scholarly journals Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank: Pendekatan CAMEL Dan RGEC

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Erika Amelia ◽  
Astiti Chandra Aprilianti
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Asset Management ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Sound Level ◽  
Capital Asset ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Almost All ◽  
Bank Soundness

This study aims to determine the risk based bank rating at PT. Bank Maybank SyariahIndonesia if measured using CAMEL (Capital, Asset, Management, Earning,Liquidity) method and RGEC (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earning,Capital) in 2011-2016 and also aims to know differences in ratios used in CAMELSand RGEC methods. The research method used in this research is literature researchor study desk study. The data used in this research is secondary data using financialstatements of Bank Maybank Syariah Indonesia Period 2011-2016. The results showthat the bank can be said to be adequately sound because almost all the ratios usedmeet the specified requirements and there are still some ratios that have not met therequirements, but in both methods have different results. In the year 2011-2014 therisk based bank rating of Maybank Syariah Bank is calculated using CAMEL methodof bank is in the sound level. In 2015 -2016, the calculation of bank soundness showsthat bank condition is in an sound level. In Maybank Syariah Bank the state of thebank is in the sound level is in 2011-2013 if calculated using the RGEC method. Inthe year 2014-2016 the condition of the bank shows a adequately sound level.

scholarly journals ANALISIS RGEC UNTUK MENILAI TINGKAT KESEHATAN BANK PADA PERUSAHAAN PERBANKAN BUMN YANG TERDAFTAR DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA PERIODE 2013-2015

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sri Brahmayanti ◽  
Tika Wahyunanti
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Public Confidence ◽  
Financial Ratio ◽  
Minimum Capital ◽  
Minimum Capital Requirement ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Almost All ◽  
Bank Soundness

ABSTRACTThis study entitled "RGEC Analysis to Assess Bank Soundness Levels in State-Owned Banking Companies Listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange for the Period 2013-2015". The 1997 and 2008 crises that caused a decline in public confidence in the Bank led the authors to conduct research on the bank's health analysis. The purpose of this research is to know the rating of Bank Soundness at State-Owned Bank (BNI, BRI, Bank Mandiri, and BTN) listed on BEI in terms of RGEC (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, Capital) in 2013-2015.This research method using descriptive with quantitative approach. The population of this study is all state banks listed in the directory of Bank Indonesia, which has an annual report period 2013 to 2015. The number of samples as many as four banks by passing through the purposive sample stage. Data collection techniques used are techniques of documentation and literature techniques. Data analysis method using RGEC method is by collecting the required data and then assess the risk profile factor that is calculate credit risk with NPL ratio and liquidity risk with LDR ratio. Then the GCG assessment conducted by self assessment by Bank. Assessment of earning factors by calculating ROA and NIM ratios and capital valuation factors using CAR ratios. The results of the analysis show that in the period 2013-2015 almost all the banks studied have a very healthy predicate except the BTN Bank is healthy. Risk Profile Factor shows the majority of bank NPLs below 5% and the majority of LDR predicated banks are quite healthy. Good Corporate Governance factor shows the bank gets very good and good predicate. Earning factor shows bank ROA more than 1.5% and NIM bank more than 3%. Capital Factor shows that bank CAR is more than 12% so it can fulfill the minimum capital requirement requirement of 8%. The general conclusion of soundness of BUMN Bank consisting of BNI, BRI, Bank Mandiri in the period of 2013-2015 using RGEC method that is Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, Capital predicate VERY HEALTHY in composite rank 1, although one of the predicate of SEHAT at composite rank 2 is BTN. It is suggested for further research to expand the scope of research on bank soundness rating by using other financial ratio indicator with the latest method in accordance with Bank Indonesia Circular Letter. And for a bank that has been predicated very healthy to maintain it in the coming year. Keywords: Bank Health Level, NPL, LDR, GCG, ROA, NIM, CAR

TINGKAT KESEHATAN BANK DENGAN PENDEKATAN METODE RGEC PADA BANK PEMBANGUNAN DAERAH DIY

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 117
Author(s):  
Edy Anan ◽  
Roni Albarqis
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Commercial Bank ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Circular Letter ◽  
Profitability Assessment ◽  
Bank Soundness

