scholarly journals Efektivitas Undang-Undang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis terhadap Daftar Merek Usaha Dagang Industri Kecil dan Menengah

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 63
Author(s):  
Irene Svinarky ◽  
Ukas Ukas ◽  
Padrisan Jamba
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Qualitative Analysis ◽  
Brand Image ◽  
Geographical Indications ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Trademark Law ◽  
Sociological Jurisprudence ◽  
Trademark Registration ◽  
Set Up

There are not easy for new companies to build a reputation or brand image. The company still needs trust first from the community that used their products. Trademark have a very important role, especially in maintaining fair business competition, because the brand can be a differentiating force for one company with another company. The purpose of this study to know the awareness of communities concerning the importance of registering the Trademark based on Law No. 20 of 2016 on Trademark and Geographical Indications. This study uses the method of empirical legal research with sociological jurisprudence approach, as well as data analysis using qualitative analysis. The study shows that the lack of company awareness in understanding the importance of trademark registration, they do not understand the benefits of registering trademark. Communities who set up businesses tend do not registering their trademark, one of the reason is caused by highly cost. As a result, the implementation of the Trademark Law becomes less effective in practice. Perusahaan yang baru berkembang tidak tidak mudah membangun reputasi atau brand image. Perusahaan masih  membutuhkan   kepercayaan terlebih dahulu  dari masyarakat pengguna mereknya.  Merek memiliki peran yang sangat penting terutama dalam menjaga persaingan usaha yang sehat, karena merek dapat menjadi daya pembeda bagi satu perusahaan dengan perusahaan lain. Tujuan tulisan ini untuk mengetahui kesadaran masyarakat akan pentingnya mendaftarkan merek berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek Dan Indikasi Geografis. Penulisan ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum empris dengan pendekatan sociological jurisprudence, serta analisa data menggunakan analisis kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa masih kurangnya/kesadaran masyarakat dalam memahami penting pendaftaran merek, mereka tidak memahami manfaat pendaftaran merek. Masyarakat cenderung mendirikan usaha dengan tidak mendaftarkan mereknya, salah satu faktornya adalah biaya yang sangat mahal, sehingga menyebabkan implementasi ketentuan merek menjadi kurang efektif di dalam prakteknya.

KELEMAHAN UNDANG-UNDANG MEREK DALAM HAL PENDAFTARAN MEREK (Studi Atas Putusan Sengketa Merek Pierre Cardn)

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 84
Author(s):  
Karlina Perdana ◽  
Pujiyono ,
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
Geographical Indications ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Trademark Registration ◽  
Brand Understanding

<p>Abstract<br />This legal research examines the weakness of Act No. 20 of 2016 on Marks and Geographical Indications, as until now there is still a knockoff brands that passed trademark registration in Indonesia. This research uses  doctrinal  or  normative  prescriptive  research  methods.  Results  of  this  study  is  the  absence  of the requirements and there are multiple interpretations of the philosophy of the brand famous brand understanding and similarity in principle or in its entirety.</p><p>Keyword: Trademark registration, weakness of Act<br /> <br />Abstrak<br />Penulisan hukum ini mengkaji mengenai kelemahan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis sebagaimana sampai sekarang ini masih terdapat merek-merek tiruan yang lolos pendaftaran merek di Indonesia. Penulisan ini menggunakan metode penelitian doktrinal atau normatif yang bersifat preskriptif. Hasil penelitian ini adalah tidak adanya persyaratan filosofi merek dan terdapat multitafsir pemahaman merek terkenal dan persamaan pada pokoknya atau keseluruhannya.</p><p>Kata kunci: pendaftaran merek, kelemahan UU</p>

scholarly journals Problematika Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Di Bidang Merek Bagi Pelaku Usaha Mikro Kecil Menegah

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 42-56
Author(s):  
Zulfikri Toguan
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Community Organization ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Geographical Indications ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Protection Measures ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Trademark Registration ◽  
The Government

