scholarly journals ANALISIS HUKUM E-LITIGASI JO. PERMA NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2019 TENTANG ADMINISTRASI PERKARA DAN PERSIDANGAN DI PENGADILAN SECARA ELEKTRONIK DIHUBUNGKAN DENGAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 7 TAHUN 1989 JO. UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 3 TAHUN 2006 JO. UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 50 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG PENGADILAN AGAMA

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 178
Author(s):  
Annisa Annisa
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
The Law ◽  
Religious Courts

 Penelitian ini memiliki tujuan untuk memaparkan berkenaan dengan analisi hukum e-litigasi. Persidangan dengan e-litigasi yang dasar hukumnya berupa PERMA Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 dianggap telah melampaui hukum acara yang termuat dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 jo. Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2006 jo. Undang-Undang Nomor 50 Tahun 2009 Tentang Pengadilan Agama. Pnelitian ini membahas kedudukan PERMA dalam hierarki perundang-undangan agar dapat diketahui posisi PERMA dan batasan PERMA dalam menyusun peraturannya.Kata kunci: e-litigasi, PERMA, Hukum This study aims to analyze the law of e-litigation. Trials with e-litigation, the legal basis of which is Supreme Court Regulations (PERMA) Number 1 of 2019, are considered to have exceeded the procedural law contained in Law Number 7 of 1989 jo. Law Number 3 of 2006 jo. Law Number 50 of 2009 concerning Religious Courts. This study discussed the position of PERMA in the hierarchy of legislation in order to find out the position of PERMA and the limitations of PERMA in formulating its regulations.Keywords: e-litigation, PERMA, Law

scholarly journals KEDUDUKAN HUKUM ISBAT NIKAH LUAR NEGERI

Asy-Syari ah ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramdani Wahyu Seruri
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Legal Position ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Work Abroad ◽  
Religious Courts

This paper is motivated by the number of Indonesian Workers (TKI) who work abroad to get married in Sirri, some of them occurred in Malaysia. Based on this background, the authors interested in explaining the legal position validation of marriage in outside the country. That is the legal basis for the implementation of validation of marriage outside the country, referring to the legislation, ranging from generalist like regulations of Law Number 48 Of 2009 about The Judicial Authorities of clause 60B and Law about Religious Courts, as well as the rule of lex specialist like Circular Supreme Court Number 10 Of 2010, appendix B SK Supreme Court Nomor 084/KMA/ SK/V/2011 on Permit Session Establishment Marriage (isbat nikah/validation of marriage) in The embassies of the Republic of Indonesia. procedures of case examination about validation of marriage in outside the country followed the procedural law applicable in the Religious Court, whereas KUA which the authorities listed about validation of marriage in outside the country is PPN (The Registrar of Marriage) located in The embassies of the Republic of Indonesia in each country.

scholarly journals MENGGALI ‘ILLAT HUKUM PERBEDAAN AGAMA SEBAGAI HALANGAN WARIS

EMPIRISMA ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Isna Wahyudi
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Reasoning ◽  
Legal Reason ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
Religious Courts

Kompilasi Hukum Islam does not regulate interfaith inheritance distinctly. It only requires the testator and the heirs have the same religion. At court, judges of religious courts employ obligatory bequest (waṣiat wājibah) to divide inheritance to non-Muslim heirs, based on jurisprudence of the Supreme Court Number 368 K/AG/1995. As the result, different faith still become hindrance for Muslim and non-Muslim to inherit each other due to law enforcement without considering the legal reasoning (ratio legis) of the law. In this case, it is important to investigate the legal reason (ratio legis) of the hadith that prohibits the interfaith inheritance as this article tries to do. To do the investigation, the author employs Islamic legal theories (uṣūl fikih) and hermeneutics approach. As the result, the author comes to the conclusion that the ratio legis of the hadith that prohibits the interfaith inheritance is due to hostility and crime element and not due to different faith. Keywords: Interfaith Inheritance, Ratio Legis, Equality

scholarly journals REVITALIZATION OF BADAN PENASIHATAN, PEMBINAAN DAN PELESTARIAN PERKAWINAN (BP4) IN PERFORMING COURT-ANNEXED MEDIATION FOR MARITAL DISPUTES IN RELIGIOUS COURT IN D.I.YOGYAKART

