scholarly journals THE ROLE OF NATIONAL LAND AGENCY IN ACCELERATION OF LAND REGISTRATION FOR LEGAL CERTAINTY

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 107
Author(s):  
Muhammad Yamin

Observing a lot of land conflicts in Indonesia which is constantly increasing, and followed by the rapidly growing populations that caused the demand for land will also increase automatically. While the number of the available land is limited (not increasing). This condition will surely causes problems on controlling and ownership of the land. This research aims to identify the factors which causes conflict (dispute) of land, by doing inventory to the lands which is owned by the community (whether it is registered or not registered). From this temporary research result, it is known that, the implementation of the land registration in Deli Serdang district (the research location) has not happened as expected. It can be seen from the number of land which has not been registered, this condition will certainly trigger conflicts or disputes in society, both ownership boundary disputes, control of illegal land (arable land), inheritance disputes, etc. Certificate ownership mostly only exist in urban area. The lack of interest by the community to join the land registration is due to various of reasons, which is: 1) the community do not recognized the purpose of land registration, 2) the cost is expensive, 3) the management is convoluted, 4) the community feels that it is not a necessary to do it, 5) arable land. In this research, the role of National Land Agency (NLA) as the organizer of land registration has not been surely prominent, it is visible that the NLA  office is more passive, which is only waiting for the arrival of the owner land to register their lands, NLA should be more involved in land registration and followed by socialization, counseling for the community. As well for the land disputes which is in the region of the Land Office until this moment is currently unfinished and still having a lot of problems, in order to achieve the above purpose, Deli Serdang Land Office has taken steps by empowering all the existing abilities, it has been a huge duty for Land Office, by remembering there will be more and more usage and utilization in the future, while the available land is limited, and hoping that the community will be motivated to registered their lands for achieving the legal certainty.

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-47
Author(s):  
Mulia Kartiwi

Until this day land disputes in Indonesia still occur, although goverment has issued regulation for land registration that aims to create legal certainty for occupied land subject and object. This study is a descriptive analysis wish normative juridical approach that aims to find out and analyze the causal factor the land  disputes and to determince the role of PPAT in minimizing land disputes. Result showed that the causal factor of land dispute is the unavailability of authentic certificate that prove the ownership of the land right, so that they are easily intervened. Futhermore, the role of PPAT is very important in land registration because the product can be used as basis for issuance of land certificate as a strong evidence. For that reason PPAT must carry out its duties with cautious and professional to avoid mistake that can cause losses Keywords : Role, PPAT, Minimizing, Land Dispute Saat ini sengketa tanah di Indonesia masih terjadi, walaupun pemerintah  telah menerbitkan  aturan tentang pendaftaran tanah yang bertujuan menciptakan kepastian hukum akan subjek dan objek tanah yang dikuasai.Penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif analisis dengan metode pendekatan yuridis normatif yangbertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisa faktor-faktor penyebab sengketa tanah dan mengetahui peran PPAT dalam meminimalisir sengketa tanah. Dari hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa penyebab sengketa pertanahan diantaranya ketidaktersediaan akta otentik yang membuktikan kepemilikan hak tanah, sehingga mudah diintervensi oleh pihak lain. Selanjutnya Peran PPAT sangat  penting dalam pendaftaran tanah, karena produknya dijadikan dasar untuk penerbitan sertifikat tanah sebagai alat bukti yang kuat.Untuk itu PPAT dalam  melaksanakan tugasnya agar berhati-hati dan professional guna menghindari kekeliruan yang dapat menyebabkan kerugian.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 330
Author(s):  
Nia Kurniati ◽  
Jordan Mordekhai

