scholarly journals ANOMALI EFEK KALENDER PADA RETURN SAHAM LQ-45 DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 2642
Author(s):  
Komang Intan Permatasari ◽  
I Ketut Mustanda

Calendar effect anomalies indicate a return deviation in a capital market that allows investors to take advantage of a time and obtain abnormal returns. This study aims to determine the difference in the average abnormal return on the day (the day of the week effect), Monday the fourth week (week-four effect), and January with other months (January effect). The study was conducted on companies included in the LQ-45 stock group and obtained a sample of35 companies using the saturated sample method. The data source comes from secondary data, through the yahoo finance website and the method of data collection is done by non-participant observation including data collection on the development of stock prices included in the LQ-45 group during the period February 2015 to January 2018. Test results with the SPSS program through Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann Whitney Test, show that the stock’s average abnormal return at any time is not different, so the conclusion that there is no day of the week effect, week-four effect, and January effect on the LQ-45 stock index on the Stock Exchange Indonesia. Keywords: calendar effect anomaly, abnormal return

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-50
Author(s):  
Indrayani Indrayani

This study aims to analyze the January Effect phenomenon based on the presence or absence of significant difference between the 5-days average abnormal return in the end of December and 5 days in early January on mining stocks listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period 2011-2015. The January effect is the tendency of rising stock prices between 31 December to the end of the first week in January. The population of this study is 41 companies and the samples are 35 companies taken using purposive sampling technique. The data used are secondary data in the price of the daily closing of stocks and JCI during the observation period. Data analysis method used is descriptive statistical analysis. The hypothesis testing is conducted using non-parametric difference test which is called as WilcoxonSigned Rank Test. The results showed that there is a significant difference between the 5-days average abnormal return in the end of December and 5 days in early January on mining stocks listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period 2011-2015, so the January Effect phenomenon has occurred.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-171
Author(s):  
Asnat Susanti Dangga Lolu ◽  
Lusianus Heronimus Sinyo Kelen

This study examines the differences in stock prices listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange as measured using average abnormal returns on events (event studies) before and after the enactment of Large-Scale Social Restrictions for Foreign Citizens, especially COVID-19 which has an impact not only threatening human health but also has an impact on the economic sector. This condition will certainly have an impact on all sectors including stock trading on the Indonesia Stock Exchange, especially the Tourism, Hospitality, and Restaurant sub-sector. By using a sample of 41 companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange with a research period of 3 months (16 November 2020 to 15 February 2021) the type of purposive sampling research that meets the criteria and using paired sample t-test, the results show that there is no difference Average Abnormal Return before and after the occurrence of a PSBB event for Foreign Citizens. So it can be concluded that the PSBB for Foreign Citizens has no impact on the average abnormal return obtained by investors.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 3930
Author(s):  
Septia Wulandari Suarka ◽  
Ni Luh Putu Wiagustini

The purpose of this study is to analyze the significance of the influence of inflation, ROE, DER, and EPS on stock prices. This research was conducted at Concern Goods Companies that are listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the 2015-2017 period. The number of samples of this study were 31 companies. Data collection is done by the method of non-participant observation. Based on the results of the analysis found that inflation, ROE. DER, and EPS simultaneously have a significant effect on stock prices. Partially Inflation and DER have no significant effect on stock prices, this indicates that investors do not see Inflation and DER as a decision to buy shares. While partially ROE and EPS have a significant positive effect on stock prices, this shows that investors pay attention to ROE and EPS in deciding to invest. The higher the ROE and EPS, the higher the investor's interest in investing in the company's capital, so that the share price will go up. Keywords: Inflation, ROE, DER, EPS, stock price    


2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 51
Author(s):  
Reza Widhar Pahlevi

Market anomalies appears on all forms of efficient markets, both weak form, semi-strong and strongform. But plenty of evidence to link the anomaly with semi-strong form efficient market exploited togenerate abnormal returns. Market anomalies that is often discussed is the Day of the Week Effect,January Effect, Week Four Effect and other market anomalies. Empirical research is intended todetermine whether there is the phenomenon of the day of the week effect, week four effect, the effectrogalsky and January effect on LQ 45 stocks in the Indonesia Stock Exchange year period 2014-2015.Based on the analysis of data, shows that there is the phenomenon of the day of week effect on thecompany LQ-45 in Indonesia Stock Exchange 2014-2015 period, there is the phenomenon of weekfour effect on the LQ-45 in Indonesia Stock Exchange 2014-2015 period, there are phenomenonRogalski Effect on the LQ-45 in Indonesia Stock Exchange 2014-2015 period and there is no Januaryeffect phenomenon in the LQ-45 in Indonesia Stock Exchange 2014-2015 period.Keywords: the day of the week effect, week four effect, rogalsky effect and january effect


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 988
Author(s):  
I Putu Agus Ary Raditya Juliana ◽  
Ica Rika Candraningrat

The purpose of this study is to determine the market reaction to the announcement of cash dividends, by looking at differences in abnormal return and trading volume activity before and after the cash dividend announcement. Dividend announcement is an event that affects the market, because the company provides information to the public. Information provided by the company will influence investors' decision making and will act on that information. The sample of this study amounted to 33 of the 100 companies incorporated in the Kompas 100 index on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). The data collection method uses non-participant observation, which is document observation. The analysis technique used is Paired-Sample T Test and Wilcoxon-Signed Rank Test. The results showed that there were no differences in abnormal returns and trading volume activity before and after the distribution of cash dividends. Keywords: cash dividend, abnormal return, trading volume activity


