THE COMPARISON OF EVIDENCE IN STATE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT BETWEEN INDONESIA AND SOUTH KOREA

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 232
Author(s):  
Fadli Zaini Dalimunthe
Keyword(s):  
Historical Development ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
The South ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
South Korean ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Valid Evidence ◽  
Similarities And Differences ◽  
Religious Courts

The judiciary under the supreme court consists of general courts, religious courts, military courts, and state administrative courts. In each procedural law court, the provisions concerning evidence are regulated. Evidence is the stage where the parties try to convince the panel of judges about the truth of the arguments put forward in a dispute based on valid evidence. Evidence has an important role because the results of evidence can be the basis for consideration by the panel of judges in making a decision. Evidence in the procedural law of the state administrative court is not only carried out in the Indonesian state administrative court but also in the South Korean Administrative Court. The historical development and organizational structure of the South Korean Administrative Court are the basis for analyzing the Evidence in the South Korean Administrative Court. Lessons from the South Korean Administrative Court can see the similarities and differences in the concept of evidence and type of evidence used in the South Korean Administrative Court with the Indonesian State Administrative Court. The approach used in this study is the statutory approach, comparative approach, and conceptual approach.

scholarly journals Kekuatan Pembuktian Fotokopi Surat yang Tidak Dapat Dicocokkan dengan Aslinya dalam Perkara Perdata

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 323-352
Author(s):  
Devina Puspita Sari
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
District Court ◽  
Witness Testimony ◽  
High Court ◽  
Original Letter ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Opposing Party ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Valid Evidence

The photocopy acceptable in the court if it matched with the original letter and the strength of that photocopy is the same as the original letter. However, sometimes the original letter has been lost so that it cannot be shown at trial. This paper discusses whether a photocopy that cannot be matched with the original letter can be accepted in the civil procedural law and if it can be accepted how the strength of it, then the discussion will look at the judge’s consideration in two cases related to the issue. The results of discussions are that photocopies that cannot be matched with the original letter can be accepted as evidence if the photocopy matches or is strengthened with other evidence, as the jurisprudence of Decision Nr. 112 K/Pdt/1996 and Decision Nr. 410 K/pdt/2004. The jurisprudence has been followed by similar cases, which is the Decision of the Central Jakarta District Court Nr. 164/Pdt.G/2004/PN.Jkt.Pst jo. Decision of The Jakarta High Court Nr. 234/Pdt/2005/PT.DKI jo. Decision of The Supreme Court Nr. 1498 K/Pdt/2006 which in this case a photocopy can be accepted because it is strengthened by the recognition of the opposing party and The Pontianak District Court Nr.52/Pdt.G/2003/PN.Ptk which received a photocopy because it was strengthened with  witness testimony. The photocopy has a free power of proof (depends on the judge’s assessment). The use and assessment of the strength of the photocopy cannot be independent, but must be linked to other valid evidence. Abstrak Fotokopi surat dapat diterima dalam persidangan apabila dapat dicocokkan dengan aslinya, dan kekuatan pembuktiannya sama seperti surat aslinya. Tulisan ini membahas, dalam hal surat aslinya tidak dapat ditunjukkan di persidangan, apakah fotokopi surat dapat diterima dalam pembuktian hukum acara perdata, dan, apabila dapat diterima, bagaimanakah kekuatan pembuktiannya. Artikel ini menunjukkan, fotokopi surat yang tidak dapat dicocokkan dengan aslinya dapat diterima sebagai alat bukti surat jika bersesuaian atau dikuatkan dengan alat bukti lain, sebagaimana Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 112 K/Pdt/1996 dan Putusan Nomor 410 K/pdt/2004 yang telah menjadi yurisprudensi. Yurisprudensi ini telah diikuti dalam perkara serupa, yaitu dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Nomor 164/Pdt.G/2004/PN.Jkt.Pst jo. Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Jakarta Nomor 234/Pdt/2005/PT.DKI jo. Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1498 K/Pdt/2006, di mana dalam perkara ini fotokopi surat dapat diterima karena dikuatkan dengan pengakuan pihak lawan. Demikian juga dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Pontianak Nomor 52/Pdt.G/2003/PN.Ptk, yang menerima fotokopi surat yang tidak dapat dicocokkan dengan aslinya karena dikuatkan dengan alat bukti keterangan saksi. Dengan demikian, fotokopi surat memiliki kekuatan pembuktian yang bebas, artinya diserahkan kepada penilaian hakim. Penggunaan dan penilaian kekuatan pembuktian fotokopi tersebut tidak dapat berdiri sendiri, tetapi harus dikaitkan dengan alat bukti lainnya yang sah.  

