scholarly journals Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah dalam Perkawinan Campuran

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 157-163
Author(s):  
I Gede Wardana Oka Sastra Wiguna ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
I Putu Gede Seputra

The study of this research is a review of the ownership of land rights for husbands / wives as a result of the existence of mixed marriages, currently mixed marriages exist in various circles of Indonesian society, the cause of this legal incident is the result of the fast and easy development of the times, and is supported by international relations that continue to increase. With the occurrence of many mixed marriages in Indonesia, legal protection in mixed marriages should be accommodated properly in the legislation in Indonesia. The purpose of this research is to understand the arrangement of ownership of land rights according to Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning agrarian principles and to know the status of ownership of land rights that can be owned in mixed marriages. Researchers use normative techniques, namely normative legal research methods or library law research methods, which are methods or methods used in legal research conducted by examining existing library materials. This research illustrates that the ownership of land rights according to Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Basic Agrarian Regulations in general, land rights can be in the form of property rights, land use rights, land use rights, and finally use rights which are between one and one rights. Other rights have different meanings in terms of limitations on legal subjects of ownership and limitations on the duration of ownership. The status of ownership of land rights that can be owned in mixed marriages is attached to people who have Indonesian citizenship and in mixed marriages the problems of ownership of the rights over can be resolved by a marriage agreement made between the parties.

Author(s):  
Ario Patra Nugraha ◽  
Chamim Tohari

This research discusses about the status of land rights whose ownership has been not clear yet, which is the object of cooperation in utilization between the Sawir Village Government and PT Solusi Bangun Indonesia Tbk, according to the laws and principles in force in Indonesia. The problems that will be answered in this study include: (1) What is the status of land rights that are used as objects of utilization between the Sawir Village Government and PT Solusi Bangun Indonesia Tbk? (2) How is the land use cooperation between Sawir Village Government and PT Solusi Bangun Indonesia Tbk according to Western and Islamic Covenant Law? This type of research is a qualitative research, while the approach used is an empirical juridical approach, namely legal research that functions to see the laws that apply in the community. The results of this research are: (1) According to the Sawir Village Government, the land belongs to the Village Government as evidenced by the existence of a field map in the village C book. Meanwhile, according to the Tuban Regency Government, the Tuban Regency National Land Agency, and PT Solusi Bangun Indonesia Tbk, the land ownership is not registered and cannot be claimed as an asset of Sawir Village. According to Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Regulations on Agrarian Principles article 19 paragraph 1, the land cannot be referred to as land belonging to Sawir Village until the certification is completed on behalf of the village. And to get the ownership certificate, the Sawir Village Government must register or submit an application for ownership of the land to the National Land Agency of Tuban Regency. (2) According to the Islamic Covenant Law, the status of the land does not meet the requirements as an object of the agreement. This is because the land has not been legally proven to be owned by the Sawir Village Government. Whereas one of the main requirements for the validity of an agreement is that the object of the agreement must be legally owned by one of the parties who entered into the agreement.Keywords: Utilization, Non-Certified Land, Covenant Law, Customary Rights


Notaire ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 217
Author(s):  
Nailu Vina Amalia

The deed of the purchase and sale agreement (PPJB). The deed of the sale and purchase agreement is a preliminary agreement prior to the sale and purchase of land. PPJB is used only once. If what is agreed in the PPJB has been fulfilled then the signing of the sale and purchase deed can be carried out, by signing the sale and purchase deed, the ownership of land rights has been transferred. There are still many people who think that when the PPJB is signed, there will be a transfer of land rights, even though the PPJB is not an evidence of a transfer of land rights. This thesis discusses graded PPJB or recurring PPJB made by a Notary on a plot of land based on ownership rights over land use rights of former customary land based on the quotation of the Decree of the Governor of East Java Region Serial Number I/Agr/117 XI/HM/01.G/1970 issued November 4, 1970, or uncertified land. Whether it contradicts the concept of buying and selling in agrarian law and the legal consequences of the PPAT who made the sale and purchase deed based on the graded PPJB.Keywords: Graded PPJB; Recurring PPJB: Proof of Prior Rights.Akta Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (akta PPJB). Akta PPJB merupakan perjanjian pendahuluan sebelum diadakannya jual beli tanah. Akta PPJB digunakan untuk sekali saja, namun prakteknya masih ditemukan Akta PPJB bertingkat. Masih banyak masyarakat yang menganggap apabila sudah ada akta PPJB sudah ada peralihan hak atas tanah, padahal akta PPJB bukan bukti adanya peralihan hak atas tanah. Akta Jual Beli (AJB) yang merupakan bukti adanya peralihan hak atas tanah. AJB dibuat apabila syarat-syarat yang ada dalam akta PPJB sudah terpenuhi. Dalam tesis ini membahas tentang akta PPJB bertingkat atau akta PPJB berulang yang dibuat oleh Notaris atas sebidang tanah berdasarkan Hak Milik atas tanah Hak Pakai bekas Gogolan tidak tetap berdasarkan Kutipan Surat Keputusan Gubernur Kepala Daerah Tingkat I Jawa Timur Nomor I/Agr/117/XI/HM/01.G/1970 tertanggal 4 Nopember tahun 1970 atau tanah yang belum bersertipikat apakah akta PPJB bertingkat tersebut bertentangan dengan konsep jual beli dalam hukum tanah dan akibat hukum dari Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) membuat AJB berdasarkan akta PPJB bertingkat.Kata Kunci: PPJB Bertingkat; PPJB Berulang; Bukti Hak Lama.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 817
Author(s):  
Livia Cindy Ariella ◽  
Endang Pandamdari

