scholarly journals PERGESERAN PENYELENGGARAAN PEMERINTAHAN DAERAH BERDASARKAN KEWENANGAN KEPALA DAERAH DAN DPRD DARI ORDE BARU SAMPAI REFORMASI

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 1898
Author(s):  
Rizki Ramadhan

Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji perubahan atas undang-undang tentang pemerintahan daerah yang dimana adanya pergeseran kewenangan Kepala Daerah dan DPRD semenjak pemerintahan orde baru sampai reformasi, dengan menggunakan teori hukum Separation Of Power dan Distribution Of Power sebagai pisau analisis berdasarkan metode penelitian hukum yuridis normatif. Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa perundang-undangan tentang pemerintahan daerah ternyata telah mengalami lima kali pergantian dan dua kali perubahan atas undang-undang terbaru yang dampaknya berpengaruh terhadap pelayanan di masyarakat. Atas hal tersebut diketahui bahwa pergeseran atas penyelenggaraan pemerintahan daerah atas kewenangan Kepala Daerah dan DPRD ini dipengaruhi beberapa faktor, diantaranya yaitu faktor daerah, kepentingan, dan kebijakan politik dari setiap zaman. This paper aims to examine changes to the law on regional governance where there has been a shift in the authority of the Regional Head and DPRD from the New Order government to reform, using the legal theory of Separation of Power and Distribution of Power as an analysis knife based on normative juridical legal research methods. The results of the study show that the legislation on regional government has actually undergone five changes and two changes to the latest law which has an impact on services in society. Based on this, it is known that the shift in the administration of regional government to the authority of the Regional Head and DPRD is influenced by several factors, including regional factors, interests, and political policies from every era.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernst Hirsch Ballin ◽  

Written by Ernst Hirsch Ballin, this original Advanced Introduction uncovers the foundations of legal research methods, an area of legal scholarship distinctly lacking in standardisation. The author shows how such methods differ along critical, empirical, and fundamental lines, and how our understanding of these is crucial to overcoming crises and restoring trust in the law. Key topics include a consideration of law as a normative language and an examination of the common objects of legal research.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 1138
Author(s):  
Ni Putu Ayu Bunga Sasmita ◽  
I Wayan Novy Purwanto

Penelitian ini bertujuan untukemahami bagaimanakah pengaturan jual beli online dalam hukum di Indonesia dan bagaimanakah aspek hukum jual beli secara online dalam perjanjian.  Penelitian ini, menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif. Sedangkan pendekatan yang digunakan adalah menggunakan pendekatan fakta dan statute approach. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa pengaturan mengenai jual beli secara online diatur dalam ketentuan Pasal 18 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik, yang mana sebagai penerapan pasal 1313 KUHPerdata. Para pihak yang mengadakan perjanjian bisa menerapkan KUHPerdata yang jadi dasar diakui sahnya perjanjian dimana keabsahannya tercantum syarat 1320 KUHPerdata yakni:   kecakapan, kesepakatan, suatu sebab yang halal dan suatu hal tertentu.Sedangkan penerapan asas Konsensualisme dalam perjanjian online yang didasarkan oleh ketentuan dalam Pasal 1313 KUHPerdata yang menegaskan bahwa adanya suatu perjanjian berarti pihak satu dengan pihak lainnya setuju untuk mengikatkan dirinya.   This study aims to understand how the online arrangement in the sale and purchase agreement and how the legal aspects of buying and selling online in the agreement. This research uses normative legal research methods. While the approach used is to use the fact approach and statute approach. The results of this study indicate that the regulation regarding online trading is regulated in the provisions of Article 18 paragraph (1) of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendment to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions, which is the legal basis for applying article 1313 of the Civil Code. The parties who entered into the agreement can apply the KUHPer which is the basis for the validity of the agreement where the validity is stated in the terms of the 1320 KUHPer, namely: skill, agreement, a halal cause and a certain thing. While the application of the principle of consensualism in an online agreement based on the provisions in Article 1313 of the KUHPer which confirms that an agreement means that one party with another party agrees to bind themselves.