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 96
Author(s):  
Haniah Ilhami
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Institutional Transformation ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Institutional Form ◽  
National Conference ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Marital Disputes ◽  
Religious Courts

This research identify the revitalization of Badan Penasihatan, Pembinaan dan Pelestarian Perkawinan (BP4) after The 14th BP4 National Conference in 2009, in performing Court-annexed mediation for Marital Dispute at Religious Court in D.I. Yogyakarta. This  research founds several institutional transformation of BP4 including the Legal Basis, Institutional Form, Institutional Relation with Ministry of Religious Affair, Employement/Management Provisions, and Financial Provisions. In Performing Court-annexed mediation. BP4 in D.I. Yogyakarta has been cooperating with 2 (two) Religious Courts, both in Wonosari and Yogyakarta through Memorandum of Understanding in form of cooperation in the placement of certified mediator from BP4 and cooperation in funding the certified mediators. All Mediators are bound by Regulation of The Supreme Court No. 1 year 2016 concerning Procedures of Court-annexed Mediation, related to Types  of  Cases  Mediated,  Mediator’s  Fee,  Venue  of  Mediation,  Period  of  Mediation,  and Mediator’s requirement.

scholarly journals Women Dealing with The Law in Religious Courts

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Isna Wahyudi
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Gender Equality ◽  
Child Custody ◽  
Child Marriage ◽  
The Law ◽  
And Gender ◽  
Religious Courts ◽  
Joint Property

Religious Courts in Indonesia which have special jurisdiction to hear disputes among Muslims are directly involved with the issue of women dealing with the law. Most of the Indonesian women seeking justice in religious court. Hence, it is important to discuss the application of justice and gender equality perspective in religious courts involving women dealing with the law. Employing justice and gender equality perspective, the author discusses some crucial issues including divorce, female witness, child marriage, joint property, polygamy, child custody, child denial, and paternity. It argues that such discussion is important as guidance to judges of religious courts in applying Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) No. 3/2017 on Guidelines for Hearing the Case of Women Dealing with the Law. 

scholarly journals ANALISIS GENDER TERHADAP PERCERAIAN SUMPAH LI’AN DALAM PUTUSAN NOMOR 0918/Pdt.G.2019/PA.Bdw

Ijlil ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 308-322
Author(s):  
Angga Tiara Wardaningtias ◽  
Inayatul Anisah
Keyword(s):  
Islamic Law ◽  
Time Limit ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
State Position ◽  
The Law ◽  
Religious Courts

The consequence of divorce by li’an vows is the breakup of the lineage of the child with his father and the end of the marriage forever. Bondowoso Religious Court is one of the Religious Courts that decide divorce by another oath. The judge's consideration in deciding the oath of allegiance by the legal basis in the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), namely article 162. However, submitting a child denial application is not following article 102 of the Compilation of Islamic Law. Decision number 0918 / Pdt.G.2019 / PA.Bdw exceeds the time limit allowed to apply for child denial. The Judge of the Religious Court has not yet used Perma No. 03 of 2017 on Guidelines for Judging Women's Matters Facing the Law, as a guideline for judging women in a conference. So that the understanding of gender is still lacking and even do not agree with the concept of gender. What is meant by injustice here is when one type of gender is better in its state, position, and position.

EKONOMI SYARIAH DAN PENYELESAIANNYA DI PENGADILAN AGAMA

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 93
Author(s):  
Wildana Arsyad ◽  
Edi Gunawan
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Qualitative Method ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Education And Training ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
Settlement Of Disputes ◽  
Religious Courts ◽  
And Training

