scholarly journals PENYALAHGUNAAN PEMBERIAN KUASA UNTUK MENJUAL DALAM PERJANJIAN PENGIKATAN JUAL BELI (PPJB) OLEH PENERIMA KUASA (CONTOH KASUS : PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 1846/K/PDT/2017)

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 817
Author(s):  
Livia Cindy Ariella ◽  
Endang Pandamdari

A sale and purchase agreement is one of the most frequently made agreements. One of the most traded objects is land. According to customary law, land sale and purchase is a legal act of transferring land rights. The legal act of sale and purchase is carried out by a land deed official who has the authority to make a sale and purchase deed. Sometimes, the sale and purchase deed cannot be made because there are conditions that have not been fulfilled, so the parties first make a preliminary agreement called the binding sale and purchase agreement. Usually, the binding sale and purchase agreement is followed by power of attorney to sell. The formulation of the problem in this thesis is whether the inclusion of the power of attorney to sell is permissible, and if the recipient of the power of attorney misuses the power, what form of legal protection can be given to the authorizer. The author uses normative legal research methods that are supported by interviews to answer these problems. The inclusion of a power of attorney to sell within the binding sale and purchase agreement is permitted as long as it is not an absolute power that is prohibited by law. Legal protection that can be given to the authorizer is divided into two forms: preventive protection, a legal protection aimed at preventing the occurrence of disputes, and repressive protection, a protection that serves to resolve in the event of a dispute.

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
I Nyoman Gede Murdiana ◽  
A.A.A.N Sri Rahayu Gorda

An agreement will not always be able to run according to the agreement of the parties. Certain conditions can be found, such as, the occurrence of various things that result in an agreement cannot be implemented, namely the buy-back right by the seller which has been agreed upon and results in losses for the buyer and on a court decision that sentences the seller to carry out the agreement seven days after the verdict, but the implementation of the sale and purchase agreement has not yet been carried out. This paper examines the legal protection for the buyer against the sale and purchase agreement for building use rights in terms of default. This type of research is a normative juridical legal research applying a case study approach and statue approach. The preventive legal protection for the buyer, namely legal protection is by requesting for irrevocable power of attorney, referred to as absolute power of attorney. Meanwhile, repressive legal protection is legal protection after the occurrence of a dispute, namely based on the consideration of a judge's decision which can provide a sense of certainty and justice to the aggrieved buyer.   Suatu perjanjian tidak selamanya akan dapat berjalan sesuai dengan kesepakatan para pihak. Kondisi tertentu dapat ditemukan terjadinya berbagai hal yang berakibat suatu perjanjian tidak dilaksanakan yaitu dengan hak membeli kembali oleh penjual yang telah disepakati dan mengakibatkan kerugian bagi pihak pembeli dan atas putusan pengadilan yang menghukum pihak penjual untuk melaksanakan perjanjian tujuh hari setelah putusan, akan tetapi pelaksanaan perjanjian jual beli tersebut belum juga terlaksana. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan studi kasus dan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Perlindungan hukum secara preventif bagi pihak pembeli yaitu perlindungan hukum yaitu permintaaan pemberian kuasa yang tidak dapat ditarik kembali yang disebut surat kuasa mutlak. Sedangkan perlindungan hukum secara represif adalah perlindungan hukum setelah terjadinya sengketa yaitu berdasarkan pertimbangan putusan hakim yang bisa memberikan rasa kepastian dan keadilan terhadap pembeli yang dirugikan.


Author(s):  
Pringgo Soebowo ◽  
Endang Prasetyawati ◽  
Moch. Isnaeni

The sale and purchase of land-based on customary law in daily practice is still practiced by some people in Indonesia. The sale and purchase of land in customary law adhere to the principle of "tunai and terang" which means that the handover of rights by the seller is carried out simultaneously with payment by the buyer and immediately the rights have transferred. This research discusses the Ratio legis of the use of the principle of "tunai and terang" in the sale and purchase of land in Indonesia. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach as a problem approach method. The results showed that the use of "tunai and terang" in the formation of sale and purchase agreements for land rights in Indonesia is because UUPA accommodates Customary Law as the basis for the National Land Law. The existence of cash and light principles is expected to provide legal protection for sellers and buyers.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 157-163
Author(s):  
I Gede Wardana Oka Sastra Wiguna ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
I Putu Gede Seputra