ABSTRACTThis study is aimed to determine the soundness of commercial bank at PT. Bank Pembangunan Daerah DIY during the years 2011 until 2015 based on RGEC method that consisted of risk profile, good corporate governance, earnings and capital. The method that used to collect data isnonparticipant observation by documenting. Descriptive analysis technique based on the Bank Indonesia Circular Letter No. 13/24/DPNP about Assessment of Commercial Bank Soundness. The results show that the soundness level of Bank Pembangunan Daerah DIY in 2011 until 2015 wasproved. NPL and LDR that measured Risk Profile factor prove a well executed risk management. Good Corporate Governance factor shows BPD DIY has applied corporate governance well. Earnings factor or profitability assessment consist of ROA and NIM has increased and this sign of theincreasing of total assets owned by BPD DIY that followed by increasing of profit gained by BPD DIY. Using the CAR indicator, the author proved that BPD DIY has good Capital factor, which is above Bank Indonesia provision that 8%. Conclution of the result showed that soundness level ofBank Pembangunan Daerah DIY in 2011 until 2015 overall was in the first place of composite ranked with a very healthy predicate and the total of composite score for each year is 93%, 93% , 97%, 97% and 97%.ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui tingkat kesehatan bank pada PT. Bank Pembangunan Daerah DIY selama tahun 2011 hingga 2015 berdasarkan metode RGEC yang terdiri dari risk profile, good corporate governance, earnings dan capital. Metode pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah observasi nonpartisipan dengan cara dokumentasi. Teknik analisis deskriptif dengan berpedoman pada Surat Edaran Bank Indonesia No. 13/24/DPNP tentang Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Umum. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa tingkat kesehatan BPD DIY pada tahun 2011 sampai dengan 2015 secara keseluruhan dapat dikatakan bank yang sehat. Faktor Risk Profile yang dinilai melalui NPL dan LDR secara keseluruhan menggambarkan pengelolaan risiko yangtelah dilaksanakan dengan baik. Faktor Good Corporate Governance, BPD DIY sudah menerapkan tata kelola perusahaan dengan baik. Faktor Earnings atau rentabilitas yang penilaiannya terdiri dari ROA dan NIM mengalami kenaikan dan hal ini menandakan bertambahnya jumlah aset yang dimiliki BPD DIY diikuti dengan bertambahnya keuntungan yang didapat oleh BPD DIY. Dengan menggunakan indikator CAR, peneliti membuktikan bahwa BPD DIY memiliki faktor Capital yang baik, yaitu diatas ketentuan Bank Indonesia sebesar 8%. Kesimpulan hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa PT. Bank Pembangunan Daerah DIY pada tahun 2011 hingga 2015 secara keseluruhan berada pada peringkat komposit satu dengan predikat sangat sehat serta masing-masing total nilai komposit sebesar 93%, 93%, 97% , 97% dan 97%

scholarly journals MENILAI TINGKAT KESEHATAN BANK DENGAN ANALISIS METODE RISK PROFILE, GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, EARNINGS, CAPITAL PADA BANK SYARIAH DI INDONESIA

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-160
Author(s):  
Hendra Galuh Febrianto ◽  
Amalia Indah Fitriana
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Optimal Level ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Business Strategies ◽  
Islamic Banking ◽  
Risk Profiles ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Financial Research ◽  
Bank Soundness

