scholarly journals Tanggung Jawab Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) Terhadap Pendaftaran Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah Yang Menjadi Objek Sengketa

Acta Comitas ◽  
2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ida Ayu Wulan Rismayanthi
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Title Deed ◽  
Legal Consequence ◽  
Card System ◽  
The Government ◽  
Legal Consequences

The Land Deed Official (the PPAT) is a public official who is granted part of the authorities by the State in the implementation of land registration, by making the land certificate as the basis for land registration. The Agrarian Office may turn down the registration of the land rights in the event of any recording in the land registry books of the land rights which become the object of dispute. Based on Article 45 of the Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 that there is a legal ambiguity on the return of the files in the form of certificate, title deed and other related documents. According to Article 55 of the Head of National Land Agency number 1 of 2006, the PPAT is personally responsible for the execution of the task and his/her authority, in every act making. There is no clear arrangement regarding the responsibility of PPAT on the registration of the conveyance of the land which becomes the object of dispute. Such provisions result in legal issues about the legal consequences and the responsibility of PPAT on the registration of the conveyance of the land which becomes the object of dispute The type of research used in this thesis is a normative legal research as the result of the presence of the ambiguity and the vacuum of norms. The legal materials were collected by the techniques of library research and the card system. The descriptive, interpretative and argumentative theories as well as associated with laws that relevant to the issues were used to analyze the legal materials. The results showed that the Agrarian Office turns down and returns the documents to the PPAT as the legal consequence of the conveyance of land which becomes the object of dispute. The legal consequences of the deed made ??before the PPAT remains authentic during a blocking of certificate. The responsibility of the PPAT is in accordance with his/her position, in keeping the deed, certificate along with the relevant documents at the time of the restitution by the Agrarian Office. PPAT shall be mandatory as an intermediary to keep the documents that are being returned at the time of confiscation by a court or at the revocation of blocking by the applicant.

scholarly journals PERBUATAN MALADMINISTRASI DALAM PEMBUATAN AKTA JUAL BELI OLEH PPAT DAN AKIBAT HUKUMNYA MENURUT PERATURAN PEMERINTAH NOMOR 24 TAHUN 2016 TENTANG PERATURAN JABATAN PPAT Jo. PERATURAN PEMERINTAH NOMOR 37 TAHUN 1998 TENTANG PERATURAN JABATAN PPAT (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI JAKARTA SELATAN NOMOR: 129/Pdt.G/2016/PN.Jkt.Sel.)

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1378
Author(s):  
Cecyllia Tamara B. Schouten ◽  
Hanafi Tanawijaya
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Abuse Of Power ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
Ministerial Decree ◽  
Legal Consequences ◽  
Poor Management

The Land Deed Official (the PPAT) is a Public Official who is granted part of the authorities by the State in the implementation of land registration and the making of an authentic deed. The certificate must be made based on the deeds of the law by the parties. The deeds of the law based on Article 2 of the Government Regulation Number 37 of 1998, a sale and purchase, swap, gift, inbreng, granting right of building/right of use based on the land property rights, and granting of land mortgage. Based on the ordinance, the authentic deed can be used as evidence in case of dispute. In this case is usually a lot of the contempt of court. This act is called the Maladministration. Maladministration is poor management or regulation, especially in an offical capacity. Maladministration is bias, neglect, inattention, delay, incompetence, ineptitude, arbitrariness and so on and would be long and interesting list. Including abuse of power, unlawful procedures, unfairness and malfunction or incompetence. The author examines the problem using normative legal research methods supported by some interviews with some who are experts in the field of the land and maladministration. This act resulted in the existence of legal consequences. Due to the law could by law or may be cancelled. The sanctions awarded againts to the Land Deed Official who did this deed contained in Ministerial Decree of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial/Head of National Land Authority Number 112/Kep-4.1/iv/2017 Article 6 paragraph (1) include reprimand, warning, skorzing, onzetting even fired from The Land Deed Official membership.