scholarly journals PROBABILITAS MEKANISME SMALL CLAIM COURT DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA WARIS DI PENGADILAN AGAMA / PROBABILITY OF SMALL CLAIM COURT MECHANISM IN RESOLVING INHERITANCE DISPUTES IN RELIGIOUS COURT

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 387
Author(s):  
Adi Nur Rohman ◽  
Sugeng Sugeng
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Bright Spot ◽  
Analysis Tool ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Small Claim ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Religious Courts

Hukum acara formil yang berlaku di Pengadilan Agama dalam menyelesaikan sengketa waris relatif memakan waktu yang cukup lama. Hal ini mengakibatkan waktu serta biaya yang dikeluarkan menjadi lebih besar. Mekanisme small claim court yang diatur oleh Mahkamah Agung melalui PERMA No. 2 tahun 2015 tentang tata cara penyelesaian sengketa sederhana dalam sistem peradilan umum menjadi titik terang. Konsep small claim court tersebut diharapkan dapat diaplikasikan dalam sistem peradilan agama sehingga mampu memangkas waktu yang lama dalam penyelesaian sengketa waris di Pengadilan Agama. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menawarkan terobosan baru dalam sistem peradilan agama di Indonesia khususnya terkait penyelesaian sengketa waris. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual dengan menggunakan studi kepustakaan sebagai alat analisis bahan hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penyelesaian sengketa waris di Pengadilan Agama dengan konsep small claim court dipandang mungkin untuk diimplementasikan sebagai bagian dari pembaharuan hukum acara peradilan agama. Namun demikian, hal itu perlu diiringi dengan pengklasifikasian perkara waris ke dalam perkara besar dan kecil dilihat dari nilai harta warisan yang disengketakan. Oleh karenanya, perluasan pengaturan mekanisme small claim court ke dalam sistem peradilan agama menjadi penting guna memangkas mekanisme penyelesaian perkara yang terlalu lama.The formal procedural law that applies in the Religious Courts in resolving inheritance disputes takes a relatively long time. This results in greater time and costs. The small claim court mechanism regulated by the Supreme Court through Supreme Court Regulation No. 2 of 2015 concerning the procedure for resolving simple disputes in the general justice system to become a bright spot. The concept of small claim court is expected to be applied in the religious justice system so that it can cut down the long time in resolving inheritance disputes in the Religious Courts. This study aims to offer a new breakthrough in the system of religious justice in Indonesia, especially in relation to the resolving of inheritance disputes. This research is a normative juridical research with a law and conceptual approach by using literature study as a legal material analysis tool. The results showed that the resolving of dispute of inheritance in the Religious Court with the small claim court concept was considered possible to be implemented as part of the renewal of the religious court procedural law. However, this needs to be accompanied by the classification of inheritance cases into large and small cases seen from the value of the disputed inheritance. Therefore, the expansion of the small claim court mechanism into the religious justice system is deemed necessary in order to reduce the mechanism for resolving cases that are too long.

scholarly journals Limitation of Application of Sharia Principles in Sharia Economic Dispute Resolution in Religious Courts

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 24
Author(s):  
Zaidah Nur Rosidah
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Religious Courts ◽  
And Training

This paper aims to find the basis for the philosophical rationality of applying sharia principles in resolving sharia economic disputes in religious courts as well as the prerequisites required by religious court judges to apply sharia principles in resolving sharia economic disputes. The type of research used is normative legal research to find philosophical rationality and the institutionalization of sharia principles in resolving sharia economic disputes. The approach used is a conceptual approach. Secondary data were collected through literature study. The research results obtained first, the philosophical rationality of the application of sharia principles in sharia economic dispute resolution in line with the first and third principles of Pancasila. Second, the institutionalization of sharia principles becomes effective if there are prerequisites that must be met, firstly enough information for judges to understand sharia principles, secondly the obstacles that come from the judges themselves who are still oriented towards the flow of legism / positivism will have an effect on providing legal basis and third the speed of instilling the institutionalization of sharia principles can be done through education and training organized by the Supreme Court for Religious Court judges.

