scholarly journals RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA ANAK / Restorative Justice In Juvenile Justice System

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 319
Author(s):  
Randy Pradityo
Keyword(s):  
Human Resources ◽  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Best Interests ◽  
Best Interest ◽  
The Will ◽  
The Law

Anak sebagai generasi penerus bangsa sudah selayaknya mendapatkan perhatian khusus. Hal tersebut bertujuan dalam rangka pembinaan anak untuk mewujudkan sumber daya manusia yang berkualitas. Maka dari itu, diperlukan pula sarana dan prasarana hukum yang mengantisipasi segala permasalahan yang timbul. Sarana hukum ini bertujuan untuk mengantisipasi stigma atau cap jahat yang ditimbulkan ketika anak berhadapan dengan hukum, sekaligus memulihkan dan memasyarakatkan kembali anak tersebut. Salah satu solusinya adalah dengan mengalihkan atau menempatkan pelaku tindak pidana anak keluar dari sistem peradilan pidana serta memberikan alternatif bagi penyelesaian dengan pendekatan keadilan demi kepentingan terbaik bagi anak, yang kemudian dikenal dengan pendekatan restorative justice. Restorative justice yang merupakan implementasi konsep dari diversi telah dirumuskan dalam sistem peradilan pidana anak, namun sistem yang baik haruslah diiringi dengan suatu sikap yang dijiwai kehendak untuk memandang dan berkeyakinan bahwa dunia ini selalu menjadi lebih baik. Selain itu, hendaknya prinsip the best interest of the children selalu diutamakan ketika menangani anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum. Children as the nation's next generation is already deserve special attention. It aims in order to develop the child to realize the quality of human resources. Therefore, it is also necessary legal infrastructure to anticipate any problems that arise. The legal means to anticipate stigma or stamp evil inflicted when the child against the law, as well as restoring and re-socialize the child. One solution is to divert or placing the offender children out of the criminal justice system as well as providing an alternative to the settlement with justice approach in the best interests of the child, who was then known as restorative justice approach. Restorative justice which is the implementation of the concept of diversion has been formulated in the juvenile justice system, but a good system must be accompanied by an attitude which is imbued with the will to perceive and believe that this world is always getting better. In addition, should the principle of the best interest of the children always come first when dealing with children in conflict with the law.

scholarly journals OPTIMIZING RESTORATIVE JUSTICE PROGRAM FOR THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILDREN IN REFORMING JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN UTAH

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 242
Author(s):  
Cekli S Pratiwi
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Constitutional Rights ◽  
Legal Counsel ◽  
Best Interest ◽  
Justice Program ◽  
The Right ◽  
Special Protection

This study examine first, to what extent the fully restorative justice system could be implemented in the Utah’s JJS  and supported by the legislations so that the minor can enjoy a special protection while they still have the opportunity to participate actively with accountability in solving the problem  without destroy their freedom and dignity and can bring more benefit to their best interest. Second, to what extent the right to legal counsel could help the minor to enjoy their constitutional rights as well as to seek a better solution of their problem. The research done by observing the review hearing, pre-trial, petition, trial at the Fourth Judicial District Courthouse Provo and the detention hearing at Slate Canyon Youth Center. The data is also collected from various secondary resources such as the Utah Statutes, the international and regional instruments. There is an opportunity for the JJS Utah county to shift from applying the partly to the fully RJP specially for truancy or misdemeanor cases and the right to access public defender should be automatically granted to the minors.

KEBIJAKAN HUKUM PIDANA PERLINDUNGAN ANAK DALAM PEMBARUAN SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA ANAK DI INDONESIA

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 358
Author(s):  
Candra Hayatul Iman
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Child Protection ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Court ◽  
Special Treatment ◽  
System Reform ◽  
Best Interest ◽  
Cultural Paradigm ◽  
The Law

Juvenile Delinquency is an anti-social behavior can be disturbing public society, but it is recognized as a common phenomenon that must be accepted as a social fact. Children based on their physical, mental and social have a weak position compared with adults, so that children who committed needs to be special treatment. Therefore, the treatment of juvenile delinquents should be different with the treatment of adults. Child Protection in fact there are still many who have not accommodate the principles of international instruments. In the juvenile court still found violations of children's rights in the implementation of the handling of children in conflict with the law. Research it can be concluded that the formulation of policies for the protection of children in conflict with the law in the juvenile justice system in Indonesia is regulated in Law No. 3 Year l997 on Juvenile Court has not accommodated the principle of the best interest of the child in the juvenile justice system, so it is normative in the formulation did not reflect the level of the basic idea of the protection of children. Thus, the level of normative formulation does not reflect the basic idea of the child protection law. Formulation studies to the protection of children in conflict with the law in the juvenile justice system in accordance with Law No. 11 Year 2012 has been to accommodate the principle of the best interest of the child with the diversion. Yet undiscovered principles of availability of legal aid in the context of the principle of diversion and diversion control authority. Formulation studies to the protection of children in conflict with the law in the juvenile justice system in accordance with Law No. 11 Year 2012 has been to accommodate the principle of the best interest of the child, among others, by focusing on the handling of children in conflict with the law through diversion measures to promote restorative justice approach. Application policy to the protection of children in conflict with the law in the juvenile justice system involves substantial problems, structural and cultural. Paradigm of retributive justice system is still an idea in Act No. 3 of 1997. Keywords: Criminal Law Policy; child protection, juvenile justice system reform.