This study aims to provide information about procedure of dispute settlement of sharia economy in the Religious Courts. This research uses qualitative method with juridical approach. The dispute procedure of sharia economic in religious court runs in accordance with the mandate of the Law contained in article 49 to article 53 Act no. 7 years 1989, Law No. 3 year 2006, Law No. 50 of 2009 about Religious Courts. Sharia economic dispute is basically due to three things, namely because one of the parties to break the promise (wanprestasi), due to unlawful acts against the agreements agreed upon and because of coercive circumstances. Settlement of disputes is held with the aim of enforcing the law which contains the value of legal justice, the value of legal certainty, and the value of legal benefit. The settlement of the sharia economic dispute in the Religious Courts is very new, so the Supreme Court up to now still conducts education and training of sharia economic certification for all Religious Court judges.Penelitian ini  bertujuan   untuk memberikan informasi mengenai prosedur penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah di Pengadilan Agama. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan yuridis Prosedur penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah di pengadilan agama berjalan sesuai dengan amanat Undang-Undang yang tertera dalam pasal 49 sampai pasal 53 Undang-Undang No. 7 tahun 1989 jo. Undang-Undang No. 3 tahun 2006 jo.Undang-Undang No.50 tahun 2009 tentang Peradilan Agama.Sengketa ekonomi syariah pada dasarnya disebabkan karena tiga hal, yaitu karena salah satu pihak melakukan ingkar janji (wanprestasi), karena perbuatan melawan hukum terhadap perjanjian yang disepakati dan karena keadaan memaksa. Penyelesaian sengketa diadakan dengan tujuan untuk menegakan hukum yang di dalamnya mengandung nilai keadilan hukum, nilai kepastian hukum, dan nilai kemanfaatan hukum.Penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah di Pengadilan Agama merupakan hal yang sangat baru, sehingga Mahkamah Agung sampai saat ini masih melaksanakan pendidikan dan latihan sertifikasi ekonomi syariah bagi seluruh hakim Pengadilan Agama.

scholarly journals PROBABILITAS MEKANISME SMALL CLAIM COURT DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA WARIS DI PENGADILAN AGAMA / PROBABILITY OF SMALL CLAIM COURT MECHANISM IN RESOLVING INHERITANCE DISPUTES IN RELIGIOUS COURT

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 387
Author(s):  
Adi Nur Rohman ◽  
Sugeng Sugeng
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Bright Spot ◽  
Analysis Tool ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Small Claim ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Religious Courts

Hukum acara formil yang berlaku di Pengadilan Agama dalam menyelesaikan sengketa waris relatif memakan waktu yang cukup lama. Hal ini mengakibatkan waktu serta biaya yang dikeluarkan menjadi lebih besar. Mekanisme small claim court yang diatur oleh Mahkamah Agung melalui PERMA No. 2 tahun 2015 tentang tata cara penyelesaian sengketa sederhana dalam sistem peradilan umum menjadi titik terang. Konsep small claim court tersebut diharapkan dapat diaplikasikan dalam sistem peradilan agama sehingga mampu memangkas waktu yang lama dalam penyelesaian sengketa waris di Pengadilan Agama. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menawarkan terobosan baru dalam sistem peradilan agama di Indonesia khususnya terkait penyelesaian sengketa waris. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual dengan menggunakan studi kepustakaan sebagai alat analisis bahan hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penyelesaian sengketa waris di Pengadilan Agama dengan konsep small claim court dipandang mungkin untuk diimplementasikan sebagai bagian dari pembaharuan hukum acara peradilan agama. Namun demikian, hal itu perlu diiringi dengan pengklasifikasian perkara waris ke dalam perkara besar dan kecil dilihat dari nilai harta warisan yang disengketakan. Oleh karenanya, perluasan pengaturan mekanisme small claim court ke dalam sistem peradilan agama menjadi penting guna memangkas mekanisme penyelesaian perkara yang terlalu lama.The formal procedural law that applies in the Religious Courts in resolving inheritance disputes takes a relatively long time. This results in greater time and costs. The small claim court mechanism regulated by the Supreme Court through Supreme Court Regulation No. 2 of 2015 concerning the procedure for resolving simple disputes in the general justice system to become a bright spot. The concept of small claim court is expected to be applied in the religious justice system so that it can cut down the long time in resolving inheritance disputes in the Religious Courts. This study aims to offer a new breakthrough in the system of religious justice in Indonesia, especially in relation to the resolving of inheritance disputes. This research is a normative juridical research with a law and conceptual approach by using literature study as a legal material analysis tool. The results showed that the resolving of dispute of inheritance in the Religious Court with the small claim court concept was considered possible to be implemented as part of the renewal of the religious court procedural law. However, this needs to be accompanied by the classification of inheritance cases into large and small cases seen from the value of the disputed inheritance. Therefore, the expansion of the small claim court mechanism into the religious justice system is deemed necessary in order to reduce the mechanism for resolving cases that are too long.

scholarly journals Limitation of Application of Sharia Principles in Sharia Economic Dispute Resolution in Religious Courts

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 24
Author(s):  
Zaidah Nur Rosidah
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Religious Courts ◽  
And Training