A sale and purchase agreement is one of the most frequently made agreements. One of the most traded objects is land. According to customary law, land sale and purchase is a legal act of transferring land rights. The legal act of sale and purchase is carried out by a land deed official who has the authority to make a sale and purchase deed. Sometimes, the sale and purchase deed cannot be made because there are conditions that have not been fulfilled, so the parties first make a preliminary agreement called the binding sale and purchase agreement. Usually, the binding sale and purchase agreement is followed by power of attorney to sell. The formulation of the problem in this thesis is whether the inclusion of the power of attorney to sell is permissible, and if the recipient of the power of attorney misuses the power, what form of legal protection can be given to the authorizer. The author uses normative legal research methods that are supported by interviews to answer these problems. The inclusion of a power of attorney to sell within the binding sale and purchase agreement is permitted as long as it is not an absolute power that is prohibited by law. Legal protection that can be given to the authorizer is divided into two forms: preventive protection, a legal protection aimed at preventing the occurrence of disputes, and repressive protection, a protection that serves to resolve in the event of a dispute.


Jurnal Akta ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 329
Author(s):  
Mochammad Yefrie Dwi Oga ◽  
Lathifah Hanim

The purpose of this study was to determine: 1) The role of the Land Deed Official (PPAT) in registration of rights to land conversion of agricultural to non-agricultural to residential in Tegal. 2) The procedure of registration of land rights over the function of agricultural to non-agricultural to residential in Tegal. 3) Obstacles and solutions of conversion rights over agricultural land into non-agricultural to residential in Tegal. This study uses empirical juridical approach or socio-legal research. Data collected through literature, observation and interviews. Based on data analysis concluded that: 1) The role of PPAT in enrollment over the function of rights over agricultural land into non-agricultural to residential houses which provide information on the law relating to the procedure of land conversion and registration of land rights after deters conversion and the making of letters or deeds relating for their particular legal acts such as the breakdown of plot, behind the name, as well as buying and selling land. 2) The procedure of registration of land rights over the function of agricultural to non-agricultural to residential implemented through several stages of the formation of the assessment team, the assessment of land use change object, the trial of the determination, the recommendations and the issuance of a decision on approval of land use changes. 3) Obstacles and solutions in the conversion of agricultural land rights into non-agricultural to residential namely population growth, land agricultural diminishing and changing the status of land use. The solution in the conversion of rights over agricultural land into non-agricultural to residential houses of government is more emphasis on the rules on agricultural land and non-agricultural order later on agricultural land does not decrease faster than society itself should be aware of the importance of agricultural for food security community own.Keywords: Notary / PPAT; Role; Registration; Transfer Function; Land.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 247-263
Author(s):  
Adhitya Dimas Pratama

Intermarriage is a phenomenon that is rife with the development of increasingly rapid technology weapons. Implementation of mixed marriages must not be separated from the constraints and risks will dihadi offender Mixed Marriage itself. One of the problems that arise are related to the occurrence of the Joint Treasure especially over land rights as legal consequences arising from the holding of intermarriage intermarriage especially if implemented without prenuptial agreement. The author of this thesis wants to study and analyze more about the law as a result of intermarriage without severance agreement treasure to land ownership and settlement of land ownership issues arising from mixed marriage without separation agreement treasure. The method used is a normative legal research, namely legal research done by researching library materials or secondary law while in locating and collecting data is done by two approaches, namely legislation and conceptual approaches. The results showed that the legal consequences of intermarriage in the absence of agreement separating property to the ownership rights to the land after the enactment of Law No. 1 of 1974 About the marriage, property acquired during the marriage is community property as engaging joint property so that if it is not made an prenuptial agreement the property rights to land shall be released within a period of one (1) year or the land falls to the state. The resolution attempts to do to the problems of land ownership arising from mixed marriages without the agreement split the treasure is in the form of drafting of a treaty mate after marriage or reduction of land rights from property rights into rights of use in accordance with the provisions of that kind of tenure, which may possess by someone follow the status of their land rights subjects in accordance with the provisions of the legislation


