scholarly journals CONVERSION OF VILLAGE DRUWE RIGHTS BECAME PROPRIETARY RIGHTS ACCORDING TO ARTICLE II PROVISIONS ON THE CONVERSION OF AGRARIAN LAWS (UUPA)

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nonik Latifah
Keyword(s):  
Property Rights ◽  
Spatial Planning ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Article 9 ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Joint Ownership ◽  
The Law ◽  
Agrarian Law ◽  
Ownership Rights ◽  
The Village

ABSTRACTBali Provincial Regulation Number 3 of 2001 which has been amended by Bali Provincial Regulation number 3 of 2003 concerning Desa Pakraman article 9 paragraph (5) explicitly states that land owned by Pakraman village of Bali cannot be certified in the personal name and Decree of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning / Head of National Land Agency Number 276 / Kep-19. 2 / X / 2017 concerning the appointment of Pakraman Village in the province of Bali as the subject of communal ownership rights designates the pakraman village as the subject of joint ownership rights. This brings polemic related to the existence of the village Druwe's land rights. Then the focus of this research is whether the conversion of Druwe Village Rights Into Property Rights According to Article II Provisions for Conversion of the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA) is in accordance with the law. How should the conversion of Druwe Desa rights to land rights according to the LoGA. as for the research methods used Normative law research (normative law research). The approach used. Statute Approach and Historical Approach. The results of this study are found. Conversion of Village Druwe Rights to Property Rights According to Article II, the Conversion Provisions for the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA) are not in accordance with the law, because the rights of village druwe with ownership rights do not have in common or similarities either with respect to the subject of the holder of his land rights or the authority of the holder of his right, so that conversions cannot be carried out. This is reinforced by article 9 paragraph (5) of the Regional Regulation of the Province of Bali Number 3 of 2001 which has been amended by the Regional Regulation of the Province of Bali number 3 of 2003 concerning Desa Pakraman regarding land owned by the village of pakraman in Bali cannot be certified in the personal name and the Decree of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs Spatial Planning / Head of National Land Agency Number 276 / Kep-19. 2 / X / 2017 concerning the appointment of Pakraman Village in the province of Bali as the subject of communal ownership rights.

scholarly journals PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERJANJIAN NOMINEE TENTANG PERALIHAN HAK MILIK ATAS TANAH KEPADA WARGA NEGARA ASING (WNA) DITINJAU DARI PASAL 26 AYAT (2) UUPA

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 122-138
Author(s):  
Ni Putu Tanjung Eka Wijayani
Keyword(s):  
Land Rights ◽  
The State ◽  
Foreign National ◽  
Land Title ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Law ◽  
One Year ◽  
The Right ◽  
Ownership Rights

The nominee agreement is an agreement made between a person who by law can not be the subject of a particular land title (in this case the Right or the Right to Build). In this case a foreign national with an Indonesian citizen, which is intended for foreigners to possess the land of ownership or the right to use the building (de facto), but legally (de jure) of the land concerned on behalf of the Indonesian citizen. In other words, Indonesian citizen borrowed its name by foreigners citizen (acting as nominee). The existence of the obscurity of the norm in Article 26 paragraph (2) concerning whether the legal act of a foreigner / foreigner in a notarial deed called a nominee deed is valid for one year and thereafter if not transferred shall fall to the state having the same meaning and intent with the provision of Article 21 paragraph (3). This is particularly important to be considered since Article 26 paragraph (2) implicitly prohibits that legal acts directly or indirectly intended to transfer land rights from Indonesian citizens to foreigners / foreigners are null and void because the law and land fall to the State . Because the phrase that states other acts intended to directly or indirectly transfer the ownership rights to a stranger in Article 26 paragraph (2) of the BAL raises various interpretations (interpretations) so that there arises doubts that lead to the escape of norms (vague van normen).

scholarly journals PENINGKATAN STATUS HAK GUNA BANGUNAN MENJADI HAK MILIK

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Atik Winanti ◽  
Taupiq Qurrahman ◽  
Rosalia Dika Agustanti
Keyword(s):  
Property Rights ◽  
Community Service ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Know How ◽  
The People ◽  
The Status ◽  
Housing Complex ◽  
The Right ◽  
Ownership Rights ◽  
The Village

