scholarly journals Tanggung Jawab Notaris terhadap Ketidaksesuaian Akta Salinan Dengan Minuta Akta

Kosmik Hukum ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
Tyas Fidelia
Keyword(s):  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Law ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
The Difference

Notary is a public official who has the authority to make authentic deeds and has other powers as referred to in this Law or based on other laws, as described in Article 1 number 1 of the Law on the Position of Notary Public. In carrying out his position, a Notary is required to act trustworthy, honest, thorough, independent, impartial, and safeguarding the interests of the parties concerned as well as making a Deed in the form of a Minute Deed. In addition, a Notary is required to issue a Grosse Akta, a Copy of the Deed, or a Quotation of the Deed based on the Minuta Deed. These matters are regulated in Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary Public. By looking at these provisions, it is fitting for a Notary to carry out his obligations. But in reality, you can still find Notaries who do not carry out the obligations as stipulated in the Law on Notary Position. Starting from negligence in maintaining the Minuta Akta to differences between the Deed of Copy and the Minuta Akta. Of course, the difference between the Deed of Copy and the Minuta of the Deed will give losses to the parties who entered into an agreement. Regarding the responsibilities of a Notary Public, in general, it can be reviewed on a civil, criminal basis, the Law on the Position of Notary Public, and the responsibility for carrying out his / her duties based on the Notary's code of ethics. By looking at this raises a problem regarding, "What is the responsibility of the Notary for the non-conformity of the Copy Deed with the Minuta Deed?". The method used in this research is a normative or juridical legal research method.Keywords: Notary, Deed, and Notary Responsibilities

scholarly journals Islamic Justice Perspective On Notary The Perpetrators Criminal Action

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 93
Author(s):  
Ira Alia Maerani
Keyword(s):  
Islamic Law ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Islamic Perspective ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Law ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

This study aims to find out to know the form of violations and witnesses to the notary position based on Law No. 2 of 2014 concerning the Position of Notary and the perspective of Islamic justice in viewing a notary who is indicated to have committed a crime in connection with an authentic deed he made.            This research uses normative law research or dogmatic law research using the doctrinal method. Normative legal research includes research on legal principles, research on legal systematics, research on vertical and horizontal synchronization stages, comparison of law and legal history.            This research concludes that the notary public is a public official who makes an authentic deed and has the authority as regulated in Article 15,16, 17 of Law No. 2 of 2014 concerning the Position of Notary Public. The notary is obliged to act on trust; honest; independent; objective and safeguard the interests of parties involved in legal actions. Notaries in carrying out their duties and positions if convicted of violations, may be subject to sanctions or sanctions in the form of civil, administrative, and notary code of ethics in accordance with Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 of 2014 concerning Notary Positions. Even so, the Notary Position Law does not regulate criminal sanctions against Notaries. Whereas in practice there is an opportunity for a legal action or violation by a notary related to an authentic deed he made that can be qualified as a criminal offense. A notary who is indicated to have committed a crime in carrying out his authority as a Public Official, of course, must be a concern of the government and law enforcement because the law must be upheld against anyone who commits indiscriminate violations. This rule is a manifestation of the principle of "equality before the law" (equality before the law) which is a fundamental element in the concept of the rule of law. Honesty values; keep the mandate; fair; and this objective is synergistic with the values of justice in an Islamic perspective that promotes justice and problems. Described in the Qur'an An-Nisa verses 58 and 135 and QS. Al Ma'idah verse 8. Islamic law also regulates justice in recording a deed, for example just in recording accounts receivable debts (Q.S. Al Baqoroh: 282)Keywords: Islamic Perspective; Justice; Notary Public; Perpetrators; Criminal Act

scholarly journals SANKSI YANG DITERIMA OLEH PEJABAT PEMBUAT AKTE TANAH DALAM PEMBUATAN AKTA AUTENTIK YANG CACAT HUKUM (STUDI PUTUSAN: PN JAKSEL NO. 124/PDT.G/2017/PN.JKT.SEL)

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 314
Author(s):  
Andi Pratono ◽  
Tjempaka Tjempaka
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Community People ◽  
Is Theory ◽  
The Law ◽  
Legal Consequences ◽  
Made In