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-43
Author(s):  
Kadek Megah Bintaranny ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
I Wayan Arthanaya

The problem faced by the couple of a mixed marriage in Indonesia is that there are provisions in Indonesian law regarding the incorporating of assets immediately into joint property after the marriage. But on the other hand, there are laws regulating that foreigners may not own property rights in Indonesia, so joint property involving a number of properties in the form of movable or immovable property will be impossible for foreigners to own. This study examines two issues: the legal protection for third party, the bank creditors relating to the status/property status of a married couple in mixed marriages in a marriage agreement and the legal consequences of non-performing loans related to the couple’s property if they commit defaults. To uncover these two matters, the study was conducted using the normative legal research method. The results show that creditors are protected in a preventive and repressive manner. Legal consequences for husband or wife property for bank creditors if the debtor is bound in the mixed marriage defaults depend on the form of the marriage agreement made. A husband or wife who is an Indonesian citizen as a debtor is permitted to guarantee the material security of his assets freely and can be taken as collateral for repayment by the bank’s creditors if the debtor is in default.


Author(s):  
Nurhasan Ismail

<p>Penguasaan dan pemanfaatan tanah yang diatur dalam Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria (UUPA) merupakan arah dari politik hukum pertanahan Indonesia yang bertujuan untuk menjamin terwujudnya kemakmuran bagi seluruh rakyat Indonesia. Wujud dari hal tersebut terlihat dari adanya perhatian khusus kepada kelompok masyarakat lemah melalui kebijakan pertanahan. Belakangan, terjadi pergeseran politik pertanahan, dimana penguasaan dan pemanfaatan tanah hanya didapat oleh sekelompok kecil masyarakat, yaitu perusahaan besar. Tulisan yang membahas tentang politik hukum pertanahan nasional saat ini dan bentuk perlindungan hak kepemilikan tanah masyarakat dilakukan dengan metode penelitian sosio- yuridis. Dari hasil penelitian terlihat bahwa pada saat ini terdapat upaya untuk menghidupkan kebijakan pertanahan yang mengembalikan keseimbangan seperti yang diinginkan UUPA. Langkah yang ditawarkan untuk mewujudkan hal tersebut adalah dengan menerapkan politik hukum pertanahan prismatik yang mendasarkan pada beberapa prinsip seperti prinsip keberagaman hukum dalam kesatuan, prinsip persamaan atas dasar ketidaksamaan, prinsip mengutamakan keadilan dan kemanfaatan di atas kepastian hukum, dan prinsip diferensiasi fungsi dalam keterpaduan.</p><p>Land use and tenure are stipulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA) is the political direction of the Indonesian land law aimed at ensuring the realization of prosperity for all Indonesian people. Manifestations of this evident from the presence of particular concern to the community weaker over land policy. Indonesia. Later, the political shift of land, land use and tenure which obtained only by a small group of people, the big companies. Studies that discuss the political current national land law and forms of protection of land rights community do with socio-legal research methods. From the research shows that there are now efforts to turn the land policy that restores the balance as desired UUPA. Measures offered to make this happen is to apply the law of the land prismatic politics based on several principles like the principle of legal diversity in unity, the principle of equality on the basis of inequality, the principle that the justice and expediency over the rule of law, and the principle of differentiation in functionality integration.</p>


NORMA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 47
Author(s):  
Karina Shandy

The study, entitled legal protection of flat buyers whose land is actually being secured with Hak Tanggungan, first aims to find out and analyze how disputes are resolved for flats buyers who experience law execution of their future apartment units because the land rights are secured. This is normative legal research that will explore the contents of statutory regulations. The results of this research are that several instruments exist as a unit in purchasing an apartment/flats, one of which is PPJB, the status of the buyer is as a buyer, not bezitter, eignar, or non-litigation channels with specific steps prioritize detentor, the dispute settlement mechanism according to the Agreement in the PPJB. Following statutory regulations, however, the buyer can still take the litigation route as a mechanism for settling the dispute, with compensation claims and suit for default based on the existing PPJB.Keywords: PPJB, Flat, Hak Tanggungan


