scholarly journals KAJIAN RUANG PUBLIK KOTA ANTARA AKTIVITAS DAN KETERBATASAN

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 80
Author(s):  
Dedi Hantono ◽  
Yuanita F D Sidabutar ◽  
Ully I M Hanafiah

Ruang esensinya adalah tempat manusia hidup dan beraktivitas. Namun tidak semua aktivitas dapat terakomodir karena setiap ruang dibatasi dengan fungsinya masing-masing. Bagi ruang pribadi keterbatasan ruang tersebut merupakan karakteristik utama bagi ruang itu sendiri sedangkan pada ruang publik yang memiliki berbagai macam aktivitas harus dapat menampung berbagai aktivitas di dalamnya. Untuk itulah perlu dilakukan kajian mengenai ruang publik terhadap permasalahan keterbatasan ruang yang sering ditemui. Tulisan ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan melakukan pendekatan kajian literatur. Ada beberapa literatur yang diambil dari beberapa ahli serta beberapa hasil penelitian dalam artikel jurnal untuk mendukung teori dan melihat kenyataan di lapangan. Pada akhir tulisan diambil suatu kesimpulan bahwa keterbatasan ruang publik terhadap berbagai macam aktivitas yang berlangsung di dalamnya dengan terbentuknya ruang bersama baik secara permanen maupun bergantian (waktu tertentu).Kata-kata Kunci: arsitektur, ruang publik, aktivitas, ruang bersamaURBAN PUBLIC SPACE STUDIES BETWEEN ACTIVITIES AND LIMITATIONSThe essence of space is a place where humans live and doing their activities. But not all activities can be accommodated because space is limited by their functions. For private space, space limitations are the main characteristics for space itself, while in public spaces that have various kinds of activities must be able to accommodate multiple activities in it. For this reason, a study of public space needs to be done on the problems of space limitations that are often encountered. This paper uses qualitative methods by conducting a literature review approach. There is some literature taken from several experts and several research results in the journal for support the theory and see the reality in the field. At the end of the writing, it was concluded that the limitations of the public space for various kinds of activities take place in it with the formation of shared spaces both permanently and alternately (certain times).Keywords: architecture, public space, activity, share spaceREFERENCESAgustapraja, H. R. (2018). Studi Pemetaan Perilaku (Behavioral Mapping) Pejalan Kaki Pada Pedesterian Alun-Alun Kota Lamongan. Civilla, 3(1), 134–139. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30736/cvl.v3i1.220Athanassiou, E. (2017). The Hybrid Landscape Of Public Space In Thessaloniki In The Context Of Crisis. Landscape Research, 42(7), 782–794. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2017.1372399Carr, J., & Dionisio, M. R. (2017). Flexible Spaces as a Third Way Forward for Planning Urban Shared Spaces. In Cities (pp. 73–82). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.06.009Carr, S., Francis, M., Rivlin, L. G., & Stone, A. M. (1992). Public Space. New York: Cambridge University Press.Farida, N. (2013). Effect of Outdoor Shared Spaces on Social Interraction in a Housing Estate in Algeria. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 2, 457–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2013.09.002Hakim, R., & Utomo, H. (2003). Komponen Perancangan Arsitektur Lansekap: Prinsip-Unsur dan Aplikasi Desain. Jakarta: Penerbit Bumi Aksara.Hanafiah, U. I. M., & Asharsinyo, D. F. (2017). Redefenisi Ruang Publik Pada Kampung Kreatif Pasundan. Studi Kasus: Koridor Tepian Sungai Cikapundung, RT 02 RW 04, Kelurahan Balonggede, Kecamatan Regol, Kota Bandung, Jawa Barat. Idealog, 2(2), 124–137. https://doi.org/10.25124/idealog.v2i2.1220Hantono, D. (2017). Pengaruh Ruang Publik Terhadap Kualitas Visual Jalan Kali Besar Jakarta. Arsitektura, 15(2), 532–540. https://doi.org/10.20961/arst.v15i2.15114Krier, R. (1979). Urban Space. New York: Rizzoli.Liem, Y., & Lake, R. C. (2018). Pemaknaan Ruang Terbuka Publik Taman Nostalgia Kota Kupang. Arteks, 2(2), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.30822/artk.v2i2.150Mulyandari, H. (2011). Pengantar Arsitektur Kota. (Oktaviani HS, Ed.) (1st ed.). Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.Murtini, T. W., & Wahyuningrum, S. H. (2017). Penggunaan Ruas Jalan Sebagai Pasar Tradisional Di Gang Baru Pecinan, Semarang. Modul, 17(1), 17–21. Retrieved from https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/modul/article/view/17246/12396Olesen, M., & Lassen, C. (2012). Restricted Mobilities: Access to, and Activities in, Public and Private Spaces. International Planning Studies, 17(3), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2012.704755Rapoport, A. (1990). The Meaning of the Built Environment: A Nonverbal Communication Approach (1st ed.). Arizona: University of Arizona Press.Rochimah, E., & Asriningpuri, H. (2018). Adaptasi Perilaku Pedagang Bazar Dalam Teritori Ruang Dagang. Nalars, 17(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.24853/nalars.17.1.21-28Salomon-Ayeh, B. E., King, R. S., & Decardi-Nelson, I. (2011). Street Vending and The Use of Urban Public Space in Kumasi, Ghana. Surveyor, 4(1), 20–31. Retrieved from http://dspace.knust.edu.gh/bitstream/123456789/3423/1/Surveyor Journal 3.pdfSantoso, J. T., Mustikawati, T., Suryasari, N., & Titisari, E. Y. (2016). Pola Aktivitas Wisata Belanja dI Kampung Wisata Keramik Dinoyo, Malang. Tesa Arsitektur, 14(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.24167/tes.v14i1.560Simpson, P. (2011). Street Performance And The City: Public Space, Sociality, And Intervening In The Everyday. Space and Culture, XX(X), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331211412270Sudarisman, I. (2017). Kajian Pedagang Kaki Lima Di Taman Tegalega, Bandung, Jawa Barat. Arsir , 1(2), 161–174. Retrieved from http://jurnal.um-palembang.ac.id/arsir/article/view/867/769

