scholarly journals Kepastian Hukum Dari Penerapan Ketentuan Batas Waktu Pengajuan Upaya Hukum Verzet (Studi Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Barat Nomor 9/Pdt.Plw./2017/PN..JKT.BRT. Jo. Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Dki Jakarta Nomor 107/Pdt/2018/PT.DKI)

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 215
Author(s):  
Jonathan Santandrea ◽  
Ning Adiasih
Keyword(s):  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Time Limit ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
High Court ◽  
Legal Remedies ◽  
Ratio Decidendi ◽  
Legal Consequence ◽  
The Village ◽  
Case Number

As state of law, Indonesia must guarantee legal certainty in all fields including the Civil Procedure Code. Legal certainty is achieved if the rule cannot be interpreted differently and is contained in the realization of the consistency of each judge's decision. The time limit for the submission of verzet has been regulated in Article 129 Paragraph (2) HIR. However, the verdict used as study material contained inconsistencies in the decisions of judges between West Jakarta District Court in case number 9 / Pdt.Plw / 2017PN.JKT.BRT. and Jakarta High Court in case number 107 / Pdt / 2018 / PT.DKI Both have different ratio decidendi. What is the legal certainty of applying the deadline for submitting verzet legal remedies? The author uses normative legal research methods and uses interview data as supporting data. The results of the study revealed that there was no legal certainty in the application of the time limit for submitting verzet legal remedies, especially in the condition of the verstek verdict being delivered to the defendant through the village head. The legal consequence is that there are variations in the decision dictum on this matter so that it harms the plaintiff and obscures the meaning of the verstek case which is said to have been inkracht van gewijsde. It is recommended that in the revision of the Civil Procedure Law there are specific guidelines on how to calculate the deadline for submitting verzet in terms of volunteering verstek to be entrusted to the village head.

scholarly journals WANPRESTASI TERHADAP AKTA PENGAKUAN UTANG DIBAWAH TANGAN DENGAN JAMINAN SERTIFIKAT HAK MILIK ATAS TANAH DITINJAU DARI PASAL 12 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 4 TAHUN 1996 TENTANG HAK TANGGUNGAN ( Analisis Putusan Kasasi Nomor 837 K/Pdt/2019 )

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 105
Author(s):  
Aria Dimas Harapan ◽  
Andi Safira Yan Istiany
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Civil Case ◽  
Sense Of Security ◽  
Ratio Decidendi ◽  
Credit Agreement ◽  
Case Number ◽  
Legal Consequences

Starting from the need for capital, in practice some people are reluctant to make credit with banks, because the process is considered difficult, and too convoluted. Therefore, some people prefer to borrow a certain amount of money from individuals or what is better known as debt or credit. Talking about the debt and credit agreement, it will be closely related to collateral because every creditor needs a sense of security for the funds he lends. The author's research is made to examine and find out what efforts can be made if there is default in an underhand debt acknowledgment that guarantees the title of title to land without being preceded by a principal agreement, as well as the judge's consideration (Ratio Decidendi) in the Cassation Decision Number 837K / Pdt / 2019 concerning default in the debt acknowledgment. The research method used in this study is a descriptive normative juridical approach, namely research that refers to the legal norms contained in statutory regulations and court decisions. The results of the research obtained by the author in this study are the first consideration of the judge in deciding Case Number 837 / K / Pdt / 2019 is not quite right because in theory the judge's decision overrides legal certainty for a civil case by deciding in default of a debt acknowledgment, which then the judge also also declared null and void the debt acknowledgment. Where based on the provisions of Article 12 of Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights, the guarantee which is the object of the author's research, is a forbidden cause that is contrary to the validity of an agreement, so that the legal consequences are null and void from the start without having to obey prior default in the debt recognition deed. So that the author's suggestion is necessary for parties who want to carry out lending and borrowing activities, especially in terms of debt and credit, first understand any rules and legal norms that apply to their actions, so that they will not cause losses among the parties who bind themselves in the future.

scholarly journals Traditional Rights of Indigenous People in Indonesia: Legal Recognition and Court Interpretation

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-205
Author(s):  
Sartika Intaning Pradhani
Keyword(s):  
Natural Resources ◽  
Indigenous People ◽  
Indigenous Peoples ◽  
District Court ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Small Islands ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
High Court ◽  
Strong Relation ◽  
Adat Law

