scholarly journals Drug-induced cutaneous vasculitis developing during Etanercept treatment for rheumatoid arthritis

2021 ◽  
Vol 97 (4) ◽  
pp. 113-119
Author(s):  
Maria N. Chamurlieva ◽  
Yulia L. Korsakova ◽  
Stefka G. Radenska-Lopovok ◽  
Tatiana V. Korotaeva
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Tnf Inhibitors ◽  
Cutaneous Vasculitis ◽  
Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases ◽  
Tnf Inhibitor ◽  
Drug Induced ◽  
Etanercept Treatment ◽  
Increased Risk

Biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) are widely used for the treatment of chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Since the introduction of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-) inhibitors, the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis has been revolutionized. The approach of targeting TNF- has considerably improved the success of the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Their effectiveness has been extensively proven in randomized clinical trials and in clinical practice. Randomized clinical trials and post-marketing studies proved that patients undergoing TNF- inhibitors therapy are at increased risk of infectious disease, bacterial, viral, fungal, opportunistic, oncology and skin adverse effects such as psoriasis and angiitis of the skin. In this case report drug-induced cutaneous vasculitis developing during TNF- inhibitor (Etanercept) treatment for rheumatoid arthritis is described.

scholarly journals AB0302 USE OF TNF-INHIBITORS BEFORE, DURING AND THE FIRST YEAR AFTER PREGNANCY AMONG WOMEN WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1450.2-1450
Author(s):  
H. Bjørngaard ◽  
H. Koksvik ◽  
B. Jakobsen ◽  
M. Wallenius
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Post Partum ◽  
Tnf Inhibitors ◽  
Treat To Target ◽  
Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases ◽  
Tnf Inhibitor ◽  
Rheumatic Arthritis ◽  
Quality Register ◽  
In Pregnancy

Background:Treat to target is a goal, also in pregnant women with Rheumatoid arthritis (1). There is increasing evidence on safe use with TNF inhibitors during pregnancy. Adjusted use of TNF inhibitors preconception and throughout pregnancy may stabilize disease activity and prevent flares (2). Low disease activity is also beneficial for the fetus.Objectives:To study the use of TNF-inhibitors among women with Rheumatic arthritis during and after pregnancy.Methods:RevNatus is a Norwegian, nationwide quality register that monitors treatment of inflammatory rheumatic diseases before, during and after pregnancy. Data from RevNatus in the period October 2017 to October 2019 was used to map the use of all types of TNF inhibitors among 208 women with rheumatoid arthritis, diagnosed by the ACR/EULAR criteria. The use of medication was reported at the time of visit in outpatient clinic. The frequency of use of TNF inhibitors registered at seven timepoints from pre-pregnancy to twelve months after delivery.Results:The use of medication was reported at each visit for all the women with rheumatoid arthritis. Most of the women were not using TNF inhibitors before and beyond conception. Most of the women continuing TNF inhibitors beyond conception used certolizumab or etanercept. Adalimumab and infliximab were used in pregnancy (tabell 1).Tabell 1.certoliz-umabetane-rceptadalim-umabgolim-umabinflixi-mabNo TNF-inhibitorBefore pregnancyn=10521% (22)9% (10)3% (3)1% (1)66% (69)1.trimestern=8119% (15)10% (8)71% (58)2.trimestern=8810% (9)10% (9)80% (70)3.trimestern=9111% (10)5% (5)83% (76)6 weeks post partum n=9622% (21)13% (13)1% (1)1% (1)63% (60)6 months post partum n=8824% (21)18% (16)4% (4)1% (1)53% (46)12 months post partum n=8421% (18)17% (15)7% (6)2% (2)53% (43)Conclusion:Most of the women with rheumatic arthritis were not treated with TNF inhibitors before or in pregnancy. Women with rheumatic arthritis that continuing treatment with TNF inhibitors through pregnancy were using certilozumab and etanercept.References:[1]Gotestam Skorpen C, Hoeltzenbein M, Tincani A, Fischer-Betz R, Elefant E, Chambers C, et al. The EULAR points to consider for use of antirheumatic drugs before pregnancy, and during pregnancy and lactation. 2016;75(5):795-810.[2]van den Brandt S, Zbinden A, Baeten D, Villiger PM, Ostensen M, Forger F. Risk factors for flare and treatment of disease flares during pregnancy in rheumatoid arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis patients. Arthritis Res Ther. 2017;19(1):64.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals Changing Patterns of Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Use in 9074 Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 907-913 ◽  
Author(s):  
YUSUF YAZICI ◽  
SVETLANA KRASNOKUTSKY ◽  
JAIME P. BARNES ◽  
PATRICIA L. HINES ◽  
JASON WANG ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Tumor Necrosis Factor ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Tumor Necrosis ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Tnf Inhibitors ◽  
Tnf Inhibitor ◽  
Insurance Claims ◽  
Claims Database ◽  
Necrosis Factor

