scholarly journals Kewenangan Dewan Perwakilan Daerah Dalam Pengawasan Peraturan Daerah

2022 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 11
Author(s):  
Muhammad Roqib
Keyword(s):  
Central Government ◽  
Evaluation Process ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
Legal Studies ◽  
Regional Interest ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Government

Regional Representative Council (Dewan Perwakilan Daerah/DPD) is a constitution organ. This one of state institutions is established and empowered by the 1945 Constitution. The existence of the Regional Representative Council is regulated in the provision of Chapter VII Article 22 C and Article 22 D of the 1945 Constitution. The authorities and duties of the Regional Representative Council is regulated in No. 2/2018 of Law about the People’s Consultative Assembly (MPR), the House of Representative (DPR), the Regional Representative Council (DPD), and the Regional People’s Representative Council (DPRD). One of the Regional Representative Council’s authorities in the Law No. 2/2018 is able to monitor and evaluate the regional regulations plan and the regional regulations. However, since the verdict of Constitutional Court No. 137/PUU XIII/2015 and 56/PUU-XIV/2016 about revocation of the government authority (central) to nullify (executive review) the regional regulation, the authority of the Regional Representative Council in monitoring the regional regulations plan and the regional regulations is weakened and not clear. The nullification of the regional regulation(s) is owned by judicial institution only, such as the Supreme Court (MA). In fact, the Regional Representative Council should be as a representative council that can associate those two interests at once, the central government in top down way and regional interest in bottom up way. How does the Regional Representative Council align those two waves of interests at once through the regional regulation(s)? This research uses statute approach, by examining the related laws about law issues which is already analyzed and also uses conceptual approach, which starts from the point of views and developed doctrines in the legal studies. Based on the research results, it was known that the verdict of the Constitutional Court did not eliminate the control of the central government, in this case was the Regional Representative Council to the regional government, including the making of the regency/city regional regulations. But, this control was not in the shape of testing or nullifying the regional regulations. The Regional Representative Council in consort with the ministry, and governor as the representative of the central government should do some evaluation process on each regional regulations plan.

scholarly journals KEWENANGAN DEWAN PERWAKILAN DAERAH DALAM PENGAWASAN PERATURAN DAERAH

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 36
Author(s):  
Muhammad Roqib
Keyword(s):  
Central Government ◽  
Evaluation Process ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
Legal Studies ◽  
Regional Interest ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Government

Regional Representative Council (Dewan Perwakilan Daerah/DPD) is a constitution organ. This one of state institutions is established and empowered by the 1945 Constitution. The existence of the Regional Representative Council is regulated in the provision of Chapter VII Article 22 C and Article 22 D of the 1945 Constitution. The authorities and duties of the Regional Representative Council is regulated in No. 2/2018 of Law about the People’s Consultative Assembly (MPR), the House of Representative (DPR), the Regional Representative Council (DPD), and the Regional People’s Representative Council (DPRD). One of the Regional Representative Council’s authorities in the Law No. 2/2018 is able to monitor and evaluate the regional regulations plan and the regional regulations. However, since the verdict of Constitutional Court No. 137/PUU XIII/2015 and 56/PUU-XIV/2016 about revocation of the government authority (central) to nullify (executive review) the regional regulation, the authority of the Regional Representative Council in monitoring the regional regulations plan and the regional regulations is weakened and not clear. The nullification of the regional regulation(s) is owned by judicial institution only, such as the Supreme Court (MA). In fact, the Regional Representative Council should be as a representative council that can associate those two interests at once, the central government in top down way and regional interest in bottom up way. How does the Regional Representative Council align those two waves of interests at once through the regional regulation(s)? This research uses statute approach, by examining the related laws about law issues which is already analyzed and also uses conceptual approach, which starts from the point of views and developed doctrines in the legal studies. Based on the research results, it was known that the verdict of the Constitutional Court did not eliminate the control of the central government, in this case was the Regional Representative Council to the regional government, including the making of the regency/city regional regulations. But, this control was not in the shape of testing or nullifying the regional regulations. The Regional Representative Council in consort with the ministry, and governor as the representative of the central government should do some evaluation process on each regional regulations plan.

