scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI KONSUMEN BERKAITAN DENGAN PENCANTUMAN DISCLAIMER OLEH PELAKU USAHA DALAM SITUS INTERNET (WEBSITE)

Author(s):  
Ni Putu Ria Dewi Marheni

This Research is entitled “Legal Protection for Consumers Related to the Inclusion of Disclaimer by Business Owner in Website”. The problems of the present study are: first, how the inclusion of disclaimer in websites in Indonesia is like; second, what the legal protection for consumers related to the inclusion of disclaimer by business owner in websites is like. The method used in the present study is the normative legal research. The results of the study showed: first, no norm regulating disclaimer in the Act Number 11 of 2008 concerning the electronic information and transaction which specifically regulate activities in the cyberspace. However, if generally viewed from the protection for consumers in the Act Number 8 of 1999 concerning Protection for Consumers, most inclusions of disclaimer in the website is classified as exoneration clausal which is partially prepared by business agents to avoid what they are supposed to be responsible for. Second, the form of legal protection needed by consumers in the internet is still weak. However, the general legal protection for consumers may be provided through: a) Being preventive:  Reliability Certification Board ‘Lembaga Sertifikasi Keandalan’(LSK) which is supposed to give certification for every internet site already regulated by the Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 82 of 2012 concerning the Implementation of Electronic System and Transaction  which is a derivative of Article 10 clause (2) of the Act Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transaction; b) being repressive: through Litigation Lane which may be done by submitting a civil suit and civil sanction based on the Act Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transaction. Another alternative is through the Non Litigation lane, that is, the Arbitrate Lane, which is settled using the Alternative of Dispute Settlement

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 158-162
Author(s):  
Robertus Berli Puryanto ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti

Labor is something that is needed by an employing company in carrying out its economic activities. This can be seen in the constitutional arrangements of the Republic of Indonesia in Article 27 paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. In the implementation of the working relationship between workers and the employing company, there are several rights and obligations that must be fulfilled between the two parties. Because there are provisions regarding work agreements that are differentiated based on the form of the agreement, each worker has different rights where these rights must be guaranteed by the company based on law. From this, the problems that will be examined are legal protection for workers with an unwritten work agreement at the employing company, as well as legal remedies that can be taken by workers with an unwritten agreement in the event of a violation of rights by the company. The research method used is normative legal research, namely legal research conducted by examining existing library materials. By examining problems by looking at existing regulations, and describing problems that occur in practice or in everyday life in society. From the research conducted, it was found that legal protection for workers with an unwritten work agreement at the employing company is regulated based on Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower where the basis is that the applicable work agreement is an indefinite work agreement so that the rights obtained under the provisions of the law. Then efforts that can be made if there is a violation of the law in work relations is based on Law Number 20 of 2004 concerning Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement, namely in the form of Bipartite, Tripartite (Mediation, Consoliation and Arbitration) negotiations, as well as through Trials at the Industrial Relations Court.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 277
Author(s):  
Reda Manthovani ◽  
Kukuh Tejomurti

<p>The Supreme Court has rejected a petition for case review from Baiq Nuril Maknun, a West Nusa Tenggara woman who was convicted of defamation against her alleged sexual harasser. Justices Margono, Desniyati and Suhadi rejected Nuril’s challenge against the Supreme Court's decision in September 2018, which found Nuril guilty of violating Article 27 of the Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE) Law and sentenced her to six months in prison and a fine of Rp 500 million (US$34,644). The defamation case has been criticized for using the controversial law to incriminate an alleged victim of sexual harassment, when the Mataram Education Agency reported Nuril for recording the phone call.This research is prescriptive normative research namely, legal research that takes legal issues as a norm system used to provide prescriptive justifications about a legal event. From Nuril’s case we can see the laws are sorely inadequate, case in point the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (ITE Law), that got her into trouble. It’s so rubbery, it can be interpreted any way anyone wants. Amnesty should be given to Baiq Nuril Maknun because amnesty is the authority of the President for the interests of the state, in this case human rights and citizens' rights to get legal protection and free from discrimination and Law Number 11 <em>Drt</em> In 1954, yet it contradicted the constitution in cases and institutions, because Article 14 paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia had no case restrictions in granting amnesty and was carried out with consideration of the People’s Representative Council of The Republic of Indonesia.</p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 159-172
Author(s):  
Vera Yanti Artega ◽  
Adwani Adwani ◽  
Sanusi Bintang

