scholarly journals Vector-mediated cancer gene therapy: A review

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 152-165
Author(s):  
Manisha. B. Shinde ◽  
Dr. Archana D. Kajale ◽  
Dr. Madhuri A. Channawar ◽  
Dr. Shilpa R. Gawande

Gene therapy is the transfer of genetic material to cure a disease or at least to improve the clinical status of a patient. One of the basic concepts of gene therapy is to transform viruses into genetic shuttles, which will deliver the gene of interest into the target cells. Safe methods have been devised to do this, using several viral and non-viral vectors. Two main approaches emerged: in vivo modification and ex vivo modification. Retrovirus, adenovirus, adenoassociated virus are suitable for gene therapeutic approaches which are based on permanent expression of the therapeutic gene. Non-viral vectors are far less efficient than viral vectors, but they have advantages due to their low immunogenicity and their large capacity for therapeutic DNA. The most commonly used DNA virus vectors are based on adenoviruses and adeno-associated viruses. An example of gene-knockout mediated gene therapy is the knockout of the human CCR5 gene in T-cells in order to control HIV infection. To improve the function of non-viral vectors, the addition of viral functions such as receptor mediated uptake and nuclear translocation of DNA may finally lead to the development of an artificial virus. Gene transfer protocols have been approved for human use in inherited diseases, cancers and acquired disorders. Although the available vector systems are able to deliver genes in vivo into cells, the ideal delivery vehicle has not been found. Thus, the present viral vectors should be used only with great caution in human beings and further progress in vector development is necessary.

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-56
Author(s):  
Hogir Saadi

Gene therapy can be described broadly as the transfer of genetic material to control a disease or at least to enhance a patient's clinical status. The transformation of viruses into genetic shuttles is one of the core principles of gene therapy, which will introduce the gene of interest into the target tissue and cells. To do this, safe strategies have been invented, using many viral and non-viral vector delivery. Two major methods have emerged: modification in vivo and modification ex vivo. For gene therapeutic approaches which are focused on lifelong expression of the therapeutic gene, retrovirus, adenovirus, adeno-associated viruses are acceptable. Non-viral vectors are much less successful than viral vectors, but because of their low immune responses and their broad therapeutic DNA ability, they have advantages. The addition of viral functions such as receptor-mediated uptake and nuclear translocation of DNA may eventually lead to the development of an artificial virus in order to improve the role of non-viral vectors. For human use in genetic conditions, cancers and acquired illnesses, gene transfer techniques have been allowed. The ideal delivery vehicle has not been identified, although the accessible vector systems are capable of transporting genes in vivo into cells. Therefore, only with great caution can the present viral vectors be used in human beings and further progress in the production of vectors is required. Current progresses in our understanding of gene therapy approaches and their delivery technology, as well as the victors used to deliver therapeutic genes, are the primary goals of this review. For that reason, a literature search on PubMed and Google Scholar was carried out using different keywords.


2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaitip Tipanee ◽  
Yoke Chin Chai ◽  
Thierry VandenDriessche ◽  
Marinee K. Chuah

Transposons derived from Sleeping Beauty (SB), piggyBac (PB), or Tol2 typically require cotransfection of transposon DNA with a transposase either as an expression plasmid or mRNA. Consequently, this results in genomic integration of the potentially therapeutic gene into chromosomes of the desired target cells, and thus conferring stable expression. Non-viral transfection methods are typically preferred to deliver the transposon components into the target cells. However, these methods do not match the efficacy typically attained with viral vectors and are sometimes associated with cellular toxicity evoked by the DNA itself. In recent years, the overall transposition efficacy has gradually increased by codon optimization of the transposase, generation of hyperactive transposases, and/or introduction of specific mutations in the transposon terminal repeats. Their versatility enabled the stable genetic engineering in many different primary cell types, including stem/progenitor cells and differentiated cell types. This prompted numerous preclinical proof-of-concept studies in disease models that demonstrated the potential of DNA transposons for ex vivo and in vivo gene therapy. One of the merits of transposon systems relates to their ability to deliver relatively large therapeutic transgenes that cannot readily be accommodated in viral vectors such as full-length dystrophin cDNA. These emerging insights paved the way toward the first transposon-based phase I/II clinical trials to treat hematologic cancer and other diseases. Though encouraging results were obtained, controlled pivotal clinical trials are needed to corroborate the efficacy and safety of transposon-based therapies.