Legal protection for a mark of a place or origin of MSMEs can be done by first registering the mark to obtain legal force. In this case the Office/Agency/Community Organization assists by facilitating MSMEs in terms of socialization and assistance for trademark registration. Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Marks and Geographical Indications provides improvements to previous laws, especially regarding preventive protection measures, namely registration procedures and registration fees. Brands produced by Indonesian MSMEs can help increase competitiveness in the development of new products. This research is normative or library research method, namely legal research carried out by reviewing and researching library materials in the form of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. This study concludes: First, the problems in the protection of intellectual property rights in the field of branding for MSME products are due to the understanding of MSME actors on brand rights is still low/shallow so that MSME actors do not register the brand of MSME products. Second, efforts to provide brand protection to the MSME industry are by registering MSME brands and the government makes it easy for MSME industry players to register trademarks.

scholarly journals The Urgency of Trademark Registration for Business Actors (Case Study of Supreme Court Decision No 575 K / Pdt.Sus-HKI / 2020 Between Ruben Samuel Onsu vs PT Ayam Geprek Benny Sujono)

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 250-259
Author(s):  
Nurhani Fithriah
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Geographical Indications ◽  
Trademark Law ◽  
Business People ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Trademark Registration

Brand registration is very important for business people. A brand is one of the distinguishing entities between the business activities of business actors. The problem occurs when business actors already have a trademark which is then well known in the community but in fact they have not registered the trademark, as experienced by Ruben Samuel Onsu with his Geprek chicken business. However, in its development, it turns out that there are other business actors using the same mark but have registered the mark. This research was conducted using a normative method through a statutory approach and concepts. This research examines the Supreme Court's decision rejecting the appeal from Ruben Samuel Onsu and analyzes the urgency and procedures for trademark registration. Based on the research results, trademark law in Indonesia is regulated in Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications. The terms and procedures for application for registration of a mark are regulated in Article 4 - Article 8 and further regulated in the Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights No. registration of a mark and being recognized as the legal owner of the mark and rights to the mark are obtainedafter the mark is registered. Ruben Onsu's Bensu mark was declared invalid because Ruben Onsu was not the first party to register the mark, and the Supreme Court decided to cancel all trademark applications made by Ruben Onsu.

scholarly journals THE LEGAL POLITIC OF REGULATION FOR TRADEMARK REGISTRATION SYSTEMS IN INDONESIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-81
Author(s):  
Darwance Darwance ◽  
Sudarto Sudarto
Keyword(s):  
Geographical Indications ◽  
Trademark Law ◽  
Trademark Registration ◽  
Colonial Government ◽  
Current Marks ◽  
Dutch Colonial

The development of brand functions which was originally only as a distinguishing element to be more of a reputation, to be the brand that is usually represented by the image, logos, etc., resulting in a brand being one of the triggers for a dispute. Therefore, a number of regulations that provide protection for marks have been issued in Indonesia started with the Trademark Law of 1885 published by the Dutch Colonial Government until Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Current Marks and Geographical Indications. But, trademark disputes still occur. This juridical normative research with a legal approach aims to know and analyze the legal politics of trademark registration regulations in Indonesia. The result is that there are weaknesses in the existing regulations regarding trademark registration, both substantial and procedural. Therefore, they need to be clearer and more concrete regulations in regulating trademark registration in Indonesia so that trademark disputes can be minimized.

scholarly journals Cancellation of Deed of Sale and Purchase of Land Rights and Deed of Granting Mortgage Based on Court Decision

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 023-031
Author(s):  
Devendra Dovianda Priyono
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Qualitative Analysis ◽  
Precautionary Principle ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Precautionary Principle ◽  
Yogyakarta City

