scholarly journals ANALYSIS OF BANK SOUNDNESS LEVEL USING RGEC METHOD BEFORE AND AFTER THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PSAK 71

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 71-78
Author(s):  
Dian Indri Purnamasari ◽  
Adelia Prima Retina Claranita
Keyword(s):  
Commercial Banks ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Descriptive Statistics ◽  
Economic Conditions ◽  
Dynamic Nature ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Normality Test ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Bank Soundness ◽  
Paired T Test

The changing economic conditions require dynamic regulations on economic system in order to keep the pace of economic growth. By the dynamic nature we mean making constant changes in economic aspects in efforts to adapt to the current conditions. An example could be the bank regulation which is an important institution in distributing funds to concerned parties. The present study aims to determine the differences in bank soundness level before and after the implementation of PSAK 71 in Indonesian commercial banks. We adopted assessments of Risk Profile, Earnings, Good Corporate Governance and Capital. The study used 21 samples collected using a purposive sampling approach. To analyze our data we used descriptive statistics, normality test, and paired t-test. The results indicate that differences were found between all ratios before and after the implementation of PSAK 71, except NPL ratio.

scholarly journals Effect of Risk Based Bank Rating on Financial Performance of Sharia Commercial Banks

Akuntabilitas ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-214
Author(s):  
Diah Munawaroh ◽  
Peny Cahaya Azwari
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Commercial Banks ◽  
Regression Models ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Descriptive Statistics ◽  
Regression Methods ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Bank Ratings

Risk Based Bank Rating (RBBR) is one of the assessments of the new health level of the bank in lieu of CAMELS in accordance in Bank Indonesia Regulation No. 13/1 / PBI / 2011. This study aims to examine the effect of Risk-Based Bank Ratings (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earning and Capital) on Financial Performance (ROA). The method used is descriptive statistics, determination of regression models, classic assumption tests, multiple linear regression methods and hypothesis testing. The type of data in this study uses panel data. Based on the results of the study indicate that the ratio of NPF, GCG and CAR does not significantly influence ROA. While the ratio of FDR, BOPO and NOM has a significant effect on ROA.

TINGKAT KESEHATAN BANK DENGAN PENDEKATAN METODE RGEC PADA BANK PEMBANGUNAN DAERAH DIY

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 117
Author(s):  
Edy Anan ◽  
Roni Albarqis
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Commercial Bank ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Circular Letter ◽  
Profitability Assessment ◽  
Bank Soundness

ABSTRACTThis study is aimed to determine the soundness of commercial bank at PT. Bank Pembangunan Daerah DIY during the years 2011 until 2015 based on RGEC method that consisted of risk profile, good corporate governance, earnings and capital. The method that used to collect data isnonparticipant observation by documenting. Descriptive analysis technique based on the Bank Indonesia Circular Letter No. 13/24/DPNP about Assessment of Commercial Bank Soundness. The results show that the soundness level of Bank Pembangunan Daerah DIY in 2011 until 2015 wasproved. NPL and LDR that measured Risk Profile factor prove a well executed risk management. Good Corporate Governance factor shows BPD DIY has applied corporate governance well. Earnings factor or profitability assessment consist of ROA and NIM has increased and this sign of theincreasing of total assets owned by BPD DIY that followed by increasing of profit gained by BPD DIY. Using the CAR indicator, the author proved that BPD DIY has good Capital factor, which is above Bank Indonesia provision that 8%. Conclution of the result showed that soundness level ofBank Pembangunan Daerah DIY in 2011 until 2015 overall was in the first place of composite ranked with a very healthy predicate and the total of composite score for each year is 93%, 93% , 97%, 97% and 97%.ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui tingkat kesehatan bank pada PT. Bank Pembangunan Daerah DIY selama tahun 2011 hingga 2015 berdasarkan metode RGEC yang terdiri dari risk profile, good corporate governance, earnings dan capital. Metode pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah observasi nonpartisipan dengan cara dokumentasi. Teknik analisis deskriptif dengan berpedoman pada Surat Edaran Bank Indonesia No. 13/24/DPNP tentang Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Umum. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa tingkat kesehatan BPD DIY pada tahun 2011 sampai dengan 2015 secara keseluruhan dapat dikatakan bank yang sehat. Faktor Risk Profile yang dinilai melalui NPL dan LDR secara keseluruhan menggambarkan pengelolaan risiko yangtelah dilaksanakan dengan baik. Faktor Good Corporate Governance, BPD DIY sudah menerapkan tata kelola perusahaan dengan baik. Faktor Earnings atau rentabilitas yang penilaiannya terdiri dari ROA dan NIM mengalami kenaikan dan hal ini menandakan bertambahnya jumlah aset yang dimiliki BPD DIY diikuti dengan bertambahnya keuntungan yang didapat oleh BPD DIY. Dengan menggunakan indikator CAR, peneliti membuktikan bahwa BPD DIY memiliki faktor Capital yang baik, yaitu diatas ketentuan Bank Indonesia sebesar 8%. Kesimpulan hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa PT. Bank Pembangunan Daerah DIY pada tahun 2011 hingga 2015 secara keseluruhan berada pada peringkat komposit satu dengan predikat sangat sehat serta masing-masing total nilai komposit sebesar 93%, 93%, 97% , 97% dan 97%