scholarly journals Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Anak Melalui Diversi sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Bagi Anak

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 079-084
Author(s):  
Nurmalawaty Nurmalawaty
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
Justice Process ◽  
The Law

Ide Diversi pada awalnya dicanangkan dalam United Nation Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice atau dikenal dengan The Beijing Rules. Diversi merupakan pemberian kewenangan kepada aparat penegak hukum untuk mengambil tindakan atau kebijaksanaan dalam menangani atau menyelesaikan masalah pelanggar anak dengan tidak mengambil jalan formal, misalnya dengan menghentikan atau tidak meneruskan/melepaskan dari proses peradilan pidana. Dengan diundangkan Undang-undang Nomor 11 tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak pada tanggal 30 Juli 2012, dan mulai berlaku 2 tahun kemudian, maka Indonesia secara sah sudah memiliki suatu peraturan yang memberikan perlindungan hukum terhadap anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum dengan salah satu metodenya adalah Diversi. Selanjutnya sebagai Peraturan Pelaksana dikeluarkannya Perma Nomor 4 tahun 2014 tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Diversi Dalam Sistem Peradilan Anak, dan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 65 tahun 2015 tantang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Diversi dan Penanganan Anak yang Belum Berumur 12 tahun. Pada prinsipnya Diversi dengan pendekatan keadilan restoratif untuk memberikan jaminan perlindungan hukum terhadap anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum untuk menghindari stigmatisasi terhadap anak serta diharapkan anak dapat kembali ke dalam lingkungan social secara wajar. Keadilan Restoratif adalah suatu proses dimana semua pihak yang terlibat dalam suatu perkara pidana bersama-sama menyelesaikan masalah serta menciptakan suatu kewajaran untuk membuat segala sesuatunya menjadi lebih baik dengan melibatkan korban, anak dan masyarakat dalam upaya mencari solusi memperbaiki dan menentramkan hati dengan tidak berdasaarkan pembalasan.   The idea of Diversion was originally proclaimed in the United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice, otherwise known as The Beijing Rules. Diversion is the granting of authority to law enforcement officials to take action or policy in handling or resolving problems of child offenders by not taking a formal path, for example by stopping or not continuing / releasing from the criminal justice process. With the enactment of Act No. 11 of 2012 concerning the Child Criminal Justice System on 30 July 2012, and entered into force 2 years later, Indonesia has legally established a regulation that provides legal protection for children facing the law, with one of its methods called Diversion. Furthermore, as the Implementing Regulation, the issuance of Supreme Court Regualtion No. 4 of 2014 concerning Guidelines for the Implementation of Diversion in the Juvenile Justice System, and Government Regulation No. 65 of 2015 concerning The Guidelines for the Implementation of Diversion and Handling of Children Under 12 Years Old. In principle, Diversion with a restorative justice approach is to guarantee legal protection for children facing the law to avoid stigmatization of children and it is expected that children can return to the social environment fairly. Restorative Justice is a process where all parties involved in a criminal case together solve a problem and create a fairness to make things better by involving victims, children and the community in an effort to find solutions to improve and reassure by not responding to retaliation.

scholarly journals EFEKTIFITAS KONSEP DIVERSI DALAM PROSES PERADILAN ANAK PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA MENURUT UU NO. 11 TAHUN 2012 TENTANG SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA ANAK (Dalam Proses Peradilan Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Di Kabupaten Malang)

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 266
Author(s):  
Komariah Komariah ◽  
Tinuk Dwi Cahyani
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
The State ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Law

Enforcement of the Act No. 11 of 2012 on Juvenile Justice System provides protection of the rights of juvenile who commit criminal acts use the diversion approach to realize the concept of Restorative Justice. To figure out the implementation of the Act, it is necessary to study with the socio-legal research method in the Police District, the State Attorney and the District Court at Malang. The results of these studies found that the application of diversion has been effective although there are still some obstacles. One of the toughest obstacles to implementing a diversion to fit is the unavailability of places to educate, nurture and put the brat as stated in the law. The study also found that in Malang at least there are some organizations / institutions in applying the diversion of government supporters, among others: BAPAS and P2TP2A.