2013 ◽  
Vol 409-410 ◽  
pp. 883-886
Author(s):  
Bo Xuan Zhao ◽  
Cong Ling Meng

City, is consisting of a series continuous or intermittent public space images, and every image for each of our people living in the city is varied: may be as awesome as forbidden city Meridian Gate, like Piazza San Marco as a cordial and pleasant space and might also be like Manhattan district of New York, which makes people excited and enthusiastic. To see why, people have different feelings because the public urban space ultimately belongs to democratic public space, people live and have emotions in it. In such domain, people can not only be liberated, free to enjoy the pleasures of urban public space, but also enjoy urban life which is brought by the city's charm through highlighting the vitality of the city with humanism atmosphere. To a conclusion, no matter how ordinary the city is, a good image of urban space can also bring people pleasure.


2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 491-502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasmine B. Ulmer

In this article, the street is both a place of travel and a space for critical discourse. As tensions between public and private spaces play out in the streets, street artists claim visible space through multiple forms of art. Through a critical performance geography and a qualitative inquiry of the street, I photograph the movement of art across walls, doorways, windows, sidewalks, lampposts, alleyways, gutters, and dumpsters over a 7-month period in the Eastern Market neighborhood of Detroit ( N = 806). After describing street art as a fluid genre that has developed into a diverse spectrum of post-graffiti, I explore how street art contributes to a changing visual terrain through discussions of racism, decolonization, gentrification, and the role of art in spatial justice. Photographic cartography is introduced as (a) a visual method of performance geography that illustrates material-discursive “fault lines” and (b) a critical means of analyzing conversations in contested public space. Significantly, street artists simultaneously work within and against urban renewal policies in “creative cities” such as Detroit. Given that the arts are at the center of sophisticated visual discourse regarding neoliberalism, democracy, and the battle over public space, researchers might continue to examine how street artists inscribe social justice in, on, and around the streets.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Etoile Catherine Stewart

Public space is planned space. The discourse that takes place among federal, municipal and local governments, as well as the interaction that takes place on the street between people, informs the agenda and values inherent in policy and social norms. Urban revitalization strategies and city bylaws produce public and private spaces, thereby informing the cityscape within which everyone interacts. This study examines the contribution, circulation and regulation of transgressive actions in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, in order to consider what these actions reveal about power relations in the urban environment and the production of public space. This research uses both a policy case study and urban theory to investigate the means by which public and private spaces are produced and imbued with the ideologies that shape and maintain these spaces in Winnipeg's downtown area.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Etoile Catherine Stewart