scholarly journals MENILAI TINGKAT KESEHATAN BANK DENGAN ANALISIS METODE RISK PROFILE, GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, EARNINGS, CAPITAL PADA BANK SYARIAH DI INDONESIA

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-160
Author(s):  
Hendra Galuh Febrianto ◽  
Amalia Indah Fitriana
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Optimal Level ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Business Strategies ◽  
Islamic Banking ◽  
Risk Profiles ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Financial Research ◽  
Bank Soundness

ABSTRACT In the banking world of soundness, banks are very important for the formation of trust. Trust and loyalty to banks is a very helpful factor and makes it easier for bank management to develop good business strategies. Bank Soundness Levels are results issued by banks which are carried out on bank risk and performance (Bank Indonesia Regulation Number: 13/1 / PBI / 2011). If more than conventional banking with Islamic banking, conventional banking finance is better than Islamic banking. This is blessed with poor sharia banking (corporate governance) management. In order to be able to carry out its functions properly, banks must have sufficient capital, ensure the quality of their assets properly, be well managed and managed based on the principle of prudence, generate sufficient profits to maintain an increase, and support liquidity so that it can be adjusted to their needs. Therefore banks are required to be able to achieve and maintain a good and optimal level of performance, because the level of bank performance can increase the level of trust and loyalty needed by the wider community to use the products, services and financial activities of the bank. The purpose of this study is for advanced financial research with analysis of Risk Profiles (Risk Profiles), Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Profitability (Income), and Capital (Capital) which is hereinafter abbreviated as RGEC with the final aim of research for the needs of Sharia banking management in accordance with the latest Bank Indonesia and OJK regulations. This type of research uses descriptive research proposed in the RGEC analysis (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Income, and Capital) at Islamic Banks in Indonesia. from 2013 to 2017. Keywords: Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Income, Capital, Bank Soundness   ABSTRAK Dalam dunia perbankan tingkat kesehatan bank sangat penting bagi pembentukan kepercayaan. Kepercayaan dan loyalitas nasabah terhadap bank merupakan faktor yang sangat membantu dan mempermudah pihak manajemen bank untuk menyusun strategi bisnis yang baik. Tingkat Kesehatan Bank adalah hasil penilaian kondisi bank yang dilakukan terhadap risiko dan kinerja bank (Peraturan Bank Indonesia Nomor: 13/1/PBI/2011). Jika dibanding antara perbankan konvensional dengan perbankan syariah, kinerja keuangan perbankan konvensional lebih baik daripada perbankan syariah. Hal ini dikarena tatakelola (good corporate governance) perbankan syariah yang masih buruk. Agar dapat menjalankan fungsinya dengan baik, bank harus mempunyai modal yang cukup, menjaga kualitas asetnya dengan baik, dikelola dengan baik dan dioperasikan berdasarkan prinsip kehati-hatian, menghasilkan keuntungan yang cukup untuk mempertahankan kelangsungan usahanya, serta memelihara likuiditasnya sehingga dapat memenuhi kewajibannya. Oleh karena itu bank dituntut untuk bisa mencapai dan mempertahankan tingkat kinerja yang baik dan optimal, karena tingkat kinerja bank yang baik dapat meningkatkan kepercayaan dan loyalitas nasabah maupun masyarakat luas untuk menggunakan produk, jasa dan aktivitas keuangan dari bank tersebut. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menilai tingkat kesehatan keuangan dengan analisis Profil Risiko (Risk Profile), Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Rentabilitas (Earnings), dan Permodalan (Capital) yang selanjutnya disingkat RGEC dengan tujuan akhir merekomendasikan kebijakan untuk memperbaiki manajemen perbankan Syariah yang sesuai peraturan Bank Indonesia dan OJK yang terbaru. Jenis penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian deskriptif yang berfokus pada analisis RGEC (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, and Capital) pada Bank Syariah di Indonesia. dari tahun 2013 sampai 2017. Kata kunci: Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, Capital, Tingkat Kesehatan Bank

scholarly journals ANALISIS TINGKAT KESEHATAN BANK DENGAN PENERAPAN METODE RGEC (RISK PROFILE, GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, EARNINGS DAN CAPITAL) PADA PT.BANK BENGKULU

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-91
Author(s):  
Yun Fitriano ◽  
Ririn Marlina Sofyan
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Health Research ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Health Level ◽  
Bank Soundness