Objective.Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) commonly switch between tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors after failing to control disease activity. Much of the clinical data that support switching to a second TNF agent when one agent fails to work has come from small, short-term studies. We utilized a US insurance claims database to determine patterns of use such as dose escalation, time to discontinuation, and switching between TNF inhibitors in patients with RA.Methods.A retrospective analysis was performed using an insurance claims database in the US from 2000 to 2005. TNF inhibitor use, time to switch, dose escalation, and continuation times were analyzed in patients with RA.Results.Nine thousand seventy-four patients with RA started TNF inhibitors during the period 2000 to 2005. Etanercept was the most commonly used TNF inhibitor; infliximab had the highest duration of continuation, about 50% at 2 years. In addition, infliximab showed higher rates of dose escalation compared to etanercept and adalimumab. For all TNF inhibitors, time to switching decreased from 2000 to 2005.Conclusion.TNF inhibitor use patterns changed from 2000 to 2005, with more frequent changes among the different TNF inhibitors and a shorter duration of treatment before the change. Only about 50% of TNF inhibitors are still continued at 2 years, reflecting the difference between randomized clinical trials and real-world experience.

scholarly journals AB0115 COMPARISON OF ULTRASOUND FINDINGS BETWEEN TNF INHIBITORS AND NON-TNF INHIBITORS AT FIRST BIOLOGICS IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1086.2-1087
Author(s):  
T. Okano ◽  
T. Koike ◽  
K. Inui ◽  
K. Mamoto ◽  
Y. Yamada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Disease Duration ◽  
Power Doppler ◽  
Tnf Inhibitors ◽  
Tnf Inhibitor ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Us ◽  
Us Findings ◽  
Improvement Ratio