Public space is planned space. The discourse that takes place among federal, municipal and local governments, as well as the interaction that takes place on the street between people, informs the agenda and values inherent in policy and social norms. Urban revitalization strategies and city bylaws produce public and private spaces, thereby informing the cityscape within which everyone interacts. This study examines the contribution, circulation and regulation of transgressive actions in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, in order to consider what these actions reveal about power relations in the urban environment and the production of public space. This research uses both a policy case study and urban theory to investigate the means by which public and private spaces are produced and imbued with the ideologies that shape and maintain these spaces in Winnipeg's downtown area.


Author(s):  
Myka Tucker-Abramson

Novel Shocks argues that the political and cultural origins of neoliberalism lie in the battles over suburban and urban space in the 1950s and early 1960s. At the end of World War II, Harry Truman’s administration launched a national program of urban renewal that sought to create a new and distinctly American modernity, which would underpin US global hegemony. The program’s effects in Manhattan were particularly notable: throughout the 1950s and 1960s, New York bulldozed vast areas of land deemed “slums” or “blighted” to make way for freeways, public and private housing projects, medical centers, skyscrapers, and even the new United Nations headquarters. Taken together, these processes dramatically transformed New York’s metropolitan region, creating the segregated landscape of prosperous white suburbs and poor black cities, and with it new cultural forms and subjectivities. Throughout the 1950s and early 1960s, novelists such as Ralph Ellison, Patricia Highsmith, Ayn Rand, William Burroughs, Sylvia Plath, and Warren Miller all depicted and responded to these new urban spaces as forms of traumatic “shock” that required new aesthetic forms and political structures. These novels rejected older shock-based modernisms such as Surrealism and naturalism and, like the urbanization projects they depicted, forged a new kind of modernism, one that transformed shock from a traumatic and disruptive effect of urban modernity into a therapeutic force that helps strengthen and shape a more flexible, self-reliant, and resilient subject that would nourish the roots of neoliberalism.


2021 ◽  
pp. 2057150X2110273
Author(s):  
Alin Li

This article discusses the meaning of public space and the problem of public reconstruction by means of sociological intervention through an experimental study of community formation and courtyard space rearrangement in the old neighborhood of Dashilar in Beijing. In the West, scholars regard public space as part of public life with political or social significance. In the courtyards of Dashilar, however, residents understand public space as important as a shared property of neighboring families that is separate from public life, as they are often acquainted with but alienated from one another. To grasp this different understanding of public space, this article first looks into the historical transformation of property rights in Dashilar. The courtyards in Dashilar have clearly been defined as state-owned urban space since the 1980s but have remained neglected in administration. Therefore, residents gradually encroached upon these courtyards that were owned by the state and divided them for private use. As this act of encroaching was rooted in the relationship between the state and the individual, the courtyards were not merely changed into privatized properties with specific functions, but became places for interactions between various actors. To reveal the complexity of these courtyards as public spaces, we discuss the expansion of private space by individuals in their daily life and the “public disturbances” initiated by temporary coalitions in space construction. This complexity of courtyards as public spaces can be well illustrated by two experiments of space rearrangement conducted in Dashilar. Both experiments introduced strong social interventions into space rearrangement: one attempted to rebuild social life in a courtyard, and the other worked on the public and private boundaries in a courtyard. The former experiment ended in failure while the latter was a success. The results of these two experiments tell us that public reconstruction is not just about rebuilding social interactions between people, but also about adjusting the state–individual relationship and establishing the rules of living together in public space.