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aparna Bansal ◽  
Himanshu

Introduction: Gene therapy has emerged out as a promising therapeutic pave for the treatment of genetic and acquired diseases. Gene transfection into target cells using naked DNA is a simple and safe approach which has been further improved by combining vectors or gene carriers. Both viral and non-viral approaches have achieved a milestone to establish this technique, but non-viral approaches have attained a significant attention because of their favourable properties like less immunotoxicity and biosafety, easy to produce with versatile surface modifications, etc. Literature is rich in evidences which revealed that undoubtedly, non–viral vectors have acquired a unique place in gene therapy but still there are number of challenges which are to be overcome to increase their effectiveness and prove them ideal gene vectors. Conclusion: To date, tissue specific expression, long lasting gene expression system, enhanced gene transfection efficiency has been achieved with improvement in delivery methods using non-viral vectors. This review mainly summarizes the various physical and chemical methods for gene transfer in vitro and in vivo.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (14) ◽  
pp. 7545
Author(s):  
Myriam Sainz-Ramos ◽  
Idoia Gallego ◽  
Ilia Villate-Beitia ◽  
Jon Zarate ◽  
Iván Maldonado ◽  
...  

Efficient delivery of genetic material into cells is a critical process to translate gene therapy into clinical practice. In this sense, the increased knowledge acquired during past years in the molecular biology and nanotechnology fields has contributed to the development of different kinds of non-viral vector systems as a promising alternative to virus-based gene delivery counterparts. Consequently, the development of non-viral vectors has gained attention, and nowadays, gene delivery mediated by these systems is considered as the cornerstone of modern gene therapy due to relevant advantages such as low toxicity, poor immunogenicity and high packing capacity. However, despite these relevant advantages, non-viral vectors have been poorly translated into clinical success. This review addresses some critical issues that need to be considered for clinical practice application of non-viral vectors in mainstream medicine, such as efficiency, biocompatibility, long-lasting effect, route of administration, design of experimental condition or commercialization process. In addition, potential strategies for overcoming main hurdles are also addressed. Overall, this review aims to raise awareness among the scientific community and help researchers gain knowledge in the design of safe and efficient non-viral gene delivery systems for clinical applications to progress in the gene therapy field.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vyacheslav Z. Tarantul ◽  
Alexander V. Gavrilenko

: Peripheral artery diseases remain a serious public health problem. Although there are many traditional methods for their treatment using conservative therapeutic techniques and surgery, gene therapy is an alternative and potentially more effective treatment option especially for “no option” patients. This review treats the results of many years of research and application of gene therapy as an example of treatment of patients with critical limb ischemia. Data on successful and unsuccessful attempts to use this technology for treating this disease are presented. Trends in changing the paradigm of approaches to therapeutic angiogenesis are noted: from viral vectors to non-viral vectors, from gene transfer to the whole organism to targeted transfer to cells and tissues, from single gene use to combination of genes; from DNA therapy to RNA therapy, from in vivo therapy to ex vivo therapy.


mBio ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina L. Parker ◽  
Timothy M. Jacobs ◽  
Justin T. Huckaby ◽  
Dimple Harit ◽  
Samuel K. Lai