scholarly journals The Urgency Of Creating Regional Regulations For Supporting The Implementation Of Regional Autonomy

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 75
Author(s):  
Lies Ariany ◽  
Risni Ristiawati
Keyword(s):  
Local Governments ◽  
Local Community ◽  
Central Government ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Regional Autonomy ◽  
Library Research ◽  
The People ◽  
The Government ◽  
Government Level

The Regional government which carried out based on the principle of autonomy as wide as possible implies that the regions are given the authority to regulate and manage all their own affairs. So, this study tried to conduct a study of normative law to further examine the nature of the implementation of regional autonomy, and the second tried to analyze the role of regional regulations in order to support the implementation of regional autonomy through library research using the statute approach and conceptual approach. The results of the study indicated that one of the important ideals and rationalities for implementing regional autonomy was to make the policy process closer to the society, not only in the central government. For this reason, authority needs to be given so that local governments can take their own initiative to make decisions regarding the interests of the local community through laws at the local government level. Thus, the contents of the Regional Regulations are to accommodate the interests of the people in the regions in order to achieve happiness and prosperity that is distributed equally to the people in the area.Pemerintah daerah dilaksanakan berdasarkan prinsip otonomi yaitu memberi dan melaksanakan rumah tangga itu sendiri. Untuk alasan ini, penelitian ini adalah studi hukum normatif untuk memeriksa lebih lanjut tentang pelaksanaan otonomi daerah dan pendekatan lain yang dapat dianalisis dengan menggunakan pendekatan perpustakaan menggunakan pendekatan Statuta dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa salah satu cita-cita dan rasionalitas penting pelaksanaan otonomi daerah adalah membuat proses lebih dekat dengan masyarakat, tidak hanya di pemerintah pusat. Untuk alasan ini, perlu mengisi ruang sehingga pemerintah dapat mengambil inisiatif sendiri untuk membuat keputusan tentang lingkungan masyarakat melalui peraturan di tingkat pemerintah daerah. Ini adalah konten materi dari Peraturan Daerah pada dasarnya untuk mengakomodasi manfaat masyarakat di daerah dalam rangka mencapai kebahagiaan dan kemakmuran yang didistribusikan secara merata kepada orang-orang di daerah tersebut.(The regional government is carried out based on the principle of autonomy is giving and carrying out the household itself. For this reason, the research is normative legal studies to examine more about the implementation of regional autonomy and other approaches that can be analyzed using the library approach using the Statute approach and the conceptual approach. The results of the study show that one of the important ideals and rationalities of the implementation of regional autonomy is to make the process closer to the community, not only in the central government. For this reason, it is necessary to fill the space so that the government can take its own initiative to make decisions about the community environment through a regulation at the regional government level. This is the material content of the Regional Regulation is essentially to accommodate the benefits of the community in the area in order to achieve happiness and prosperity that is evenly distributed to the people in the area). 

scholarly journals KEDUDUKAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI SEBAGAI LEMBAGA NEGARA BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR 1945

Solusi ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-105
Author(s):  
Johansyah Johansyah
Keyword(s):  
Political Parties ◽  
House Of Representatives ◽  
Vice President ◽  
Executive Branch ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Election Results ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

The Constitutional Court is the executive branch of the judiciary that is independent and separate from other branches of power, namely the government (executive) and legislative institutions. The Constitutional Court as a first and last level judiciary does not have an organizational structure as large as the Supreme Court which is the peak of a judicial system whose structure is vertically and horizontally covers five judicial environments, namely the general court environment, the state administrative court environment, the religious court environment, and military court environment. As an organ of judicial power that operates the judicial function, the Constitutional Court is independent, both structurally and functionally. The functions and authorities of the Constitutional Court based on Law No. 24 of 2003, namely the Constitutional Court has the authority to hear: Test the laws against the Republic of Indonesia 1945 Constitution; Decide on authority disputes between state institutions whose authority is granted by the Republic of Indonesia 1945 Constitution; Decide the dissolution of political parties; Decide disputes about election results; Give a verdict on the opinion of the House of Representatives that the President and / or Vice-President are suspected of violating the law in the form of treason, corruption, bribery, other serious crimes, or despicable acts, or no longer fulfill the conditions as President and or Vice President, as intended in the Republic of Indonesia 1945 Constitution.