Author(s):  
Dekry Oktavia ◽  
Zainal Asikin ◽  
Cahyowati Cahyowati

Department of Population and Civil Registration is one of the Regional Service which is part of the Regional Apparatus that has the task of carrying out Regional Government Affairs and Assistance Tasks in the field of Population and Civil Registration. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the arrangements for the authority of the appointment of heads of population and civil registration according to legislation, and the implementation of the appointment of the Head of the Population and Civil Registration Service. Research methods, types of normative legal research with regulatory approaches, conceptual approaches, and case approaches, using primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. Legal materials obtained are processed and analyzed prescriptively normatively. Conclusion, there is a conflict of authority setting norms for the appointment of the Head of the Population and Civil Registration Service in force in Indonesia which results in juridical defects of State Administrative Decrees issued by officials deemed unauthorized, legal products in the form of decrees issued by unauthorized officials must be revoked and declared invalid as stipulated in Law No. 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration.


Author(s):  
Raden Hamidi ◽  
Ahmad Yamin ◽  
Nyoman Nurjaya ◽  
Idrus Abdullah ◽  
Gatot Dwi Hendro W.

The village, or what is called by another name, existed before Indonesian independence. Regulations regarding villages are regulated in several laws and regulations. The purpose of this research is to analyze and find a comparison of the authority of village administration before and after the implementation of Law no. 6 of 2014. Research methods, types of normative legal research, with philosophical approaches, statutory approaches, conceptual approaches, and historical approaches, using primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The obtained legal materials are processed and analyzed prescriptive normatively. In conclusion, the comparison of village government authority before the implementation of Law No. 6 of 2014 places the village authority in two roles, namely the authority to manage its own household, and the role as the lowest government under the sub-district head, and the uniformity of villages throughout the territory of the Republic of Indonesia, before the implementation of the Law No.6 of 2014, the authority of the village government remains with the district/city government, so that the authority of the village government is always in a truncated and amputated position.


Acta Comitas ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 132
Author(s):  
Ni Wayan Winiarti

Changes to the implementation of the affairs of labor inspection with the enactment of Law Number 23 Year 2014 on Regional Government impact on the implementation and reporting procedures for compulsory labor report in the company, namely: 1) How the implementation of compulsory reporting of employment in the company at the office of the office in charge of manpower in the districts /city? 2) How is the reporting procedure required to report employment in the company following the enactment of Law Number 23 Year 2014? To find and find solutions to the problem formulation to be studied, then in this writing is done by normative legal research methods with the approach of legislation. As regulated in Article 4 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of Law Number 7 of 1981 concerning Obligatory Reporting of Employment in the Company, employers or managers of the company shall report in writing any establishment, termination, reestablishment, transfer or dissolve the company to the Minister who is responsible in the field of manpower or appointed official in this matter who is entrusted with the task of supervision in the field of manpower. Perubahan terhadap penyelenggaraan urusan pengawasan ketenagakerjaan dengan berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah berdampak pada pelaksanaan dan tata cara pelaporan wajib lapor ketenagakerjaan di perusahaan,  yakni:  1) Bagaimanakah pelaksanaan wajib lapor ketenagakerjaan di perusahaan pada kantor dinas yang membidangi ketenagakerjaan di kabupaten/kota? 2) Bagaimanakah tata cara pelaporan wajib lapor ketenagakerjaan di perusahaan setelah berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014? Untuk mencari dan menemukan pemecahan atas rumusan masalah yang akan dikaji, maka dalam penulisan ini dilakukan dengan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 4 ayat (1) dan ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1981 tentang Wajib Lapor Ketenagakerjaan di Perusahaan, pengusaha atau pengurus perusahaan wajib melaporkan secara tertulis setiap mendirikan, menghentikan, menjalankan kembali, memindahkan atau membubarkan perusahaan kepada Menteri yang bertanggung jawab dalam bidang ketenagakerjaan atau pejabat yang ditunjuk dalam hal ini yang diserahi tugas pengawasan di bidang ketenagakerjaan. 