As an implementation of welfare society, the government issued Law Number 5 of 1960 Article 19 paragraph (2) c, which provide the legal certainty of land rights for all Indonesians carried out through land registration. The land registration system adopted by Indonesia is negative land cadastre with positive tendency. The implementation of land registration provide the basis of state duty to produce land registration evidence, namely certificate, which is valid as a strong proof of rights. This certificate guarantees the correctness of physical data besides juridical data as long as it is not proven otherwise. Method: This legal research used Normative juridical method, with qualitative juridical data analysis. Results of the study: Negative land cadastre with positive tendency adopted by Indonesia currently does not guarantee legal certainty of land ownership and the community justice itself. This is indicated by the fact that there is still a phenomenon of land disputes, among the result of the issuance of overlapping. By using a legal cadastre-based domain approach, through an approach of extracting historical values of land and integrating the process of dialogue within the issuing of certificate; obtaining legal certainty and the community justice can be achieved. Conclusion: Negative land cadastre with positive tendency is still unable to manifest legal certainty of land ownership and community justice so it is appropriate that an adage states “the highest legal certainty, is the highest injustice”. Strengthening land registration system through the domain approach is an alternative option to manifest legal certainty and community justice.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cindy Nabila Saraswati ◽  
Atik Winanti

AbstractThe background of this research is due to the high number of land disputes in Indonesia that have not been resolved by the District Courts and State Administrative Courts. Land dispute cases that have not been resolved and are still in the process of being resolved result in the absence of legal certainty and expediency to the disputing parties over the status of the disputed land.This journal writing focuses on the role of the District Courts and State Administrative Courts in resolving land disputes in Indonesia and the urgency of establishing a special agrarian court to realize legal certainty and benefits.The research method used in writing this journal is juridical normative through a conceptual approach and a statutory approach. The results of this research is that the District Courts and State Administrative Courts have not been able to resolve existing land disputes optimally, this can be seen from the very high percentage of land disputes and it is necessary to establish an Agrarian Court as a Special Court that will resolve land disputes in Indonesia, a judgement issued by a Agrarian Court will provide more legal certainty and expediency to the disputing parties.Keyword: Agrarian Court, Special Court, Land Disputes, Legal Certainty, Expediency. AbstrakLatar belakang dilakukannya penelitian ini dikarenakan tingginya angka sengketa pertanahan di Indonesia yang belum terselesaikan oleh Pengadilan Negeri dan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara.  Kasus sengketa pertanahan yang belum terselesaikan dan masih dalam proses penyelesaian mengakibatkan tidak adanya kepastian hukum dan kemanfaatan hukum kepada para pihak yang bersengketa atas status tanah yang dipersengketakan. Penulisan jurnal ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui peran Pengadilan Negeri dan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara (PTUN) dalam mengatasi sengketa pertanahan di Indonesia dan urgensi pembentukan pengadilan khusus agraria untuk mewujudkan kepastian dan kemanfaatan hukum. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penulisan jurnal ini adalah yuridis normatif melalui pendekatan pendekatan konseptual dan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Hasil dari penelitian ini menjelaskan bahwa Pegadilan Tata Usaha Negara dan Pengadilan Negeri belum bisa menyelesaikan sengketa pertanahan yang ada secara optimal  hal ini terlihat dari presentase angka sengketa pertanahan masih sangat tinggi, dan diperlukan adanya pembentukan Pengadilan Agraria sebagai Pengadilan Khusus yang akan menyelesaikan sengketa pertanahan di Indonesia, putusan yang dikeluarkan oleh pengadilan khusus pertanahan akan lebih memberi kepastian hukum dan kemanfaatkan hukum kepada pihak yang bersengketa.Kata kunci: Pengadilan Agraria, Pengadilan Khusus, Sengketa Pertanahan, Kepastian Hukum, Kemanfaatan Hukum.