ABSTRACT In the banking world of soundness, banks are very important for the formation of trust. Trust and loyalty to banks is a very helpful factor and makes it easier for bank management to develop good business strategies. Bank Soundness Levels are results issued by banks which are carried out on bank risk and performance (Bank Indonesia Regulation Number: 13/1 / PBI / 2011). If more than conventional banking with Islamic banking, conventional banking finance is better than Islamic banking. This is blessed with poor sharia banking (corporate governance) management. In order to be able to carry out its functions properly, banks must have sufficient capital, ensure the quality of their assets properly, be well managed and managed based on the principle of prudence, generate sufficient profits to maintain an increase, and support liquidity so that it can be adjusted to their needs. Therefore banks are required to be able to achieve and maintain a good and optimal level of performance, because the level of bank performance can increase the level of trust and loyalty needed by the wider community to use the products, services and financial activities of the bank. The purpose of this study is for advanced financial research with analysis of Risk Profiles (Risk Profiles), Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Profitability (Income), and Capital (Capital) which is hereinafter abbreviated as RGEC with the final aim of research for the needs of Sharia banking management in accordance with the latest Bank Indonesia and OJK regulations. This type of research uses descriptive research proposed in the RGEC analysis (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Income, and Capital) at Islamic Banks in Indonesia. from 2013 to 2017. Keywords: Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Income, Capital, Bank Soundness   ABSTRAK Dalam dunia perbankan tingkat kesehatan bank sangat penting bagi pembentukan kepercayaan. Kepercayaan dan loyalitas nasabah terhadap bank merupakan faktor yang sangat membantu dan mempermudah pihak manajemen bank untuk menyusun strategi bisnis yang baik. Tingkat Kesehatan Bank adalah hasil penilaian kondisi bank yang dilakukan terhadap risiko dan kinerja bank (Peraturan Bank Indonesia Nomor: 13/1/PBI/2011). Jika dibanding antara perbankan konvensional dengan perbankan syariah, kinerja keuangan perbankan konvensional lebih baik daripada perbankan syariah. Hal ini dikarena tatakelola (good corporate governance) perbankan syariah yang masih buruk. Agar dapat menjalankan fungsinya dengan baik, bank harus mempunyai modal yang cukup, menjaga kualitas asetnya dengan baik, dikelola dengan baik dan dioperasikan berdasarkan prinsip kehati-hatian, menghasilkan keuntungan yang cukup untuk mempertahankan kelangsungan usahanya, serta memelihara likuiditasnya sehingga dapat memenuhi kewajibannya. Oleh karena itu bank dituntut untuk bisa mencapai dan mempertahankan tingkat kinerja yang baik dan optimal, karena tingkat kinerja bank yang baik dapat meningkatkan kepercayaan dan loyalitas nasabah maupun masyarakat luas untuk menggunakan produk, jasa dan aktivitas keuangan dari bank tersebut. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menilai tingkat kesehatan keuangan dengan analisis Profil Risiko (Risk Profile), Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Rentabilitas (Earnings), dan Permodalan (Capital) yang selanjutnya disingkat RGEC dengan tujuan akhir merekomendasikan kebijakan untuk memperbaiki manajemen perbankan Syariah yang sesuai peraturan Bank Indonesia dan OJK yang terbaru. Jenis penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian deskriptif yang berfokus pada analisis RGEC (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, and Capital) pada Bank Syariah di Indonesia. dari tahun 2013 sampai 2017. Kata kunci: Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, Capital, Tingkat Kesehatan Bank

scholarly journals ANALISIS TINGKAT KESEHATAN BANK DENGAN PENERAPAN METODE RGEC (RISK PROFILE, GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, EARNINGS DAN CAPITAL) PADA PT.BANK BENGKULU

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-91
Author(s):  
Yun Fitriano ◽  
Ririn Marlina Sofyan
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Health Research ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Health Level ◽  
Bank Soundness

This study aims to determine the health level of PT. Bank Bengkulu in the 2014-2016 period if measured using the RGEC method (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, and Capital). Based on the results of the assessment of bank soundness by applying the RGEC method at PT. Bank Bengkulu is seen from factors, namely 1. Risk Profile, the results of the 2014 NPL ratio of 0.39%, in 2015 amounted to 0.39%, and in 2016 amounting to 0.33% can be said to be very healthy. The results of the LDR ratio in 2014 amounted to 85.79%, in 2015 amounted to 91.05%, and in 2016 amounting to 93.31% this could be said to be quite healthy. 2. Good Corporate Governance in the 2014-2016 period of 89.33% can be said to be very healthy. 3. Eanings, the results of the 2014 ROA ratio amounted to 3.69%, in 2015 amounted to 3.29%, and in 2016 amounting to 3.02% this could be said to be very healthy. The results of the BOPO ratio in 2014 amounted to 74.10%, in 2015 amounted to 80.54%, and in 2016 amounting to 77.71% this could be said to be very healthy. 4. Capital, the results of the 2014 CAR ratio amounted to 16.99%, in 2015 amounted to 21.39%, and in 2016 amounting to 19.07% can be said to be very healthy. The results of the health research at PT. Bank Bengkulu in the 2014-2016 period showed that PT. The Bengkulu Bank gets PK 1, which is very healthy.

scholarly journals ANALISIS TINGKAT KESEHATAN BANK DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN PENDEKATAN RGEC (RISK PROFILE, GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, EARNINGS, CAPITAL)? Studi pada PT BPR SINAR KUTA Periode 2016-2018

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Komang Gede ◽  
Tri Ratnawati
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Liquidity Risk ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Bank Performance ◽  
Good Management ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Bank Soundness