scholarly journals Refleksi Konstitusionalitas Pengawasan Peraturan Daerah Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 137/PUU-XIII/2015

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 391
Author(s):  
Firdaus Firdaus
Keyword(s):  
Local Government ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
Central Government ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Standing ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Government ◽  
And Function ◽  
The Relationship

Peraturan Daerah (Perda) sebagai produk hukum pemerintahan daerah untuk mengatur dan memerintah sendiri sebagai manifestasi otonomi, tetapi dalam praktiknya sering kali dihadapkan dengan penundaan atau pembatalan akibat fungsi pengawasan preventif atau represif oleh Pemerintah. Melalui Putusan Nomor 137/PUU-XIII/2015, Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) meneguhkan fungsi pengawasan preventif dan membatalkan fungsi pengawasan represif dengan harapan: pertama mengakhiri dilema konstitusional fungsi Pengawasan Pemerintah terhadap Perda; kedua, memperkuat otonomi daerah; dan ketiga, meneguhkan pengujian perda sebagai kompetensi Mahkamah Agung (MA). Namun hal tersebut justru menciptakan dikotomi baru, baik terkait hubungan Pemerintah Pusat dengan pemerintahan daerah maupun dalam memaknai fungsi pengawasan represif dihubungkan dengan kompetensi MA menguji peraturan perundang-undangan di bawah undang-undang terhadap undang-undang. Bentuk dikotomi baru yang dimaksud; pertama, merevitalisasi instrumen sentralisme; dan kedua mereduksi otonomi dan fungsi kekuasaan Pemerintah dengan karakteristik yang bersifat aktif, sepihak (bersegi satu) dalam mengawasi dan memastikan pelaksanaan undangundang. Dimensi konstitusional yang harus dipastikan, bahwa pelaksanaan fungsi pengawasan represif terhadap Perda memberi kedudukan hukum bagi Pemerintah Daerah otonom untuk dapat mengajukan permohonan pengujian kepada MA.Local Regulation (Perda) as a legal product of local government is to regulate and govern itself as a manifestation of autonomy. Yet, in practice it is often confronted with delays or cancellations due to the Government's preventive or repressive supervision functions. Through Decision Number 137 / PUU-XIII / 2015, the Constitutional Court (MK) affirmed the function of preventive supervision and canceled the repressive supervision function in the hope of: first, ending the constitutional dilemma of the Government Oversight function on Local Regulations; second, strengthening local autonomy; and third, confirm the perda review as Supreme Court (MA) competency. However, this actually creates a new dichotomy, both in relation to the relationship between the Central Government and the local government and in interpreting the repressive monitoring function associated with the MA competency in examining the legislation under the regulations toward the statute. The form of the new dichotomy in intended; firstly, revitalize the instrument of centralism; and secondly reducing the autonomy and function of the Government's power with active, unilateral (onesided) characteristics in supervising and ensuring the implementation of the statute. The constitutional dimension that must be ensured is that the implementation of the repressive oversight function of the Local Regulation gives a legal standing for the autonomous local Government to be able to submit an application for judicial review to the Supreme Court.

scholarly journals Comentario de los autos del Tribunal Supremo de 17 de octubre y 6 y 27 de noviembre de 2014, relativos a la ley de consultas populares y la «consulta popular no referendaria sobre el futuro político de Cataluña»

2016 ◽  
pp. 595
Author(s):  
Estela Gilbaja Cabrero
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Central Government ◽  
The Political ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
The People ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Right