Eksistensi Lembaga Pengumuman Terhadap Legalitas Sertipikat Hak Atas Tanah (Pelaksanaan Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematik Lengkap)

Tunas Agraria ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-183
Author(s):  
Mitta Ramadany Wael ◽  
Sarjita Sarjita ◽  
Mujiati Mujiati
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Government ◽  
Customary Land ◽  
Legal Consequences

Abstract: The implementation of the announcement agency in land registration to apply the principle of publicity, but in its implementation according to PP 24 of 1997 and the PTSL regulation there is a difference in both the number of days of implementation and the status of registered parcels. This research used legal research methods is a normative law research methods and empirical juridical law that aims to determine the existence of the announcement agency in the implementation of PTSL and find out the legal consequences of the announcement agency on the legality of the Land Rights Certificate. The result of this research is the existence of the announcement agency in PP No. 24 of 1997 is different from the implementation of PTSL. Explicitly in PP No. 24 of 1997 the announcement was only carried out for customary land for 30 days and the announcement of state land was not implemented while the existence of the announcement agency in PTSL did not differentiate the status of the land, either state land or customary land, the announcement was still held for 14 calendar days. In accordance with the hierarchy of state the Government Regulation has a higher position than the Ministerial Regulation, this causes the making of the regulations below must refer to the regulations above so as not to collide/counter-productive. This rule collision will cause a legal gap if there is a lawsuit in the Administrative Court, so the product can be legally flawed and canceled. Kata Kunci : existence, announcement agency and PTSL Intisari: Pelaksanaan lembaga pengumuman sesuai PP No. 24 Tahun 1997 dan Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematik Lengkap (PTSL) terdapat perbedaan baik dalam jumlah hari pelaksanaan maupun status bidang tanah yang didaftarkan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dan hukum yuridis empiris yang bertujuan untuk mengetahui eksistensi lembaga pengumuman dalam pelaksanaan PTSL dan mengetahui konsekuensinya terhadap legalitas sertipikat hak atas tanah. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah eksistensi lembaga pengumuman dalam PP No. 24 Tahun 1997 berbeda dengan pelaksanaan dalam PTSL. Secara tegas dalam PP No. 24 Tahun 1997 pengumuman hanya dilaksanakan untuk tanah adat selama 30 hari dan untuk tanah tanah negara tidak dilaksanakan pengumuman, sedangkan eksistensi lembaga pengumuman dalam PTSL tidak membedakan status tanah, baik itu tanah negara maupun tanah adat tetap dilakukan pengumuman selama 14 hari kalender. Sesuai dengan hierarki peraturan perundang-undangan, peraturan pemerintah memiliki kedudukan lebih tinggi dari peraturan menteri, hal ini menyebabkan pembuatan peraturan yang di bawah harus merujuk kepada peraturan yang ada di atasnya supaya tidak bertabrakan/kontra produktif. Tabrakan aturan ini akan menimbulkan celah hukum apabila terjadinya suatu gugatan di PTUN, sehingga produk yang dihasilkan bisa jadi cacat hukum dan dibatalkan. Kata Kunci : eksistensi, lembaga pengumuman dan PTSL

scholarly journals The Strength of Evidence (Certificate) in Land Rights Disputes According to Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 Concerning Land Registration

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriella Talenta Sekotibo
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Good Faith ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Strength Of Evidence ◽  
Legal Standing ◽  
Legal Consequences

The purpose of this study is to provide legal certainty and to resolve disputes over land rights ownership for buyers who are acting in good faith when purchasing and selling inheritance. The research method is normative juridical, employing both a statutory and case-based approach. According to the study's findings, buyers with good intentions receive legal protection in the form of compensation. However, when parties with bad intentions violate Article 1267 of the Civil Code, the legal consequences of buying and selling inherited land are null and void, as they contain elements of fraud, oversight, and ignorance. additional heirs. Keeping in mind that the property being traded is inheritance land that already possesses permanent legal standing and cannot be traded without the approval of other heirs.Keywords: Legal Protection; Good Faith Buyers; and Inheritance Land.

scholarly journals Keabsahan Akta PPAT Yang Tidak Ditandatangani Para Saksi (Studi Putusan PN. No.16/Pdt.G/2015/Pn.Krg)

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 57-76
Author(s):  
Valerio Xaverius Tjipto
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Legal Problem ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Legal Standing ◽  
Legal Effect ◽  
Legal Consequence