Article 33 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution which reads Earth, water and natural resources in it are controlled by the State and used for the greatest prosperity of the people. This article is one of the foundations for the birth of a law on basic agrarian principles. In the UUPA, land rights include property rights, rights to build, right to cultivate, use rights and other rights.So far, people in Indonesia control land with the status of ownership rights and building use rights. The strongest and most fulfilled status of land a person has is only property rights. Meanwhile, the right to build only has a certain period. We chose a place of service in the village of Satria Jaya because in this village there is a housing complex, namely Perum Graha Prima which is intended for Civil Servants and Members of the Indonesian National Army who are certified Building Use Rights. Most of the residents in this housing do not know how to qualify and how to change their rights position. From building use rights to ownership rights.  So that giving understanding to the community about the importance of property rights and how to improve the position of land rights is a solution given to local communities. The implementation of community service activities is carried out virtually by using the Zoom application. Where the resource person delivered material about Property Rights, Building Use Rights and the process of increasing the status of land rights.ABSTRAK:Pasal 33 ayat (3) Undang-undang Dasar 1945 yang berbunyi Bumi, air dan kekayaan alam di dalamnya dikuasai oleh Negara dan dipergunakan untuk sebesar-besarnya kemakmuran rakyat. Pasal tersebut sebagai salah satu landasan lahirnya undang-undang tentang peraturan dasar pokok-pokok agraria (UUPA). Dalam UUPA hak-hak atas tanah meliputi hak milik, hak guna bangunan, hak guna usaha, hak pakai dan hak lainnya. Sejauh ini, masyarakat di Indonesia menguasai tanah dengan status hak milik dan hak guna bangunan. Status tanah yang terkuat dan terpenuh yang dimiliki seseorang hanyalah hak milik.  Sedangkan hak guna bangunan hanya mempunyai jangka waktu tertentu. Kami memilih tempat pengabdian di desa Satria Jaya karena di Desa ini terdapat Perumahan yaitu Perum Graha Prima yang diperuntukkan bagi PNS dan Anggota TNI yang bersertifikat Hak Guna Bangunan (HGB). Hampir sebagian besar penduduk di perumahan tersebut tidak mengetahui bagaimana persyaratan dan caranya untuk merubah status hak dari Hak Guna Bangunan menjadi Hak Milik. Sehingga pemberian pemahaman kepada masyarakat tentang pentingnya hak milik serta bagaimana peningkatan status hak katas tanah menjadi solusi yang diberikan kepada masyarakat setempat. Kegiatan pelaksanaan pengabdian dilakukan secara virtual dengan mempergunakan aplikasi Zoom. Dimana narasumber menyampaikan materi tentang Hak Milik, Hak Guna Bangunan dan proses peningkatan status hak atas tanah

scholarly journals PELAKSANAAN HAK WARIS ATAS TANAH BAGI SEORANG ANAK DARI PERKAWINAN CAMPURAN DENGAN PERJANJIAN KAWIN BERDASARKAN PERATURAN PERUNDANGAN DI INDONESIA

NOTARIUS ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 127
Author(s):  
Ulfia Wijaya ◽  
Fifiana Wisnaeni
Keyword(s):  
Property Rights ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Mixed Marriage ◽  
Dual Citizenship ◽  
Mixed Marriages ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Agrarian Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
Ownership Of Land

The implementation of inheritance rights for children born of mixed marriage with a prenuptial agreement can not be executed before they are 18 (eighteen) years old or already married and they have declared themselves to choose to become an Indonesian citizens. With regard to the ownership of land rights, the Agrarian Law (UUPA) explicitly provides that only Indonesian citizens can own property rights to land as defined in Article 21 paragraph (1). This means that what can be the subject of property rights is only Indonesian citizens. The transfer of ownership of land ownership in any way to children born of mixed marriage will cause any form of the transfer to become null and void. When dual-citizen children obtain an inheritance from one parent in the form of land with a proprietary title, their right to inheritance is certainly not wiped out. However, they must wait until 18 (eighteen) years old and choose to become an Indonesian citizen then they have the right according to the rules. Keywords: Mixed Marriages, Dual Citizenship, Children's Rights With Dual Citizenships Abstrak Pelaksanaan hak waris atas tanah bagi seorang anak yang lahir dari perkawinan campuran dengan perjanjian kawin tidak dapat dilaksanakan sebelum anak tersebut berusia 18 (delapan belas) tahun atau sudah menikah dan anak tersebut telah menyatakan diri untuk memilih menjadi warga negara Indonesia. Berkaitan dengan kepemilikan hak atas tanah, UUPA secara tegas mengatur bahwa hanya WNI yang dapat memiliki hak milik atas tanah sebagaimana ditegaskan dalam Pasal 21 ayat (1). Ini berarti bahwa yang dapat menjadi subyek hak milik hanyalah WNI. Pengalihan kepemilikan hak milik atas tanah dengan cara apapun kepada anak yang lahir dari perkawinan campuran akan menyebabkan segala bentuk pengalihan tersebut menjadi batal demi hukum. Bilamana anak yang berkewarganegaraan ganda memperoleh warisan dari salah satu orang tuanya berupa tanah dengan status hak milik, maka hak anak tentang warisan tersebut tentunya tidak hapus. Akan tetapi ia harus menunggu sampai usia 18 (delapan belas) tahun, sampai memilih menjadi WNI maka barulah ia memiliki haknya sesuai peraturan yang berlaku.  Keyword: Perkawinan Campuran, Kewarganegaraan Ganda, Hak Waris Anak 