ABSTRACT Despite their exceptional potencies, the broad tropism of most commonly used lentivirus (LV) vectors limits their use for targeted gene delivery in vivo. We hypothesized that we could improve the specificity of LV targeting by coupling (i) reduction of their binding to off-target cells with (ii) redirection of the vectors with a bispecific antibody (bsAb) that binds both LV and receptors on target cells. As a proof of concept, we pseudotyped nonreplicating LV using a mutated Sindbis envelope (mSindbis) with ablated binding to native receptors, while retaining the capacity to facilitate efficient fusion and endosomal escape. We then evaluated the transduction potencies of the mSindbis LV for HER2-positive (HER2+) (SKBR3) breast and HER2-negative (HER2−) (A2780) cells when redirected with different bsAbs. mSindbis LV alone failed to induce appreciable green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression in either cell. When mixed with HER2-targeting bsAb, mSindbis LV was exceptionally potent, transducing 12% to 16% of the SKBR3 cells at a multiplicity of infection (MOI [ratio of viral genome copies to target cells]) of 3. Transduction was highly specific, resulting in ∼50-fold-greater selectivity toward SKBR3 cells versus A2780 cells. Redirecting mSindbis LV led to a 10-fold improvement in cell-specific targeting compared to redirecting wild-type Sindbis LV with the same bsAb, underscoring the importance of ablating native virus tropism in order to maximize targeting specificity. The redirection of mutated LV using bsAb represents a potent and highly versatile platform for targeted gene therapy. IMPORTANCE The goal of gene therapy is specific delivery and expression of therapeutic genes to target cells and tissues. Common lentivirus (LV) vectors are efficient gene delivery vehicles but offer little specificity. Here, we report an effective and versatile strategy to redirect LV to target cells using bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) that bind both cell receptors and LV envelope domains. Importantly, we ablated the native receptor binding of LV to minimize off-target transduction. Coupling bsAb specificity and ablated native LV tropism synergistically enhanced the selectivity of our targeted gene delivery system. The modular nature of our bsAb-based redirection enables facile targeting of the same LV to diverse tissues/cells. By abrogating the native broad tropism of LV, our bsAb-LV redirection strategy may enable lentivirus-based gene delivery in vivo, expanding the current use of LV beyond ex vivo applications.


2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 369-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulliana Augusta Rangel Gonçalves ◽  
Raquel de Melo Alves Paiva

ABSTRACT The ability to make site-specific modifications to the human genome has been an objective in medicine since the recognition of the gene as the basic unit of heredity. Thus, gene therapy is understood as the ability of genetic improvement through the correction of altered (mutated) genes or site-specific modifications that target therapeutic treatment. This therapy became possible through the advances of genetics and bioengineering that enabled manipulating vectors for delivery of extrachromosomal material to target cells. One of the main focuses of this technique is the optimization of delivery vehicles (vectors) that are mostly plasmids, nanostructured or viruses. The viruses are more often investigated due to their excellence of invading cells and inserting their genetic material. However, there is great concern regarding exacerbated immune responses and genome manipulation, especially in germ line cells. In vivo studies in in somatic cell showed satisfactory results with approved protocols in clinical trials. These trials have been conducted in the United States, Europe, Australia and China. Recent biotechnological advances, such as induced pluripotent stem cells in patients with liver diseases, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell immunotherapy, and genomic editing by CRISPR/Cas9, are addressed in this review.


1996 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 204-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.A. Garlick ◽  
E.S. Fenjves