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Satria ◽  
Munajah Munajah ◽  
Sulistia Ningsih Rahayu ◽  
Suryadi Suryadi

The purpose of this research discusses political intervention in legislation in Indonesia to examine the problems that occur in the process of making laws. Based on the problems examined by the author, the research method used is a normative research method. Normative legal research methods or library research methods are methods or methods used in legal research conducted by examining existing library materials. Law intervention results in the form of ratification of the agenda of the intervention, and the Articles then become the basis for activities that are detrimental to the people at large and are contrary to ideology, religion for the Indonesian people. Thus, the intervention of the Law harms the nation extensively.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 500-504
Author(s):  
I Dewa Gede Pramana adhi ◽  
I Nnyoman Gede Sugiartha ◽  
I Made Minggu Widyantara

Indonesia is a developing country where each region has its own natural wealth. This advantage cannot be used because there are many people who send out of the region without permission and vice versa, goods from outside countries are smuggled into Indonesia only to avoid the applicable taxes. This study aims to examine the regulation of smuggling in criminal law in Indonesia and reveal the responsibility of the director of PT. Garuda Indonesia, which carried out the act of smuggling luxury motorcycles. This research is a type of normative legal research conducted with research methods based on legal materials, while the problem approach used is a legislative and conceptual approach. Sources of data used are primary and secondary legal materials. Another bad example is shown by one of the people who has a big name in Indonesia, the smuggling case by the president of Garuda Indonesia is an illustration of how weak the law in Indonesia is and this incident has resulted in criminal and administrative sanctions. The results of the study indicate that the regulation of smuggling crimes in Indonesia is contained in Law Number 17 of 2006 concerning Customs. Handling of violations of customs provisions is more focused on the fiscal settlement, namely in the form of payment of a sum of money to the State in the form of a fine. The criminal liability of smugglers is regulated in Law No. 17 of 2006 the president director of PT. Garuda Indonesia is threatened with criminal and administrative sanctions


Acta Comitas ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 298
Author(s):  
Dewa Ayu Dian Sawitri ◽  
Ni Ketut Supasti Dharmawan

The purpose of this study to examine the protection of transformation of lontar copyrighted works in the form of digitalization and the mechanism of legalizing the transformation of works that were originally in the form of lontar. This study uses a socio-legal researchy method which is a mixture of normative legal research methods with empirical legal research methods. This study uses a statutory approachy, conceptuayl approach and facts. The study results show that the regulation of transformation of lontar copyright works in the form of digitalization is regulatedd in Article 40 paragraph 1 letter n of the Copyright Law which is made possible through an expanded interpretation. It can be stated that the transformation also includes works of traditional cultural expression. The process of legalizing the transformation is included in Article 26 paragraph (1) of the Cultural Promotion Act which explains that the Central Government and the Regional Government are obliged to save the Cultural Promotion Object. Transformation of lontar into the form of digitization is one form of saving against lontar but in the process of this transformation must still refer to the agreement of the owner of the lontar work.  Tujuan studi ini untuk mengkaji perlindungan transformasi karya cipta lontar dalam bentuk digitalisasi serta mekanisme legalisasi pentransformasian dari karya yang awalnya berbentuk lontar. Studi ini menggunakan metode penelitian sosio-legal yang merupakan campuran dari metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan metode penelitian hukum empiris. Studi ini menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual dan fakta. Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa pengaturan transformasi karya cipta lontar dalam bentuk digitalisasi diatur dalam Pasal 40 ayat 1 huruf n UU Hak Cipta yang dimungkinkan melalui suatu penafsiran yang diperluas dapat dikemukakan bahwa transformasi juga mencakup karya ekspresi budaya tradisional. Proses legalisasi transformasi termasuk dalam Pasal 26 ayat 1 Undang-Undang Pemajuan Kebudayaan yang menjelaskan bahwa Pemerintah Pusat danjatau Pemerintah Daerah penyelamatan dilakukan wajib Objek Pemajuan Kebudayaan. Transformasi lontar ke dalam bentuk digitalisasi merupakan salah satu bentuk penyelamatan terhadap lontar tetapi dalam proses transformasi ini harus tetap 


Acta Comitas ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 511
Author(s):  
Ni Putu Anggelina