This study aims to determine the health level of PT. Bank Bengkulu in the 2014-2016 period if measured using the RGEC method (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, and Capital). Based on the results of the assessment of bank soundness by applying the RGEC method at PT. Bank Bengkulu is seen from factors, namely 1. Risk Profile, the results of the 2014 NPL ratio of 0.39%, in 2015 amounted to 0.39%, and in 2016 amounting to 0.33% can be said to be very healthy. The results of the LDR ratio in 2014 amounted to 85.79%, in 2015 amounted to 91.05%, and in 2016 amounting to 93.31% this could be said to be quite healthy. 2. Good Corporate Governance in the 2014-2016 period of 89.33% can be said to be very healthy. 3. Eanings, the results of the 2014 ROA ratio amounted to 3.69%, in 2015 amounted to 3.29%, and in 2016 amounting to 3.02% this could be said to be very healthy. The results of the BOPO ratio in 2014 amounted to 74.10%, in 2015 amounted to 80.54%, and in 2016 amounting to 77.71% this could be said to be very healthy. 4. Capital, the results of the 2014 CAR ratio amounted to 16.99%, in 2015 amounted to 21.39%, and in 2016 amounting to 19.07% can be said to be very healthy. The results of the health research at PT. Bank Bengkulu in the 2014-2016 period showed that PT. The Bengkulu Bank gets PK 1, which is very healthy.

scholarly journals Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank: Pendekatan CAMEL Dan RGEC

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Erika Amelia ◽  
Astiti Chandra Aprilianti
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Asset Management ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Sound Level ◽  
Capital Asset ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Almost All ◽  
Bank Soundness

This study aims to determine the risk based bank rating at PT. Bank Maybank SyariahIndonesia if measured using CAMEL (Capital, Asset, Management, Earning,Liquidity) method and RGEC (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earning,Capital) in 2011-2016 and also aims to know differences in ratios used in CAMELSand RGEC methods. The research method used in this research is literature researchor study desk study. The data used in this research is secondary data using financialstatements of Bank Maybank Syariah Indonesia Period 2011-2016. The results showthat the bank can be said to be adequately sound because almost all the ratios usedmeet the specified requirements and there are still some ratios that have not met therequirements, but in both methods have different results. In the year 2011-2014 therisk based bank rating of Maybank Syariah Bank is calculated using CAMEL methodof bank is in the sound level. In 2015 -2016, the calculation of bank soundness showsthat bank condition is in an sound level. In Maybank Syariah Bank the state of thebank is in the sound level is in 2011-2013 if calculated using the RGEC method. Inthe year 2014-2016 the condition of the bank shows a adequately sound level.

scholarly journals PERBANDINGAN TINGKAT KESEHATAN BANK UMUM KONVENSIONAL DAN BANK UMUM SYARIAH MENGGUNAKAN METODE RGEC (RISK PROFILE, GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, EARNINGS, DAN CAPITAL)

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 635-653
Author(s):  
Zara Zettyra R. D ◽  
Evi Mutia
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Commercial Banks ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
T Test ◽  
Islamic Banks ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Significant Difference

The purpose of this study was to see a comparison of the health levels of conventional commercial banks and Islamic commercial banks using the RGEC method in the 2014-2017 period. The sample of this study were 30 conventional commercial banks and 11 sharia commercial banks. The assessment used uses the RGEC method (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, Capital) Risk Profile seen through the NPL and NPF indicators for conventional commercial banks while Islamic banks use LDR and FDR. Corporate governance is measured through Self Assessment. Earnings are measured through ROA and NIM indicators. Capital is measured based on the CAR indicator. Testing the hypothesis in this study using the Independent T-Test and Mann-Wnithey Test samples. The results of this study indicate that there is a difference between conventional commercial banks and Islamic commercial banks seen from the ratio of NPL, LDR, and ROA. While the ratio of GCG, NIM, and CAR does not have a significant difference between conventional commercial banks and Islamic commercial banks.

scholarly journals ANALISIS TINGKAT KESEHATAN BANK DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN PENDEKATAN RGEC (RISK PROFILE, GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, EARNINGS, CAPITAL)? Studi pada PT BPR SINAR KUTA Periode 2016-2018

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Komang Gede ◽  
Tri Ratnawati
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Liquidity Risk ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Bank Performance ◽  
Good Management ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Bank Soundness