Background:In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), biologics treatment is one of the effective treatment options. Usually, there is no difference in therapeutic effect regardless of which biologics is used, but the effect for joint synovitis is unknown. Recently, ultrasound (US) has played a role of sensitive imaging modality in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with RA.Objectives:The aim of this study was to compare the improvement of US findings between TNF inhibitors and non-TNF inhibitors at first biologics in patients with RA.Methods:Fifty-four RA patients who started the first biologics from September 2016 to December 2018 were included in this longitudinal study (SPEEDY study, UMIN000028260). All the patients were performed clinical examination, blood test and US examination at baseline, 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 weeks. A US examination was performed at the bilateral first to fifth metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints, first interphalangeal (IP) and second to fifth proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints, wrist joints (three part of radial, medial and ulnar) and first to fifth metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints, by using HI VISION Ascendus (Hitachi Medical Corporation, Japan) with a multifrequency linear transducer (18-6 MHz). The gray scale (GS) and power Doppler (PD) findings were assessed by the semi-quantitative method (0-3). GS score and PD score (both 0-108 points) were defined as the sum of each score. The change of disease activity and US findings were compared between TNF group and non-TNF group.Results:Among 54 cases, 32 patients were used TNF inhibitor and 22 were non-TNF inhibitor. Age and duration of RA were significantly higher in the non-TNF group, and MTX dose was significantly lower in the non-TNF group. The baseline inflammatory markers tended to be higher in the non-TNF group and the disease activity was also higher in the non-TNF group. However, the US findings showed no significant difference in both GS and PD between two groups at baseline. US improvement ratio was no difference between TNF group and non-TNF group at 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 weeks in both GS and PD score. Regardless of the type of biologics, patients with long-term disease duration tended to have poor improvement in US synovial fingings.Table 1.Baseline patient and disease characteristicsTNF (n=32)non-TNF (n=22)P valueFemale patients, n (%)21 (65.6)16 (72.7)0.767Age (years)63.5±15.471.0±9.00.030Disease duration (years)6.5±8.213.0±11.70.032CRP (mg/dl)1.8±2.53.0±3.20.170DAS28-ESR5.0±1.45.8±1.20.022GS score26.1±18.831.8±21.10.313PD score17.6±11.423.1±14.60.150Figure 1.GS and PD improvement ratio at 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 weeksConclusion:There was no difference in the US findings improvement between patients with TNF inhibitor and non-TNF inhibitor at first biologics in patients with RA.References:[1]Grassi W, Okano T, Di Geso L, Filippucci E. Imaging in rheumatoid arthritis: options, uses and optimization. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2015;11:1131-46.[2]Nishino A, Kawashiri SY, Koga T, et al. Ultrasonographic Efficacy of Biologic andTargeted Synthetic Disease-ModifyingAntirheumatic Drug Therapy in RheumatoidArthritis From a Multicenter RheumatoidArthritis Ultrasound Prospective Cohort in Japan. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018;70:1719-26.Acknowledgements:We wish to thank Atsuko Kamiyama, Tomoko Nakatsuka for clinical assistant, Setsuko Takeda, Emi Yamashita, Yuko Yoshida, Rika Morinaka, Hatsue Ueda and Tomomi Iwahashi for their special efforts as a sonographer and collecting data.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals AB0304 IMMUNOGENICITY OF BIOLOGIC DRUGS IN THE CLINICAL PRACTICE IN THE BULGARIAN POPULATION OF PATIENTS SUFFERING FROM RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1451.3-1451
Author(s):  
K. Kraev ◽  
M. Geneva-Popova ◽  
S. Popova
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Tnf Alpha ◽  
Drug Bioavailability ◽  
Drug Induced ◽  
Etanercept Treatment ◽  
Markers Of Inflammation

Background:Biological drugs are protein derivatives that, as such, are highly immunogenic. In recent years there have been many conflicting opinions about the role of drug immunogenicity in clinical practice.Objectives:To evaluate the drug immunogenicity of TNF-alpha blocking drugs (etanercept and adalimumab) used to treat patients with rheumatoid arthritis. To determine whether their presence can alter the effect of treatment and to evaluate their role in the clinical practice of rheumatologists.Methods:121 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, as well as 31 healthy controls, similar in sex and age, were examined. They were all monitored at 0, 6, 12 and 24 months from the start of TNF-alpha blocker treatment. Demographics, vital signs, markers of inflammation such as C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and disease activity indices were examined at each visit, respectively. Drug-induced neutralizing antibodies, as well as drug bioavailability in patients treated with adalimumab, were examined by ELISA.Results:Drug-induced neutralizing antibodies to adalimumab were detected in 11.57% of patients at 6 month, in 17.64% of patients at 12 month, and 24.8% at 24 month. Drug-induced neutralizing antibodies to etanercept were not detected at 6 months, at 7.77% at 12 months, at 9.63% of patients at 24 months. Of the adalimumab patients who were having drug-induced antibodies, 92.59% had low drug bioavailability, while the remaining 7.41% of patients showed normal drug bioavailability despite the presence of drug-induced neutralizing antibodies. In terms of worsening of the disease activity, a positive correlation was found with the presence of drug antibodies - Pearson Correlation = 0.701, p = 0.001. Patients with poor clinical response and available drug antibodies receiving adalimumab were slightly more than those treated with etanercept at 12 and 24 months but the difference is non-significant-U = 0.527, p> 0.05 and U = 0.623, p> 0.05, respectively.Conclusion:Presence of drug-induced neutralizing antibodies in patients treated with adalimumab and etanercept has been associated with poor clinical response and worsening of the patient’s condition. Testing of drug-induced neutralizing antibodies as well as the drug bioavailability of the drug used can be used as reliable biomarkers in clinical rheumatology.References:[1]Benucci M., F.Li Gobbi, M. Meacii et al., “Antidrug antibodies against TNF-blocking agents: correlations between disese activity, hypersensitivity reactions, and different classes of immunoglobulins”, Biologics and Targets and Therapy, 2015: 9 7 -2.[2]Chen D., Y. Chen, W. Tsai et al., “ Significant associations of antidrug antibody levels with serum drug trough levels and therapeutic response of adalimumab and etanercept treatment in rheumatoid arthritis”, Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Mar; 74 (3).[3]Kalden J. and H. Schulze-Koops, “ Immunogenicity and loss of response to TNF inhibitors: implications for rheumatoid arthritis treatment ”, Nature Reviews Rheumatology, 2017 volume 13, 707–718.[4]Wolf-Henning Boehnck, N. Brembilla, “ Immunogenicity of biological therapies: causes and consequences, ” Expert Review of Clinical Immunology, Vol 14, 2018, Issue 6, 513-523Disclosure of Interests:None declared