Indigenous peoples are victims of agrarian conflict, but their existence are not recognized by Indonesia. Indonesia recognizes Adat Law Community, distinct community living in Indonesia according to their Adat Law, and their traditional right. This paper is written based on legal normative research to analyze right of Adat Law Community towards their land and territory; and rule of the court regarding right of Adat Law Community. Adat Law Community has strong relation with their land and territory, namely Ulayat Right which guaranteed in Constitution and regulated in various law and regulation, especially regarding natural resources. Recognition towards Ulayat Right held by Adat Law Community through regional law product is declaratory because it only confirms the exiting right. Court has prominent role to enforce right of Adat Law Community. Constitutional Court has revoked several provisions in law which neglect Ulayat Right of Adat Law Community, such as Adat Forest which defined as state forest located in Adat Law Community’s territory; and Right of Coastal Water which limits Ulayat Right of Adat Law Community to access natural resources in coastal area and small islands. Though Constitutional Court has strengthen right of Adat Law Community, this community still face difficulties to claim their right towards land and territory against government and investor before District Court, High Court, and Supreme Court because those Court more focus on formal legal certainty of Adat Law Community’s authorization towards their land and territory than factual authorization as narrated by the community.

scholarly journals Penyelesaian atas Sertipikat Tanah Ganda Menurut Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 Tentang Pendaftaran Tanah (Studi Putusan: Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1537 K/PDT/2018)

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1214
Author(s):  
Vanesia Hendrika Elvina ◽  
Hasni Hasni
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
District Court ◽  
Positive System ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
High Court ◽  
Strength Of Evidence ◽  
Ownership Of Land ◽  
First Time

The purpose of implementing land registration is to provide legal certainty and legal protection. The Agrarian Law that is used in Indonesia adheres to a negative system that is tied to a positive system. The land registration activity for the first time produced proof of rights, in the form of certificates as a means of proof of land rights. Certificate as a strong proof of rights means that physical data and juridical data in a certificate have the strength of evidence and must be accepted as true information, as long as it is not proven otherwise with other evidence in the form of certificates or other certificates. In Subari’s case, there was a double land certificate in the same plot of land. Subari has the ownership of land rights that is got from his parents and from purchasing with two buffaloes. But, there are other people who dominate the land that is belong to Subari and they also have the certificate to proof their ownership of the land rights. Settlement of multiple land certificates can be done through the Court, to obtain legal certainty that the certificate of ownership of land rights which has stronger evidence is based on evidence. The district court ruled that ownership of land rights belonged to Subari, and this decision was reinforced by high court and a Supreme Court.[F1]  [F1]Paragarf single

scholarly journals The Certificate of Building Use of Rights (Shgb) that has been out Duration of Ownership, with Execution of Sita Object Guarantee to Land

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 1200-1208
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
District Court ◽  
High Court ◽  
Civil Case ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Litigation Process ◽  
Proof Of Ownership ◽  
Ownership Of Land

The length of the civil litigation process regarding land from the District Court, the High Court to the final level and legal protection of the assets seized as well as proof of ownership of land or building rights are certificates. Based on these problems, it can be analyzed the validity of the execution of the object of confiscation of land against the Land Use Certificate (SHGB) that has expired and can be analyzed what steps must be taken in protecting the assets confiscated in a civil case through the Civil Procedure Code, the Agrarian Regulation Indonesia, Indonesian Auction Regulations. Based on this analysis, the Confiscation, Execution and Building Rights Auction activities that have expired are the conclusions of this study.

scholarly journals LEGAL CERTAINTY OF THE DEED OF AGREEMENT MADE BY A NOTARY BASED ON THE POWER TO SELL (CASE STUDY CASE NUMBER: 41/PDT.G/2016/PN.PA)

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-108
Author(s):  
Puspita Putri Ramadhani ◽  
Hasbir Paserangi ◽  
Wiwie Heryani
Keyword(s):  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Power Of Attorney ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Consequence ◽  
Study Case ◽  
Written Law ◽  
Formal Requirements ◽  
Case Number ◽  
Laws And Regulations

Default is an omission or negligence, breaking a promise, or violating what has been agreed. One example of an engagement default is case number: 41/Pdt.G/2016/PN.PA. This case began with an agreement between Indoria Hi. The Mpasu brothers were represented by Alfian Chaniago as the authority holder with Lang Hartoyo and Rizal Tjahyadi through a letter of the agreement made by notary XX. Indoria Hi. The Mpasu brothers were unwilling to fulfill the agreement's contents and decided to cancel the agreement unilaterally because they felt they were never involved in the agreement. Based on the case above, a further question arises about how to guarantee legal certainty for authentic deeds and the consequences of the legal deed of agreement that does not follow the procedure. This study is normative legal research, which examines aspects of written law. The approach to the problem in this study is normative juridical, that is, it is based on applicable laws and regulations. In conclusion, the binding deed of the agreement made before a notary does not always go as expected. An authentic deed that does not meet formal requirements is considered imperfect, so it does not have an element of legal certainty. The legal consequence of the deed of the agreement under the power of attorney to sell that is not following the procedure is that the agreement will be null and void.