Author(s):  
M. Syuib ◽  
Sarah Diana Aulia

In order to guarantee legal certainty for land rights holders, the Government is conducting land registration program throughout Indonesia territory. The program has put an obligation to the land rights holder to register their land. The purpose of land registration is, to provide evidence for the ownership of land. The implementation mechanism of the program in regulated in the Permen ATR/BPN Number 6 of 2018 concerning Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL). The presence of the Permen is, in order to prevent land disputes in the community by accelerating land registration. Sub-district of Ingin Jaya, which is located in the Aceh Besar district, is one of the areas where PTSL activities are carried out. Currently, there is a large area of land in the Aceh Besar district has not been certified yet, it may cause legal uncertainty for land owner and such condition can potentially lead to land dispute. One of the indicators to claim this, are by taking land dispute cases as put on trial in the Jantho Court which has reached 32 cases from 2014 until 2019. This study aims to find out how the implementation of PTSL and its barrier in the Sub-District of Ingin Jaya, Aceh Besar. The research method is an empirical juridical research; it works by conducting observations, interviews, and documentation. The result found that the implementation of PTSL in the Sub-District of Ingin Jaya, Aceh Besar, is in accordance with Permen ATR/BPN No. 6 of 2018. However, in the ground, it is found that there are a number of obstacles which affect the successful of the PTSL program both internally and externally. Therefore, synergy and cooperation with all parties are needed so that the PTSL program in the Sub-District of Ingin Jaya can be implemented successfully in order to provide legal certainty for land rights holders, so that the land dispute can be prevented as early as possible.


Author(s):  
Isnaini Isnaini ◽  
Rizkan Zulyadi ◽  
Abdul Kadir

This study is to find an alternative model of North Sumatra provincial government policy in resolving the ex-hgu land conflicts of PTPN II plantations in Deli Serdang Regency. This study is based on the fact that regional autonomy as regulated in Law Number 23 of 2014 gives the authority to the regional government in autonomy to resolve disputes over arable land in their territories. One of them relates to ex-HGU PTPN II land disputes starting in 2002 with the Central BPN Decree number 42, 43 and 44 / HGU / BPN / 2002 and Decree Number 10/2004 regarding the granting of an extension of the term of the Right to Cultivate (HGU) covering an area of 5,873 , 068 Ha from PTPN II HGU. However, the problem arises because of legal uncertainty over the distribution of land that had expired during the PTPNII HGU, so that horizontal or vertical conflicts (community cultivators, PTPN II, government and developers) occurred. From the results of the study, it was concluded that first, the ineffective model of handling policies that are appropriate, fast, and comprehensive is carried out by the government. This relates to the problem of land conversion where there is a lack of orderly administration and past land data. So that each party has its own claim on land ownership and ownership. Both the boundary and location of land parcels. Second, legal uncertainty, that there are legislation that overlaps both horizontally and vertically as well as regulated substance


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 12-24
Author(s):  
Rielly Lontoh ◽  
Ronny A. Maramis ◽  
J. Ronald Mawuntu ◽  
Abdurrahman Konoras

The role of the judiciary, law enforcement officials in the resolution of disputes is important. The number of disputes is increased, many authorities in Indonesia produce multiple decisions with conflicting legal force making it difficult to execute. The purpose of the study was to find the standardization of competency of law enforcement officials, the relationship between the professionalism of law enforcement officials and legal certainty in the settlement of land disputes as mandated by Article 33 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution and the Basic Agrarian Law Number 5/1960. Settlement of land disputes is achieved through the General Court and the Administrative Court. The existence of regulations regarding competency standards for law enforcement officials who handle land disputes for the sake of fair settlement of land disputes and legal certainty.


Author(s):  
Abdul Muthallib

This article discusses legal certainty as one of the objectives of Law No. 5 of 1960 concerning Agrarian (Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Pokok-Pokok Agraria) Principles and the influence of land rights certificates as a strong means of proof of land registration. The provision of guarantees of legal certainty to holders of land rights is accommodated in Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Agrarian Principles and further regulated in Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration (Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah). Using a normative legal view, this article refers to regulations on agrarian. The discussion of the article looks at the role of the government in providing opportunities for all citizens to register land with the aim of obtaining legal certainty and minimizing disputes. This article looks at the purpose of issuing certificates in land registration activities so that right-holders can easily prove that they are the right-holders. This is done so that rights holders can obtain legal certainty and legal protection. However, the land rights certificate issued is considered to be still lacking in minimizing disputes and it is assumed that it has not affected the land rights owners to protect their rights.