The results of this study indicate that based on the analysis of the BPR Sinar Kuta NPL formula in 2018 increased every year 2016 = 2.55%, 2017 = 3.12%, and 2018 =3.75%. and Liquidity risk using two ratios, namely LDR and LAR, has increased anddecreased. This shows that BPR Sinar Kuta has good profitability towards third partyrefunds. GCG Bank Sinar Kuta also has very good management as evidenced from 2016 -2018 showing a good composite predicate by determining a healthy bank valuation matrixbased on Bank Indonesia Regulation No.13 and the predicate is that all the compositevalues are still in greater or equal rules with (?) 1.5. When viewed from CAR, BankSinar Kuta is ranked 5th, it shows that Bank Sinar as a BPR Bank has a reasonable levelof health. Keywords: Factor Analysis, Bank Soundness, Bank Performance, RGEC

scholarly journals ANALYSIS OF RISK PROFILE, GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, EARNINGS, AND CAPITAL (RGEC) IN SYARIAH COMMERCIAL BANKS AND CONVENTIONAL COMMERCIAL BANKS

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Oyong Lisa
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Commercial Banks ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
T Test ◽  
Public Funds ◽  
Analytical Technique ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Net Profit ◽  
Lower Ability

Banks play a role in collecting public funds because banks are institutions that are trusted by the community from various parties in placing funds safely. This study aims to analyze the differences in financial performance by using RGEC consisting of risk profile, good corporate governance, earnings, and capitals between syariah commercial banks and conventional commercial banks. The analytical technique uses independent sample t-test. The result of the analysis shows that there is a difference of NPL between syariah bank and conventional bank. This shows that conventional commercial banks are better at covering the risk of default of credit repayment by debtors than syariah commercial banks. There is an LDR difference between syariah commercial banks and conventional commercial banks. This shows that conventional commercial banks have a slightly better liquidity level compared to syariah commercial banks. The LDR ratio is too large to indicate the lower ability of  the bank's liquidity. There is no GCG difference between syariah commercial banks and conventional commercial banks. This shows that both groups of banks have implemented good corporate governance so that internal management goes according to what is planned. There is a difference of ROA between syariah commercial banks and conventional commercial banks. This shows that the ability of conventional commercial banks has better ability in obtaining net profit with the use of all assets owned by the bank compared to syariah commercial banks. There is no CAR difference between syariah commercial banks and conventional commercial banks. This shows that both groups of banks have met Bank Indonesia's requirements as a sound bank.

scholarly journals Analysis of Banking Risk, Good Corporate Governance, Capital and Earning Influences on the Indonesia’s Commercial Bank Performances

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Nuruddin Subhan
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Commercial Bank ◽  
Commercial Banks ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Partial Least Square ◽  
Least Square ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Bank Soundness

This study aims to analyze the effect of commercial bank soundness in Indonesia based on Bank Indonesia regulation number 13/24/DPNP date 25 October 2011, which concern on the implementation guide for Bank Regulation in Indonesia number 13/1/PBI/ 2011 on assessment of bank healthy. In general, those assessments cover risks, good corporate governance (GCG), earning and capital. While, the performance of commercial bank is measured based on credit growth and profit growth. A total of 45 commercial banks listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange are the population of the study which will be analyzed using the structural equation modeling program - partial least square (SEM-PLS). The results show that credit risk, GCG and earnings have no effect on bank’s performance in Indonesia. Market risk, liquidity risk and capital negatively affect the performance of commercial banks in Indonesia. This research is expected to contribute to the policy making of central banks and also commercial bank organization in particular to improve their performance. This research also contributes to the theory by enriching the discussion on related themes.

scholarly journals ANALISIS TINGKAT KESEHATAN BANK MENGGUNAKAN METODE PROFIL RISIKO, TATA KELOLA PERUSAHAAN YANG BAIK, PENDAPATAN & MODAL (Studi Komparasi Antara Bank Umum Konvensional dan Bank Umum Syariah Di Indonesia Lemabaga yang Terdaftar Pada Otoritas Layanan Keuangan

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-77
Author(s):  
Gusganda Suria Manda ◽  
Rina Maria Hendriyani
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Commercial Bank ◽  
Commercial Banks ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Quantitative Approach ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Good Rating ◽  
Descriptive Method ◽  
Better Than

This analysis aims to find out, analyze and explain how the bank's soundness level compares with the Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earning and Capital methods in accordance with applicable regulations. This research was conducted using a comparative descriptive method with a quantitative approach. The results of the analysis of this study the authors get that Conventional Commercial Banks have a Risk Profile (NPL ratio) with a rating of "Good" better than a Sharia Commercial Bank with a rating of "Fairly Good". Conventional Commercial Banks have a Risk Profile (LDR) higher than Islamic Commercial Banks with a rating of "Fairly Good". Conventional Commercial Banks have Good Corporate Governance (GCG) better than Sharia Commercial Banks with a "Good" rating. Conventional Commercial Banks have better Earning (ROA) with a "Very Good" rating than a Sharia Commercial Bank with a "Very Poor" rating. Sharia Commercial Banks have a Capital (CAR) higher than Conventional Commercial Banks with a rating of "Very Good

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document