scholarly journals Level Berpikir Pertanyaan Guru pada Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-119
Author(s):  
Andi Rurisfiani ◽  
Ramly Ramly ◽  
Sultan Sultan

Analisis Pertanyaan Guru dengan Kerangka LOTS (Lower Order Thinking Skills) dan HOTS (Highter Order Thinking Skills) pada Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia di SMKN 3 Soppeng. Penelitian ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan wujud pertanyaan LOTS dan HOTS guru pada awal, tengah, dan akhir pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia di SMK Negeri 3 Soppeng dengan menggunakan panduan Taksonomi Bloom Revisi Anderson & Krathwohl. Analisis dalam penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif kuantitatif. Teknik yang digunakan dalam pengumpulan data adalah teknik rekam dan teknik catat. Teknik yang digunakan untuk menganalisis data dalam penelitian ini adalah statistik deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pada awal dan akhir pembelajaran terdapat 100% pertanyaan tingkat rendah (LOTS). Pada inti pembelajaran sebanyak 89.72% pertanyaan tingkat rendah dan sebanyak 10.28% pertanyaan yang termasuk kategori pertanyaan tingkat tinggi (HOTS).

Author(s):  
Intan Permata Sari And Indra Hartoyo

This study is aimed at (1) analyzing reading exercises based Bloom’s taxonomy for VIII grade in English on Sky textbook. (2) Found the distribution of the lower and higher order thinking skill in reading exercises. (3) To reason for level reading exercises. After analyzed the data, the result of the data analysis also infers that the six levels of Bloom’s taxonomy in reading exercises weren’t applied totally. The creating skill doesn’t have distribution in reading exercise, and the understanding – remembering level more dominant than another levels. The distribution of the higher order thinking level was lower than the lower order thinking level and the six levels are not appropriate with the proportion for each level of education based Bloom’s taxonomy, such as the distribution of the creating level in the reading exercise must be a concern because no question that belong to the creating level. It was concluded that reading exercises in English on Sky textbook cannot improve students' critical thinking skills for VIII grade.


Author(s):  
J. K. Stringer ◽  
Sally A. Santen ◽  
Eun Lee ◽  
Meagan Rawls ◽  
Jean Bailey ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Analytic thinking skills are important to the development of physicians. Therefore, educators and licensing boards utilize multiple-choice questions (MCQs) to assess these knowledge and skills. MCQs are written under two assumptions: that they can be written as higher or lower order according to Bloom’s taxonomy, and students will perceive questions to be the same taxonomical level as intended. This study seeks to understand the students’ approach to questions by analyzing differences in students’ perception of the Bloom’s level of MCQs in relation to their knowledge and confidence. Methods A total of 137 students responded to practice endocrine MCQs. Participants indicated the answer to the question, their interpretation of it as higher or lower order, and the degree of confidence in their response to the question. Results Although there was no significant association between students’ average performance on the content and their question classification (higher or lower), individual students who were less confident in their answer were more than five times as likely (OR = 5.49) to identify a question as higher order than their more confident peers. Students who responded incorrectly to the MCQ were 4 times as likely to identify a question as higher order than their peers who responded correctly. Conclusions The results suggest that higher performing, more confident students rely on identifying patterns (even if the question was intended to be higher order). In contrast, less confident students engage in higher-order, analytic thinking even if the question is intended to be lower order. Better understanding of the processes through which students interpret MCQs will help us to better understand the development of clinical reasoning skills.


2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-34
Author(s):  
Raymond Godwin ◽  
Fanny Chairunnisa ◽  
Rani Agias Fitri

Hoaxes have become a common phenomenon in Indonesia. The Indonesian Telematics Society Survey shows that even though Indonesian people understand the way in recognizing hoaxes, they Indonesia are not sure of being able to immediately recognize hoaxes. Based on previous studies, there are two reasons that lead to lack of the assuredness, namely, the idleness in using thinking skills and ignorance of hoax indicators in the news they read. This study aims to find the correlation between avoidance behavior toward information that can indicate hoax, critical skill, and individual perception of easiness in obtaining the information regarding hoaxes. Information Avoidance Scale and the Critical Skill dimensions of the Digital Literacy Scale were adapted to Bahasa Indonesia to measure the tendency of information avoidance and critical skills. Whereas an instrument to measure the perception of the easiness to obtain information was constructed independently. The results indicate that critical skills and perceptions of the easiness to obtain information have a negative correlation with the tendency to avoid information. However, because the correlation is poor, critical skills and perceptions of the easiness to obtain information do not adequately explain a person's tendency to avoid information that can help him to recognize hoaxes. 