scholarly journals Use of Nominee in Ownership of Rights to Land in Indonesia by Foreign Citizens: Case of Mataram State Court Decision Number 67/Pdt.G/2008/Pn.Mtr. 30 July 2009

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 27-36
Author(s):  
Habib Adjie
Keyword(s):  
Land Rights ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
State Court ◽  
The Real ◽  
Article 9 ◽  
The Law ◽  
Agrarian Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
As If ◽  
Laws And Regulations

Article 9 paragraph (1), Article 21 paragraph (2), and Article 26 paragraph (2) of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Agrarian Law have confirmed that only Indonesian Citizens and Indonesian Law, which was established based on Indonesian laws and regulations may have land rights in Indonesia, while for foreign citizens based on Article 42 letter b of the BAL, it states that foreigners who are domiciled in Indonesia may only have a Right of Use. The practice of this provision is often circumvented by making a Nominee Agreement. The foreigner borrows the name of the Indonesian Citizen. The land is legally written with the name of the Indonesian Citizen, but in fact, it is controlled by a foreigner who acts as if the real owner. It is proven in the analysis of the Court's Decision Mataram State Number 67/Pdt.G/2008 /Pn. Mtr. 30 July 2009.

scholarly journals Juridical Review Of Nominee Agreement In Land Of Tenure Property Rights Under The Book Of Civil Law And Agraria

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 441
Author(s):  
Indah Esti Cahyani ◽  
Aryani Witasari
Keyword(s):  
Property Rights ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Good Faith ◽  
Freedom Of Contract ◽  
Related Statement ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Law ◽  
Legal Consequences

Nominee agreement is an agreement made between someone who by law can not be the subject of rights to certain lands (property rights), in this case that foreigners (WNA) and Indonesian Citizen (citizen), with the intention that the foreigners can master land de facto property rights, but legal-formal (de jure) land property rights are assigned to his Indonesian citizen. The purpose of this paper isto assess the position of the nominee agreement in Indonesia's legal system and the legal consequences arising in terms of the draft Civil Code and the Law on Agrarian. Agreement is an agreement unnamed nominee made based on the principle of freedom of contract and good faith of the parties. However, it should be noted that the law prohibits foreigners make agreements / related statement stock wealth / property (land) for and on behalf of others, sehingga the legal consequences of the agreement is the nominee of the agreement is not legally enforceable because the agreement was made on a false causa.Keywords: Nominee Agreement; Property Rights; Foreigners.

scholarly journals Coasian and modern property rights economics

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 391-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
KIRSTEN FOSS ◽  
NICOLAI FOSS
Keyword(s):  
Property Rights ◽  
Research Program ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Institutional Research ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Rich ◽  
1960S And 1970S ◽  
The 1960S ◽  
Ownership Rights ◽  
Governance Arrangements

Abstract:Laying the foundations of property rights economics stands out among Ronald Coase's many seminal contributions. This approach had an impact on a number of fields in economics in, particularly, the 1960s and 1970s. The modern body of property rights economics mainly originates in the work Oliver Hart and is quite different in style, scope, and implications from the original property rights economics of Coase, Demsetz, Alchian, Cheung, Umbeck, Barzel, etc. Based on our earlier work on the subject (Foss and Foss, 2001), we argue that the change from Mark I to Mark II property rights economics led to a substantial narrowing of the scope of property rights economics, somewhat akin to a Kuhnian loss of content. In particular, Mark II property rights economics make strong assumptions concerning the definition and enforcement of ownership rights made which lead to many real life institutions and governance arrangements being excluded from consideration, and a much more narrow focus than that of the rich institutional research program initiated by Coase and his followers.