scholarly journals The Settlement Principles and Effectiveness of Divorce by Mediation of Islamic Civil Perspective: A Critical Review of The Supreme Court Regulation

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 168-188
Author(s):  
Abdullah Taufik
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Critical Review ◽  
Equal Opportunity ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Cost Of Living ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Religious Courts ◽  
Joint Property

Mediation of divorce is expected to be able to suppress the settlement of the case peacefully. In principle, based on the Elucidation of Law Number 1 of 19 74 concerning Marriage, the purpose of marriage is to form a happy and eternal family. Therefore it is urgent to find mediation pillars in settlement of divorce cases. To find the idea in response to these problems, three approaches: 1) laws and regulations, by examining them that relate with divorce settlement through mediation in religious courts; Supreme Court Regulation Numb. 1 of 2016, Civil Procedure Code. 2) Conceptual approach, from the view of experts/scholars, is used to find ideas by building concepts and arguments according to the issues to be examined to find the efficiency in the implementation of mediation. 3) Philosophy, studying literacy related to the theme of the study to capture philosophical content in finding the pillars of mediation in the study of Islamic civil law. The findings in this study are the pillars of mediation whose relevance to divorce disputes should be stated are: 1) Essence of Deliberation, to reach an agreement. 2) The essence of mutual forgiveness, to end the dispute. 3) The essence of respecting the rights of others, of avoiding the nature of egoism. 4) The essence of justice, giving equal opportunity to speak to each other so that both parties get the same rights. While the efficiency of the mediation implementation in settlement of divorce can be done by mediating: 1) Regarding the care and education of children, 2) cost of living of ex-wife, 3) guarantee for the maintenance of the joint property after the termination of a marriage.Mediasi diharapkan mampu menekan penyelesaian perkara penyelesaian secara damai. Pada prinsipnya berdasarkan Penjelasan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 tahun 19 74 tentang Perkawinan tujuan perkawinan adalah untuk membentuk keluarga yang bahagia dan kekal. Penurunan tingkat perceraian perlu ditekan, maka dari itu sangat mendesak untuk mencari pilar-pilar mediasi dalam penyelesaian perkara perceraian. Untuk menemukan ide dalam menanggapi permasalahan tersebut digunakan tiga pendekatan: 1) Peraturan perundang undangan, yang berhubungan dengan penyelesaian perceraian melalui mediasi di pengadilan agama; Peraturan Mahkamah Agung No. 1 tahun 2016, Kitab Undang Undang Hukum Acara Perdata. 2) Pendekatan konseptual, dari pandangan para ahli / ulama digunakan untuk menemukan ide dengan membangun konsep dan argumen sesuai dengan masalah yang akan dikaji sehingga dapat ditemukan efektifitas dalam pelaksanaan mediasi 3) Filsafat, mempelajari literasi yang berkaitan dengan tema kajian untuk menangkap muatan filosofis dalam menemukan pilar-pilar mediasi dalam kajian hukum perdata Islam. Temuan dalam penelitian ini adalah pilar-pilar mediasi yang relevansinya dengan perselisihan perceraian yang harus dikemukakan adalah: 1) Inti Musyawarah, untuk mencapai kesepakatan. 2) Inti saling memaafkan, untuk mengakhiri perselisihan. 3) Esensi menghargai hak orang lain, menghindari sifat egoisme. 4) Esensi keadilan, memberikan kesempatan yang sama untuk saling berbicara, sehingga kedua belah pihak mendapatkan hak yang sama. Sedangkan efektifitas pelaksanaan mediasi dalam penyelesaian perceraian dapat dilakukan dengan memediasi: 1) Seputar pengasuhan dan pendidikan anak, 2) biaya hidup mantan istri, 3) jaminan pemeliharaan harta bersama pasca pemutusan hubungan perkawinan.

scholarly journals ASAS NON DISKRIMINASI DALAM CONTEMPT OF COURT

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 210
Author(s):  
Nur Kholis
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Code ◽  
Legal Issue ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Law System ◽  
Legal Subject ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Legal Subjects