Author(s):  
Anggun Kemala Putri ◽  
Yuslim Yuslim ◽  
Suharizal Suharizal

Disputes that often occur are usually related to ownership of land, this is because of the important role of land in human life, so that land becomes an object that is prone to disputes or disputes between people, this occurs because human needs for land are increasing, but the land supply is relatively fixed. Notary  as a public official trusted by the community to resolve land disputes through a peace deed made by a notary to ensure legality. The method used is empirical juridical research. Research data were collected through field studies through interviews with resource persons to obtain primary data and literature studies to obtain primary data. The focus in this research is to find out and analyze the authority of a notary public in resolving land disputes with a deed of peace. The results showed that 1) Notary was authorized to make a peace deed to guarantee legal certainty for the parties to settle land disputes in accordance with article 15 Paragraph (2) letter f of the UUJN and 2) The peace deed drawn up by a Notary Public is an Authentic Deed but not final binding like a van dading deed decided from the results of mediation in court.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 27
Author(s):  
Ricco Survival Yubaidi

As an acceleration program for land registration in Indonesia that is directly led by the President, Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) should provide a guarantee of legal certainty and protection regarding land ownership rights. However, in fact, the role of the land deed official (PPAT), as a public official who receives a mandate from the Governmental Regulation no. 24 of 1997 regarding Land Registration, is not found within the implementation of PTSL. The present research aimed to investigate the role of PPAT in the implementation of PTSL. Using normative legal approach, this study employed literature study to collect the primary data. This research found that PPAT does not have any role in regulatory legislation regarding PTSL. If we see Governmental Regulation no. 24 of 1997, all transfers occurring after the issuance of the regulation requires PPAT’s deed as written evidence of land ownership. The adjudication committee as the PTSL implementer supposes to collaborate with PPAT to make sure that PTSL meets the steps of juridical data collection in order to obtain an orderly, complete land registration that provides legal certainty regarding land ownership right.


PETITUM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-156
Author(s):  
Mashita Amalia Razak ◽  
Farida Patittingi ◽  
Maskun Maskun

The research aims to determine the implementation of the digital certificate mapping (plotting) policy in providing legal certainty for land rights. The research is empirical legal research. This research was conducted at the Data and Information Center of the Ministry of Agrarian and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency of Kendari City. The results showed that the implementation of digital certificate mapping (plotting) was carried out by inputting manual data of land certificates (both old certificates and newly issued certificates) into a digital registration map application based on Global Positioning System technology which aims to validate the correctness of certificate data. where the results will show the validity of the land parcel data according to the information in the certificate. In line with the negative land registration publication system with a positive tendency in Indonesia, plotting does not provide absolute legal certainty, but at least plotting can minimize the potential for land disputes that can arise in the future, including double or overlapping certificates Penelitian bertujuan untuk mengetahui implementasi kebijakan pemetaan sertifikat secara digital (plotting) dalam memberikan kepastian hukum terhadap hak atas tanah. Penelitian adalah penelitian hukum empiris. Penelitian ini dilakukan di Pusat Data dan Informasi Kementerian Agraria dan Tata Ruang/Badan Pertanahan Nasional Kota Kendari. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa implementasi pemetaan sertipikat secara digital (plotting) dilakukan dengan menginput data manual sertipikat tanah ke dalam dalam aplikasi peta pendaftaran digital yang berbasis teknologi Global Positioning System yang bertujuan memvalidasi kebenaran dari data sertifikat yang mana hasilnya akan menunjukkan validitas data bidang tanah telah sesuai keterangan di sertifikat. Sejalan dengan sistem publikasi pendaftaran tanah negatif bertendensi positif, plotting belum memberikan kepastian hukum secara absolut akan tetapi setidaknya plotting dapat meminimalisir potensi sengketa tanah yang dapat timbul di kemudian hari diantaranya sertipikat ganda atau tumpang-tindih


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document