scholarly journals Learning models and authentic assessment on football skill learning achievement

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-31
Author(s):  
I Wayan Artanayasa ◽  
Made Kurnia Widiastuti Giri

The current study was aimed at finding the effect of teaching models and an authentic assessment on football skill learning achievement by controlling motor educability. The sample consisted of 142 students of Physical Education Health Department that were selected randomly. The study used the 2x2 factorial experimental design, while the data were analyzed using 2-way ANACOVA. The results showed that after controlling motor educability, football skill learning achievement of the students who learned through the Cooperative Learning type Jigsaw model was higher than those who learned through the conventional model; the football skill learning achievement of those who were assessed by portfolio assessment was better than those who were assessed by authentic assessment. There was also an interaction between the teaching model and an authentic assessment on football skill learning achievement. The students who learned through the Cooperative Learning type jigsaw model was more appropriately assessed by portfolio assessment, while those who learned through the conventional learning model was more appropriately assessed by performance assessment.

2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 100
Author(s):  
Herlina Herlina

The purpose of this study was to compare the learning achievement using cooperative learning model Student Teams Achievement Divisions with cooperative learning model Student Teams Achievement Divisions modification of guided discovery in terms of verbal abality. Based on the results of the study concluded that (1) based on a model of learning, the mathematics achievement of students who use cooperative learning model Student Teams Achievement Divisions as good with mathematics achievement of students who use cooperative learning model Student Teams Achievement Divisions modifications guided discovery, both onstudents who have the high verbal skills, medium and low, (2) base on terms of verbal skills, mathematics achievement of students who have high verbal ability is better than mathematics achievement of students who have medium and low verbal ability, and mathematics achievement of students have medium verbal skillsbetter than mathematics achievement of students have the ability low verbal skills. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui perbandingan prestasi belajar yang menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Student Teams Achievement Divisions dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Student Teams Achievement Divisions modifikasi penemuan terbimbing ditinjau dari kemamuan verbal. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian disimpulkan bahwa (1) berdasarkan model pembelajaran, prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Student Teams Achievement Divisions sama baiknya dengan prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang dikenai model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Student Teams Achievement Divisions modifikasi penemuan terbimbing,baik pada peserta didik yang memiliki kemampuan verbal tinggi, sedang dan rendah, (2) ditinjau dari kemampuan verbal, peserta didik yang memiliki kemampuan verbal tinggi lebih baik daripada peserta didik yang memiliki kemampuan verbal sedang dan rendah, dan peserta didik yang memiliki kemampuan verbal sedang lebih baik daripada peserta didik yang memiliki kemampuan verbal rendah.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 58-69
Author(s):  
Gede Aprianto ◽  
I Made Candiasa ◽  
I Made Gita

AbstrakTujuan utama penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaruh implementasi asesmen otentik yang terdiri dari asesmen proyek dan asesmen kinerja terhadap hasil belajar gambar teknik dengan pengendalian bakat mekanik yang dilakukan di kelas X TKRO SMK Negeri 3 Singaraja. Penelitian ini merupakan jenis quasi experiment dengan rancangan single factor independent groups design with use covariate. Sampel penelitian berjumlah 70 orang siswa yang diambil menggunakan teknik random sampling. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan metode tes obyektif dan uraian. Hipotesis pada penelitian ini diuji dengan Anakova satu jalur. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa : Pertama, hasil belajar gambar teknik siswa yang diberi penerapan asesmen proyek lebih baik daripada siswa yang diberi penerapan asesmen kinerja (thit = 2,303; p ≤ 0,05). Kedua, setelah dilakukan pengendalian terhadap bakat mekanik, hasil belajar gambar teknik siswa yang diberi penerapan asesmen proyek lebih baik daripada hasil belajar siswa yang diberi penerapan asesmen kinerja (Fhit = 49,204; p ≤ 0,05). Ketiga, terdapat kontribusi bakat mekanik (86,2%) terhadap hasil belajar gambar teknik (R = 0,929; thit = 20,620; p ≤ 0,05). Atas temuan tersebut, disimpulkan bahwa asesmen proyek dan bakat mekanik mempunyai pengaruh terhadap hasil belajar gambar teknik pada siswa kelas X TKRO SMK Negeri 3 Singaraja. Kata kunci: asesmen otentik, hasil belajar gambar teknik, bakat mekanik AbstractThe main objective of this study was to determine the effect of authentic assessment implementation consisting of project assessment and performance assessment towards the technical drawing learning achievement by controlling mechanical talent in X TKRO class at SMK Negeri 3 Singaraja. The study employed a quasi-experimental type with a single factor design independent groups design with use covariate. There were 70 students as the samples of the study that determined by random sampling technique. The data were obtained through objective test and essay method. The hypothesis in this study was tested by a one-way Ancova. The results showed that: a) the technical drawing learning achievement of the students that applied project assessment were better than the learning achievement of students who were applied performance assessment (thit= 2.303; p ≤ 0.05), b) after controlling for mechanical talent, the technical drawing learning achievement of the students applied project assessment were better than the students who applied performance assessment (Fhit = 49.204; p ≤ 0.05), c) there was a contribution of mechanical talent (86.2%) to the technical drawing learning achievement (R = 0.929; thit = 20.620; p ≤ 0.05). Based on these findings, it was concluded that project assessment and mechanical talent had an influence on the technical drawing learning achievement of X TKRO class at SMK Negeri 3 Singaraja. Keywords: authentic assessment, technical drawing learning achievement, mechanical talent