2020 ◽  
pp. 339-352
Author(s):  
Oscar Rodrigo Perilla

As epitomized by the famous rivalry between Jane Jacobs and Robert Moses in the '60s New York, city planning and the understanding of public space has mainly oscillated between two opposing poles: the tidy and organized city planned with a top-down approach by architects using geometry to shape it, on one hand; and the messy and disorganized city, shaped with a bottom-up spirit, lacking planning, and allowing the traces of its inhabitants to take place, on the other. This article makes an analysis of the origin and nature of that opposition, putting in context different endeavors undertaken to tear it down. Going back to its Greek origin in the opposition between technē and mousikē, passing through Kant's concepts of the beautiful and the sublime, Nietzsche's opposition between the Apollonian and the Dionysian and ending up in Wölfflin's fundamental opposition between the Renaissance and the Baroque, it maps out this oscillating trend in history that favors the organized opposite full of rules in some periods, and the romantic one full of freedom in others, to provide a framework to explore endeavors that challenge those extremes in an attempt to take advantage of the benefits of both, as in 18th century picturesque, John Habraken's approach and Stan Allen's concept of infrastructural urbanism. Within this framework, it examines projects where we explore at Pontifical Xavierian University, innovative approaches to urban and public space design that empower inhabitants to shape their own city (bottom-up), whilst maintaining a sense of order and composition through designed structures (top-down) that challenge Leon Battista Alberti's foundational criterion of architectural beauty: you can neither add nor subtract any element without destroying the harmony achieved.


2019 ◽  
pp. 88-92
Author(s):  
I. I. Maslikova

The article explores changes in the organization and functioning of public space in cities in the context of sociocultural dynamics – from antiq- uity to modernшен. The sociocultural features of open urban space in ancient Greece and Rome, Renaissance Italy, modern Europe, the USA, Latin America, Ukraine are clarified. The experience of the functioning and management of public space is analyzed on specific examples of world- famous urban squares – Antique agora, roman forum, piazza del Campo in Siena, piazza della Signoria in Florence, piazza San Marco in Venice, Union Square in New York, Latin American squares, Bibikovsky boulevard and University park in old Kyiv, "Maydan" – Independence Square in contemporary Kyiv. Particular attention is being given to transformations of ceremonial, religious, recreational, economic, political, aesthetic and moral functions of open public space. Urban squares are places for official celebrations and religious rituals. They serves as a place of a rest, reali- zation of creative ideas and are a conductor of public communication. Public spaces create opportunities for trade, affect the formation and reten- tion of real estate prices, and are a means of attracting investment and business development in them and adjacent territories. All these provide opportunities for uniting citizens for joint projects and activities, political protests or symbolization of power. It is noted that the cultural value of the modern square is manifested in architectural forms, aesthetics of recreational areas and historical monuments, and is associated with its ability to be a place for the proclamation and implementation of high moral ideals of order, equality, solidarity, freedom, independence, human dignity, the value of moral rights and civic virtues. From the time of antiquity to the present day, the central squares of cities, as a public space, reproduce the aesthetics of the city and become a symbol of spiritual and political power, since temples, municipalities, financial and commercial institutions, theaters, and restaurants are often concentrated in such spaces.


2021 ◽  
pp. 200-234
Author(s):  
Benjamin Holtzman

In 1980s New York City, residents and officials grappled with the extraordinary growth of people experiencing homelessness residing in public spaces. Public homelessness emerged at a time of rising value of public spaces, which finally began to receive infusions of public and private capital after years of neglect—a development homeless bodies seemed to threaten. The city’s seeming inability to stem public homelessness led private sector actors and the quasi-public officials who oversaw the subways and major Manhattan transportation centers where the homeless resided in the greatest numbers to implement more punitive policies as a solution to public homelessness. Buttressed by new legal measures that expanded private sector governance over public space, these tactics ultimately influenced officials’ adoption of similarly aggressive measures toward public homelessness to protect the enhanced value of public space.


2013 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret Kohn

This article examines the legal and normative debates about the Occupy Toronto movement in order to illuminate the issues raised by Occupy Wall Street. It challenges the view that the occupation of parks and plazas was an illegitimate privatization of public space. In both New York City and Toronto, the courts relied on a theory that Habermas called “German Hobbesianism.” This sovereigntist theory of the public was used to justify removing the protesters and disbanding the encampments. The alternative is what I call the populist model of the public, a term which describes the political mobilization of the people outside the institutional structures of the state. While my focus is on public space, I suggest the appropriation of space was the most visible aspect of a broader call for collective control of the common wealth of society. In other words, we should understand the occupations synecdochally as struggles over the meaning and power of public and private.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document