ABSTRACT             PPAT Deed is an authentic deed in the case of certain legal actions, especially in the case of transfer of land rights from one party to another party. An authentic deed is a deed made by an authorized official for that, in the place where the deed was made and the format is in accordance with the provisions of the legislation in force. The authentic PPAT deed must be read in front of the parties, and signed by the witnesses and PPAT. The legal standing of witness in the PPAT authentic deed is as an instrument witness who witnessed and knew the making of the PPAT deed and also as evidence to strengthen the PPAT deed was made. If there is a legal problem with the PPAT deed, the instrumentair witness who signed the PPAT deed can be asked for information relating to the implementation of the PPAT deed, including information about the presence of the parties who signed the PPAT deed before the PPAT and the witnesses. The problem in this research is how the legal arrangement of witnesses in the PPAT deed, How is the legal effect on the PPAT deed whose signature was carried out in the presence of two witnesses and How is the legal analysis considered by the Panel of Judges in the Karanganyar District Court Decision No. 16 / Pdt.G / 2015 / PN.Krg.             This type of research is empirical juridical research, in which the approach to the problem is carried out by reviewing the implementation of PPAT obligations based on the applicable laws and regulations in this case are Articles 21 and 22, PP No. 24 of 2016 concerning amendments to PP No. 37 of 1998 concerning PPAT position regulations and this research was also supported by conducting direct interviews with 3 PPAT people whose working area was in Medan City.The results of the study stated that the legal arrangements regarding witnesses in the PPAT deed contained in Articles 21 and 22, PP No. 24 of 2016 concerning amendments to PP No. 37 of 1998 concerning PPAT position regulations, Article 18 paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 of the regulation of the State Minister for Agrarian Affairs / Head of the National Land Agency (BPN) Number 1 of 2006 concerning Provisions for Implementing Government Regulation Number 37 of 1998 concerning PPAT Position Regulations, Article 1895-1912 Civil Code in the description of the criteria for witnesses recognized in making the PPAT deed and Article 37 PP No. 24 of 1997 concerning land registration, the legal consequence of the PPAT deed which was signed before two witnesses was that the PPAT deed was degraded to a deed under the hand, because it contained a formal legal flaw and the legal analysis of the Judge Panel's consideration in the Karanganyar District Court Decision No. 16 / Pdt.G / 2015 / PN.Krg which states that the PPAT has committed acts against the law and the authentic deed has been degraded to a deed under the hand.Keywords: PPAT Law, PPAT Deed, and the Witness Position

scholarly journals ESENSI TRANSPARANSI DAN AKUNTABILITASI DALAM PENDAFTARAN TANAH DALAM SISTEM HUKUM INDONESIA

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Deselfia D N M Sahari
Keyword(s):  
Local Government ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Positive Tendency ◽  
The Government

The essence of transparency and accountability in land registration within the legal system in Indonesia has not been realized properly. Due to the weakness of the guarantee of legal certainty and legal protection from the government.  In addition, the publication system of land registration adopted is negative with a positive tendency, not applied in Article 32 paragraph (2) of Government Regulation Number 24 Year 1997 regarding expiration to file a five-year lawsuit there is a synchronization / non-harmonization concerning land authority between local government Article 14 paragraph (2 ) Letter k of Law Number 23 Year 2014 regarding Regional Government and Authority of National Land Agency (Regulation of Head of National Land Agency No.2 Year 2013 regarding Abundance of Land Rights and Land Registration Authority) and regulation of grace period of entitlement right. AbstrakEsensi transparansi dan akuntabilitas dalam pendaftaran tanah dalam sistem hukum di Indonesia belum terealisasi dengan baik. Karena lemahnya jaminan kepastian hukum dan perlindungan hukum dari pemerintah. Selain itu, sistem publikasi pendaftaran tanah yang diadopsi negatif dengan kecenderungan positif, tidak diterapkan dalam Pasal 32 ayat (2) Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang berakhirnya pengajuan gugatan lima tahun ada sinkronisasi / non-harmonisasi tentang kewenangan pertanahan antar pemerintah daerah Pasal 14 ayat (2) Huruf k Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah dan Kewenangan Badan Pertanahan Nasional (Peraturan Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional No.2 Tahun 2013 tentang Kelimpahan Hak atas Tanah dan Pendaftaran Tanah Otoritas) dan peraturan masa tenggang hak cipta. Kata kunci: Transparansi; Akuntabilitas; Pendaftaran Tanah; Sistem Hukum;

scholarly journals Akibat Hukum Ketentuan Pasal 33 Peraturan Menteri Agraria dan Tata Ruang/Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 6 Tahun 2018