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 57
Author(s):  
Teguh Rachmatuloh Effendi ◽  
Suhendar Suhendar ◽  
AA Juhanda
Keyword(s):  

<p align="center">Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kemunculan jenis pertanyaan yang diajukan mahasiswa magang di SMA Kota Sukabumi berdasarkan taksonomi bloom revisi pada konsep pencemaran lingungan. Objek penelitian adalah tigaorang calon guru biologi yang mengajar di sejumlah SMA Kota Sukabumi Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa persentase jenis pertanyaan yang diajukan mahasiswa magang atau dari tiga calon guru rata-rata menggunakan pertanyaan tingkat rendah (<em>Lower-Order Thinking Skills</em>) yaitu pada mahasiswa magang ke satu pada aspek kognitif C1 faktual 16,66% dan C1 konseptual 16,66%, sedangkan aspek kognitif C2 konseptual 50%, dan aspek kognitif C3 prosedural 16,66%. Pada hasil persentase jenis pertanyaan mahasisswa magang ke dua pada aspek kognitif C1 dan aspek pengetahuan faktual 28,57%, C1 konseptual 14,28%, dan C2 faktual 14,28%, C2 konseptual 42,85%, kemudian persentase pertanyaan tingkat tinggi pada aspek kognitif C6 dan aspek pengetahuan konseptual 14,28%. Lalu pada hasil persentase mahasiswa ke tiga menunjukan aspek kognitif C1 faktual 42,85%,C1 konseptual 14,28%. Aspek kognitif C2 konseptual 14,28%, sedangkan aspek kognitif C5 prosedural 14,28%. Rata-rata persentase kemunculan jenis pertanyaan yang diajukan mahasiswa magang masih tergolong menggunakan pertanyaan tingkat rendah yaitu dari C1sampai C3 meskipun dari hasil penelitian menunjukan ada kemunculan meggunakan pertanyaan tingkat tinggi.</p><p><strong><em> </em></strong></p><p><strong><em>Kata Kunci:</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong>Jenis Pertanyaan, Mahasiswa Magang, Taksonomi Bloom Revisi</p>


2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 467-483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgios Tsaparlis

This work analyses students’ failure in the 2019 Nationwide Chemistry Examination in Greece, which concerns secondary education graduates, competing for admission to higher education Greek institutions. The distinction of thinking skills into higher and lower order (HOTS and LOTS) is used as a theoretical tool for this analysis. The examination included several questions that contained HOTS elements that had been unusual in previous examinations. This led to a decrease in overall student performance but better discrimination between outstanding and good students. Based on two samples of examination papers, corresponding to very similar subsets of the student population, the 2018 and 2019 examinations are compared, and the individual 2019 questions are evaluated. It was found that section B of the 2019 examination paper (which included contexts unfamiliar to the students, and for which, a large effect size between 2018 and 2019 was calculated) may have caused the large drop. An important link is established between the 2019 low performance and the HOTS and LOTS features of the questions, and the role or non-role of algorithmic calculations is examined. In addition, the critical opinions of chemistry teachers are provided, with a consensus emerging in favour of connecting chemistry with everyday life. Keywords: chemistry examinations, higher-order cognitive skills, higher-order thinking skills, student assessment, twelfth-grade chemistry.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-100
Author(s):  
Umi Salma Fauziyah

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui relevansi dari materi bahasa Indonesia pada buku tematik kelas 3 revisi 2018 dengan beberapa aspek yaitu ruang lingkup materi berdasarkan Permendikbud No 21 tahun 2016; HOTS (Higher Order Thinking Skills); 4Cs (creative thinking, critical thinking, communication, collaboration); literasi membaca-menulis; literasi digital. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah kualitatif dengan jenis analisis wacana pada materi bahasa Indonesia di buku tematik kelas 3 revisi 2018. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya relevansi antara materi bahasa Indonesia pada buku tematik kelas 3 revisi 2018 dengan aspek yang sudah disebutkan dengan hasil 46% materi sudah disajikan, keterampilan HOTS tidak imbang karena mayoritas critical thinking yaitu 66,7% dan decision making tidak ada, keterampilan 4Cs sudah merata meski critical thinking lebih banyak yaitu 40,5%, literasi membaca persentasenya 78,9% dan literasi menulis 21,1%, literasi digital dibahas pada satu bagian tersendiri yaitu pada tema 7 subtema 3 meskipun materinya masih tahap pengenalan. Secara keseluruhan materi bahasa Indonesia pada buku tematik kelas 3 sudah cukup relevan dengan aspek-aspek yang berkaitan meski ada yang masih kurang merata pada beberapa aspek.


2018 ◽  
Vol 76 (4) ◽  
pp. 483-498
Author(s):  
Soo Eun Chae ◽  
Mi-Suk Lee

Past research on higher-order thinking (HOT) was mainly conducted on the bases of educational context in U.S. or western countries. This research aimed to see what kinds of HOT styles actually appear in universtiy students in South Korea. The use of HOT skills were explored in Korean universtiy students and the factors influencing the classification were examined. 1,138 Korean university students were called to respond to Lee’s (2016) Higher-Order-Thinking-Scale for Korean University Students (HOTUS). Then, a latent profile analysis and the multinomial logistic analysis were conducted. The latent profile analysis revealed that the use of HOT skills could be classified into four classes (i.e., a lower-order thinking class, a creative-argumentative class, an analytical-caring class, and a higher-order thinking class). Gender, year, and instructional approach were the determinants of latent profile types. However, there were no differences when measured by academic fields. Students with lower years were likely to fall under lower-order thinking class. The probability that men was classified as a caring class was statistically significantly lower than that of women. Students who received lecturer-centered learning were more likely to fall under the analytical and caring class. Keywords: higher-order thinking skill, latent profile analysis, multinomial logistic analysis.


