scholarly journals The Effectiveness Of Scientific Approach With Open-Ended Problem Based Learning Worksheet Viewed From Learning Achievement, Creative Thinking Ability, Interest, And Mathematics Self-Efficacy

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 292
Author(s):  
Lisda Fitriana Masitoh ◽  
Enggar Prasetyawan
Keyword(s):  
Student Achievement ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Creative Thinking ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
Scientific Approach ◽  
The Difference ◽  
And Mathematics ◽  
Creative Thinking Ability

This study aimed to describe the effectiveness and differences of scientific approach with open-ended problem based learning worksheet and scientific approach. The population in this study was students of class VII of SMP Negeri 17 Pamulang, South Tangerang. The sample of this study was determined randomly. They were two classes and the results were VII.3 and VII.4. To determine the effectiveness, one sample t-test was used. To discover the difference of effectiveness, MANOVA (Hotteling's Trace) test was used. The results show that (1) Scientific approach with open-ended problem based learning worksheet and scientific approach are effective viewed from learning achievement, creative thinking ability, interests and mathematic self-efficacy (2) There is no difference in effectiveness between scientific approach with open-ended problem based learning worksheet with scientific approach viewed from learning achievement, creative thinking ability, interests and mathematic self-efficacy (3) Scientific approach with open-ended problem based learning worksheet are more effective than scientific approaches viewed from student achievement

scholarly journals Efektivitas PBL setting TTW dan TPS ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, berpikir kritis dan self-efficacy siswa

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wahyu Hardiyanto ◽  
Rusgianto Heri Santoso
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
T Test ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Critical Thinking Ability ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
The Difference

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan keefektifan pendekatan problem-based learning (PBL) setting think talk write (TTW) dan problem-based learning (PBL) setting think pair share (TPS) serta mendeskripsikan perbedaan keefektifan antara PBL setting TTW dan PBL setting TPS ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis dan self-efficacy siswa. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu. Instrumen yang digunakan untuk mengumpulkan data adalah tes prestasi belajar, tes kemampuan berpikir kritis dan angket self-efficacy siswa. Data yang dikumpulkan dianalisis dengan menggunakan one sample t-test, dan analisis multivariat (MANOVA). One sample t-test dilakukan untuk menguji keefektifan pendekatan PBL setting TTW dan keefektifan pendekatan PBL setting TPS, sedangkan analisis multivariat (MANOVA) dilakukan untuk menguji perbedaan keefektifan antara kedua treatment tersebut ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis dan self-efficacy siswa. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa pendekatan PBL setting TTW dan pendekatan PBL setting TPS efektif ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis dan self-efficacy siswa. Selain itu hasil analisis multivariat menunjukkan bahwa tidak terdapat perbedaan keefektifan yang signifikan antara pendekatan PBL setting TTW dengan pendekatan PBL setting TPS ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis dan self-efficacy siswa. The Effectiveness of PBL Setting TTW and TPS Seen from Students Learning Achievement, Critical Thinking and Self-Efficacy  AbstractThis study aims to describe the effectiveness of problem-based learning (PBL) setting think talk write (TTW) and PBL setting think pair share (TPS) and describe the difference of the effectiveness between PBL setting TTW and PBL setting TPS in terms of learning achievements, critical thinking ability and self-efficacy of grade students. This research is quasi-experimental research. The research instruments to collect the data are a learning achievement test, a test to examine the ability to think critically and a self-efficacy questionnaire. One sample t-test was conducted to examine the effectiveness PBL setting TTW and PBL setting TPS. Meanwhile, multivariate test (MANOVA) was carried out to determine the difference between PBL setting TTW and PBL setting TPS. The results show that both PBL setting TTW and PBL setting TPS are effective in terms of students learning achievements, critical thinking ability, and self-efficacy and there is no significant difference between the effectiveness of PBL setting TTW and the effectiveness of PBL setting TPS in terms of learning achievements, critical thinking ability and student self-efficacy.