The legal status of a Notary employee in his capacity is a witness of the Instrumentair to support the validity of an authentic deed which is inseparable and has legal consequences for the deed of the Notary. Notary deed that raises the law causes the Notary employee to work as a witness instrument in the deed to be the party responsible and responsible for the law that appears. The legal issue in this journal is the Responsibility for the accountability of instruments in the deed of a Notary? And how to place the legal position in the instrumentation in terms of supporting the Notary deed related to the Notary's responsibility to keep the confidentiality of the deed which is made by him based on Article 16 Paragraph (1) Letter F and Article 40 of the UUJN Amendment?, This article is analyzed by normative legal research methods with a study of Article 16 paragraph (1) letter f UUJN Changes that still involve obscurity of legal norms. The purpose of this study is to examine the accountability of the instrumentair in the deed of the Notary and also provide understanding in terms of the legal position of the instrumentair selection related to the authenticity of the Notary deed. The results of the study through the journal can prove the lawsuits related to the substance of the deed whose signing involved him, remembering his capacity only employees who are functioned by a Notary to prepare the deed. The legal position of viewing related to the occupation of the Notary keeps the confidentiality of the deed whose production is made based on Article 16 paragraph (1) letter f and Article 40 of the UUJN. Therefore the instrumentair witness cannot apply Article 322 of the Criminal Code because his capacity as an election is not bound by professional ownership. Witness instructors who do not support the confidentiality of Notary documents. Status hukum pegawai Notaris dalam kapasitasnya menjadi saksi Instrumentair guna mendukung sahnya suatu akta autentik merupakan hal yang tak terpisahkan dan memiliki konsekwensi hukum terhadap akta Notaris. Akta Notaris yang menimbulkan persoalan hukum menyebabkan pegawai Notaris yang berfungsi sebagai saksi instrumentair dalam akta menjadi pihak yang dianggap tahu dan bertanggung jawab atas persoalan hukum yang muncul. Isu hukum dalam jurnal ini adalah Bagaimanakah tanggungjawab saksi instrumentair dalam akta Notaris? Dan bagaimanakah kedudukan hukum saksi instrumentair dalam hal mendukung keautentikan akta Notaris terkait adanya kewajiban Notaris menyimpan kerahasiaan akta yang pembuatannya dilakukan olehnya berdasarkan Pasal 16 Ayat (1) Huruf F dan Pasal 40 UUJN Perubahan ?, Artikel ini dianalisis dengan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan kajian terhadap Pasal 16 ayat (1) huruf f UUJN Perubahan yang masih terdapat kekaburan norma hukum. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengkaji secara mendalam tanggungjawab saksi instrumentair dalam akta Notaris serta memberikan pemahaman dalam hal kedudukan hukum saksi instrumentair terkait dengan keautentikan akta Notaris. Hasil kajian melaui jurnal ini diketahui bahwa saksi instrumentair tidak bisa dituntut secara hukum terkait substansi akta yang penandatanganannya melibatkan dirinya, megingat kapasitasnya hanya pegawai yang difungsikan oleh Notaris untuk mempersiapkan akta. Kedudukan hukum saksi instrumentair terkait adanya kewajiban Notaris menyimpan kerahasiaan akta yang pembuatannya dilakukan olehnya berdasarkan Pasal 16 ayat (1) huruf f dan Pasal 40 UUJN Perubahan tidak diwajibkan secara pasti harus menjaga kerahasiaan subtansi akta. Oleh sebab itu terhadap saksi instrumentair tidak bisa diterapkan Pasal 322 KUHP karena kapasitasnya sebagai saksi tidak melekat jabatan profesi. Saksi instrumentair yang tidak menjaga kerahasiaan dokumen Notaris perbuatannya diklasifikasikan perbuatan melawan hukum.


2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 20
Author(s):  
Arfiansyah Arfiansyah

Since the downfall of Soeharto’s New Order regime in 1999, Indonesia political orientation drastically changed. President Baharuddin Jusuf (BJ) Habibie enacted number of laws that changed the face of Indonesian politics from authoritarianism to democracy. One of the laws was Law No. 22 of 1999 on Regional government, which was amended by Law No. 32 of 2004 on Regional Government. The law brought Indonesia from centralism politics to fully decentralism. All individuals and groups, mainly marginalized Muslim groups during the New Order regime, have taken the best of the shift to force the implementation of Syaria law in Indonesia by advocating the enactment of numbers of Syariat inspired regional regulations (Perda berbasis Syariat) in tens of provinces. The Perda soon became controversial and triggered debate among Muslims themselves. Even some worried if the Perda would change Indonesian constitution and ideology from secular to Islamic one. Using qualitative approach and analyzing Indonesian political preference at national-wide, this article argues that the Perda would not affect Indonesian constitution and ideology. Even large number of Indonesians likely accept the development of the Perda as part of development of democracy in Indonesia.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document