scholarly journals PENGARUH PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING “WHAT’S ANOTHER WAY DAN DISCOVERY LEARNING DALAM MENINGKATAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KREATIF MATEMATIS SISWA SMP

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jayanti Putri Purwaningrum
Keyword(s):  
High Schools ◽  
Creative Thinking ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Discovery Learning ◽  
Junior High Schools ◽  
Ability Test ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
And Mathematics ◽  
Creative Thinking Ability

The aim of this study is to investigate the enhancement of the students’ mathematical creative thinking ability in two classes whereby in one class, the students learning through problem-basedlearning “what’s another way” and in another class, the students learning through discovery learning. The population of the study were all seven grade students in a junior high schools in Pekalongan regency. The sampling technique used purposive sampling and involved two classes as samples. The data were gathered by employing three research instruments such as mathematics creative thinking ability test, teaching materials, and observation sheet. The results of the study indicated that there was no significance difference in the enchancement between student who recieved WAW and student who recieve discovery learing.Keywords: Problem-Based Learning “What’s Another Way”, Discovery Learning, and Mathematics Creative Thinking Ability

scholarly journals Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Melalui Problem Based Learning “What’s Another Way” dan Discovery Learning

Teknodika ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 39
Author(s):  
Jayanti Putri Purwaningrum
Keyword(s):  
High Schools ◽  
Experimental Research ◽  
Creative Thinking ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Discovery Learning ◽  
Junior High Schools ◽  
Ability Test ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Creative Thinking Ability

The students’ mathematical creative thinking ability which were not optimal became the reason for conducting this study. It was a quasi-experimental research through problem-based learning “what’s another way” and discovery learning. In this case, the population of the study were all seven grade students in a junior high schools in Pekalongan regency with two classes as the sample. The data were gathered by employing three research instruments such as mathematics creative thinking ability test, teaching materials, and observation sheet. The results of the study indicated that there was no difference between the achievement and the enhancement of the students’ mathematical creative thinking ability in two experimental classes. Besides, the overall students’ activities in both the class employing problem-based learning “what’s another way” and the class employing discovery learning had been very good.

scholarly journals PENERAPAN MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING BERBANTUAN MEDIA TANGRAM UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KREATIF MATEMATIS SISWA

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 85
Author(s):  
Ririn Prihantini ◽  
Azin Taufik ◽  
Mohamad Riyadi
Keyword(s):  
Junior High School ◽  
Creative Thinking ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Ability Test ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
Creative Thinking Ability

The aim of this study was determine the differences of the ability of mathematical creative thinking and the differences in the increase between classes using Problem Based Learning (control class) and the class that uses a model of Problem Based Learning with tangram. The research method used is quasi experimental design of non-equivalent pre-test-post-test control group design. The population in this study were all students of class VII junior high school in Kuningan in the even semester of the academic year 2017/2018.� Through purposive sampling technique, 2 classes of 10 classes were selected as samples where the class VIIA as the control class and VIIB as experimental class with a total sample of 70 students. Data collection techniques were obtained through mathematical creative thinking ability test and data analysis technique included normality test, homogeneity test, and t test. The results showed that there were difference in mathematical creative thinking ability and there were difference in the increase between the classes using Problem Based Learning and the classes using a model of Problem Based Learning with tangram.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Model Problem Based Learning Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Peserta Didik SMA

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 66
Author(s):  
Agustina Elizabeth ◽  
Maria Magdalena Sigahitong
Keyword(s):  
Creative Thinking ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Average Score ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Ability Test ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
Creative Thinking Ability

Has be done research about the effect of Problem Based Learning model on students’ creative thinking abilityin SMAS Katolik St. John Paul II maumere. This type of research is a quasi experiment with the Nonequivalent Control Group Design. Sampling is done by nonprobability sampling technique, (class XI MIA 1 and class XI MIA), which is satueated sampling where all populations are sampled. The creative thinking ability of students in this study were collected with creative thinking ability test in the form of essay test consisted 10 items and observation sheets. The result showed that : 1) the average score of creative thinking ability from students who take learning using Problem Based Learning model are 73.80; 2) the average score of creative thinking ability from students who take learning with Expository Learning model are 65.97; 3) there are differences in creative thinking ability significantly between students who learn to use the Problem Based Learning model with students who learn to use Expository Learning model. Students who learned Problem Based Learning model show better think creative than who learned Expository Learning model. Thus, Proble, Based Learning model influences students creative thinking abilities.