scholarly journals PENGARUH PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING “WHAT’S ANOTHER WAY DAN DISCOVERY LEARNING DALAM MENINGKATAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KREATIF MATEMATIS SISWA SMP

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jayanti Putri Purwaningrum
Keyword(s):  
High Schools ◽  
Creative Thinking ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Discovery Learning ◽  
Junior High Schools ◽  
Ability Test ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
And Mathematics ◽  
Creative Thinking Ability

The aim of this study is to investigate the enhancement of the students’ mathematical creative thinking ability in two classes whereby in one class, the students learning through problem-basedlearning “what’s another way” and in another class, the students learning through discovery learning. The population of the study were all seven grade students in a junior high schools in Pekalongan regency. The sampling technique used purposive sampling and involved two classes as samples. The data were gathered by employing three research instruments such as mathematics creative thinking ability test, teaching materials, and observation sheet. The results of the study indicated that there was no significance difference in the enchancement between student who recieved WAW and student who recieve discovery learing.Keywords: Problem-Based Learning “What’s Another Way”, Discovery Learning, and Mathematics Creative Thinking Ability

scholarly journals PENGARUH PENDEKATAN SCIENTIFIC TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KREATIF SISWA SMP MENGGUNAKAN PERMASALAHAN OPEN-ENDED

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 177
Author(s):  
Nadya Rizky Amalia ◽  
Noor Fajriah ◽  
Asdini Sari
Keyword(s):  
Creative Thinking ◽  
Design Method ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Experiment Design ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Purposive Sampling ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
Scientific Approach ◽  
Creative Thinking Ability ◽  
Quasi Experiment

Salah satu keterampilan yang perlu dikembangkan pada zaman sekarang adalah berpikir kreatif. Kenyataannya, siswa enggan menyampaikan penyelesaian selain yang dicontohkan oleh guru ketika diberi masalah. Salah satu pendekatan yang dirancang dengan melibatkan siswa langsung untuk menyampaikan alternatif-alternatif jawaban dalam menyelesaikan masalah adalah Pendekatan Scientific Berbasis Masalah Open-Ended. Penelitian ini ditujukan untuk (1) mendeskripsikan  kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa di kelas yang diterapkan pendekatan scientific berbasis masalah open-ended, (2) mendeskripsikan kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa di kelas yang diterapkan pendekatan scientific, dan (3) menganalisis pengaruh pendekatan scientific terhadap kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa menggunakan permasalahan open-ended. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode Quasi Experiment Design dengan teknik purposive sampling. Populasi yang digunakan ialah seluruh siswa kelas 8 SMP Negeri 14 Banjarmasin, sedangkan sampel yang diambil adalah siswa kelas VIII-D dan kelas VIII-E sebagai kelas eksperimen dan kelas kontrol. Hasil penelitian yang dianalisis menunjukkan bahwa: (1) Kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa yang diterapkan pendekatan scientific berbasis masalah open-ended di SMP Negeri 14 Banjarmasin berada pada tingkat cukup kreatif, (2) Kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa yang diterapkan pendekatan scientific di SMP Negeri 14 Banjarmasin berada pada tingkat kurang kreatif, dan (3) Pendekatan scientific dengan menggu­nakan masalah open-ended berpengaruh terhadap kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa di Sekolah Menengah Pertama Negeri 14 Banjarmasin. Kata kunci: Kemampuan berpikir kreatif, pendekatan scientific, masalah open-ended. Abstract: One of the skills that needs to be developed today is creative thinking. In fact, students are reluctant to present solutions that were different with the teacher’s examples when they were given problems. One of the approaches designed by involving students directly to present alternative solutions in solving problems is the Open-Ended Scientific Problem-Based Approach. This study aims to (1) describe the students’ creative thinking ability in the classroom that applied an open-ended problem-based scientific approach, (2) describe the students' creative thinking ability in the classroom that were applied a scientific approach, and (3) analyze the influence of scientific approaches to students’ creative thinking ability by using open-ended problems. This research uses Quasi Experiment Design method with purposive sampling technique. The population used was all 8th grade students of SMP Negeri 14 Banjarmasin, while the samples were grade VIII-D and grade VIII-E students as the experimental and the control group respectively. The results of the research show that: (1) students’ creative thinking ability  in the classroom that applied an open-ended problem-based scientific approach in SMP Negeri 14 Banjarmasin were at a sufficiently creative level, (2) the students' creative thinking ability in the classroom that were applied a scientific approach in SMP Negeri 14 Banjarmasin were at a less creative level, and (3) the scientific approach using open-ended problems has an effect on students' creative thinking ability in SMP Negeri 14 Banjarmasin. Keywords: creative thinking abilities, scientific approach, open-ended problems.