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-52
Author(s):  
Ade Onny Siagian

The purpose of the study. To find out: a) The effect of the Jigsaw cooperative learning bentuk on learning achievement in sports physiology. b) The influence of motivation on learning achievement in Sports Physiology. c) The interaction between the Jigsaw cooperative learning bentuk and motivation on learning achievement in Sports Physiology. Materials and methods. The research was conducted from April to December 2019. The population was students of the Department of Sport Science and Sports Coaching, Faculty of Sports and Health, Bhayangkara University Greater Jakarta. The sample is the third semester students consisting of two classes, namely class A as treatment and class B as control. Because the population is small, there is no sampling. Data collection techniques using motivation questionnaires and learning achievement tests. The data analysis technique used two-way analysis of variance. Results. The results The results of the analysis a) The learning achievement of students taught with the Jigsaw cooperative learning bentuk (mean = 60.81) was better than students taught with the conventional bentuk (mean = 60.21) obtained a statistical value of 7.234 with a significance of 0.002. b) The learning achievement of students with high motivation (mean = 71.05) is better than students who study with low motivation (mean = 50.00) obtained a statistical value of 146.905 with a significance of 0.000. c) There is an interaction of influence between learning bentuks and motivation in increasing learning achievement in the Sports Physiology course, the statistical value is 12.342 with a significance of 0.001. Conclusions. So from the results of this study it can be concluded that the Jigsaw type of cooperative learning bentuk is better than the conventional bentuk, and high learning motivation is better than low learning motivation


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zerri Rahman Hakim ◽  
Taufik Taufik. ◽  
Qurrotul Aini

The research in inteded to know the understanding concept buying and selling activities in IPS (social studies) subject learning that cooperative learning type talking stick modelis better than the conventional model. The research method used is quasi experimental with non-equivalent control group research design, sampling was done by using purposive sampling tehnique. The selected sample is class III A student as the control group that get a conventional model as the the treatment and class III B is an experimental class that get cooperative learning type talking stick model as the treatment. Based on the post –test data analysis, it showed that the average of control gorup  student understanding concept is 60,50 while the experimental class is 85,50 it can be seen from the result of the right example test , the result of tcount ttable or 3,43 2,00 with a significant level of 0,05. Based on the results of research that has done, it can be concluded that the student understanding concept buying and selling activities IPS (social studies) subject the applied cooperative learning type talking stick model better than student that applied conventional model. 


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 230
Author(s):  
Ni ketut Erna muliastrini

This study aimed at investigating the effect of inquiry learning model with scaffolding techniques toward ability of science literacy and natural science learning achievement. The design used in this study was using basic pattern Single Factorial Independent Group Design with quasi-experiment type. The sample used was 58 students. The data collected were ability of science literacy and naural science learning achievement. The data were analyzed by using MANOVA used SPSS 17.00 for windows. Research results showed that: First, the ability of science literacy students who were taught by using inquiry learning model with scaffolding techniques was significantly better than students who were taught by using conventional model (F = 19,982; p < 0.05). Second, the natural science achievement of students who were taught by using inquiry learning model with scaffolding techniques was significantly better than students who were taught by using conventional model (F = 13,268; p < 0.05). Third, simultaneously, the ability of science literacy and natural science learning achievement between students who were taught by using inquiry model with scaffolding techniques was significantly better than students who were taught by using conventional model.