scholarly journals Efektivitas Problem Based Learning Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Mahasiswa Program Studi Tadris Matematika UIN Mataram

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 41
Author(s):  
Fadrik Adi Fahrudin
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Education ◽  
Education Program ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Creative Thinking ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Creative Thinking Ability ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui efektivitas Problem Based Learning terhadap kemampuan berpikir kreatif mahasiswa Program Studi Tadris Matematika UIN Mataram. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah kuantitatif dengan jenis penelitian eksperimen. Teknik pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan cluster random sampling. Populasi penelitian ini adalah mahasiswa semester 3 sebanyak 108 mahasiswa dengan sampel kelas IIIA sebanyak 26 mahasiswa sebagai kelas eksperimen, dan kelas IIIB sebanyak 24 mahasiswa sebagai kelas kontrol. Hasil post-test menunjukkan bahwa nilai rata-rata kelas eksperimen sebesar 71,54 dan nilai rata-rata kelas kontrol sebesar 63,35. Analisis uji-t diperoleh thitung = 2,55 pada dk = n1+n2-2, 24+26-2 = 48 dan ttabel = 5%(t0,05; 48) = 1,95. Jadi pada dk = 48, thitung > ttabel yaitu 2,55 > 1,95. Hal ini berarti bahwa H0 ditolak dan Ha diterima, dengan kata lain model pembelajaran Problem Based Learning efektif terhadap kemampuan berpikir kreatif mahasiswa Program Studi Tadris Matematika UIN Mataram. Abstract:  This research aims to determine the effectiveness of Problem Based Learning on the creative thinking ability of students of Mathematics Education Program of UIN Mataram. The approach used is quantitative with the type of experimental research. The sampling technique was done by cluster random sampling. The population of this research is student of 3rd grade of 108 students with class IIIA sample as much as 26 students as experiment class, and class IIIB as many as 24 students as control class. Post-test results show that the average grade of the experimental class is 71,54 and the average value of the control class is 63,35. The t-test analysis is obtained t-count = 2,55 at dk = n1+n2-2, 24 + 26-2 = 48 and t-table = 5% (t0,05;48) = 1,95. So at dk = 48, t-count > t-table = 2,55 > 1,95. The conclusion is H0 rejected and Ha accepted, in other words Problem Based Learning is effective towards the creative thinking ability of students of Mathematics Education Program of UIN Mataram.

scholarly journals The Effectiveness Of Scientific Approach With Open-Ended Problem Based Learning Worksheet Viewed From Learning Achievement, Creative Thinking Ability, Interest, And Mathematics Self-Efficacy

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 292
Author(s):  
Lisda Fitriana Masitoh ◽  
Enggar Prasetyawan
Keyword(s):  
Student Achievement ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Creative Thinking ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
Scientific Approach ◽  
The Difference ◽  
And Mathematics ◽  
Creative Thinking Ability

This study aimed to describe the effectiveness and differences of scientific approach with open-ended problem based learning worksheet and scientific approach. The population in this study was students of class VII of SMP Negeri 17 Pamulang, South Tangerang. The sample of this study was determined randomly. They were two classes and the results were VII.3 and VII.4. To determine the effectiveness, one sample t-test was used. To discover the difference of effectiveness, MANOVA (Hotteling's Trace) test was used. The results show that (1) Scientific approach with open-ended problem based learning worksheet and scientific approach are effective viewed from learning achievement, creative thinking ability, interests and mathematic self-efficacy (2) There is no difference in effectiveness between scientific approach with open-ended problem based learning worksheet with scientific approach viewed from learning achievement, creative thinking ability, interests and mathematic self-efficacy (3) Scientific approach with open-ended problem based learning worksheet are more effective than scientific approaches viewed from student achievement

scholarly journals Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran geometri bangun ruang SMP dengan menggunakan model guided inquiry

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 219
Author(s):  
Siti Rochana
Keyword(s):  
Creative Thinking ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Junior High Schools ◽  
Research Development ◽  
Guided Inquiry ◽  
Ability Test ◽  
Is Research ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
Creative Thinking Ability ◽  
Geometry Learning