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP MEREK TERKENAL ASING DI INDONESIA (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN MAHKAMA AGUNG NOMOR: 165/Pdt.Sus-Hki/2016 DAN PUTUSAN MAHKAMA AGUNG NOMOR: 557K/Pdt.sus-HKI/2015)

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 1026
Author(s):  
Ronald Kurniawan ◽  
Simona Bustani
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Main Issue ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Remedies ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Case Number

The first dispute with Case Number MA Decree 557 K / Pdt.Sus-HKI / 2015 that occurred between the designer clothing (designer) from France, Pierre Cardin owner of the Brand Business Pierre Cardin as the claimant, whose brand is a popular brand and has been used since the beginning In March 1974, in this matter the prosecutor against the defendant Alexander Satryo Wibowo, was a local businessman who owned the Trademark Pierre Cardin, who had registered his trademark since July 29, 1977 in Indonesia, where there were similarities in essence or overall in the use of the trademark between the claimant and defendant. Therefore Pierre Cardin, hereby as the prosecutor, demanded the cancellation of the registered mark Card Pierre Cardin used by the defendant, against this demand the Commercial Court at the Central Jakarta District Court has determined the determination of Ms. 15 / Pdt.Sus-Trademark / 2015 / PN.Niaga.Jkt .Pst., Dated June 9, 2015 which in the main issue rejected the claim of the prosecutor for the whole. Furthermore, the Plaintiff requested the appeal of the appeal to the Supreme Court. Legal remedies requested by the claimant in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 6 point (3) letter b of Law Number 15 of 2001 concerning Trademarks. In carrying out the appeal appeal law, the Supreme Court has decided on decision number 557 K / Pdt.Sus-HKI / 2015 which in its stipulation stipulates rejecting an appeal request from the appealer Pierre Cardin.

scholarly journals KONSTRUKSI HUKUM DALAM PEMBUKTIAN UNSUR TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN BERENCANA

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-70
Author(s):  
Hajairin Hajairin
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
High Court

In this research, the author saw in two court judgments which taken out by the District Court (PN) of Raba Bima, number 341/Pid.B/2014/PN.R.bi and the High Court of Mataram (PT), number 20/Pid/2015/PT.Mtr. Both of judgments are strengthen each other, it defendant is in the period of detention during 19 years in prison. However, the  verdict/judgment of Supreme Court Number 815K/Pid/2015 cancelled of two court judgment which it underneath. In this case, the Judge has different view of law as the main point to be consideration to make decision for Abdul Khalik. The construction of law in this case has to be seen and translated by the concept of judgment and legal certainty, because of different decision making by District Court (PN) of Raba Bima, the High Court of Mataram and Supreme Court which is freeing Abdul Khalik from all lawsuits. Based on these situation, it need to deep analysis and critically to get the best judgment as the goal of criminal law which is born by the criminal justice system.

scholarly journals PUTUSAN ULTRA PETITA DALAM KASUS PEMBUNUHAN DI PENGADILAN NEGERI JAKARTA TIMUR

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-66
Author(s):  
Denty Suci Mareta Femylia ◽  
Muchammad Chasani ◽  
Muchammad Chasani
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
High Court ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Supreme Court Rulings ◽  
Case Number