2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 135
Author(s):  
Arie Purwa Kusuma

The objectives of this research were to investigate the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in Mathematics viewed from the spatial ability of the students. This research used the quasi-experimental research method with the factorial design of 3 x 3. Its population was all of the students in grade XI of State Senior High Schools of Wonosobo regency in Academic Year 2017/2018. The samples of the research were taken by using the cluster random sampling technique. They consisted of 326 students. The data of the research were analyzed by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells.The results of the research are as follows.1) The cooperative learning model of the STAD type results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than the cooperative learning model of the TAI type and the direct learning model and the cooperative learning model of the STAD type results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than the conventional learning model.2) The learning achievement in Mathematics of the students with the high spatial ability was better than that of the students with the moderate and low spatial abilities, and the learning achievement in Mathematics of the students with the moderate spatial ability was better than that of the students with the low spatial ability. 3) There was an interaction the aforementioned learning models and the categories of the spatial ability on the learning achievement in Mathematics of the students.


2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Herlina Herlina

The purpose of this study was to compare the learning achievement using cooperative learning model Student Teams Achievement Divisions with cooperative learning model Student Teams Achievement Divisions modification of guided discovery in terms of verbal abality. Based on the results of the study concluded that (1) based on a model of learning, the mathematics achievement of students who use cooperative learning model Student Teams Achievement Divisions as good with mathematics achievement of students who use cooperative learning model Student Teams Achievement Divisions modifications guided discovery, both on students who have the high verbal skills, medium and low, (2) base on terms of verbal skills, mathematics achievement of students who have high verbal ability is better than mathematics achievement of students who have medium and low verbal ability, and mathematics achievement of students have medium verbal skillsbetter than mathematics achievement of students have the ability low verbal skills.   Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui perbandingan prestasi belajar yang menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Student Teams Achievement Divisions dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Student Teams Achievement Divisions modifikasi penemuan terbimbing ditinjau dari kemamuan verbal. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian disimpulkan bahwa (1) berdasarkan model pembelajaran, prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Student Teams Achievement Divisions sama baiknya dengan prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang dikenai model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Student Teams Achievement Divisions modifikasi penemuan terbimbing, baik pada peserta didik yang memiliki kemampuan verbal tinggi, sedang dan rendah, (2) ditinjau dari kemampuan verbal, peserta didik yang memiliki kemampuan verbal tinggi lebih baik daripada peserta didik yang memiliki kemampuan verbal sedang dan rendah, dan peserta didik yang memiliki kemampuan verbal sedang lebih baik daripada peserta didik yang memiliki kemampuan verbal rendah.


Author(s):  
Aulia Nur Rahma ◽  
Ichsan Anshory AM ◽  
Erna Yayuk

Abstract: According to observation done by researcher that in SDN Dermo I of Bangil Sub-district Pasuruan. The research purposes are: (1) finding out and describing student’s learning result difference after learning process using cooperative learning model: TAI with conventional learning model in SDN Dermo 1 Elementary School of Bangil Sub-district Pasuruan Regency, and (2) finding out and describing which model are more effective between cooperative model TAI type and conventional model. The research uses experiment research type. Pretest is analyzed with normality and homogenity test, according to the analysis, there found that all classes has normal distribution and homogen. T-test analysis shows that learning result using cooperative learning model TAI type with average 72.50 is significantly better than learning result using conventional learning model with average 62.00.  Abstrak: Berdasarkan hasil observasi yang telah dilakukan peneliti bahwa di SDN Dermo I Bangil Kabupaten Pasuruan. Peneliti mencoba menerapkan pembelajaran kooperatif, salah satu pembelajaran kooperatif TAI. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) untuk mengetahui dan mendeskripsikan perbedaan hasil belajar siswa setelah kegiatan pembelajaran mengguna- kan model TAI dengan model konvensional di SDN Dermo 1 Bangil Kabupaten Pasuruan, dan (2) Untuk mengetahui dan mendeskripsikan manakah model yang lebih efektif antara model TAI dengan model konvensional. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian eksperimen. Ha- sil pretest dianalisis dengan uji normalitas dan homogenitas, berdasarkan analisis tersebut dida- patkan semua kelas berdistribusi normal dan homogen. Hasil analisis uji-t yaitu hasil belajar menggunakan model TAI dengan rata-rata 72,50 lebih baik secara signifikan dibanding dengan hasil belajar menggunakan model konvensional dengan rata-rata 62,00. Kata Kunci: hasil belajar matematik, model TAI, model konvensional