Indonesia is the law of state or law state, as a law state country, Indonesia must have 3(three) important element such as legal certainty, justice, and expediency. Those main elements represent all the law state. In community, people everyday acts always relate to legal act, such as contract, buying or selling object that promised. To ensure those legal act have the ability perfect proof power, those legal act poured in the form of deed. In buying and selling land, a deed of sale and purchase must be made in front authorized official like land deed officer. However land deed officer as public official do make mistake on duty, with the result that party at a disadvantage. Party that loss because of mistake land deed officer, do ask for responsibility by suing the land deed officer to compensate the losses. Land deed officer in carrying out their duties must apply the precautionary principle so as to minimize any mistakes in making the deed. Author is using normative legal research methods, supported by a data which is theory and interviews some expert in land deed officer and Code of Ethics. The legal consequences to the land deed officer due the legal acts are against the law, which is a sanction will be given. The sanction will divided in three types such as sanction according to the Civil Law, Criminal Law and Code of Ethics or Government Regulation about land deed officer.

scholarly journals Kewajiban Pemberian Jasa Hukum Secara Cuma-Cuma Oleh Notaris Pada Orang Tidak Mampu

Acta Comitas ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 446
Author(s):  
Claudia Verena Maudy Sridana ◽  
I Ketut Westra
Keyword(s):  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Legal Assistance ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Social ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
Legal Consequences

As a public official who works as a notary public has the authority to be able to make an authentic deed. As a notary in carrying out his commitment to make an authentic deed, the Notary gets approval to provide his services for free or voluntarily to people who are not capable in the financial field. How can you ask for legal assistance by a notary in the free notary area for people who can't afford it? Problems related to legal notifications to notaries who refuse to provide legal assistance in the field of notary to those who are unable? The purpose of the discussion is to analyze and discuss the request for legal assistance by a notary in the notary sector not providing legal assistance in the notary sector for people who cannot afford. This research uses empirical legal research methods, primary data and secondary data obtained were analyzed qualitatively and arranged systematically, which was collected by literature study and interview techniques. The conclusion of this research is the notary in providing his services without collecting honorariums is not only given to people who can not afford it, but notaries can provide free services to those who want to make a foundation or activities in the social, social and dialogue. The legal consequences of notaries who are reluctant to provide legal assistance to people who are not in accordance with the provisions of the sanctions provided for in Article 37 paragraph (2) of the UUJN are also in accordance with the provisions in the Code of Ethics I.N.I.

scholarly journals The ambiguity of dismissal of notary over bankruptcy in Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 269-285
Author(s):  
Rahayu Hartini
Keyword(s):  
Content Analysis ◽  
The Other ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Law ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
The Right ◽  
Legal Subjects ◽  
Legal Consequences

A notary is a public official who has the authority to make authentic deeds and other authorities regulated in-laws and regulations. Notaries are also private legal subjects (natuurlijk persons), which have free will to carry out legal actions. According to the Law on Notarial Positions, a Notary is dishonorably dismissed when (s)he is declared bankrupt. On the other hand, the UUK and PKPU recognize the rehabilitation of bankrupt debtors if they have fulfilled their obligations. This is where there is ambiguity or a fuzzy norm (vegen norm). Legal research aims to find out how bankruptcy is regulated in the notary position, and what are the legal consequences for the position of a notary both as a person and in relation to his/her position as a notary public? This legal research is normative juridical using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The legal materials obtained are analyzed using content analysis. The results of the discussion: 1). Notary bankruptcy has been regulated in UUK and PKPU as well as in the Law on Notary Position. 2). The legal consequences for a Notary who is declared bankrupt by the Commercial Court have an impact on the notary's personality, as well as on his position. According to the Law on the Position of Notary Public, if violating Article 84 which results in losses to the parties, the notary is obliged to pay compensation. According to the UUK and PKPU, this could result in the debtor losing the right to act freely on his assets, but not losing the right to perform his/her tasks and hold a position. As a recommendation, in the Law on the Position of Notary Public, it is necessary to clearly define the separation of Notary as a person from her/his position as his profession.

scholarly journals Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Yang Melakukan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dalam Pembuatan Akta Autentik