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan perlindungan hukum internasional terhadap negara yang disadap secara melawan hukum oleh negara lain dan menjelaskan metode penyelesaian sengketa yang dilakukan Indonesia dalam  menyelesaikan konflik antar negara akibat penyadapan yang dilakukan Australia terhadap Indonesia Tahun 2013. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis metode penelitian hukum yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hukum internasional belum memberikan perlindungan yang cukup kepada negara yang disadap oleh negara lain. Adapun metode penyelesaian sengketa yang digunakan Indonesia dalam menyelesaikan kasus penyadapan dengan Australia adalah penyelesaian sengketa internasional secara damai melalui cara negosiasi. Oleh karena itu, peraturan mengenai penyadapan lintas negara harus segera dibentuk, sehingga perlindungan hukum terhadap negara yang disadap bisa dilakukan. Serta kedua negara harus membentuk code of conduct. Inter-State Conflict Under International Law International relation between two countries at some time could evoke problems which are caused by the cheating action of one party, such as interception resulting in conflict between them. This study aims to explain the protection of international law against countries that are illegally intercepted by other countries and explain the method of dispute settlement conducted by Indonesia in resolving inter-state conflicts resulting from Australian interception to Indonesia in 2013. This study uses a normative-juridical legal research method, by using legislation, case study , and conceptual approach with library data sources. The result shows that international law has not provided sufficient protection to countries intercepted or tapped by other countries. The method of dispute resolution used by Indonesia in solving wiretapping case with Australia is the peaceful settlement of international disputes through negotiation. Therefore, regulations concerning cross-country intercepting must be established immediately, thus legal protection of the tapped countries could be proceeded, and the two countries must establish a code of conduct.


2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 141
Author(s):  
Rimbawanto ◽  
Doddy Kridasaksana ◽  
Ariyono

<p>Tujuan yang hendak dicapai dari penelitian ini dapat mengetahui perlindungan hukum terhadap perbatasan wilayah antara Negara Republik Indonesia dengan Timor Leste dan kendala dan upaya mengatasi masalah perbatasan wilayah antara Negara Republik Indonesia dengan Timor Leste.</p><p>Penelitian ini menggunakan yuridis normatif yaitu penelitian hukum yang dilakukan dengan cara meneliti atau mempelajari masalah dilihat dari segi aturan hukumnya, meneliti bahan pustaka atau data sekunder</p><p>Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan secara umum berdasarkan hasil inventarisir peraturan perundang-undangan, pengakuan masyarakat adat di Indonesia tidak dalam posisi untuk mengakui keberadaan masyarakat adat, melainkan untuk membatasi keberadaan masyarakat adat.</p><pre>The objectives to be achieved from this research can be legal protection of the territorial border between the Republic of Indonesia and Timor Leste and the constraints and efforts to overcome the border issues between the Republic of Indonesia and Timor Leste.</pre><pre>               This study uses yuridis normative, namely legal research conducted by researching or studying the problem seen in terms of the rule of law, researching library materials or secondary data</pre><pre>               The results of this study show Generally based on the results of inventory of legislation, the recognition of indigenous peoples in Indonesia is not in a position to recognize the existence of indigenous peoples, but rather to limit the existence of indigenous peoples. </pre><pre> </pre>


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 392
Author(s):  
Samuel Samuel ◽  
Siti Nurbaiti

In principle, the resolution of consumer disputes can be pursued peacefully. through an alternative mediation dispute resolution. In Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection and Regulation of the Minister of Trade of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6 / M-DAG / PER / 2017 concerning the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body does not impose limits on the authority of BPSK in handling and adjudicating a consumer dispute. However, in reality many times the decisions of the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body (BPSK) are submitted to the district court and stated that BPSK is not authorized to handle such disputes. How is the authority of the Consumer Dispute Resolution Board in handling disputes between PT. Sinar Menara Deli and Sari Alamsyah are the issues discussed. The method used in this research is descriptive normative legal research, using secondary data and primary data as supporting data with the law approach. The results of the study illustrate that BPSK is not authorized to handle disputes between PT. Sinar Menara Deli with Sari Alamsyah, because the business actors in this dispute have submitted a refusal to be resolved through BPSK and not achieving the requirements for consumer disputes. It is recommended that BPSK members pay more attention to the provisions in the Consumer Protection Act and other regulations concerning the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 54
Author(s):  
Azharuddin Azharuddin

The presence of the Internet Banking service has offered a number of convenience and flexibility in conducting transactions, both between the bank and its customers, the bank and merchant, bank with the bank and the customer with the customer. However, this simplicity does not mean no risk. In addition to the Internet Banking service provides convenience, also in fact have some risks. The risk of a new character and is a challenge for practitioners and experts in the field of Internet Banking service to handle it, so it becomes important to discuss the legal efforts to protect customers' personal data in the operation of Internet Banking service after changes in legislation and elektronic information transaction. Forms of protection against customer data in Internet Banking in Indonesia are from several types of regulations that have regulated internet banking, namely Bank Indonesia Regulation Number 9/15 / PBI / 2007 concerning Application of Risk Management in the Use of Information Technology by Commercial Banks and Act No. 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Act No. 8 of 2011 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions along with the Financial Services Authority Act in the section on consumer protection


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 247
Author(s):  
Inayah Inayah ◽  
Surisman Surisman

The case of work termination which involves businessowners and labor happens widelyin various companies due to the Covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia. This research usesthe normative legal research method. During this Covid-19 pandemic, this worktermination is carried out to save the company and to prevent more victims. Problemswhich happen regarding work termination include the reasons for this termination andthe post-termination compensation. Work relations is a reciprocal relationship which isbased on a two-party agreement. The legal protection for work termination may becarried out during this Covid-19 pandemic. If the rights stated above are not obtainedby the workers, then they may initiate a deliberation. They may also go through conflictresolution procedures on industrial relations outside of court, based on the Republic ofIndonesia’s Constitution No. 2 of 2004.