This paper aims to find the basis for the philosophical rationality of applying sharia principles in resolving sharia economic disputes in religious courts as well as the prerequisites required by religious court judges to apply sharia principles in resolving sharia economic disputes. The type of research used is normative legal research to find philosophical rationality and the institutionalization of sharia principles in resolving sharia economic disputes. The approach used is a conceptual approach. Secondary data were collected through literature study. The research results obtained first, the philosophical rationality of the application of sharia principles in sharia economic dispute resolution in line with the first and third principles of Pancasila. Second, the institutionalization of sharia principles becomes effective if there are prerequisites that must be met, firstly enough information for judges to understand sharia principles, secondly the obstacles that come from the judges themselves who are still oriented towards the flow of legism / positivism will have an effect on providing legal basis and third the speed of instilling the institutionalization of sharia principles can be done through education and training organized by the Supreme Court for Religious Court judges.

scholarly journals Kesaksian Non Muslim dalam Perkara Perceraian menurut Pendapat Hakim di Pengadilan Agama Bandung

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 87
Author(s):  
Ahmad Nabil Atoilah ◽  
Bayu Alif Ahmad Yasin
Keyword(s):  
Islamic Law ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
The Law ◽  
Religious Courts

Islamic law one of the requirements to be a witness is Islam, but the Procedural Law of Religious Courts does not regulate the Islam of a witness. Terms of Islam are getting responses from various parties, especially the judges. The judge has his own opinion about the witness who must be Muslim, and that is different as formulated by the scholars. The issue of non-Muslim testimony in the case of divorce of judge opinion on the testimony of non-Muslims so that their testimony is accepted and declared valid as Islamic law which refers to Law no. 7 since 1989, since the enactment of the Law, the Procedural Law of Religious Courts is allowed to apply the procedural law applicable in the General Courts as the Law of the Program, namely HIR and R.Bg.

scholarly journals Legalitas Sumpah Pocong Sebagai Alat Bukti di Pengadilan Agama

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Rifqi Kurnia Wazzan
Keyword(s):  
Primary Source ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Direct Impact ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Journal Articles ◽  
Applicable Law ◽  
Dead Person ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Descriptive Approach ◽  
Religious Courts

<p>Pocong Oath (an oath carried out by someone in a state of being wrapped in a shroud like a dead person) is one of the community traditions to decide a case. The community believes that pocong oath has a direct impact on those who say it. Even so, this tradition becomes problematic if it is faced to the applicable law. In the provisions of the procedural law, there is no explanation that pocong oath is included as one of the evidences. This article seeks to describe the views of religious court judges on the legality of pocong oath as evidence at the trial along with its legal basis. This article comes from juridical sociology research with a phenomenological descriptive approach. The primary source of research is taken from the results of interviews to religious court judges. While large secondary data are from journal articles and books related to this research. The results of this study indicate that pocong oath is not part of the procedural law of religious courts. Nevertheless, through extensive interpretation and application of the procedural principles of the religious court, substantially pocong oath can be accepted as the decisive oath that has the power of <em>litis decissoir</em>.</p>Sumpah pocong adalah salah satu tradisi masyarakat untuk memutus suatu perkara. Masyarakat meyakini sumpah pocong membawa dampak langsung terhadap para pihak yang mengucapkannya. Meskipun demikian, tradisi ini menjadi bermasalah jika dihadapkan dengan hukum yang berlaku. Dalam ketentuan hukum acara, tidak ada penjelasan bahwa sumpah pocong termasuk dalam salah satu alat bukti. Artikel ini berupaya mendeskripsikan pandangan hakim pengadilan agama terhadap legalitas sumpah pocong sebagai alat bukti di persidangan beserta dasar hukumnya. Artikel ini berasal dari penelitian yuridis sosiologi dengan pendekatan deskriptif fenomenologis. Sumber primer penelitian diambil dari hasil wawancara dengan hakim pengadilan agama. Sedangkan data sekunder besar dari artikel jurnal dan buku yang berkaitan dengan penelitian ini. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa sumpah pocong bukan bagian dari hukum acara peradilan agama. Meskipun demikian, melalui penafsiran ekstensif dan penerapan asas-asas hukum acara peradilan agama, secara substansial sumpah pocong dapat diterima sebagai sumpah pemutus yang memiliki kekuatan <em>litis decissoir</em>.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document