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 261
Author(s):  
Aprilia Putri Suhardini ◽  
Sukarmi Sukarmi
Keyword(s):  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Public Official ◽  
The Law

ABSTRAKNotaris adalah pejabat umum yang berwenang membuat akta autentik dan memiliki kewenangan yang lainnya sebagaimana dimaksud dalam Undang-Undang jabatan Notaris atau berdasarkan Undang-Undang lainnya. Dalam Pasal 16 Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris disebutkan bahwa salah satu tugas Notaris adalah bertindak jujur dan amanah dalam menjalankan jabatannya. Namun dalam praktiknya banyak Notaris yang dipanggil pengadilan untuk mempertanggungjawabkan akta autentik yang dibuatnya karna mengandung unsur melawan hukum. Tindakan Notaris tersebut tidak sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan dan Kode Etik Notaris dan telah menimbulkan kerugian kepada banyak pihak.Kata Kunci: Notaris, Akta Autentik, pertanggungjawaban, melawan hukum.ABSTRACTNotary is a public official authorized to make an authentic deed and has other authority as referred to in the Law of Public Notary or other Law. Article 16 of the Notary Law is mentioned that one of Notary's duties is to act in an honest and trustful manner in carrying out his / her position. In practice, however, many Notaries are summoned by the courts to account for the authentic deeds they make because they contain elements against the law. The act of Notary is not in accordance with the laws and the Notary Code of Ethics and has caused loss to many parties.Keywords: Notary, Authentic deed, Accountability, Againts the law

scholarly journals Perspektif Kode Etik Jabatan Notaris terhadap Publikasi dan Promosi Jabatan Notaris melalui Aplikasi Android

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Nadia Imanda
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Supervisory Board ◽  
Electronic Media ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Android Application ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Legal Provisions

Abstract: The era of technology brings people to the development of sophisticated computers and smartphones in which the applications of various types and purposes are. Notary as a public official appointed by the state to take care of most countries and communities in the context of civil law, has legal provisions related to what may and may not be done by a Notary. In this case, the Notary Code of Ethics of the Indonesian Notary Association (INI) states that notaries are denied publication and self-promotion of their positions through writing media as well as electronic media, but the category of advertising on publicity and self-promotion does not provide clear interpretation on android application that indicates to violate the Article 4 paragraph (3) Notary Code of Ethics. This legal research uses normative research methods using the statute approach and conceptual approaches. The use of an android application by a notary who indicates committing violation must be studied and supervised from the Notary Honorary Board and Notary Supervisory Board  so that the inteniont and the purpose of the UUJN and the Notary Code of Ethics can be realized and the office of notary as a profession cannot be dishonored.  Abstrak: Era teknologi membawa manusia pada perkembangan komputer dan smartphone canggih yang di dalamnya terdapat fasilitas aplikasi berbagai macam jenis dan tujuan. Notaris sebagai pejabat umum yang diangkat oleh negara untuk mengurusi sebagian urusan negara dan masyarakat dalam lingkup hukum perdata, memiliki ketentuan hukum terkait apa yang boleh dan tidak boleh dilakukan oleh seorang Notaris. Dalam hal ini, Kode Etik Notaris Ikatan Notaris Indonesia (I.N.I) menyatakan bahwa notaris dilarang melak         ukan publikasi dan promosi diri terhadap jabatannya melalui media tulis mau pun media elektronik, namun kategori batasan terhadap publikasi dan promosi diri dinilai kurang memberikan kejelasan hukum bahwasanya ditemukan aplikasi android yang berindikasi pelanggaran Pasal 4 ayat (3) Kode Etik Notaris. Penelitian hukum ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan berdasarkan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan konsep (conceptual approach). Penggunaan aplikasi android oleh notaris yang berindikasi melakukan pelanggaran harus dilakukan pengkajian dan pengawasan dari Dewan Kehormatan Notaris dan Majelis Pengawas Notaris agar maksud dan tujuan UUJN serta Kode Etik Notaris dapat terwujud dan tidak mencederai jabatan notaris sebagai profesi yang mulia. 