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 220
Author(s):  
Bambang Tri Wahyudi ◽  
Rachmad Safa’at
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Spatial Planning ◽  
Income Tax ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Right ◽  
Legal Consequences ◽  
Legal Force

This study aimed to analyze the legal force, legal conflicts, and legal consequences of the provisions of Article 33 of the Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency Number 6 of 2018 and the formulation that was appropriate with the regulations of the payment procedures for income tax (PPh) and acquisition duty of right on land and building (BPHTB). This study used a normative juridical method with a conceptual and statute approach. Based on academic juridical perspective, article 33 Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency Number 6 of 2018 had weak legal force, while from a formal juridical perspective the regulation remained valid before a decision to cancel its application from the Supreme Court. The provisions of Article 33 of the Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency Number 6 of 2018 contradicted the provisions of Articles 3 and 7 of Government Regulation Number 34 of 2018 and Articles 90 and 91 of Law Number 28 of 2009. It caused legal consequences i.e. legal uncertainty, legal injustice, and did not fulfill the legal force of land rights certificates as a strong means of proof. The formulation of the right regulation regarding the procedure for paying income tax and fees for acquiring land and building rights was carried out by establishing and stipulating a ministerial regulation as a normative guideline for a complete systematic land registration program.

scholarly journals Dynamics Of The Community In The Implementation Of Complete Systematic Land Registration Program In The Land Office Of Blora Regency

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 163
Author(s):  
Nuryanto Nuryanto ◽  
Umar Ma'ruf
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
Community Dynamics ◽  
Great Influence ◽  
Field Research ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Library Research ◽  
The Government

The birth of a complete systematic land registration program is expected to reduce the level of land problems faced by the government, especially in fulfilling land rights and accelerating the making of land certificates for the community. In this research, the formulation of the problem proposed is how is the dynamics of the community in implementing a complete systematic land registration in Blora Regency?. This study uses a sociological juridical approach to the type of analytical descriptive research. The data used for this study are primary and secondary data taken by library research methods, field research, and interviews. Based on the results of the study concluded that the dynamics of the community towards the implementation of the PTSL program by looking at the benefits of the program which has a great influence on the welfare of the community. In an effort to realize the welfare of the community, the community receiving land certificates through PTSL can be mobilized together to make various productive businesses that are expected to improve the community's economy.Keywords: Community Dynamics; Complete Systematic Land Registration; Land Office.

scholarly journals Peranan PPAT Dalam Pensertifikatan Tanah Akibat Jual Beli

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 241
Author(s):  
Ratih Mega Puspa Sari ◽  
Gunarto Gunarto
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Property Right ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
The Real ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right