Gene therapy has moved beyond the pre-clinical stage to the treatment of a variety of inherited and acquired diseases. For such therapy to be successful, genes must be efficiently delivered to target cells and gene products must be expressed for prolonged periods of time without toxic effects to the host. This may be achieved by means of an in vivo strategy where genes are transferred directly into a host cell, or by means of an ex vivo approach through which cells are removed, cultured, targeted for gene delivery, and grafted back to the host. Several obstacles continue to delay safe and effective clinical application of gene therapy in a variety of target cells. The limited survival of transplanted cells, transient expression of transferred genes, and difficulties in targeting stem cells are technical issues requiring further investigation. Epidermal and oral keratinocytes are potential vehicles for gene therapy. Several features of these tissues can be utilized to achieve delivery of therapeutic gene products for local or systemic delivery. These qualities include: (1) the presence of stem cells; (2) the cell-, strata-, and site-specific regulation of keratinocyte gene expression; (3) tissue accessibility; and (4) secretory capacity. Such features can be exploited by the use of gene therapy strategies to facilitate: (1) identification, enrichment, and targeting of stem cells to ensure the continued presence of the transferred gene; (2) high-level and persistent transgene expression using keratinocyte-specific promoters; (3) tissue access needed for culture and grafting for ex vivo therapy and direct in vivo gene transfer; (4) secretion of transgene product for local or systemic delivery; and (5) monitoring of genetically modified tissue and removal if treatment termination is required. Optimal gene therapy strategies are being tested in a variety of tissues to treat dominant and recessive genetic disorders as well as acquired diseases such as neoplasia and infectious disease. This experience provides a basis for the application of such clinical studies to a spectrum of diseases effecting epidermal and oral keratinocytes. Gene therapy is in an early stage yet holds great promise for its ultimate clinical application.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 164-173
Author(s):  
Saleha Rehman ◽  
Bushra Nabi ◽  
Faheem Hyder Pottoo ◽  
Sanjula Baboota ◽  
Javed Ali

: The neuropsychiatric illnesses have been enigmatic, with no effective treatment to date. The complexity and heterogeneity of psychiatric disorders are daunting for the development of novel treatment modalities. The conventional treatment approaches are less effective and are associated with several side effects, thus creating the need for the development of more innovative strategies. Since psychiatric disorders are known to exhibit genetic linkage, gene therapy has created an interest among the researchers worldwide. The delivery of nucleic acids is a complex process requiring the transport of genetic material across various intracellular and extracellular barriers to reach the target cells eliciting the transfection process. Therefore, the identification or development of the delivery system for nucleic acid delivery still remains the challenge. Viral vectors are quite effective but are associated with toxicity and side effects. With the rapid advancement in the field of nanotechnology, nanosized materials were identified to be the perfect candidate for nonviral vectors in gene delivery. The biggest advantage of nanoparticles is that their surface can be engineered in many possible ways to deliver the drugs directly to the target site. Although gene therapy has already been established as an innovative treatment modality for several neurological diseases, its use in psychiatry still warrants more investigations for its translation into clinical use. The present manuscript discusses the prospects of gene therapy in psychiatric disorders, their benefits, and pitfalls. The review embarks upon the importance of nanoparticle-based gene therapy for effective management of psychiatric disorders.


2012 ◽  
Vol 303 (6) ◽  
pp. H629-H638 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng-Huang Su ◽  
Yih-Jer Wu ◽  
Hsueh-Hsiao Wang ◽  
Hung-I Yeh

The goal of gene therapy is either to introduce a therapeutic gene into or replace a defective gene in an individual's cells and tissues. Gene therapy has been urged as a potential method to induce therapeutic angiogenesis in ischemic myocardium and peripheral tissues after extensive investigation in recent preclinical and clinical studies. A successful gene therapy mainly relies on the development of the gene delivery vector. Developments in viral and nonviral vector technology including cell-based gene transfer will further improve transgene delivery and expression efficiency. Nonviral approaches as alternative gene delivery vehicles to viral vectors have received significant attention. Recently, a simple and safe approach of gene delivery into target cells using naked DNA has been improved by combining several techniques. Among the physical approaches, ultrasonic microbubble gene delivery, with its high safety profile, low costs, and repeatable applicability, can increase the permeability of cell membrane to macromolecules such as plasmid DNA by its bioeffects and can provide as a feasible tool in gene delivery. On the other hand, among the promising areas for gene therapy in acquired diseases, ischemic cardiovascular diseases have been widely studied. As a result, gene therapy using advanced technology may play an important role in this regard. The aims of this review focus on understanding the cellular and in vivo barriers in gene transfer and provide an overview of currently used chemical vectors and physical tools that are applied in nonviral cardiovascular gene transfer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document