scholarly journals DEGRADASI AKTA OTENTIK YANG TIDAK DILAKUKAN PENANDATANGANAN PARA PIHAK SECARA BERSAMA

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 263
Author(s):  
Dian Dharmayanti ◽  
Rr Asfarina Izazi Razan ◽  
Nahdlotul Fadilah
Keyword(s):  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
The Other ◽  
The Will ◽  
High Integrity ◽  
The Law ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
Take All ◽  
Laws And Regulations

<em>Notary is a general officer authorized to create an authentic deed of all actions, agreements, and statutes required by the laws and/or regulations required by the interested to be expressed in the deed Authentically, guaranteeing the certainty of the date of the deed, storing the deed, giving Grosee, copies and quotations of the deed, all of them throughout the making of the deed were not also assigned or excluded to the other officers stipulated by the law. Thus, it is described in article 1 number 1 of Law No. 2 of 2014 concerning the amendment to law Number 30 year 2004 concerning the Notary Regulation (Hereinafter called UUJN). A notary public is a noble, independent and high integrity position, so it is only natural to take all actions in their position seriously referring to the laws and regulations and the code of ethics. The law actions of the parties as described in the notarial deed is purely wishes of the parties and the notary is limited to providing law counseling related to the contents of the deed and the law actions of the parties, without imposing the will of the parties. party or in favor of one party. After the deed is made and then read out in front of the parties and witnesses, it must be signed when it is signed by all parties present and witnesses as well, it becomes one of the notary obligations stipulated in UUJN.</em>

scholarly journals Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Notaris Atas Pembuatan Akta Oleh Penghadap Yang Dinyatakan Palsu (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 385 K/PID/2006)

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 131
Author(s):  
Vitto Odie Prananda
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Ratio Decidendi ◽  
The Law ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
Public Environment

<p>Permasalahan yang sering terjadi berkaitan dengan pelaksanaan tugas jabatan Notaris adalah jika ada akta Notaris yang dipersalahkan oleh para pihak terlebih jika para pihak datang kepada Notaris dengan memberikan keterangan palsu atau menggunakan alat bukti palsu dalam pembuatan akta. Hal ini membuat Notaris dikaitkan sebagai pihak yang turut serta melakukan suatu tindak pidana. Penulis dalam penelitian ini ingin menelaah dan menganalisa lebih lanjut tentang keabsahan akta notaris yang didasarkan pada alat bukti yang dinyatakan palsu dan<em> ratio decidendi </em>Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 385 K/PID/2006 Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif, yaitu penelitian hukum yang dilakukan dengan cara meneliti bahan pustaka atau bahan hukum sekunder sedangkan pendekatan masalah dilakukan dengan menggunakan pendekatan undang-undang dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa akta Notaris yang didasarkan pada alat bukti yang dinyatakan palsu adalah batal demi hukum. Notaris tidak berwenang untuk mengkaji sah atau tidaknya Surat Kuasa di bawah tangan dan Notaris tidak bertanggungjawab secara dipidana atas akta yang dibuatnya meskipun pembuatan akta tersebut didasarkan pada alat bukti palsu.</p><p> </p><p>Issues that are commonly occur within notary public environment is concerning fake information given by client. Numerous clients commonly provide fake information and evidence in order to achieve their goals in making notarial deed published by notary public. This condition makes notary public alleged as party that conducting criminal act. The present research tries to analyze further about validity of notarial deed that is based on fake information or evidence provide by the client. Moreover, the present study tries to ratio decidendi of Indonesia Supreme Court No 385 K/PID/2006 The method used in the present study is a normative legal research, namely legal research which is conducted by examining the library materials or secondary law while in finding and collecting the data is done by two approaches, namely the law and conceptual approaches. The present study concludes that notarial deed based on fake information or evidence provided by the client is canceled. Notary public is not obliged to examine validity of information coupled with evidence provided by the client. Furthermore, notary public is not responsible for criminal act although he/she publishes notarial deed with fake information or evidence provided by the client.</p>

scholarly journals Legal Review Of Malpractice Notary In The Notary’s Deed

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 647
Author(s):  
Enriko Silalahi ◽  
Akhmad Khisni
Keyword(s):  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Supervisory Board ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Library Studies ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
Administrative Sanction