The study of this research is a review of the ownership of land rights for husbands / wives as a result of the existence of mixed marriages, currently mixed marriages exist in various circles of Indonesian society, the cause of this legal incident is the result of the fast and easy development of the times, and is supported by international relations that continue to increase. With the occurrence of many mixed marriages in Indonesia, legal protection in mixed marriages should be accommodated properly in the legislation in Indonesia. The purpose of this research is to understand the arrangement of ownership of land rights according to Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning agrarian principles and to know the status of ownership of land rights that can be owned in mixed marriages. Researchers use normative techniques, namely normative legal research methods or library law research methods, which are methods or methods used in legal research conducted by examining existing library materials. This research illustrates that the ownership of land rights according to Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Basic Agrarian Regulations in general, land rights can be in the form of property rights, land use rights, land use rights, and finally use rights which are between one and one rights. Other rights have different meanings in terms of limitations on legal subjects of ownership and limitations on the duration of ownership. The status of ownership of land rights that can be owned in mixed marriages is attached to people who have Indonesian citizenship and in mixed marriages the problems of ownership of the rights over can be resolved by a marriage agreement made between the parties.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 182
Author(s):  
Clara Vania Arianto

<p>In a land sale and purchase transaction, if the conditions for making a Sale and Purchase Deed by a Land Deed Official cannot be fulfilled, the parties can make a Commitment of Sale and Purchase Agreement by a Notary as a preliminary agreement to bind the parties. In practice, the making of a Commitment of Sale and Purchase Agreement is often accompanied by Absolute Power of Attorney which cannot be revoked. This Absolute Power of Attorney often creates legal problems because its use is prohibited by the prevailing laws and regulations. The formulation of the problems studied in this research mainly concerns about the regulation of the Notary’s authority in making deeds that use Absolute Power of Attorney in land sale and purchase transactions and the Notary’s responsibility regarding cancellation of a deed due to the use of Absolute Power of Attorney. The research methods used are juridical normative with empirical juridical support. Research results show that Notary is authorized to make a Commitment of Sale and Purchase Agreement accompanied by Absolute Power of Attorney. In addition, the Notary cannot be sued to give a responsibility for the cancellation of the deed. According to the law, making of the deed is valid. This is because the use of Absolute Power of Attorney is not a prohibited act, as long as its use meets the requirements stipulated by statutory regulations and based on legally justifiable reasons.</p><p><strong>BAHASA INDONESIA ABSTRACT:</strong></p><p>Dalam rangka pelaksanaan jual beli tanah, apabila syarat-syarat pembuatan Akta Jual Beli di hadapan Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah belum dapat dipenuhi, maka biasanya akan dibuat Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (PPJB) di hadapan Notaris sebagai perjanjian pendahuluan untuk mengikat para pihak. Pada pembuatan PPJB dengan objek tanah, biasanya terdapat pemberian kuasa yang berisi ketentuan tidak dapat dicabut kembali atau dikenal sebagai kuasa mutlak. Pemberian kuasa mutlak ini sering menimbulkan permasalahan yang berakibat akta menjadi batal demi hukum karena penggunaannya merupakan hal yang dilarang oleh peraturan yang berlaku. Rumusan permasalahan yang dikaji dalam penelitian ini pada pokoknya menyangkut pengaturan tentang kewenangan Notaris dalam pembuatan akta yang menggunakan kuasa mutlak dalam transaksi jual beli tanah dan tanggung jawab Notaris terhadap akta yang dibatalkan karena menggunakan kuasa mutlak. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan dukungan yuridis empiris. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Notaris berwenang untuk membuat PPJB yang disertai dengan pemberian kuasa mutlak. Selain itu, Notaris tidak dapat dituntut untuk memberikan pertanggungjawaban atas dibatalkannya akta yang dibuatnya. Secara hukum, pembuatan akta tersebut adalah sah. Sebab, pemberian kuasa mutlak bukan merupakan tindakan yang dilarang, sepanjang penggunaannya memenuhi syarat-syarat yang ditentukan oleh peraturan perundang-undangan dan memiliki alasan yang dapat dipertanggungjawabkan secara hukum.</p>


