scholarly journals Gene Therapy Approaches

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-56
Author(s):  
Hogir Saadi

Gene therapy can be described broadly as the transfer of genetic material to control a disease or at least to enhance a patient's clinical status. The transformation of viruses into genetic shuttles is one of the core principles of gene therapy, which will introduce the gene of interest into the target tissue and cells. To do this, safe strategies have been invented, using many viral and non-viral vector delivery. Two major methods have emerged: modification in vivo and modification ex vivo. For gene therapeutic approaches which are focused on lifelong expression of the therapeutic gene, retrovirus, adenovirus, adeno-associated viruses are acceptable. Non-viral vectors are much less successful than viral vectors, but because of their low immune responses and their broad therapeutic DNA ability, they have advantages. The addition of viral functions such as receptor-mediated uptake and nuclear translocation of DNA may eventually lead to the development of an artificial virus in order to improve the role of non-viral vectors. For human use in genetic conditions, cancers and acquired illnesses, gene transfer techniques have been allowed. The ideal delivery vehicle has not been identified, although the accessible vector systems are capable of transporting genes in vivo into cells. Therefore, only with great caution can the present viral vectors be used in human beings and further progress in the production of vectors is required. Current progresses in our understanding of gene therapy approaches and their delivery technology, as well as the victors used to deliver therapeutic genes, are the primary goals of this review. For that reason, a literature search on PubMed and Google Scholar was carried out using different keywords.

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 152-165
Author(s):  
Manisha. B. Shinde ◽  
Dr. Archana D. Kajale ◽  
Dr. Madhuri A. Channawar ◽  
Dr. Shilpa R. Gawande

Gene therapy is the transfer of genetic material to cure a disease or at least to improve the clinical status of a patient. One of the basic concepts of gene therapy is to transform viruses into genetic shuttles, which will deliver the gene of interest into the target cells. Safe methods have been devised to do this, using several viral and non-viral vectors. Two main approaches emerged: in vivo modification and ex vivo modification. Retrovirus, adenovirus, adenoassociated virus are suitable for gene therapeutic approaches which are based on permanent expression of the therapeutic gene. Non-viral vectors are far less efficient than viral vectors, but they have advantages due to their low immunogenicity and their large capacity for therapeutic DNA. The most commonly used DNA virus vectors are based on adenoviruses and adeno-associated viruses. An example of gene-knockout mediated gene therapy is the knockout of the human CCR5 gene in T-cells in order to control HIV infection. To improve the function of non-viral vectors, the addition of viral functions such as receptor mediated uptake and nuclear translocation of DNA may finally lead to the development of an artificial virus. Gene transfer protocols have been approved for human use in inherited diseases, cancers and acquired disorders. Although the available vector systems are able to deliver genes in vivo into cells, the ideal delivery vehicle has not been found. Thus, the present viral vectors should be used only with great caution in human beings and further progress in vector development is necessary.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (14) ◽  
pp. 7545
Author(s):  
Myriam Sainz-Ramos ◽  
Idoia Gallego ◽  
Ilia Villate-Beitia ◽  
Jon Zarate ◽  
Iván Maldonado ◽  
...  

Efficient delivery of genetic material into cells is a critical process to translate gene therapy into clinical practice. In this sense, the increased knowledge acquired during past years in the molecular biology and nanotechnology fields has contributed to the development of different kinds of non-viral vector systems as a promising alternative to virus-based gene delivery counterparts. Consequently, the development of non-viral vectors has gained attention, and nowadays, gene delivery mediated by these systems is considered as the cornerstone of modern gene therapy due to relevant advantages such as low toxicity, poor immunogenicity and high packing capacity. However, despite these relevant advantages, non-viral vectors have been poorly translated into clinical success. This review addresses some critical issues that need to be considered for clinical practice application of non-viral vectors in mainstream medicine, such as efficiency, biocompatibility, long-lasting effect, route of administration, design of experimental condition or commercialization process. In addition, potential strategies for overcoming main hurdles are also addressed. Overall, this review aims to raise awareness among the scientific community and help researchers gain knowledge in the design of safe and efficient non-viral gene delivery systems for clinical applications to progress in the gene therapy field.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vyacheslav Z. Tarantul ◽  
Alexander V. Gavrilenko

: Peripheral artery diseases remain a serious public health problem. Although there are many traditional methods for their treatment using conservative therapeutic techniques and surgery, gene therapy is an alternative and potentially more effective treatment option especially for “no option” patients. This review treats the results of many years of research and application of gene therapy as an example of treatment of patients with critical limb ischemia. Data on successful and unsuccessful attempts to use this technology for treating this disease are presented. Trends in changing the paradigm of approaches to therapeutic angiogenesis are noted: from viral vectors to non-viral vectors, from gene transfer to the whole organism to targeted transfer to cells and tissues, from single gene use to combination of genes; from DNA therapy to RNA therapy, from in vivo therapy to ex vivo therapy.