Article 84 and Article 85 of Law No. 2 year 2014 on the amendments to the Act No. 30 year 2004 concerning Notary Public Official, when a Notary in performs his official duties and is proven to have committed a violation, the Notary may be subjected or sanctioned. The sanction is in the form of civil sanction, administration, and code of ethics of Notary. Besides, if a Notary commits a criminal offense, a criminal sanction may be imposed to him.The purpose of the research was to find out the malpractice of the Notary in the Notary deed, and to find out the role of the Regional Supervisory Board (MPD) in supervising Notaries who carry out malpractice actions.This study used a juridical-normative approach derived from the collection of primary data and secondary data, then they were analyzed by qualitative analysis methods. Data collection techniques used was library studies with qualitative data analysis.The result of the research showed that UUJN does not mention the existence of sanction punishment but a legal action against the violation done by Notary. It invites elements of forgery over intent/negligence in making authentic letter/deed which contains false facts. After administrative sanction/professional code of ethics Notary and civil sanctions, as well as qualified are as a criminal act committed by a Notary. If the notary is proven to have been involved in intentionally committing a crime of forgery of an authentic deed the sanction will be given to him/her.Suggestion to lawmakers to anticipate the different interpretations of the law can be done quickly, so that malpractice Notary will never occur again.Keywords: Sanctions; Notary; Malpractice; Accountability

scholarly journals Legalitas Peresmian Akta Notaris Berbasis Cyber Notary Melalui Media Konferensi Zoom

Acta Comitas ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (01) ◽  
pp. 185
Author(s):  
I Dewa Gede Cahaya Dita Darmaangga ◽  
I Dewa Ayu Dwi Mayasari
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The World ◽  
Result Show ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
Legal Concepts ◽  
Legal Consequences

This study aims to find out about the legality of the inauguration of cyber-based notary deeds through the Zoom Conference media and the legal consequences of notarial deeds inaugurating the Zoom Conference media. The research method used is normative legal research methods that use a statutory approach and analysis of legal concepts based on primary and secondary legal materials. The study result show that according to Article 1868 of the Civil Code stipulates that the making of an authentic deeds is made is the presence of an authorized public official. Homeever, when referring to the explanation of Article 15 paragraph (3) of Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning the Position of Notary Public, there is no clarity regarding the explanation regarding electronic certification (cyber notary) whether tappers must remain physically present in front of a notary or may not ignore it virtually. Regarding the inauguration of deeds through the Zoom Conference media, its is necessary to have clearer regulations regarding the concept of cyber notary in the world of notary so that notaries can carry out their duties without violating laws and regulations. The concept of cyber notary, in the inauguration of the deed, it is felt that there is a need for regulations that clearly regulate how the terms or conditions in the inauguration of authentic deeds/notaries are carried out using the concept of cyber notary, one of which is the Zoom Cenference media.   Studi ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui mengenai legalitas peresmian akta Notaris berbasis cyber notary melalui media Konferensi Zoom dan akibat hukum peresmian akta otaris dilakukan dengan media Konferensi Zoom. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu dengan metode penelitian hukum normatif yang menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan serta analisis konsep hukum dengan bersumber pada bahan-bahan hukum primer maupun sekunder. Hasil studi menunjukan bahwa menurut Pasal 1868 KUHPerdata menentukan mengenai pembuatan akta otentik tersebut dibuat dihadapan pejabat umum yang berwenang. Tetapi apabila merujuk terhadap penjelasan Pasal 15 ayat (3) Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Jabatan Notaris tidak ada kejelasan mengenai penjelasan mengenai sertifikasi elektronik (cyber notary) apakah para penghadap harus tetap hadir secara fisik dihadapan notaris ataukah boleh tidak melaikan secara virtual. Terkait dengan peresmian akta melalui media Konferensi Zoom maka diperlukan adanya pengaturan lebih jelas mengenai konsep cyber notary dalam dunia kenotariatan agar notaris dapat menjalankan tugas jabatannya tanpa menyalahi undang-undang dan peraturan perundang-undangan. Konsep cyber notary ini dalam peresmian akta dirasa perlunya ada pengaturan yang mengatur dengan jelas bagaimana ketentuan atau syarat dalam peresmian akta autentik/notaris yang dilakukan dengan menggunakan konsep cyber notary salah satunya adalah media Konferensi Zoom.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document