Author(s):  
Aprina Wardhani ◽  
Ferdi Ferdi ◽  
Muhammad Hasbi

Based on Article 39 paragraph (1) letter d PP No. 24 of 1997 stated that "PPAT refused to make a deed if one of the parties or parties acted on the basis of an absolute power of attorney which essentially contained the legal act of transferring rights" .In case number  90 / PDT.G / 2013 / PN.PDG between Bahar and Henky Sutanto CS, Hj. Elly Satria, S.H, H. Hendri Final, S.H, and the Land Agency of the City of Padang. The problem occurred because the power deed number 67 dated February 17, 1996 which was categorized as absolute power was made as the basis for the transfer of certified land rights without being preceded by the PPJB or any agreement, even though the Principal Agreement and this power cannot be separated. The formulation of the problem discussed in this thesis is how the process of transferring land rights is based on absolute power, how the legal consequences of transferring land rights are based on absolute power and how the responsibility of Notary / PPAT in making deeds that use absolute power as the basis of transfer of rights .The research method used is normative legal research. Based on what was investigated, the process of transferring land rights based on absolute power was carried out based on the usual judicial process, namely because the mediation failed, followed by the reading of the lawsuit, the respondent's reply, replication and duplication, verification, and the verdict was partially granted.The legal consequences with the use of absolute power in the case of transfer of ownership rights to land in this case resulted in the absolute deed of power being null and void. Based on the theory of accountability, the author argues that PPAT is responsible for making sale and purchase deeds based on absolute power. Losses to the parties for negligence of the PPAT are borne by the Official who, because of the negligence, has caused a loss.


Arena Hukum ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 150-166
Author(s):  
Ahmad Muddin ◽  
◽  
Hardianto Djanggih

Abstract This study aims to analyze dispute resolution, the dispute resolution approach that guarantees legal certainty and examine the factors that influence the construction of the settlement of land rights of the customary community of Malind-Amin. This normative and empirical legal research is analized descriptively and analytically. The results shows that the nature of customary land dispute with customary law can be resolved through positive legal mechanisms and customary law mechanisms, while dispute resolution on disputed objects that have certificates based on the release of traditional institutions through mediation, synchronization / harmonization of laws and the making of local regulations. However, efforts to resolve this have experienced various factors of internal and external obstacles.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-132
Author(s):  
I Putu Gian Favian Adhi Pradana ◽  
I Made Suwitra ◽  
I Ketut Sukadana

The purpose of the procedure for certificate management is still bound by mortgage rights, namely to provide legal protection for creditors, if there is a certificate holder, all of the breakers will be re-burdened according to the loan borrowed. This study aims to look at the legal protection for the bank against land title certificate holders who are encumbered with mortgage rights and legal responsibilities for land title certificates that are encumbered with mortgage rights. This research uses a type of normative legal research, with an invited-invited approach (The Statute Approach) and a conceptual approach. The results showed that the legal protection measures for the bank against the management of land title certificates that were encumbered with mortgage rights could be done by making a power of attorney to charge and making them to sell. In practice, in order to obtain a legal protection against the certainty of the guarantee to be resolved, the Bank will ask permission to make a power of attorney to make the sale. In this case a power of attorney is made to sell by the bank's debtor and can also sell the guarantee. As a result of the legal law, the certificate which is being burdened with a mortgage will be nullified and will be re-burdened on the owner.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 491-495
Author(s):  
I Gusti Ngurah Md Rama Andika ◽  
Ni Luh Made Mahendrawati ◽  
Ida Ayu Putu Widiati

In the implementation of a franchise agreement, it is not uncommon for the agreement not to be implemented due to a unilateral termination by the franchisor. Considering that the franchisee in the franchise agreement is in a weaker position, in the event of a unilateral termination, it will suffer a large loss. However, in the laws and regulations, there are no clear arrangements for the protection of franchisees who experience unilateral termination who actually experience losses. The purpose of this study is to analyze the franchise agreement may be terminated unilaterally by the franchisor and the legal protection of the franchisee against the unilateral termination of the franchise agreement by the franchisor. This study uses normative legal research methods using primary legal materials, with the types of approaches used are statutory approaches, case approaches and conceptual approaches. Legal sources are then analyzed systematically. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that basically the franchise agreement cannot be terminated unilaterally unless the void conditions stated in the contract have been fulfilled and legal protection for the franchisee against the losses he has suffered can be sued for compensation based on default.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 9
Author(s):  
Made Oka Cahyadi Wiguna