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menghasilkan perangkat pembelajaran perangkat pembelajaran geometri bangun ruang SMP dengan menggunakan model Guided Inquiry berorientasi pada kemampuan berpikir kreatif dan motivasi belajar siswa yang valid, praktis, dan efektif. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian pengembangan (Development of Research). Penelitian ini mengembangkan perangkat pembelajaran yang meliputi rencana pelaksanaan pembelajaran (RPP) dan lembar kerja siswa (LKS) dengan menggunakan model pengembangan Plomp. Hasil validasi menunjukkan perangkat yang dikembangkan layak digunakan dengan kategori valid. Hasil uji coba menunjukkan bahwa perangkat yang dikembangkan praktis dan efektif. Ketuntasan belajar secara klasikal sudah mencapai kriteria minimal 80% yaitu untuk tes ketercapaian kompetensi mencapai 80% sedangkan tes kemampuan berpikir kreatif 86, 67%. Berdasarkan analisis angket motivasi belajar menunjukkan bahwa persentase siswa yang memiliki motivasi dengan kategori minimal baik adalah 80%.Kata kunci: pengembangan, perangkat pembelajaran, guided inquiry Developing a learning kit on geometry build space for junior high schools by using model-oriented guided inquiry AbstractThis research aims to produce a geometry learning device for SMP by using models of Guided Inquiry oriented to creative thinking skills and students' motivation which is valid, practical, and effective. This type of research is research development (Development of Research). This study developed a learning device that includes learning implementation plan (RPP) and the student worksheet (LKS) using a model developed by the development Plomp. The result of the validation shows that the kits device developed are decent with a valid category. The experimental results show that the device developed practical and effective. Classical learning completeness reached at least 80% criterion for the test of achievement of competence reached 80%, while creative thinking ability test 86, 67%. Based on the analysis of motivation questionnaire show that the percentage of students who have a good motivation with minimal category is 80%Keywords: development, learning kit, guided inquiry

scholarly journals Mathematical Creative Thinking and Student Self-Confidence in the Challenge-Based Learning Approach

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hayatun Nufus ◽  
Muhammad Duskri ◽  
Bahrun Bahrun
Keyword(s):  
High Schools ◽  
Creative Thinking ◽  
Qualitative Method ◽  
Junior High Schools ◽  
Learning Approach ◽  
Seventh Grade ◽  
Self Confidence ◽  
Challenge Based Learning ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
Creative Thinking Ability

The new curriculum (K13) requires a teacher to develop students’ ability in order to learn and fully understand Mathematics. The important abilities needed for a student in understanding Mathematics are the creative thinking and self-confidence. The certain study is essential in order to enhance students’ ability of mathematical creative thinking and self-confidence. Challenge-Based Learning is not only demanding a student to discover a solution to a problem, but also to be confident in what he has done. The qualitative method is used in this research to describe the students’ mathematical creative thinking ability and self-confidence. The subjects are six students chosen from 21 students of seventh grade at one of Junior High Schools in Aceh, Indonesia. They are the student with high, moderate, and low creative thinking ability. The research instrument is a test for creative thinking ability, a questionnaire of self-confidence and an interview guideline. The result indicates that the students with high and moderate level meet at least three indicators of creative thinking ability. They are also confident in solving the problem. In contrast, the student with low level did not reach any indicators of creative thinking ability and have poor self-confidence.  Keywords: Challenge-based Learning, Creative thinking ability, Self-confidence.

scholarly journals DISCOVERY AND CORE LEARNING MODEL TOWARD CREATIVE THINKING VIEWED FROM LOGICAL MATHEMATICAL INTELLIGENCE

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 308
Author(s):  
Veronika Yusnita Andriani Prastika ◽  
Riyadi Riyadi ◽  
Siswanto Siswanto
Keyword(s):  
Random Sampling ◽  
Creative Thinking ◽  
Control Design ◽  
Eighth Graders ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Discovery Learning ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Creative Thinking Ability ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