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Afriyeni Afriyeni ◽  
Doni Marlius

In this research uses empirical design, the goal is to determine how the effect of the initial public offering of the abnormal return earned by investors on the Stock Exchange went public in the period 2008-2010. This study is a population of all shares of listed companies on the Stock Exchange. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling method based sampling method with a consideration of certain criteria in order to obtain as many as 26 samples. Based on the statistical test results, it can be concluded that the initial public offering and a significant positive effect on abnormal returns earned by investors on the Stock Exchange, which can be seen from the alternative hypothesis is accepted. This means that the average abnormal return earned by investors on the Stock Exchange for the first six weeks of the companies that go public as many as 26 companies will be greater than 0 (zero) or positive. Overall average abnormal return earned by investors is positive, so that the average IPO price of 26 companies that went public in the year 2008 to 2010 is considered low (undervalued) or if the real rate of return higher than the return that expected.


2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdul Rashid ◽  
Saba Kausar

In this paper, we first examine the presence of monthly calendar anomaly in Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) using aggregate and firm-level monthly stock returns. Secondly, we classify the sample firms into low-beta, medium-beta, and high-beta firms to examine the monthly anomaly of stock returns for firms having different level of systematic risk. By considering the stochastic dominance approach (SDA), we employ the simulation based method of Barrett and Donald (2003) to identify the dominant month over the period from January 2000 to December 2017. We find significant evidence of the existence of the January effect in both firm and market stock returns. We also find that the January effect exists more prominently in both low-risk and high-risk firms categorised based on their systematic risk. On the other end of the continuum, for moderately risky firms, there is strong evidence of the presence of the December effect. One of possible explanations of the January effect is the yearend bonus received in the month of January. Such bonuses are generally used to purchase stocks, causing the bullish trend of stock prices in January. However, the evidence of the January anomaly in both low-beta and high-beta portfolios returns is puzzling, suggesting that investors may invest in both low- and high-risk stocks when enthusiastically investing in stock market. The findings of the paper suggest that investors may get abnormal returns by forecasting stock return patterns and designing their investment strategies by taking into account the January and December effects and the level of systematic risk associated with the firms. JEL Classification: G02, G12, G14 Keywords: Behavioural Finance, Stochastic Dominance Approach, Monthly Anomaly, January Effect, December Effect, TOY Anomaly, Abnormal Returns, KS Type Test, PSX


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 1026
Author(s):  
I Gede Aditya Baskara ◽  
Made Gede Wirakusuma

This research is an event study that aims to determine the market reaction arising from the 2019 Indonesian presidential election, against companies listed in the infrastructure stock sector on April 17, 2019, using the abnormal return indicator. This study uses secondary data in the form of daily stock prices per company during the period with the population of the infrastructure sector listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The statistical tests used to test hypotheses are descriptive statistical tests, normality tests and one sample t-test. The results of the one sample t-test on abnormal return is that there is no significant difference, which means the market does not respond to the event. These results indicate that the efficient market is not answered in the 2019 Indonesian presidential election due to the absence of abnormal returns in it. Keywords : Event Study, Market Reaction, Abnormal Return, 2019 Indonesian Presidential Election.


2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 756
Author(s):  
Gusti Ayu Ratrini ◽  
I Wayan Suartana

The January Effect is one of the seasonal anomalies, which reveals that stock returns in January tend to be higher than in months other than January. This study aimed to examine and analyze the existence of the January effect using abnormal return and trading volume activity (TVA) variables. The presence of the January Effect was researched on companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) and continues to be included in the Investor33 Index during 2017-2019. The samples studied were 25 companies. It was selected using purposive sampling method. The results of the normality test showed that the data was not normally distributed. Thus, only the non-parametric test, namely the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test, can be used as a data analysis technique. Based on the analysis conducted, it was found that there was a significant difference in abnormal returns and no significant difference in TVA in January and other than January. Therefore, it can be concluded that statistically, the January Effect occurred in Indonesia during the test period indicated by abnormal returns. Keywords: January Effect; Abnormal Return; TVA.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-55
Author(s):  
Agung Suprayogi ◽  
Abdul Basyith

This research was conducted to see the effect of the implementation of the Employee Stock Ownership Program on average abnormal returns of banking companies before and after applying ESOP and trading volume. The aim is to find out the difference in average abnormal return before and after applying the ESOP. The variable used in this study is average abnormal return. The period of this research event is 20 days, 10 days, 5 days and 1 day which are divided before and days after the date of application. This study examines banking companies that apply the Employee Stock Ownership Program listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange so that data is obtained from trading in the company's stock price. The sampling criteria used a purposive sampling method in order to obtain 9 samples. The hypothesis method used in the normally distributed data is Paired Samples T-test. The result is that all average abnormal return periods both on the first and the last date of the ESOP application have a significant value >0.05, which means that the entire event period of the variable is proven to have no significant difference both before and after the banking company applies the Employee Stock Ownership Program.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document