JURNAL IQRA ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Tyas Kusumaningtyas

This study aims to determine: (1) Which has the mathematics learning achievement better, a model of cooperative Thinking Aloud Pairs Problem Solving (Tapps), cooperative Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) or direct instruction, (2) Which has the achievement better mathematics learning, students who have the cognitive style field independent (FI) or students who have the cognitive style field dependent (FD), (3) in each cognitive style, which one has the mathematics learning achievement better, a model of cooperative Thinking Aloud Pairs Problem Solving (Tapps), cooperative Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) or direct learning, (4) on each of the learning model, which one has the achievement of better mathematics learning, students who have the cognitive style field independent (FI) or students who have the cognitive style of field dependent (FD. This study is a quasi-experimental research. The populations in this study were all students of class VII SMP N 5 Metro 2015/2016 school year. The sampling technique was conducted by stratified cluster random sampling. The balance test performed using one way analysis of variance with different cells before carrying out a study of three groups of population. The data analysis technique used to test the hypothesis is two-way ANOVA with different cell with a 3x2 factorial design. Lilliefors prerequisite test method to test for normality and Bartlett methods for homogeneity. From the analysis concluded: (1) cooperative learning model Thinking Aloud Pairs Problem Solving (Tapps) generates mathematics learning achievement better than cooperative learning model Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS), cooperative learning model Thinking Aloud Pairs Problem Solving (Tapps ) generates mathematics learning achievement better than learning direct, cooperative learning model Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) generates mathematics learning achievement better than learning Direct, (2) students with cognitive style Field Independent (FI) had mathematics learning achievement better than students with cognitive style Field Dependent (FD), (3) the individual cognitive style, cooperative learning model Thinking Aloud Pairs Problem Solving (Tapps) generates mathematics learning achievement better than cooperative learning model Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS ), cooperative learning model Thinking Aloud Pairs Problem Solving (Tapps) generates mathematics learning achievement better than learning direct, cooperative learning model Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) generates mathematics learning achievement better than learning Direct (4) on each model of learning, mathematics achievement of students with cognitive style Field Independent (FI) have better mathematics learning achievement than students with cognitive style Field Dependent (FD). Keywords: Tapps, TSTS, Direct learning, Learning Achievement, Cognitive Style.


2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 237
Author(s):  
Aulia Nur Rahma ◽  
Ichsan Anshory AM ◽  
Erna Yayuk

Abstract: According to observation done by researcher that in SDN Dermo I of Bangil Sub-district Pasuruan. The research purposes are: (1) finding out and describing student’s learning result difference after learning process using cooperative learning model: TAI with conventional learning model in SDN Dermo 1 Elementary School of Bangil Sub-district Pasuruan Regency, and (2) finding out and describing which model are more effective between cooperative model TAI type and conventional model. The research uses experiment research type. Pretest is analyzed with normality and homogenity test, according to the analysis, there found that all classes has normal distribution and homogen. T-test analysis shows that learning result using cooperative learning model TAI type with average 72.50 is significantly better than learning result using conventional learning model with average 62.00.  Abstrak: Berdasarkan hasil observasi yang telah dilakukan peneliti bahwa di SDN Dermo I Bangil Kabupaten Pasuruan. Peneliti mencoba menerapkan pembelajaran kooperatif, salah satu pembelajaran kooperatif TAI. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) untuk mengetahui dan mendeskripsikan perbedaan hasil belajar siswa setelah kegiatan pembelajaran mengguna- kan model TAI dengan model konvensional di SDN Dermo 1 Bangil Kabupaten Pasuruan, dan (2) Untuk mengetahui dan mendeskripsikan manakah model yang lebih efektif antara model TAI dengan model konvensional. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian eksperimen. Ha- sil pretest dianalisis dengan uji normalitas dan homogenitas, berdasarkan analisis tersebut dida- patkan semua kelas berdistribusi normal dan homogen. Hasil analisis uji-t yaitu hasil belajar menggunakan model TAI dengan rata-rata 72,50 lebih baik secara signifikan dibanding dengan hasil belajar menggunakan model konvensional dengan rata-rata 62,00. Kata Kunci: hasil belajar matematik, model TAI, model konvensional


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document