The results of this study indicate that based on the analysis of the BPR Sinar Kuta NPL formula in 2018 increased every year 2016 = 2.55%, 2017 = 3.12%, and 2018 =3.75%. and Liquidity risk using two ratios, namely LDR and LAR, has increased anddecreased. This shows that BPR Sinar Kuta has good profitability towards third partyrefunds. GCG Bank Sinar Kuta also has very good management as evidenced from 2016 -2018 showing a good composite predicate by determining a healthy bank valuation matrixbased on Bank Indonesia Regulation No.13 and the predicate is that all the compositevalues are still in greater or equal rules with (?) 1.5. When viewed from CAR, BankSinar Kuta is ranked 5th, it shows that Bank Sinar as a BPR Bank has a reasonable levelof health. Keywords: Factor Analysis, Bank Soundness, Bank Performance, RGEC

scholarly journals Penilaian Kesehatan Bank (Studi Pada PT. Bank Muamalat Indonesia, Tbk. Tahun 2016- 2019)

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Citra Puspa Permata
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Annual Report ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Descriptive Study ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Financial Health ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Financial Condition ◽  
Financial Conditions ◽  
Good Corporate Governance

This study aims to determine the financial health of PT. Bank Muamalat Indonesia, Tbk from four aspects in RGEC which is Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, and Capital. This research is a descriptive study with a quantitative approach. The main data of this study comes from the Annual Report of PT. Bank Muamalat Indonesia, Tbk. from 2016 to 2019, the so-called secondary data were analyzed using the RGEC method. The results showed that in the period 2016-2019, the risk profile aspect of PT. Bank Muamalat Indonesia with the NPF and  FDR Indicator on average is in a healthy financial condition, but the CR indicator showed unhealthy financial conditions. The GCG aspect using self-assessment showed a fairly healthy financial condition, the earnings aspect. with NOM, ROA and average ROE showed unhealthy financial conditions, as well as the capital aspect with average CAR and PR ratios is in very healthy financial conditions.

scholarly journals ANALISIS TINGKAT KESEHATAN BANK PT. BANK PERKREDITAN RAKYAT JORONG KAMPUNG TANGAH PARIAMAN CABANG PADANG

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Doni Marlius ◽  
Junika Sukma
Keyword(s):  
Asset Management ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Quantitative Data ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Financial Health ◽  
Analysis Method ◽  
Capital Asset ◽  
Qualitative And Quantitative ◽  
Quantitative Data Analysis

The purpose of this study was to determine how the Bank's Soundness at PT. Bank Perkreditan Rakyat JKT-Pariaman, Padang Branch. The research method used is a qualitative and quantitative data analysis method. The type of data used is secondary data obtained from the publication report of the Financial Services Authority and the People's Credit Bank JKT-Pariaman Padang Branch for the period 2017-2018. Analysis of the level of financial health of banks using the CAMEL method (Capital, Asset, Management, Earning, Liquidity). The results showed that the level of financial health of BPR JKT-Pariaman Padang Branch in 2017-2018 showed a healthy category, where CAR 2017-2018 was above the BI standard of 8% which means healthy, and ROA owned in a healthy condition while the LDR Ratio of PT. BPR-JKT Pariaman Padang Branch is not in the healthy category in 2017-2018 banks cannot keep the LDR below 94.75%.

PENERAPAN RGEC SEBAGAI INDIKATOR TINGKAT KESEHATAN PT BANK RAKYAT INDONESIA TBK TAHUN 2018-2020

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 12
Author(s):  
Tomy Rizky Izzalqurny ◽  
Aldi Santoso
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Annual Report ◽  
Profile Analysis ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Health Level ◽  
Governance Analysis

ABSTRACTThe purpose of this study is to determine the level of bank health level using the RGEC indicator. The research method used is descriptive quantitative. The variables used as research measurements are the Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, and Capital variables. The data used is the annual report of PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia AgroNiaga Tbk 2018-2020. Risk Profile analysis shows that the level of banking health can be said to be healthy. Good Corporate Governance analysis shows that the soundness of banking is said to be very good. Earnings analysis shows that the soundness of banking can be said to be unhealthy. Capital analysis shows that the soundness of banking can be said to be healthy.Keywords: Bank Health, BRI Agro, COVID-19, RGECABSTRAKTujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui tingkat kesehatan bank dengan menggunakan indikator RGEC. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah deskriptif kuantitatif. Variabel yang digunakan sebagai pengukuran penelitian adalah variabel profil risiko, good corporate governance, earnings, dan capital. Data yang digunakan adalah laporan tahunan PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia AgroNiaga Tbk 2018-2020. Analisis profil risiko menunjukkan bahwa tingkat kesehatan perbankan dapat dikatakan sehat. Analisis good corporate governance menunjukkan bahwa tingkat kesehatan perbankan dapat dikatakan sangat baik. Analisis laba menunjukkan bahwa tingkat kesehatan perbankan dapat dikatakan tidak sehat. Analisis permodalan menunjukkan bahwa tingkat kesehatan perbankan dapat dikatakan sehat.Kata kunci: Kesehatan Bank, BRI Agro, COVID-19, RGEC

scholarly journals ANALISIS TINGKAT KESEHATAN PT. BANK RAKYAT INDONESIA (BRI) SYARIAH BERDASARKAN METODE RGEC

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-32
Author(s):  
Muhamad Manarul Hidayat ◽  
Usep Deden Suherman ◽  
Hendra Syafri
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Health Level ◽  
Rank One ◽  
Bank Soundness ◽  
Quantitative Approaches