This research raises the title of non discrimination principle in contempt of Court with legal issue (1). Non-discrimination Principles as the basis for the application of Contempt of Court criminal acts and (2). Formulation of sanction of Contempt of Court crime by using method (1). Normative research type, (2). Approach problems that include (a). Conceptual approach, (b). Legal Approach, (c). Case approach and (d). Comparative approach. The result of this dissertation research in the form of Contempt of court is an insulting behavior, disobedient to the order of the court institution (harassment) which has been included in the criminal law realm. Contempt of court derived from common law system, not derived from countries that the legal system embraces Civil law system including the State of Indonesia. While in Indonesia first knew Contempt of Court on the enactment of Law No. 14 of 1985 on the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. The Criminal Code (KUHP) does not regulate the crime of Contempt of court, but only acts or criminal acts in the Criminal Code are categorized into the realm of criminal acts Contempt of court, so that the Judge (court) is only a legal object of action criminal Contempt of court. The Non-Discrimination Principle can be applied to the crime of Contempt of Court because all legal subjects must be equal before the law, so that the application of the principle of Non-Discrimination judges will be the subject of law, so there is a shift in the concept of being a legal subject because it is based on the principle of Non Discrimination. The norm as a Contempt of court arrangement is stated as "everyone ...".

scholarly journals IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF ULTRA PETITUM PARTIUM IN DECIDING CHILDREN LIVELIHOOD IN DIVORCE LAWSUIT IN RELIGIOUS COURTS

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hotnidah Nasution
Keyword(s):  
Child Protection ◽  
Child Support ◽  
The South ◽  
Basic Principles ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
The Law ◽  
Religious Courts

This study analyzes 64 decisions of the South Jakarta Religious Courts, issued in 2011-2013, to see how ultra petitum partium principle is used to settle a child support claim in a divorce case. Child protection lawsuit is a legal solution given by the law to force fathers to carry out their obligations to fulfil their children's livelihood. In the Religious Courts, the case can be done simultaneously with a divorce case or done separately. In this study, the author argues that in deciding children’s livelihood claims, judges in the Religious Courts, besides having to comply with the applicable procedural law, should also follow basic principles applied in the General Court.  This is based on article 54 of Law No. 7 of 1989 (amended by Law No. 3 of 2006 and Law No. 50 of 2009). One of the principles is ultra petitum partium, in which the judges are prohibited from deciding a matter that is not stated in the lawsuit or decide more than what is demanded. From 64 decisions, 60 of them applied the ultra petitum partium principle. In this case, none of them decided to order the fathers to pay for children supports, even though the posita mentions that children were born during their marriage, and the children are with the mothers. 

The Song the South Korean Church and the North Korean Church Will Sing Together

2012 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 373-394
Author(s):  
이상일
Keyword(s):  
Korean Church ◽  
The South ◽  
South Korean ◽  
The North

A Comparative Analysis of Two Qualitative Methods: Deciding Between Grounded Theory and Phenomenology for Your Research

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-40
Author(s):  
Masoodi Marjan
Keyword(s):  
Grounded Theory ◽  
Data Analysis ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Historical Development ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Qualitative Approaches ◽  
Development Goals ◽  
Applied Approach ◽  
Similarities And Differences ◽  
Research Students

Abstract The purpose of this article is to compare two qualitative approaches that can be used in different researches: phenomenology and grounded theory. This overview is done to (1) summarize similarities and differences between these two approaches, with attention to their historical development, goals, methods, audience, and products (2) familiarize the researchers with the origins and details of these approaches in the way that they can make better matches between their research question(s) and the goals and products of the study (3) discuss a brief outline of each methodology along with their origin, essence and procedural steps undertaken (4) illustrate how the procedures of data analysis (coding), theoretical memoing and sampling are applied to systematically generate a grounded theory (5) briefly examine the major challenges for utilizing two approaches in grounded theory, the Glaserian and Straussian. As a conclusion, this overview reveals that it is essential to ensure that the method matches the research question being asked, helps the researchers determine the suitability of their applied approach and provides a continues training for the novice researchers, especially PhD or research students who lack solid knowledge and background experience in multiple research methods.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document