This research aims to 1) which learning model that supports students’ creative thinking ability whether discovery, CORE, or conventional learning model, 2) which model that supports creative thinking ability the most to high, moderate, and low level students, 3) know if there is interaction between learning model and students’ logical mathematical intelligence, and creative thinking ability. This is a quasi-experimental research with the population of eighth graders of junior high schools in Madiun Regency. The research design used a group pretest-posttest control design. The sample was determined using stratified cluster random sampling. This research uses two-way unequal ANOVA. This research concluded that 1) students’ creative thinking skill is developed better using Discovery than CORE and conventional learning model, 2) students with high logical mathematical intelligence have higher creative thinking ability than those with moderate and low logical mathematical intelligence,3) there is no interaction between learning model and logical mathematical intelligence with creative thinking ability.Keywords: Creative Thinking; Learning Model; Logical Mathematical Intelligence. AbstrakTujuan dari penelitan ini untuk mengetahui 1) model pembelajaran manakah yang memberikan kemampuan berpikir kreatif yang lebih  antara model pembelajaran discovery learning, CORE atau konvensional, 2) manakah yang memberikan kemampuan berpikir kreatif yang lebih baik siswa yang memiliki kecerdasan logis matematis tinggi, sedang, atau rendah, 3) apakah terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan keceredasan logis matematis dengan kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa. Metode yang digunakan pada penelitian adalah eksperimen semu, dengan populasi siswa kelas VIII SMP N Se-Kabupaten Madiun. Desain penelitian menggunakan group pretest-posttest control design Pemilihan sampel dengan menggunakan stratified cluster random sampling. Teknik analisis penelitian ini menggunakan anava dua jalan dengan sel tak sama. Kesimpulan pada penelitian ini 1) kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa yang kenai model discovery learning lebih baik daripada model pembelajaran CORE dan konvensional, 2) Kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa yang memiliki kecerdasan logis matematis tinggi lebih baik daripada siswa yang memiliki kecerdasan logis matematis sedang dan rendah, , 3) tidak ada interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan kecerdasan logis matematis dengan kemampuan berpikir kreatif.Kata kunci: Berpikir kreatif; kecerdasan logis matematis; model pembelajaran.

scholarly journals KORELASI MODEL GROUP INVESTIGATION DENGAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KREATIF DAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-154
Author(s):  
Umar Soleh ◽  
Ferry Ferdianto ◽  
Setiyani Setiyani
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Creative Thinking ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Model Group ◽  
Student Activity ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
Creative Thinking Ability ◽  
And Control ◽  
Relationship Of

The purpose of this research is to know the relationship of Group Investigation model with creative thinking ability and problem solving ability. Model Group Investigation is a group-based learning model where students are given opportunities to discuss, think critically, and be responsible for the learning. The research method used is experimental method, with sampling technique used is Purposive Sample. The instrument used in this research is the observation sheet of student activity, the question of creative thinking ability and the problem solving test problem. The test used is Pearson Product Moment correlation test, ANOVA Factorial test, and uji t. The results of this study are: (1) student activity in learning mathematics by using Group Investigation model overall percentage reaches 65,6% and included in good category; (2) there is correlation of Group Investigation model with creative thinking ability; (3) there is correlation of Group Investigation model with problem solving ability; (4) there is a correlation of Group Investigation model with creative thinking ability and problem-solving ability; (5) there is difference of average ability of creative thinking and problem solving ability between experiment class student and control class student, with mean value of experiment class is 76,60 whereas mean value of control class is 68,57.

scholarly journals THE EFFECT OF INQUIRY TRAINING LEARNING MODEL USING MACROMEDIA FLASH AND CREATIVE THINKING ABILITY ON SCIENCE PROCESS SKILLS OF STUDENT

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helena Evadonna Siagian ◽  
Nurdin Bukit ◽  
Derlina .
Keyword(s):  
Test Data ◽  
Creative Thinking ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Process Skills ◽  
Ability Test ◽  
Science Process Skills ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
Creative Thinking Ability ◽  
Research Type ◽  
Better Than

The aims of this research were to analyze science process skills of students using Inquiry Training Learning Model use Macromedia Flash on science process skills of students compare using conventional learning, analyze science process skills ofstudents who have high category in creative thinking ability better than low category in creative thinking ability, and analyze the interaction between Inquiry Training learning model use Macromedia Flash and the level of creative thinking ability in improving the science process skills. The research type was quasi experiment andtwo group pretest-posttest designs were used in this study. The sample was choosen by using cluster random class technique. The instrument was consist of science process skills test and creative thinking ability test. Data in this research was analyzed by using twoway Anova. The results of this research showed that the inquiry training learning model use macromedia flash was better than conventional learning in improving the students science process skills, the science process skills of the students who had highcategory in creative thinking ability was better than low category, and there was interaction between inquiry training learning model use macromedia flash and the level of creative thinking ability in improving students science process skills.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document