scholarly journals TANAH PEKULEN DALAM STRUKTUR HUKUM AGRARIA DI JAWA

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 466 ◽  
Author(s):  
Widhiana Hestining Puri ◽  
S Sulastriyono
Keyword(s):  
Land Tenure ◽  
Land Law ◽  
Joint Ownership ◽  
Agrarian Law ◽  
The Village ◽  
Agrarian Structure ◽  
Adat Law

ABSTRACTThe dualism of national land law appears before the formation of the agrarian law through the Basic Agrarian Law (BAL), has not been fully terminated. Various opportunities or legal vacuum still encountered, especially in relation to the provision of rights to land based on adat law. Pekulen land derived from adat law with communal characteristics/ joint ownership and land tenure in rotation, in fact is still exist in rural Java. Its posision became an important element in the village agrarian structure has the potential to make agrarian justice through policies at the local level.INTISARIDualisme hukum tanah nasional yang muncul sebelum terbentuknya hukum agraria melalui UUPA, belum sepenuhnya dapat diakhiri. Berbagai peluang atau kekosongan hukum masih ditemui terutama dalam kaitannya pengaturan hak atas tanah yang berdasar pada hukum adat. Tanah pekulen yang bersumber dari hukum adat dengan karakteristik komunal/ pemilikan bersama serta penguasaannya secara bergilir, pada kenyataannya masih ada di wilayah pedesaan di Jawa. Kedudukannya menjadi unsur penting dalam struktur agraria desa karena berpotensi menjadi sarana pencipta keadilan agraria melalui kebijakan di tingkat lokal. 

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PIHAK PEMBELI DALAM PERJANJIAN PENGIKATAN JUAL BELI YANG TIDAK TERLAKSANYA AKTA JUAL BELI AKIBAT PENOLAKAN DARI SEBAGIAN AHLI WARIS PIHAK PENJUAL BERDASARKAN KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PERDATA

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-209
Author(s):  
Fatmie Utari ◽  
Haifa Hasna
Keyword(s):  
Property Rights ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Legal Consequence ◽  
Joint Ownership ◽  
Two Stages ◽  
Ownership Rights

ABSTRAK Pada kondisi tertentu terdapat akta jual beli yang belum dapat dibuat oleh PPAT, seperti misalnya belum lunasnya pembayaran untuk tanah tersebut oleh pihak pembeli kepada pihak penjual, sehingga akta jual beli belum bisa dibuat maka notaris akan membuatkan Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (PPJB). PPJB saja tidak lantas menyebabkan beralihnya hak milik atas barang dari tangan penjual ke tangan pembeli sebelum dilakukan penyerahan (levering). Pada hakekatnya PPJB itu dilakukan dalam dua tahap yaitu tahap kesepakatan kedua belah pihak mengenai barang dan harga yang ditandai dengan kata sepakat (jual beli) dan yang kedua, tahap penyerahan (levering) benda yang menjadi objek perjanjian, dengan tujuan untuk mengalihkan hak milik dari benda tersebut. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah berupa yuridis normatif, adalah Penelitian yuridis normatif membahas doktrin-doktrin atau asas-asas dalam ilmu hukum. Perlindungan hukum bagi pihak pembeli adalah bahwa pihak pembeli memiliki kekuatan pembuktian dari akta PPJB yang dibuat oleh notaris dihadapan pengadilan. Pihak pembeli dapat mengajukan tuntutan untuk para ahli waris melaksanakan akta jual beli. Pihak pembeli disini telah dirugikan dengan adanya salah satu pihak ahli waris yang menolak untuk melaksanakan akta jual beli. Karena tanah tersebut masih kepemilikan bersama dari para ahli waris keseluruhan. Akibat hukum yang timbul karena pihak penjual telah melakukan wanprestasi adalah pihak penjual harus membayar ganti rugi yang telah timbul karena pihak penjual menghambat untuk melaksanakan akta jual beli. Kata kunci : Perjanjian, PPJB, Perlindungan Hukum. ABSTRACT In certain conditions there is a sale and purchase deed that has not been made by the PPAT, such as for example the payment for the land has not been fully paid by the buyer to the seller, so that the sale and purchase deed cannot be made, the notary will make a Sale and Purchase Agreement (PPJB). PPJB alone does not necessarily result in the transfer of ownership rights to the goods from the hands of the seller to the hands of the buyer prior to the levering. In essence, the PPJB is carried out in two stages, namely the stage of agreement between the two parties regarding goods and prices which are marked by an agreement (sale and purchase) and secondly, the stage of levering the objects which are the object of the agreement, with the aim of transferring property rights of the objects. the. The research method used in this research is in the form of normative juridical, is a normative juridical research that discusses the doctrines or principles in the science of law. Legal protection for the buyer is that the buyer has the power of proof from the PPJB deed made by a notary before the court. The buyer can file a claim for the heirs to implement the sale and purchase deed. The buyer here has been harmed by the presence of one of the heirs who refuses to implement the sale and purchase deed. Because the land is still joint ownership of the whole heirs. The legal consequence that arises because the seller has defaulted is that the seller must pay compensation that has arisen because the seller prevents him from implementing the sale and purchase deed. keywords: Agreement, PPJB, Legal Protection