2005 ◽  
Vol 110 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Scott Ralph ◽  
Katie Binley ◽  
Liang-Fong Wong ◽  
Mimoun Azzouz ◽  
Nicholas D. Mazarakis

Gene therapy holds great promise for the treatment of a wide range of inherited and acquired disorders. The development of viral vector systems to mediate safe and long-lasting expression of therapeutic transgenes in specific target cell populations is continually advancing. Gene therapy for the nervous system is particularly challenging due to the post-mitotic nature of neuronal cells and the restricted accessibility of the brain itself. Viral vectors based on lentiviruses provide particularly attractive vehicles for delivery of therapeutic genes to treat neurological and ocular diseases, since they efficiently transduce non-dividing cells and mediate sustained transgene expression. Furthermore, novel routes of vector delivery to the nervous system have recently been elucidated and these have increased further the scope of lentiviruses for gene therapy application. Several studies have demonstrated convincing therapeutic efficacy of lentiviral-based gene therapies in animal models of severe neurological disorders and the push for progressing such vectors to the clinic is ongoing. This review describes the key features of lentiviral vectors that make them such useful tools for gene therapy to the nervous system and outlines the major breakthroughs in the potential use of such vectors for treating neurodegenerative and ocular diseases.


Diseases ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiaki Hidai ◽  
Hisataka Kitano

Although the development of effective viral vectors put gene therapy on the road to commercialization, nonviral vectors show promise for practical use because of their relative safety and lower cost. A significant barrier to the use of nonviral vectors, however, is that they have not yet proven effective. This apparent lack of interest can be attributed to the problem of the low gene transfer efficiency associated with nonviral vectors. The efficiency of gene transfer via nonviral vectors has been reported to be 1/10th to 1/1000th that of viral vectors. Despite the fact that new gene transfer methods and nonviral vectors have been developed, no significant improvements in gene transfer efficiency have been achieved. Nevertheless, some notable progress has been made. In this review, we discuss studies that report good results using nonviral vectors in vivo in animal models, with a particular focus on studies aimed at in vivo gene therapy to treat cancer, as this disease has attracted the interest of researchers developing nonviral vectors. We describe the conditions in which nonviral vectors work more efficiently for gene therapy and discuss how the goals might differ for nonviral versus viral vector development and use.


2000 ◽  
Vol 164 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Stone ◽  
A David ◽  
F Bolognani ◽  
PR Lowenstein ◽  
MG Castro

The transfer of genetic material into endocrine cells and tissues, both in vitro and in vivo, has been identified as critical for the study of endocrine mechanisms and the future treatment of endocrine disorders. Classical methods of gene transfer, such as transfection, are inefficient and limited mainly to delivery into actively proliferating cells in vitro. The development of viral vector gene delivery systems is beginning to circumvent these initial setbacks. Several kinds of viruses, including retrovirus, adenovirus, adeno-associated virus, and herpes simplex virus, have been manipulated for use in gene transfer and gene therapy applications. As different viral vector systems have their own unique advantages and disadvantages, they each have applications for which they are best suited. This review will discuss viral vector systems that have been used for gene transfer into the endocrine system, and recent developments in viral vector technology that may improve their use for endocrine applications - chimeric vectors, viral vector targeting and transcriptional regulation of transgene expression.


Author(s):  
Anne-Christine Field ◽  
Waseem Qasim

Alongside advancements in gene therapy for inherited immune disorders, the need for effective alternative therapeutic options for other conditions has resulted in an expansion in the field of research for T cell gene therapy. T cells are easily obtained and can be induced to divide robustly ex vivo, a characteristic that allows them to be highly permissible to viral vector-mediated introduction of transgenes. Pioneering clinical trials targeting cancers and infectious diseases have provided safety and feasibility data and important information about persistence of engineered cells in vivo. Here, we review clinical experiences with γ-retroviral and lentiviral vectors and consider the potential of integrating transposon-based vectors as well as specific genome editing with designer nucleases in engineered T cell therapies.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2897-2897 ◽  
Author(s):  
Osamu Iijima ◽  
Koichi Miyake ◽  
Aki Nakamura ◽  
Tsutomu Igarashi ◽  
Chizu Kanokoda ◽  
...  