scholarly journals PENERAPAN MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING BERBANTUAN MEDIA TANGRAM UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KREATIF MATEMATIS SISWA

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 85
Author(s):  
Ririn Prihantini ◽  
Azin Taufik ◽  
Mohamad Riyadi
Keyword(s):  
Junior High School ◽  
Creative Thinking ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Ability Test ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
Creative Thinking Ability

The aim of this study was determine the differences of the ability of mathematical creative thinking and the differences in the increase between classes using Problem Based Learning (control class) and the class that uses a model of Problem Based Learning with tangram. The research method used is quasi experimental design of non-equivalent pre-test-post-test control group design. The population in this study were all students of class VII junior high school in Kuningan in the even semester of the academic year 2017/2018.� Through purposive sampling technique, 2 classes of 10 classes were selected as samples where the class VIIA as the control class and VIIB as experimental class with a total sample of 70 students. Data collection techniques were obtained through mathematical creative thinking ability test and data analysis technique included normality test, homogeneity test, and t test. The results showed that there were difference in mathematical creative thinking ability and there were difference in the increase between the classes using Problem Based Learning and the classes using a model of Problem Based Learning with tangram.

scholarly journals Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa SMP melalui Model Problem Based Learning

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-39
Author(s):  
Rika Siviani ◽  
Cut Morina Zubainur ◽  
Muhammad Subianto
Keyword(s):  
Junior High School ◽  
Learning Process ◽  
Creative Thinking ◽  
Qualitative Method ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
Class Viii ◽  
Creative Thinking Ability ◽  
Pbl Model

Creative thinking ability of students is still low and less attention in the implementation of the learning of mathematics. Some efforts are needed to foster creative thinking ability because of lack of creative thinking ability in the learning of mathematics. One of effort is applying Problem Based Learning (PBL) Model. The purpose of this research was (1) to describe the creative thinking ability of students during the learning process with PBL Model, and (2) to determine the increase of the creative thinking ability of students after implementation of PBL model. This research used mixed methods with concurrent triangulation strategy. Samples were selected by random sampling from all grade 8 students from one of junior high school at Banda Aceh, those were 28 students in class VIII-3. The instrument used to obtain data of the creative thinking ability of students after learning with PBL Model was test and observation. The instrument used to obtain data to determine the increase of the students’ creative thinking ability after learning with the PBL model were pretest and posttest. Test and observations were analyzed by using an assessment rubric of creative thinking abilities with descriptive qualitative method. The result of pretest and posttest were analyzed by statistical tests using t-test. The results showed that the students were creative in solving problems during the learning process with model of PBL. There was increasing creative thinking abilities of students after learning with PBL Model. The implication of this research indicates that creative thinking abilities of students increase through PBL model.

scholarly journals Discovery Learning with Scaffolding To Promote Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability And Self-Efficacy

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 351-370
Author(s):  
Mohamad Gilar Jatisunda ◽  
Vici Suciawati ◽  
Dede Salim Nahdi
Keyword(s):  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Creative Thinking ◽  
Discovery Learning ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
Creative Thinking Ability ◽  
One Way Anova ◽  
Better Than