AbstractEvery bank must have a bank soundness level from all aspects with very healthy criteria, as well as PT. BRI Syariah. Therefore, this article aims to analyze the factors that affect the health level of PT. BRI Syariah uses Bank Indonesia regulations, namely PBI No.13 / 1 / PBI / 2011 and criteria guidelines for using SE. No.13 / 24 / DPNP. In accordance with these provisions, the soundness of a bank is measured by the RGEC method (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, and Capital). This article uses descriptive methods and quantitative approaches to determine the health level of PT. BRI Syariah is also compared to two state-owned sharia banks, namely PT. BNI Syariah and BSM. The results showed that using the RGEC method the assessment factors used were NPF, FDR, ROA, BOPO, CAR, and ROE. It appears that PT. The health level of BRI Syariah is still below BNI Syariah and BSM. This indicates that BRI Syariah still has to improve its financial performance to have a healthy rating at rank one, which is very healthy.   Keywords: Health Level, RGEC Method, BRI Syariah AbstrakSetiap bank harus memiliki tingkat kesehatan bank dari segala aspek dengan kriteria sangat sehat, begitupula dengan PT. BRI Syariah. Maka dari itu, artikel ini bertujuan menganalisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi tingkat kesehatan PT. BRI Syariah menggunakan ketentuan Bank Indonesia yaitu PBI No.13/1/PBI/2011 dan pedoman kriteria menggunakan SE. No.13/24/DPNP. Sesuai ketentuan tersebut, tingkat kesehatan bank diukur dengan metode RGEC (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, and Capital). Artikel ini menggunakan metode deskriptif dan pendekatan kuantitatif untuk mengetahui tingkat kesehatan PT. BRI Syariah yang mana juga dibandingkan dengan dua bank syariah milik BUMN yaitu PT. BNI Syariah dan BSM.  Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dengan menggunakan metode RGEC faktor penilaian yang digunakan adalah NPF, FDR, ROA, BOPO, CAR, dan ROE. Terlihat bahwa Tingkat kesehatan PT. BRI Syariah masih berada di bawah BNI Syariah dan BSM. Hal ini menandakan bahwa BRI Syariah masih harus meningkatkan kinerja keuangannya untuk memiliki peringkat yang sehat pada peringkat satu yaitu sangat sehat. Kata kunci: Tingkat Kesehatan, Metode RGEC, BRI Syariah

scholarly journals Analisis Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Dengan Menggunakan Metode Rgec Pada PT. Bank Tabungan Negara, Tbk. Periode 2015-2017

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 7
Author(s):  
Fina Priskila Kawengian ◽  
Frendy A. O. Pelleng ◽  
Wilfried S. Manoppo
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Financial Statement ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
A Value ◽  
Data Source ◽  
Composite Rating ◽  
Quantitative Descriptive

This study aimed to analyze the health of a bank, at PT. Bank Tabungan Negara, Tbk. by using the Rgec method. The Rgec method consists of several components, namely Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, Capital. of these components also have indicators. which will later rank a bank which is ranked in what category, based on calculations through the company's financial statement data. This research uses quantitative descriptive research. The data source used is secondary data with documentation data collection techniques. Based on the results of data analysis, it was concluded that during the 2015-2017 period, (1) Bank BTN risk profile was in a healthy condition with NPL of 1,60%, 1,40% and 1,30% respectively, and LDR of 109,54%, 103,63%, and 104,19%. (2) GCG for the period 2015-2017 is 2 with healthy criteria. (3) Earnings in the 2015-2017 period are in a healthy condition with ROA of 1,47%, 1,55%, and 1,47%, NIM of 3,96%, 3,81%, and 3,57% , BOPO was 78,67%, 77,96% and 77,12%. (4) Capital is in a very healthy condition with a CAR value of 16,96%, 20,33% and 18,86%. (5) Rgec as a whole is in Composite Rating 1 which is very healthy with a value of 85,71%.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document