FRI0279 USE OF TNF-INHIBITORS BEFORE, DURING AND THE FIRST YEAR AFTER PREGNANCY IN WOMEN WITH SPONDYLOARTHRITIS

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 727.1-727
Author(s):  
H. Bjørngaard ◽  
H. Koksvik ◽  
B. Jakobsen ◽  
M. Wallenius
Keyword(s):  
Disease Activity ◽  
Post Partum ◽  
Tnf Inhibitors ◽  
Treat To Target ◽  
Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases ◽  
Tnf Inhibitor ◽  
Quality Register ◽  
Frequency Of Use ◽  
Asas Criteria ◽  
Pregnancy And Lactation

Background:Treat to target is a goal in pregnant women with spondyloarthristis. There is increasing evidence on safe use with TNF inhibitors during pregnancy (1). Adjusted use of TNF inhibitors preconception and throughout pregnancy may stabilize disease activity and prevent flares (2). Low disease activity is also beneficial for the fetus.Objectives:To study the use of TNF-inhibitors among women with spondyloarthritis in Norway before, during and after pregnancy.Methods:RevNatus is a Norwegian, nationwide quality register that monitors treatment of inflammatory rheumatic diseases before, during and after pregnancy. Data from RevNatus in the period October 2017 to October 2019 were used to map the use of all types of TNF inhibitors among 208 women with spondyloarthitis, fulfilling the ASAS criteria.The use of medication was reported at the time of visit in outpatient clinic. The frequency of use of TNF inhibitors is registered at seven timepoints from pre-pregnancy to twelve months after delivery.Results:The use of TNF-inhibitors was reported at each visit for all the women with spondyloarthritis. Most women are not using TNF inhibitors before and beyond conception. Most of the women continuing TNF inhibitors beyond conception, used certolizumab, etanercept, or adalimumab. Infliximab or golimumab were not used in pregnancy (tabell 2).Table 2:SPACertoli-zumabEtaner-ceptAdali-mumabGolim-umabInflik-simabNo TNF -inhibitorBefore Pregnancyn=13910% (14)8% (11)6% (9)6% (9)69% (96)1.trimestern=1027% (7)7% (7)2 % (2)84% (86)2.trimestern=1047% (7)6% (6)1% (1)87% (90)3. trimestern=953% (3)2% (2)1% (1)94% (89)6 weeks post partumn=10015% (15)10% (10)8% (8)3% (3)64% (64)6 months post partumn=8219% (16)12% (10)7% (6)2% (2)2% (2)55% (46)12 months post partumn=7422% (16)15% (11)7% (5)4% (3)5% (4)47% (35)Conclusion:A majority of the women with spondyloarthritis were not treated with TNF inhibitors before or during pregnancy. Only a few of the women with spondylosthritis continued treatment with TNF inhibitors during pregnancy.References:[1]Gotestam Skorpen C, Hoeltzenbein M, Tincani A, Fischer-Betz R, Elefant E, Chambers C, et al. The EULAR points to consider for use of antirheumatic drugs before pregnancy, and during pregnancy and lactation. 2016;75(5):795-810.[2]van den Brandt S, Zbinden A, Baeten D, Villiger PM, Ostensen M, Forger F. Risk factors for flare and treatment of disease flares during pregnancy in rheumatoid arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis patients. Arthritis Res Ther. 2017;19(1):64.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals Suicidality: Once Again, Don’t Blame the Drug Class