Mathematical creative thinking ability and self-efficacy are a combination of abilities students need to have when studying mathematics. Mathematical learning is expected to improve both abilities. However, teachers still use conventional learning such as direct teaching, which results in a low increase in students' mathematical creative thinking abilities and self-efficacy. So we need alternative student-centred learning and teachers as facilitators who provide scaffolding. The study was conducted to obtain a description of the discovery learning process with scaffolding which aims to improve the ability to think creatively and self-efficacy. Two quasi-experimental designs with three class groups were used: The Matching-only Pretest-posttest Control Group Design was used to measure mathematical creative thinking skills, and The Matching-only Posttest-only Control Group Design was used to measure the self-efficacy scale. Based on the results of one-way ANOVA, the mathematical creative thinking ability of students discovery learning with scaffolding is better than discovery learning and conventional learning. Likewise, this happens to 'self-efficacy, based on the one-way ANOVA that students' self-efficacy of discovery learning with scaffolding is better than discovery learning and conventional learning. The learning process of discovery learning with scaffolding has a positive impact on the improvement of mathematical creative thinking abilities and self-efficacy

scholarly journals MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KREATIF DAN SELF EFFICACY SISWA MENGGUNAKAN MODEL CREATIVE PROBLEM SOLVING PADA MATERI SISTEM KOLOID

Vidya Karya ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wahyu Wahyu ◽  
Rusmansyah Rusmansyah ◽  
Arif Sholahuddin
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Creative Thinking ◽  
Creative Problem Solving ◽  
Colloid System ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
Good Score ◽  
Creative Problem ◽  
Creative Thinking Ability

Abstract. This study aims to improve teacher and students activities, creative thinking ability, self efficacy, and student learning outcomes in Colloid system material using creative problem solving model. The subjects were 36 students of grade XI IPA SMA PGRI 4 Banjarmasin. This classroom action research was conducted in 2 cycles through the stages of planning, action, evaluation and observation, and reflection. The data were collected using observation instruments, creative thinking skills tests, student achievement test, and questionnaires. Analysis of the data used qualitative and quantitative analysis techniques. The results of the cycle I and cycle 2 showed: (1) there was an increase in teacher and student activities from good to very good, (2) students' creative thinking ability increased from moderate to high, (3) self efficacy of students increased from moderate to high, (4) students' learning outcomes on the attitude aspects improved from good (score 71,53) to be very good (score 86.34), the skill aspects improved from good enough to good, and the percentage of students' mastery increased from 52.78% in the first cycle to 83.33% in te second cycle.                  Keywords: Creative problem solving, creative thinking ability, self efficacy, colloid system. Abstrak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan aktivitas guru dan aktivitas siswa, kemampuan berpikir kreatif, self efficacy, dan hasil belajar siswa pada materi sistem Koloid menggunakan model pembelajaran creative problem solving. Subjek penelitian adalah 36 orang siswa kelas XI IPA SMA PGRI 4 Banjarmasin. Penelitian tindakan kelas ini dilakukan dalam 2 siklus melalui tahap-tahap perencanaan, tindakan, evaluasi dan observasi, dan refleksi. Data dikumpulkan menggunakan instrumen observasi, tes kemampuan berpikir kreatif, tes hasil belajar, dan angket. Analisis data menggunakan teknik analisis kualitatif dan kuantitatif. Hasil penelitian siklus I dan siklus 2 menunjukkan: (1) terjadi peningkatan aktivitas guru dan aktivitas siswa dari baik menjadi sangat baik, (2) kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa meningkat dari sedang menjadi tinggi, (3) self efficacy siswa menigkat dari sedang menjadi tinggi, (4) hasil belajar siswa pada aspek sikap meningkat dari baik (skor 71,53) menjadi sangat baik (skor 86,34),  aspek keterampilan meningkat dari cukup baik menjadi baik, dan persentase ketuntasan pengetahuan siswa meningkat dari 52,78% pada siklus I menjadi 83,33% di siklus II.Kata kunci: creative problem solving, kemampuan berpikir kreatif, self efikasi, sistem koloid.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document