This study is entitled "Cancellation of Deed of Sale and Purchase of Land Rights and Mortgage Deed Based on Court Decision". The first of this research aims to find out how the precautionary principles applied by PPAT in making the Deed of Sale and Purchase of Land Rights and the Mortgage deed Rights and the second is to find out and analyze the basis of legal considerations used by judges in deciding cases of cancellation of PPAT Deeds. This type of research in legal research is empirical, using a case approach that is supported by interviewing informants. Data analysis in this legal research uses qualitative analysis. The resource persons in this legal research are PPAT in Yogyakarta City, Bantul Regency and Kulonprogo Regency. Based on the results of the first research, that PPAT in making the Deed of Sale and Purchase of Land Rights and the Mortgage deed Rights must apply the precautionary principle as regulated in Article 22 of Government Regulation Number 37 of 1998 that the PPAT Deed must be read / explained its contents to the parties by attended by at least 2 (two) witnesses before being signed immediately by the parties, witnesses and PPAT, PPAT is obliged to apply the prudential principle to avoid problems that arise and harm the parties and to prevent the PPAT Deed being canceled and becoming not legally enforceable. Second, the basis for legal considerations used by the judge to cancel the PPAT deed was because the buyer committed tort and abuse of circumstances against elderly sellers who were sick, lived alone and could not read and write and were lied to by the Buyer's words.

scholarly journals KRITERIA TANDA PUBLIC DOMAIN YANG DIGUNAKAN SEBAGAI MEREK

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur Novy Tuwaidan
Keyword(s):  
Public Good ◽  
Government Policy ◽  
Public Domain ◽  
Public Knowledge ◽  
Geographical Indications ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Trademark Law ◽  
The Public ◽  
Public Property ◽  
Protection Period

This study examines the Criteria for Signs of Public Domain Used as a Brand. This research is legal research by using a method that is in accordance with the scientific characteristics of Law (jurisprudence), namely normative legal research. Concluded also some signs of criteria in the Public Domain Trademark law, namely: Public Domain because it is over the protection period, the Public Domain for distinguishing the substantive requirements are not met. (Article 20 letter (f) UU No. 16/2016 on Trademarks and Geographical Indications), Public Domain because it includes the area of public property, Public Domain because it does not open rivalry, Public Domain because it includes Public Knowledge. Public Domain since its birth, Public Domain because of government policy, Public Domain because something that can be enjoyed by everyone at any time, Public Domain because it is a public good, and Public Domain because there is no scarcity and is available to all

scholarly journals Penerapan Prinsip Kehati-Hatian Pembuatan Akta Otentik Pada Kantor Notaris Kabupaten Gowa

PETITUM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-197
Author(s):  
Suhartati Suhartati
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Qualitative Analysis ◽  
Precautionary Principle ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Precautionary Principle ◽  
Analysis Methods ◽  
Legal Consequences

This research aims to know and understand clearly the application of the precautionary principle of Notaries in making authentic deeds and the legal consequences of authentic deeds based on false letters and false statements. The research method used is empirical normative legal research, which is a combination of the normative legal approach with the addition of empirical elements. Data analysis in this study used qualitative analysis methods. From the results of the research, it was found that, first, the application of the precautionary principle by the notary in the process of making authentic deeds has been implemented but has not been implemented optimally because there are still often found authentic deeds based on false letters and false statements. Second, the legal consequences of notarial deeds based on false letters and false statements are null and void (nitiegbaarheid). Penelitian Ini bertujuan mengetahui dan memahami secara jelas  penerapan prinsip kehati-hatian Notaris terhadap pembuatan akta Otentik dan akibat hukum terhadap akta otentik yang berdasarkan surat palsu dan keterangan palsu. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif empiris, yang merupakan penggabungan Antara pendekatan hukum normatif dengan adanya penambahan unsur-unsur empiris. Analisis data dalam penelitian ini menggunakan metode analisis kualitatif. Dari Hasil Penelitian ditemukan Bahwa, Pertama, Penerapan prinsip kehati-hatian yang dilakukan oleh Notaris dalam proses pembuatan akta otentik itu sudah diterapkan tetapi belum dilaksanakan secara optimal karena masih sering dijumpai ada akta otentik yang dibuat berdasarkan surat palsu dan keterangan palsu. Kedua, Akibat hukum terhadap akta notaris yang dibuat berdasarkan surat palsu dan keterangan palsu adalah batal demi hukum (nitiegbaarheid).