Author(s):  
Muhammad Aji Samudra ◽  

Existence of Lanting Houses for traditional Kalimantan people, especially Banjarmasin people, is a primary need because it their place to live. The life of the Lanting House is now, in the beginning, to be abandoned because the local government is trying to relocate the Lanting House, and there is no legal status of the Lanting House so that many heirs sell the Lanting House only with receipts. Seeing the object of the Lanting House that was built on the water was not able to get ownership rights like on the land, this caused the weak legal force against the object of this Lanting House if it had transitioned rights because an object that was built floats on the water according to the Agrarian Law does not can get land rights. The purpose of this study was to determine the protection obtained by the Lanting House. This study used a normative juridical approach by reviewing and analyzing the laws and regulations and library materials relating to the Lanting House, and the rules used as the basis for the status of the Lanting House. This study used secondary data covering primary legal material in the form of legislation, and secondary licensed content in the form of theories and literature related to the issues discussed. Research showed that the Lanting House could be protected under Law No. 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Rules of Agrarian Principles and Government Regulation No. 40 of 1996 concerning Land Use Rights, Building Use Rights, and Land Use Rights. Where the Lanting House can be given the right to use the building that has been approved by the minister of agrarian and spatial planning so that the Lanting House is recognized as a building that can be given legal certainty.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 1729
Author(s):  
Komang Gede Pradnyan Supardi Yasa ◽  
I Gede Agus Kurniawan

Seiring perkembangan jaman banyak genre musik baru yang bermunculan, salah satunya adalah genre Koplo. Belakangan ini marak grup-grup musik yang mengubah genre dari Pop menjadi Koplo. Banyak dari grup-grup tersebut yang mengubah genre lagu tanpa seijin pencipta lagu tersebut sehingga kemudian muncul permasalahan Hak Cipta. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan gambaran yang jelas mengenai bagaimana perlindungan hukum terhadap pencipta yang lagunya diubah tanpa seijin dari pencipta lagu tersebut dan bagaimana penyelesaian jika terjadinya sengketa terhadap lagu yang diubah tanpa seijin pencipta lagu. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum Normatif, yang dimana metode penelitian ini mengkaji hukum sebagai suatu norma yang dimana terdapat kekaburan norma tentang perlindungan hukum. Hasil pembahasan dari penelitian ini yaitu pemegang Hak Cipta sudah mendapatkan perlindungan hukum sejak karyanya diwujudkan ke dalam bentuk nyata yang dimana hal tersebut sesuai dengan prinsip deklaratif. Meskipun sudah mendapatkan perlindungan sejak karyanya diwujudkan dalam bentuk nyata, sebaiknya jika dilakukan pencatatan terhadap hak cipta tersebut agar memiliki bukti yang formal. Penyelesaian sengketa terhadap Hak Cipta dapat diselesaikan melalui dua cara. Cara yang pertama melalui jalur non litigasi dan yang kedua melalui jalur litigasi. Penyelesaian melalui jalur no nlitigasi dibagi menjadi beberapa bagian yaitu Konsultasi, mediasi, negosiasi, konsiliasi, dan arbitrase. Sedangkan jika melalui jalur litigasi, dapat ditempuh melalui dua cara yaitu upaya perdata dan upaya pidana. Jika pelaku terbukti melakukan pelanggaran maka sanksi yang diterima dapat berupa kurungan dan denda sesuai yang tercantum didalam Undang-Undang Hak Cipta tersebut. Along with the times, many new music genres have emerged, one of which is the Koplo genre. Lately, music groups are blooming which changed the genre from Pop songs to Koplo. Many of these groups have changed the song genre without the author's permission, so they appear later to become Copyright. The purpose of this study is to provide a clear picture of making laws about the creator whose song was changed without the author's permission and how to increase the refutation of the song that was changed without the author's permission. The method used in this study uses normative legal research methods, where this research method studies law as a norm that exists everywhere that is related to norms regarding legal protection. The result of this research discussion is that the Copyright holder has obtained legal protection because his work has been made in a form that is in accordance with declarative principles. Because it has been approved since the work was manifested in concrete form, copyright must be approved to have official proof. Settlement if there is a dispute about Copyright can be resolved in two ways. The first method is through non-litigation and the second is through litigation. Settlement through non-litigation is divided into several parts, namely Consultation, mediation, negotiation, conciliation, and arbitration. While through litigation, it can be continued in two ways, namely civil struggle and struggle. If the lottery is proven, the penalty received can be in the form of confirmation and fines in accordance with the Copyright Act.  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document