1 was accepted so it can be concluded that learning outcomes with cooperative learning model STAD type based mind mapping was higher than the direct learning model on chemical bonding.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document