2021 ◽  
pp. 153575972110531
Author(s):  
Faught Edward
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Suicidal Ideation ◽  
Risk Ratio ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Adjunctive Treatment ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Increased Risk

Importance Mostantiseizure medications (ASMs) carry a US Food and Drug Administration–mandated class label warning of increased suicidality risk, based on a meta-analysis comparing suicidality between individuals treated with medications vs placebo in randomized clinical trials done before 2008. ASMs approved since then carry this warning although they were not similarly studied. Objective To review all placebo-controlled phase 2 and 3 studies of 10 ASMs approved since 2008 to evaluate the risk of suicidality of these drugs compared with placebo. Data Sources Primary publications and secondary safety analyses in PubMed of all phase 2 and 3 randomized placebo-controlled epilepsy trials of ASMs approved since 2008, using keywords epilepsy, antiepileptic drugs, seizures, suicidality, suicidal ideation, and the names of individual drugs. Study Selection All phase 2 and 3 randomized clinical trials of adjunctive treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy and their secondary safety analyses. Data Extraction and Synthesis Articles were reviewed for frequency of suicidality (ideation, attempts, and completed suicides). Mode of suicidality ascertainment included treatment-emergent adverse event reports, Standardized Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities queries for events in prespecified categories including suicidal ideation and behavior, prospective collection of suicidality data as a prespecified safety outcome using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale, and retrospective evaluation by blinded review using the Columbia-Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment. A meta-analysis compared risk for drugs vs placebo of each outcome for all drugs overall and by individual drugs and trials. Main Outcomes and Measures Suicidality (total and by ideation), attempts, and completed suicides. Results Excluding studies that did not evaluate suicidality (everolimus and fenfluramine) or did not evaluate it prospectively (lacosamide, ezogabine, and clobazam), 5 drugs were analyzed: eslicarbazepine, perampanel, brivaracetam, cannabidiol, and cenobamate. Suicidality was evaluated in 17 randomized clinical trials of these drugs, involving 5996 patients, of whom 4000 patients were treated with ASMs and 1996 with placebo. There was no evidence of increased risk of suicidal ideation (drugs vs placebo overall risk ratio, .75; 95% CI, .35–1.60) or attempt (risk ratio, .75; 95% CI, .30–1.87) overall or for any individual drug. Suicidal ideation occurred in 12 of 4000 patients treated with ASMs (.30%) vs 7 of 1996 patients treated with placebo (.35%) ( P  =  .74). Three patients treated with ASMs and no patients treated with placebo attempted suicide ( P  =  .22). There were no completed suicides. Conclusions and Relevance There is no current evidence that the 5 ASMs evaluated in this study increase suicidality in epilepsy and merit a suicidality class warning

scholarly journals The Risk of Newly Diagnosed Cancer in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis by TNF Inhibitor Use: A Nationwide Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boyoon Choi ◽  
Hyun Jin Park ◽  
Yun-Kyoung Song ◽  
Yoon-Jeong Oh ◽  
In-Wha Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Tnf Inhibitors ◽  
Tnf Inhibitor ◽  
Matched Cohort ◽  
Korean Patients ◽  
Study Results ◽  
The One ◽  
Risk Of Cancer

Abstract Background Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors use in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has raised safety concerns about cancer risk, but study results remain controversial. This largest nationwide study to date compared cancer risk in TNF inhibitor users to non-biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (nbDMARD) users in Korean patients with RA. Methods Data on all the eligible patients diagnosed with RA between 2005 and 2016 were retrieved from the Korean National Health Information Database. The one-to-one matched patients consisted of the matched cohort. The risks for developing all-type and site-specific cancers were estimated using incidence and incidence rate (IR) per 1,000 person-years. Adjusted hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using a Cox regression model. Results Of the 22,851 patients in the before matching cohort, 4,592 patients were included in the matched cohort. Treatment with TNF inhibitors was consistently associated with a lower risk of cancer than in the nbDMARD cohort (IR per 1,000 person-years, 6.5 vs. 15.6; adjusted HR, 0.379; 95% CI, 0.255–0.563). The adjusted HR (95% CI) was significantly lower in the TNF inhibitor cohort than the nbDMARD cohort for gastrointestinal cancer (0.432; 0.235–0.797), breast cancer (0.146; 0.045–0.474), and genitourinary cancer (0.220; 0.059–0.820). Conclusions The use of TNF inhibitors was associated with a lower cancer incidence in Korean patients with RA. A further study linking claims and clinical data is needed to confirm our results.