Putusan Pengadilan Nomor 537/Pid/B/2007/PN.Jkt.Tim memutuskan terdakwa telah melakukan kejahatan berat berupa pembunuhan dengan sengaja. Melihat kejahatan yang dilakukannya, maka pantas baginya mendapatkan hukuman yang setimpal yaitu 15 tahun. Masalah dalam penelitian ini adalah apa yang menjadi dasar pertimbangan seorang hakim dalam memutus perkara seperti nomor putusan 537/Pid/B/2007/PN.Jkt.Tim, dan bagaimana penerapan putusannya dalam kasus ini. Metode penelitian hukum yang digunakan adalah yuridis sosiologis. Sasaran dari penelitian adalah norma-norma hukum positif yang mengatur tentang putusan ultra petita khususnya di Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Timur. Hasil Penelitian yang diperoleh, bahwa Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Timur memutus ultra petita karena dalam kasus ini, Jaksa menuntut terdakwa dengan menggunakan Pasal 338 KUHP dengan ancaman hukumannya adalah 14 tahun sedangkan hakim dalam vonisnya menggunakan Pasal 340 KUHP dengan menjatuhkan hukuman kepada terdakwa yaitu dengan 15 tahun penjara. Penerapannya adalah terdakwa mengajukan Peninjauan Kembali ke Mahkamah Agung dengan hasil putusannya adalah terdakwa Ferry Surya Prakasa divonis dengan 8 tahun penjara. Simpulan yang diperoleh dari penelitian ini adalah putusan majelis hakim atas Perkara Nomor: 537/Pid/B/2007/PN.Jkt.Tim, bahwa hakim seharusnya dapat memutus perkara tidak dari faktor yuridisnya saja melainkan dapat memutus perkara tersebut dengan memperhatikan dari faktor nonyuridisnya. Terkait dengan penerapannya bahwa terdakwa dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri, Pengadilan Tinggi dan Putusan Mahkamah Agung telah memutus 15 tahun penjara dan dalam peninjauan kembali divonis dengan 8 tahun penjara.Judgment of the Court Number 537 / Pid / B / 2007 / PN.Jkt.Tim decided the defendant had committed a serious crime of intentional murder. Seeing the crime he committed, it was fitting for him to get a 15-year sentence. The problem to be studied in this research are what is the basic consideration of a judge in deciding case such as decision number 537 / Pid / B / 2007 / PN.Jkt.Tim, and how the application of decision in this case. The approach used in the research is socio legal research. The objectives of the research are the poitive legal norms that regulate the Ultra petita Decision especially in the East Jakarta District Court. The result of the research shows that the East Jakarta District Court made decision of ultra petita verdict exceeded the prosecutor's demand, because in this case, the prosecutor demanded the defendant using Article 338 of the Criminal Code with the penalty of 14 years While the judge in his sentence using Article 340 of the Criminal Code by sentencing the defendant to 15 years imprisonment. Its application is the defendant filed a Judicial Review to the Supreme Court with the result of the verdict is defendant Ferry Surya Prakasa with 8 years in prison. The conclusion of this research is the decision of the panel of judges on the Case Number: 537 / Pid / B / 2007 / PN.Jkt.Tim, that the judge should be able to decide the case not from juridical factor but can decide the case by considering from the nonyuridis factor. In relation to its application that the defendant in the District Court, High Court and Supreme Court rulings have terminated 15 years of imprisonment and are under review with a term of 8 years imprisonment.

scholarly journals Can harmonized time limits in European civil procedure enhance the effectiveness of the enforcement of EU Law? = Possono termini processuali armonizzati in materia civile incre-mentare l’ effettività nell’esecuzione del diritto dell’Unione Europea?

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 543
Author(s):  
Giovanni Chiapponi
Keyword(s):  
Member State ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Time Limit ◽  
Eu Law ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Provisional Measure ◽  
Judicial Cooperation ◽  
Time Limits ◽  
Recognition And Enforcement ◽  
The Relationship

Abstract: The article focuses on the judgment Al Bosco, rendered by the ECJ on 4th October 2018. Al Bosco gives a new insight as to how the ECJ interprets the following questions: firstly, it clarifies the relationship between the doctrine of extended effects and that of equivalent effects; secondly, it underlines the importance of the principle of legal certainty; finally, it addresses issues concerning the time limit for the enforcement of a provisional measure issued in a Member State other than the Member State in which enforcement is sought. Against such a background, I will examine the pos-sibility of introducing a uniform and autonomous concept of harmonized time limits within the EU.Keywords: Time limits, provisional measures, recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and com-mercial matters, civil judicial cooperation, harmonisation.Riassunto: lo scritto è di commento alla sentenza “Al Bosco”, pronunciata dalla CGUE il 4 ottobre 2018. L’arresto in parola si segnala per il quid novi introdotto dalla Corte di Lussemburgo sull’interpretazione di talune questioni: inizialmente, chiarifica il rapporto tra il principio di estensione dell’efficacia e quello di equivalenza degli effetti; sottolinea, quindi, la centralità del principio di legalità giuridica. Affronta, da ultimo, talune problematiche relative all’applicazione del termine per l’esecuzione di una misura cautelare (un sequestro conservativo) in un contesto transfrontaliero. La sentenza mi fornisce lo spunto per svolgere alcune brevi considerazioni circa l’opportunità di valutare l’introduzione di un concetto autonomo ed uniforme di termini processuali armonizzati all’interno dell’Unione Europea. Parole chiave: termini processuali, misure cautelari, riconoscimento ed esecuzione di decisioni in materia civile e commerciale, cooperazione giudiziale in materia civile, armonizzazione.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document