ABSTRACTDalam Pasal 1 Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 24 tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Pemerintah nomor 37 tahun 1998 tentang Peraturan Jabatan Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah ini yang dimaksud dengan Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah, selanjutnya disebut PPAT, adalah pejabat umum yang diberi kewenangan untuk membuat akta-akta otentik mengenai perbuatan hukum tertentu mengenai hak atas tanah atau Hak Milik atas Satuan Rumah Susun. Dan sejak berlakunya Pemerintah Peraturan Nomor 10 Tahun 1961 sebagaimana telah diperbaharui dengan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah, jual beli atas tanah dilakukan oleh para pihak di hadapan PPAT yang bertugas membuat aktanya. Akta jual beli yang ditandatangani para pihak membuktikan telah terjadi pemindahan hak dari penjual kepada pembelinya dengan disertai pembayaran harganya, telah memenuhi syarat tunai dan menunjukkan secara nyata atau riil perbuatan hukum jual beli yang bersangkutan telah dilaksanakan. Akta tersebut membuktikan bahwa benar telah dilakukan perbuatan hukum pemindahan hak untuk selama-lamanya dan pembayaran harganya.Karena perbuatan hukum yang dilakukan merupakan perbuatan hukum pemindahan hak, maka akta tersebut membuktikan bahwa penerima hak (pembeli) sudah menjadi pemegang haknya yang baru .Kata kunci : Pejabat pembuat akta tanah, Akta Jual Beli Tanah ABSTRACTIn Article 1 of the Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 24 of 2016 on Amendment to Government Regulation No. 37 of 1998 on the Regulation of the Official of the Author of the Land Deed as meant by the Land Deed Authority Officer, hereinafter referred to as PPAT, is a public official authorized to make the deed- authentic deeds concerning certain legal acts concerning the right to land or the Property Right of the Flats Unit. And since the enactment of Government Regulation Number 10 Year 1961 as has been updated with Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 on Land Registration, the sale and purchase of land carried out by the parties in the presence of PPAT in charge of making the act. The sale and purchase deed signed by the parties proves that there has been a transfer of rights from the seller to the purchaser, accompanied by the payment of the price, has met the cash requirements and shows the real or real deed of the sale and purchase law concerned has been executed. The deed proves that the right to have done the legal act of transfer of rights for ever and the payment of the price. Because the legal act is done is a legal act of transfer of rights, then the deed proves that the recipient of the right (buyer) has become the new rights holder.Keyword : Land Deed Official ,The Deed Of Sale And Purchase Of Land

scholarly journals The Contradiction of Between Judge’s Decision and Legal Provisions Regarding The Position of Heirs in Proof of Land Rights

2019 ◽  
pp. 133-148
Author(s):  
Sulistiani Adont ◽  
La Syarifuddin ◽  
Rahmawati Al Hidayah
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
Valid Evidence ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right

As the economic development of Indonesian society increases, so will the need for legal certainty in the field of land for the right holder of a plot of land. the fundamental issue in verifying the right to the land is any person claiming to have a right, or appointing an event to affirm his right or to deny any right of another person, shall prove the existence of that right or prove the event, the heirs' a case study of the Samarinda District Court Judgment Number 138 / Pdt.G / 2014 / PN.Smr.This research uses normative research method. The primary legal material of this research is the legislation that is compiled into a conceptual form based on existing legislation. Which then conducted legal analysis of the problems in this study.The result of the research is the position of the heirs in verification of the right to land must have at least two evidences, that can prove that the heirs are valid first through the certificate of inheritance. To strengthen the verification of the heirs to the land rights, the heirs must prove by means of evidence as set forth in Article 24 paragraph (1) of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Registration. The second result of the research is the letter of appointment by the Government/Local Government is a valid evidence based on existing legislation, and it becomes the base of the right which is the basis of the land ownership, the analysis of the judge's decision namely the judge decision of Samarinda District Court No. 138 / Pdt.G / 2014 / PN.Smr is incorrect and does not provide legal certainty, it is caused by no reference what is contained in Article 24 paragraph (1) and Article 32 paragraph (2) Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 on Land Registration.

scholarly journals PENGARUH SERTIFIKAT HAK ATAS TANAH SEBAGAI ALAT BUKTI DALAM MENCAPAI KEPASTIAN HUKUM

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-43
Author(s):  
Abdul Muthallib
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right ◽  
Role Of The Government

This article discusses legal certainty as one of the objectives of Law No. 5 of 1960 concerning Agrarian (Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Pokok-Pokok Agraria) Principles and the influence of land rights certificates as a strong means of proof of land registration. The provision of guarantees of legal certainty to holders of land rights is accommodated in Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Agrarian Principles and further regulated in Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration (Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah). Using a normative legal view, this article refers to regulations on agrarian. The discussion of the article looks at the role of the government in providing opportunities for all citizens to register land with the aim of obtaining legal certainty and minimizing disputes. This article looks at the purpose of issuing certificates in land registration activities so that right-holders can easily prove that they are the right-holders. This is done so that rights holders can obtain legal certainty and legal protection. However, the land rights certificate issued is considered to be still lacking in minimizing disputes and it is assumed that it has not affected the land rights owners to protect their rights.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document