scholarly journals LEGALITAS MEREK DAGANG DAN KEMITRAAN USAHA PADA UNIT PERDAGANGAN BUMDES NIAGARA

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 111
Author(s):  
Trisa Nur Kania ◽  
Latifah Adnani
Keyword(s):  
Community Service ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Geographical Indications ◽  
Business Partnerships ◽  
Trademark Law ◽  
Business Partners ◽  
Trademark Registration ◽  
Business Contract ◽  
Insight Into

Law Number 20 of 2016 in Indonesia regulates brands and geographical indications (hereinafter referred to as Trademark Law). For businesses, making an effort to legalize the brand of the products/services they sell is important, even though in reality, many business actors do not understand this. This study aims to find out, analyze and provide insight into knowledge and understanding of businesses about the importance of a product being given a trademark and legally legalized through trademark registration to the state. Other than that, the other purpose of this research is to provide business partners with an understanding of business partnerships. The research method uses case studies with the consideration that the focus of the research is on contemporary (present) phenomena in the context of real life. The results showed that the business actors did not understand the rules relating to trademark design and procedures for trademark registration and did not understand the business contract with business partners. Therefore, in order to help solve the problems faced by business actors, the community service activities are carried out in stages, namely: provide counseling on regulations and laws related to trademark and assistance in the procedure for trademark registration, as well as assistance in making business contracts with business partners.

An Analysis of China's System of Protecting Geographical Indications

2006 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 1-21
Author(s):  
Lanye Zhu
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Trips Agreement ◽  
Geographical Indications ◽  
Trademark Law ◽  
Chinese Law ◽  
Trademark Registration

AbstractGeographical indications are a kind of intellectual property required to be protected under the TRIPS Agreement of the WTO. In order to fulfil its WTO obligations, China started to protect geographical indications even before it was formally admitted to the WTO. At present, geographical indications can be protected in Chinese law through one or both of the following ways: trademark registration pursuant to the Trademark Law, and the registration of special labels bearing geographical indications. However, internal problems exist within both of these systems, and the co-existence of the systems also creates conflicts. This article analyses these problems and proposes ways of resolving them.

scholarly journals EXECUTORIAL DECISION OF REGISTERED BRAND CANCELLATION

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 11
Author(s):  
Eko Yuliyanto
Keyword(s):  
The State ◽  
Geographical Indications ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Trademark Law ◽  
Legal Consequences

Brand cancellation is implemented through the delete list of the brands, it has brought legal consequences such the expire protection by the state. However, it is still leave some problems if the brand cancellation not accompanied by concrete actions such of a ban on re-use of the brand that has been canceled.The paper will focus on the analysis of judges' consideration in making the decision to cancel the registered brand (case study of decision No. 85 PK / Pdt.Sus-HKI / 2015), as well as an analysis of the execution of the decision to revoke registered brand (case study of decision No. 85 PK / Pdt.Sus -HKI / 2015). The method used is normative legal research. The results of the study showed that the legal basis by the Judges had accommodated all the substance of the juridical reason for the cancellation of the brand Cap Kaki Tiga by referring the provisions of Article 6 paragraph (3) letter b of Trademark Law (currently regulated in Article 21 Paragraph (2) letter b of the Trademark and Geographical Indications Law).Furthermore, an executorial decision regarding the cancellation of a registered brand may only be limited to procedural actions in administrative business such cancellation the brand from the general register and announcing the cancellation the brandin the official news of that brand.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document