scholarly journals Jual Beli Tanah Dalam Hukum Tanah Atas Akta Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Bertingkat yang Dibuat oleh Notaris

Notaire ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 217
Author(s):  
Nailu Vina Amalia
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Serial Number ◽  
Agrarian Law ◽  
Customary Land ◽  
Ownership Of Land ◽  
Ownership Rights ◽  
Land Use Rights ◽  
Legal Consequences

The deed of the purchase and sale agreement (PPJB). The deed of the sale and purchase agreement is a preliminary agreement prior to the sale and purchase of land. PPJB is used only once. If what is agreed in the PPJB has been fulfilled then the signing of the sale and purchase deed can be carried out, by signing the sale and purchase deed, the ownership of land rights has been transferred. There are still many people who think that when the PPJB is signed, there will be a transfer of land rights, even though the PPJB is not an evidence of a transfer of land rights. This thesis discusses graded PPJB or recurring PPJB made by a Notary on a plot of land based on ownership rights over land use rights of former customary land based on the quotation of the Decree of the Governor of East Java Region Serial Number I/Agr/117 XI/HM/01.G/1970 issued November 4, 1970, or uncertified land. Whether it contradicts the concept of buying and selling in agrarian law and the legal consequences of the PPAT who made the sale and purchase deed based on the graded PPJB.Keywords: Graded PPJB; Recurring PPJB: Proof of Prior Rights.Akta Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (akta PPJB). Akta PPJB merupakan perjanjian pendahuluan sebelum diadakannya jual beli tanah. Akta PPJB digunakan untuk sekali saja, namun prakteknya masih ditemukan Akta PPJB bertingkat. Masih banyak masyarakat yang menganggap apabila sudah ada akta PPJB sudah ada peralihan hak atas tanah, padahal akta PPJB bukan bukti adanya peralihan hak atas tanah. Akta Jual Beli (AJB) yang merupakan bukti adanya peralihan hak atas tanah. AJB dibuat apabila syarat-syarat yang ada dalam akta PPJB sudah terpenuhi. Dalam tesis ini membahas tentang akta PPJB bertingkat atau akta PPJB berulang yang dibuat oleh Notaris atas sebidang tanah berdasarkan Hak Milik atas tanah Hak Pakai bekas Gogolan tidak tetap berdasarkan Kutipan Surat Keputusan Gubernur Kepala Daerah Tingkat I Jawa Timur Nomor I/Agr/117/XI/HM/01.G/1970 tertanggal 4 Nopember tahun 1970 atau tanah yang belum bersertipikat apakah akta PPJB bertingkat tersebut bertentangan dengan konsep jual beli dalam hukum tanah dan akibat hukum dari Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) membuat AJB berdasarkan akta PPJB bertingkat.Kata Kunci: PPJB Bertingkat; PPJB Berulang; Bukti Hak Lama.

scholarly journals REGULATION OF LAND OWNERSHIP FOR FOREIGN CITIZENS IN INDONESIA FROM AGRARIAN LAW PERSPECTIVE

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (01) ◽  
pp. 69-81
Author(s):  
Nur Hairul Hari Yanto ◽  
Muhammad Nasarudin
Keyword(s):  
Property Rights ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Men And Women ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Agrarian Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
Ownership Rights

In the agrarian system, Article 21 paragraph 1 of the Basic Agrarian Law states that only Indonesian citizens have property rights. One of the examples of ownership rights is the right to land ownership or those that may have a relationship with the earth and space without differentiating between men and women as well as fellow Indonesian citizens, both native and descendants.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document