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 208
Author(s):  
Muhammad Erfan ◽  
Tursina Ratu

Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) are essential skills for prospective teachers in the 21st  century. HOTS in the cognitive domain includes the ability in analyzing (C4), evaluating (C5), and creating (C6). In the process of mastering HOTS, one must know first what level of thinking skills he/she has. Therefore, this study aims to measure the achievement of the cognitive thinking skills of students of the Physics Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education University of Samawa. The measurement used test instrument in the form of essay test, then the results of the thinking skills achievement for each cognitive domain of students divided into three categories (low, medium and high). The result of  the student’s achievement of the cognitive thinking skills  obtained by students were in low category of 55%, the medium category of 11%, and 34% in the high category for mastering lower-order thinking skills (LOTS), while for HOTS, 100% was in low category and it can be concluded that the achievement of students' cognitive thinking skills is still in lower-order thinking skills.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 4351-4360
Author(s):  
Reni Guswita

Tantangan pendidikan di era revolusi industri 4.0 yang bertepatan dengan masa Pandemi Covid 19 ini menuntut tersedianya sumber daya manusia yang menguasai ilmu pengetahuan, teknologi, dan seni (IPTEKS). Pembelajaran diberbagai tingkat pendidikan terpaksa harus menerapkan sistem daring. Salah satuupaya mendukung pembelajaran daring yaitu dengan mengembangkan buku ajar digital Bahasa Indonesia berbasis Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengoptimalkan proses dan tujuan pembelajaran dan menghasilkan buku ajar digital yang menunjang pembelajaran daring. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian Researchand Development dengan model 4-D. Keempat tahap itu adalah pendefinisian (define), perancangan (design), pengembangan (develop), dan penyebaran (disseminate). Target penelitian adalah menghasilkan buku ajar digital yang valid, praktis, dan efektif. Subjek penelitian ini, yaitu mahasiswa PGSD 1D Semester Ganjil. Instrumen penelitian yang digunakan, yaitu instrumen validitas produk, instrumen keperaktisan produk, dan instrumen keefektifan produk. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa 1) Buku ajar digital Bahasa Indonesia berbasis Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) dapat meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah mahasiswa dalam pembelajaran. 2) Buku ajar digital Bahasa Indonesia berbasis Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) valid dan layak digunakan. Hal ini ditunjukkan dengan hasil analisis validasi ahli materi pembelajaran, ahli media pembelajaran dan mahasiswa menunjukkan kategori sangat baik. 


2020 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. 183-193
Author(s):  
María Bobadilla-Pérez ◽  
Noelia Galán-Rodríguez

En las últimas décadas se han tomado muchas medidas para promocionar el plurilingüismo en Galicia. Una de las iniciativas más extendidas llevada a cabo en esta comunidad autónoma es la creación de las secciones bilingües y la red de instituciones educativas plurilingües desde 2010 en Educación Infantil, Educación Primaria y Secundaria. Como elemento unificador, estas secciones siguen la metodología AICLE (Aprendizaje Integrado de Contenidos y Lenguas Extranjeras): una materia no lingüística se enseña en una lengua extranjera. Sin embargo, la lengua de instrucción (L2) es la única utilizada en estas clases; la lengua materna (L1) está a veces presente en AICLE. A pesar de la idea equivocada de que utilizar la L1 en la clase de lengua extranjera sería contraproducente, estudios han demostrado que AICLE se puede beneficiar de una cierta coexistencia de ambas lenguas (Méndez García & Pavón Vázquez, 2012). Contraria a la idea de que el uso de la L1 se debe a un dominio pobre de la lengua, la aparición de ambas lenguas en el habla de los alumnos y del profesor AICLE apuntanun conocimiento más profundo de ambas lenguas. En nuestro debate sobre este tema, nos referiremos al concepto de ‘translanguaging’, que puede ser útil para entender el uso de diferentes lenguas en las secciones AICLE gallegas. Por lo tanto, este estudio trata de analizar el uso de la L1 (castellano-gallego) y la L2 como práctica de code-switching en un contexto educativo de secundaria AICLE. Dentro del marco teórico, se considerará la taxonomía de Bloom de HOTS (Higher Order Thinking Skills) y LOTS (Lower Order Thinking Skills) (Bloom, 1956) para evaluar el tipo de producciones orales y como el code-switching está influenciado por dichas habilidades de pensamiento.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document