scholarly journals Diversion's Application in The Juvenile Justice System to Realize Restorative Justice Related to Deprivation of Liberty Principle

NORMA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 61
Author(s):  
Aunur Rofiq
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Comparative Method ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Law ◽  
Liberty Principle

Diversion Efforts can only be carried out in cases of Children in conflict with laws that threaten their crimes under 7 (seven) years and do not constitute a repeat of a criminal act. In contrast, the juvenile justice system requires deprivation of liberty principle and punishment related to the latest findings. This research uses the normative legal research method, using the law method, research method, and comparative method. From this research, we know that diversion in the juvenile justice system cannot be done in every child's case; it can only be done in the case of children who meet the requirements of a case protected under 7 (seven) and not a repeat of follow up. Not all cases of children go through a process of diversion. Children who have a conflict with the law are directly threatened with criminal punishment. However, there has been a reconciliation between the perpetrators and the victims, so that the deprivation of liberty principle, and criminalization, is the latest result, which is not successful. Therefore, diversion shall not be used again to protect children.Keywords: Diversion, Children, Liberty

scholarly journals MODEL PERADILAN RESTORATIF DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN ANAK (Kajian tentang Praktik Mediasi Pelaku dan Korban dalam Proses Peradilan Anak di Wilayah Hukum Balai Pemasyarakatan Purwokerto)

2009 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Angkasa Angkasa ◽  
Saryono Hanadi ◽  
Muhammad Budi Setyadi
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Court ◽  
Police Department ◽  
Justice Model ◽  
Article 5 ◽  
Mediation Practice

Legal fundament of implementation of restorative justice in the phase investigation of juvenile justice system  in Indonesia stated in article 5 sentence (1) Law No. 8 Year 1981 concerning KUHAP; article 42 Law No. 3 Year 1997 concerning juvenile court, article 16 sentence ( 1) letter (l), sentence (2) and article 18  Law No. 2 Year 2002 concerning Police Department of Republic of Indonesia, Confidential Telegram of Kabareskrim No. Pol. TR/359/DIT,I/VI/2008. Mediation Perpetrator and Victim in the course of Jurisdiction of Child in jurisdiction territory of prison in Purwokerto, in the form of peace among victim and perpetrator of this child, is conducted in inspection phase, is in prosecution phase and inspection of justice have never been conducted by mediation. Implementation of Mediation in case of child in Jurisdiction territory of Bapas Purwokerto, not yet earned a Restorative Justice Model. This Matter is based on fact that goals of this mediation practice tend to only aim to decontrol continuation. Kata kunci: Juvenile Justice System; Restorative Justice Model; Mediation; prison

The Rights of Children in Conflict with the Law in Ghana

2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 271-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Kwame Ame
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Offenders ◽  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Female Circumcision ◽  
Policy And Practice ◽  
Daunting Task ◽  
Female Children ◽  
The Law ◽  
Key Questions

AbstractIn a country where implementing children's rights in general remains a major challenge, the idea of according rights to children in conflict with the law can be a daunting task. With too many other children's problems to deal with such as the millions of street children and child laborers, female circumcision, and sexual violence against female children, the needs and rights of juvenile offenders could easily be relegated to the bottom of the government's priorities for children. Nonetheless, by virtue of ratifying the UNCRC in 1990, Ghana has made a commitment to address the needs and respect the rights of children in Ghana including its juvenile offenders. Thirteen years after ratifying the CRC, the Ghanaian Parliament passed the Juvenile Justice Act 2003 (Act 653). What rights does the Act accord children in conflict with the law? Do the policies and practices of the new juvenile justice system measure up to the standards of the Convention? These are the key questions addressed in this paper. The paper concludes that vis a vis the CRC, the new Juvenile Justice Act looks good on paper but argues that there is a colossal gap between policy and practice. The paper ends with suggestions on how to effectively protect the rights of children in conflict with the law.

A comparative study of measures for children in conflict with the law in Goa and Singapore

2009 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 313-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murli Desai
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Similarities And Differences ◽  
The Law

English This article aims to compare the measures undertaken for children in conflict with the law in terms of strengths and gaps and similarities and differences, together with profiles of children who enter the juvenile justice system in a progressive state of India, namely Goa, and Singapore. French Cette article vise à comparer les mesures prises pour les enfants en conflit avec la loi en termes de forces et manques, ressemblances et différences, ainsi que le profil des enfants entrants dans le système de justice des mineurs dans un état progressiste de l’Inde, en l’occurrence Goa, et Singapour. Spanish Este artículo compara las medidas tomadas para tratar a los niños en conflicto con la ley en términos de fortalezas y vacíos y similitudes y diferencias, y también el perfil de los niños que ingresan al sistema de justicia juvenil en el estado progresivo de India (Goa) y Singapur.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document