scholarly journals Novel gene variants associated with cardiovascular disease in systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis

2018 ◽  
Vol 77 (7) ◽  
pp. 1063-1069 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dag Leonard ◽  
Elisabet Svenungsson ◽  
Johanna Dahlqvist ◽  
Andrei Alexsson ◽  
Lisbeth Ärlestig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
General Population ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Risk Allele ◽  
Snp Array ◽  
Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Increased Risk

ObjectivesPatients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). We investigated whether single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at autoimmunity risk loci were associated with CVD in SLE and RA.MethodsPatients with SLE (n=1045) were genotyped using the 200K Immunochip SNP array (Illumina). The allele frequency was compared between patients with and without different manifestations of CVD. Results were replicated in a second SLE cohort (n=1043) and in an RA cohort (n=824). We analysed publicly available genetic data from general population, performed electrophoretic mobility shift assays and measured cytokine levels and occurrence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs).ResultsWe identified two new putative risk loci associated with increased risk for CVD in two SLE populations, which remained after adjustment for traditional CVD risk factors. An IL19 risk allele, rs17581834(T) was associated with stroke/myocardial infarction (MI) in SLE (OR 2.3 (1.5 to 3.4), P=8.5×10−5) and RA (OR 2.8 (1.4 to 5.6), P=3.8×10−3), meta-analysis (OR 2.5 (2.0 to 2.9), P=3.5×10−7), but not in population controls. The IL19 risk allele affected protein binding, and SLE patients with the risk allele had increased levels of plasma-IL10 (P=0.004) and aPL (P=0.01). An SRP54-AS1 risk allele, rs799454(G) was associated with stroke/transient ischaemic attack in SLE (OR 1.7 (1.3 to 2.2), P=2.5×10−5) but not in RA. The SRP54-AS1 risk allele is an expression quantitative trait locus for four genes.ConclusionsThe IL19 risk allele was associated with stroke/MI in SLE and RA, but not in the general population, indicating that shared immune pathways may be involved in the CVD pathogenesis in inflammatory rheumatic diseases.

scholarly journals Effect of Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids Treatment on Lipid Pattern of HIV Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Marine Drugs ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federica Fogacci ◽  
Enrico Strocchi ◽  
Maddalena Veronesi ◽  
Claudio Borghi ◽  
Arrigo F. G. Cicero
Keyword(s):  
Fatty Acids ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Plasma Lipid ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Lipoprotein Cholesterol ◽  
Omega 3 ◽  
Increased Risk

Even though omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) seem to be effective in the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated dyslipidemia, their impact is still debated. For this reason, our aim was to perform a meta-analysis of the clinical evidence available to date. A systematic literature search was conducted in order to identify published clinical trials assessing the effect of PUFAs treatment on serum lipoproteins, and its safety profile. The effect sizes for lipid changes were expressed as mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI). For safety analysis, odd ratios and the 95% CI were calculated with the Mantel–Haenszel method. Data were pooled from nine clinical studies comprising overall 578 HIV-affected subjects. Meta-analysis of the data suggested that omega-3 PUFAs significantly reduced triglycerides (TG) (MD = −1.04, 95% CI: −1.5, −0.58 mmol/L, p < 0.001), while increasing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (MD = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.12, 0.61 mmol/L, p = 0.004), without affecting serum levels of total cholesterol, very-low- and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B and A1. Change in TG was significantly associated with eicosapentaenoic acid administered via daily dose. PUFA treatment did not lead to an increased risk of adverse events. In conclusion, PUFAs are safe and exert a significant plasma lipid improving effect in HIV-positive patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document