Abstract Hypophosphatasia (HPP) is an inherited skeletal disease caused by mutations of the ALPL gene that encodes tissue-nonspecific alkaline phosphatase (TNALP). TNALP is an ectoenzyme and plays an essential role in bone mineralization. The major symptoms of HPP are hypomineralization of systemic bones, respiratory insufficiency and epileptic seizures. Perinatal and infantile forms of HPP are often fatal. Since ALP functions on the exterior of the cells, enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) is a potential approach to treat HPP. Currently, Phase II/III clinical trials of ERT using a recombinant TNALP which linked deca-aspartate (D10) at the C terminus for bone targeting are ongoing in North America, Europe and Japan. The perinatal and infantile patients received the ERT showed apparent improvement of the symptoms. However, the ERT is highly invasive for the young patients because it requires repeated subcutaneous administration of large amounts of the enzyme every 3 times a week for long-term correction. As another approach to treat HPP, we have reported in vivo gene therapy for ALPL (Akp2) knock-out mice (HPP mice). The treated HPP mice were rescued by a single systemic injection of lentiviral vector or adeno-associated viral vector expressing bone targeted form of TNALP (TNALP-D10) during the neonatal or fetal period. Although untreated HPP mice developed apparent growth failure and died by around 20 days of age due to severe skeletal hypomineralization and epileptic seizure, the treated HPP mice were prolonged the survival and improved the physical activity. In the treated HPP mice, plasma ALP activity was kept higher than 1 U/ml (approximately 0.01 U/ml in untreated HPP mice and 0.1 U/ml in wild type (WT) mice) which gives therapeutic effects. However, disadvantages of in vivo gene therapy include the risk of germline gene transfer and induction of immune responses to the vectors or transgene products. To overcome these problems, we examined a feasibility of ex vivo gene therapy using hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) transduced by lentiviral vector expressing TNALP-D10. The potential advantages of this approach are lifelong expression of TNALP-D10 and prevention of risks of in vivo gene therapy. The lineage negative bone marrow cells containing HSC (Lin- BMC) were harvested from B6.CD45.1 mice (Ly5.1) and then enriched using Mouse Hematopoietic Progenitor (Stem) Cell Enrichment Set (BD bioscience). Lin- BMC was transduced with lentiviral vector expressing TNALP-D10 for 20 hrs at an moi of 50 with mSCF, mIL3 and rhIL6 on Retronectin coated plate. Recipient HPP mice (Ly5.2) on day 2 after birth were received a sub-lethal dose of total body irradiation (4Gy) 4hr prior to transplantation. Then, the transduced Lin- BMC (1 x 106 cells) was transplanted intravenously into the HPP mice through the temporal vein or jugular vein. The plasma ALP activity was rapidly elevated approximately 400 fold higher than untreated HPP mice (untreated: 0.014±0.004 units/ml (n=4) and treated: 5.39±2.29 units/ml (n=7), respectively) on 1 week after the transplantation and kept at this level during the observation period. Engraftment rate of Ly5.1 donor cells were sustained at approximately 30-40% with multilineage potential. The treated HPP mice were prolonged their survival over 3 months without epileptic seizures and the physical activities were improved. The histochemical ALP staining indicated TNALP-D10 was accumulated on the surface of trabecular and cortical bones of the treated HPP mice. The bone mineralization was significantly improved, but still not satisfactory compared with age matched WT mice. Contrary to our expectations, 2 of 9 HPP mice transplanted with non-transduced BMC also survived for 3 months. However, the plasma ALP activity was not elevated at all and the bone mineralization was incomplete compared with treated HPP mice. These results indicate that a single transplantation of genetically modified BMC at neonatal period is sufficient for long-term supply of TNALP-D10 and rescue of lethal HPP mice, even though hypomineralization was not completely recovered. Further optimization of viral vector and conditioning of transplantation is required to increase the treatment efficacy for HPP. However, neonatal ex vivo gene therapy using genetically modified BMC would be a possible and practical approach to treat HPP. Disclosures: Watanabe: Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.


2004 ◽  
Vol 6 (16) ◽  
pp. 1-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boris Blechacz ◽  
Stephen J. Russell

With the increasing incidence and mortality of cancer worldwide, there is an urgent need for new therapeutic approaches. Gene therapy is one such approach and preliminary data are promising. Viral and nonviral vector systems for gene delivery are available, but most of the current systems suffer from disadvantages such as low transfection efficiencies, in vivo instability, targeting problems, mutagenic potential and immunogenicity. Viruses of the Parvoviridae family, which are characterised by their oncotropism, oncosuppression, long-term gene expression and human apathogenicity, potentially offer advantages as viral vectors. This article evaluates their usefulness in gene therapy strategies for cancer.


2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaitip Tipanee ◽  
Yoke Chin Chai ◽  
Thierry VandenDriessche ◽  
Marinee K. Chuah

Transposons derived from Sleeping Beauty (SB), piggyBac (PB), or Tol2 typically require cotransfection of transposon DNA with a transposase either as an expression plasmid or mRNA. Consequently, this results in genomic integration of the potentially therapeutic gene into chromosomes of the desired target cells, and thus conferring stable expression. Non-viral transfection methods are typically preferred to deliver the transposon components into the target cells. However, these methods do not match the efficacy typically attained with viral vectors and are sometimes associated with cellular toxicity evoked by the DNA itself. In recent years, the overall transposition efficacy has gradually increased by codon optimization of the transposase, generation of hyperactive transposases, and/or introduction of specific mutations in the transposon terminal repeats. Their versatility enabled the stable genetic engineering in many different primary cell types, including stem/progenitor cells and differentiated cell types. This prompted numerous preclinical proof-of-concept studies in disease models that demonstrated the potential of DNA transposons for ex vivo and in vivo gene therapy. One of the merits of transposon systems relates to their ability to deliver relatively large therapeutic transgenes that cannot readily be accommodated in viral vectors such as full-length dystrophin cDNA. These emerging insights paved the way toward the first transposon-based phase I/II clinical trials to treat hematologic cancer and other diseases. Though encouraging results were obtained, controlled pivotal clinical trials are needed to corroborate the efficacy and safety of transposon-based therapies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document