The government has indeed provided legal protection and certainty to indigenous peoples regarding their ulayat lands, through a Ministerial Regulation. However, it needs to be studied more deeply about the concept of communal rights to land and Pakraman village as the subject of communal rights holders on land. Communal rights to land are conceptualized as models of land rights that have just been raised in the national land law system. The consequence is that indigenous and tribal peoples as communal rights holders are authorized to use and benefit from their communal land. Pakraman village qualifies as a subject of communal rights to land because Pakraman village in Bali is classified into the community of the community, has a system of customary government referred to as the traditional prajuru led by a customary village leader. Then Pakraman village has a legal area called the Palemahan Pakraman village. As an instrument that regulates the life and social interaction of the community, awig-awig is the customary law of the community in a Pakraman village in Bali.


Author(s):  
Dewa Putu Adnyana ◽  
I Ketut Sudantra

The regulation of legal protection for customers who have savings funds in village financial institutions (LPD) is unclear. This causes no legal certainty for customers if the LPD experiences financial problems. The existence of LPDs in Bali is regulated in two types of legal rules, namely state law and customary law (legal pluralism). Analyzing the legal certainty aspects of deposit guarantor in statutory regulations and customary law is the aim of this research. This study uses a normative legal research methodology. This study uses two types of approaches namely, the statute and the conceptual approaches. The legal materials chosen as the basic analysis are primary and secondary legal materials. The conclusion of this study shows that the role of state law is more dominant than customary law. The above conclusion is shown by the fact of the research that most of the matters related to the technical operations of the LPD are regulated by the state law, in this case, is regional regulation about LPD. Based on the results of the study on the norms of local regulations on LPD and the nine awig –awig as a form of customary law from representatives of the nine regencies and city in Bali, there is no regulation on deposit guarantor institutions for LPD customers in Bali to provide legal protection. So that, regulating LPDs in Bali with two legal systems, namely the state law and the customary law system, does not guarantee legal certainty for the safety of customer's deposits. Pengaturan perlindungan hukum bagi nasabah yang mempunyai dana simpanan  di Lembaga Perkreditan Desa (LPD) saat ini tidak jelas. Hal ini menyebabkan tidak ada kepastian hukum bagi nasabah apabila LPD mengalami masalah keuangan. Keberadaan LPD di Bali diatur dalam dua jenis aturan hukum yaitu hukum negara dan hukum adat  (pluralisme hukum). Mengkaji aspek kepastian hukum penjamin simpanan  dalam setiap norma dalam peraturan perundang-undangan serta dalam hukum adat merupakan tujuan penelitian ini. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum doktrinal (normatif). Penelitian ini menggunakan dua jenis pendekatan yaitu pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan (statute approach), dan pendekatan konsep (conceptual approach). Adapun bahan hukum yang dipilih sebagai dasar analisis adalah bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Kemudian kesimpulan dari penelitian ini menyebutkan bahwa dua sistem hukum dalam pengaturan LPD di Bali menunjukkan peran hukum negara lebih dominan daripada hukum adat.  Kesimpulan ini ditunjukkan oleh fakta penelitian yang ditemukan bahwa sebagian besar hal yang berkaitan dengan teknis operasional LPD yang merupakan satu-satunya organisasi keuangan milik Desa Adat di Bali diatur oleh hukum negara dalam hal ini diatur dalam peraturan daerah tentang LPD. Kemudian, berdasarkan hasil kajian terhadap norma peraturan daerah tentang LPD dan terhadap sembilan awig–awig sebagai bentuk hukum adat dari perwakilan Kabupaten dan Kota di Bali, tidak ada ditemukan pengaturan tentang lembaga penjamin simpanan bagi nasabah LPD di Bali untuk memberikan perlindungan hukum. Dengan demikian pengaturan LPD di Bali dengan dua sistem hukum yaitu hukum negara dan sistem hukum adat ternyata tidak menjamin kepastian hukum bagi keamanan dana simpanan para nasabah. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document