Author(s):  
Wahyuni Safitri ◽  
Wafda Vivid Izziyana

Legal protection for consumers in an electronic commerce transaction in Indonesia is crucial for the development of the society’s economy. The aim of this research is to know how is the legal protection for online transaction users is in Indonesia. The method of study is the juridicial-normative method. The data collection is done through literature study. The research results show that the legal protection in the Electronic Transaction Agreement in Indonesia is regulated in Articles 47 and 48 of the Governmental Decree, No. 82 of 2012 regarding the Establishment of the Electronic System and Transaction. Legal protection for the society is written in Article 46 of the Constitution No. 11 of 2008 regarding Electronic Information and Transaction and Article 62 of the Constitution No. 8 of 1999 regarding Consumer Protection. Legal protection towards consumers in electronic transaction in Indonesia is regulated strictly both in the aspects of criminal and civil laws. Keywords: law; online transaction; consumer protection.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 61
Author(s):  
Thania Christy Corne

Technological developments in the era of globalization bring humans into the digital age. All things will directly contact with an electronic system. And so with the data, some of the data among this world is privacy. That’s why encryption is needed to be applied. Initially, encryption was used as a privacy data protector, but in its development encryption gave birth to problems in the legal field. Where criminals use encryption as a shield for their crimes. Therefore, legal issues arise, whether for reasons of government or state security can have access to one’s privacy data. How does international or national law regulate the issue of using decryption of encryption technology? The method used in this paper is a juridical-normative comparative legal research method. The result shows that international law does not regulate the use of encryption in protecting privacy data in the digital world comprehensively because some of the countries claim that the use of encryption is a part of human right, on the other hands some country has another vision on national security.


INFORMASI ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 181
Author(s):  
Aulia Puspaning Galih

Social media, as the name implies, is a media for people to socialize with the others,with borderless space and time, over the Internet. Facebook is one of Indonesian favoritesocial media. Indonesian does a lot of activities on Facebook, such as posting andcommenting on other people posts. One of the most popular features on Facebook isthe sharing feature. It can share post or link from online media or other people’s postto their own account. The ease of using the share features, it also raises many cases.The case of indignation expression of Danish badminton players against the threat ofmurder directed against them, until the case of defamation of the President of Indonesiabecame a real example of the effects of these features.Many of those kinds of cases resultin social punishment, even prison. Law of The Republic of Indonesia Number 11 year2008 about Electronic Information and Transaction which had been revised on 2016,still can not solve social problems which occur on the Internet. In fact, the Act alone willnot be enough to solve social problems. Actually, what society needs is more knowledgeabout digital literacy. Media sosial, seperti namanya, adalah media bagi masyarakat untuk bersosialisasidengan orang lain tanpa dibatasi ruang dan waktu melalui jaringan internet. Salah satu bentuk media sosial yang paling banyak digunakan saat ini, terutama oleh masyarakat Indonesia, adalah jejaring sosial Facebook. Masyarakat Indonesia melakukan banyak kegiatan di situs jejaring sosial tersebut, seperti mengunggah tulisan dan berkomentar pada suatu unggahan. Salah satu fitur yang digemari di Facebook adalah fitur bagikan yang berfungsi agar pengguna dapat membagi tautan dari orang lain keakun pribadi mereka dengan pengaturan tertentu. Adanya kemudahan dalam menggunakan fitur bagikan tersebut, ternyata malah menimbulkan banyak kasus. Kasus ungkapan kemarahan pemain bulutangkis asal Denmark terhadap ancaman pembunuhan yang ditujukan kepada mereka, hingga kasus penghinaan Presiden Indonesia menjadi contoh nyata dari efek fitur tersebut. Tidak jarang masalah yang ada di jejaring sosial berujung pada hukuman sosial,bahkan dapat masuk dalam ranah hukum pidana. Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik yang telah direvisi pada akhir tahun 2016, ternyata tidak dapat mengatasi masalah sosial yang terlanjur terjadi di internet. Faktanya, Undang-undang saja tidak akan cukup untuk mengatasi masalah sosial. Sebenarnya, yang lebih dibutuhkan masyarakat adalah pengetahuan tentang literasi digital.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document