El Parlamento catalán aprobó en 2014 una Ley de consultas populares. Anteriormente, en 2013, había aprobado una Declaración de soberanía y del derecho a decidir del pueblo de Cataluña. Basándose en los citados documentos, el Presidente de la Generalitat convocó una «consulta popular no referendaria sobre el futuro político de Cataluña», que tendría lugar el 9 de noviembre de 2014. No se llegó a celebrar porque el Tribunal Constitucional decretó su suspensión, ya que el Gobierno había impugnado ante él la Ley, la Declaración y el Decreto de Convocatoria. La Generalitat, una asociación y dos particulares entendieron que los recursos del Gobierno fueron una intromisión en los derechos de los catalanes y acudieron al Tribunal Supremo. El presente trabajo estudia los Autos del Tribunal Supremo que les dan respuesta.Catalan Parliament approved in 2014 a Popular Enquiry Act. Previously, in 2013, they had approved a Declaration of Sovereignty and the right to decide of the people of Catalonia. Based on these documents, the President of the regional Government called to a «non-referendum popular enquiry about the political future of Catalonia», which would be held on November 9, 2014. It did not get to celebrate because the Constitutional Court ordered its suspension, as the central Government had impugned the Act, the Declaration and the Decree calling for the enquiry. The regional Government, an association and two people thought those impugnations were an intrusion on the Catalans’ rights and went before the Supreme Court. This paper studies the reply of the Supreme Court.

scholarly journals The Auhtority of the Audit Board of The Republic Of Indonesia in Carrying Out Audits of Village Financial Management

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Seviola Islaini ◽  
Lalu Husni ◽  
M. Ilwan
Keyword(s):  
Financial Management ◽  
Central Government ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Status ◽  
State Finance ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
Village Government ◽  
State Regional

This study aims to determine the authority of the Audit Board of The Republic of Indonesia in carrying out audits of Village Financial Management. This research is a normative legal research with a statutory approach and conceptual approach. Based on the research results it is known that the inspection conducted by the Audit Board of The Republic of Indonesia covers all elements of state finance as stipulated in Law Number 17 of 2003, but village finance is not explicitly mentioned in the regulation. Referring to the approach used in formulating State Finances in a general explanation of Law Number 17 of 2003 concerning State Finances, can be said that finance managed by the village government is also included in the scope of state/regional finances which are also the object of Supreme Audit Board audit. This is related to the clarity of the status and legal certainty over villages in the constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Village government as the lowest body of authority has the original authority to regulate its own household also has the authority and power as a gradual delegation of government over it ie the regional government and the central government, so that the central/regional government and village government is an inseparable part of government administration country. Therefore village finance is a state/regional financial subsystem as a consequence of the division of tasks among the government, regional government and village government.

scholarly journals JUDICIAL ACTIVISM IN INDONESIA

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-177
Author(s):  
Rahayu Prasetianingsih
Keyword(s):  
Judicial Review ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Constitutional Rights ◽  
Judicial Activism ◽  
Constitutional Interpretation ◽  
National Assembly ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Constitutional Culture ◽  
The Government

The existence of Constitutional Court becomes important as requisite for the rule of law principle and democracy in Indonesia. Amendment of the Constitution by Indonesia National Assembly has chosen to share judicial power held by the Supreme Court and Constitutional Court with the authority to judicial review of legislation to the Constitution. The Constitutional Court as Guardian of the Constitution has its own role in establishing constitutional culture in Indonesia. Commitment to constitutionalism is adistinctive constitutional culture which will also develop the constitution itself. Commitment to UUD 1945 as the limitation to the powers and a guarantee of constitutional rights that must be protected by the Constitutional Court with the authority to review as the implementation of Indonesia constitutionalism. Constitutional culture discuss in this paper is focused on understanding constitutional culture which will affect the implementation of the constitution by "the formal institutions of the state", especially in relation to the citizenry. The Constitutional Court in review of the legislation to the constitution has used various methods of Constitutional interpretation to uphold the law and substantive justice. From several decisions seem that the constitutional interpretation made by the Constitutional Court was expanding the existing notions of UUD 1945 or event change the constitution. The Constitutional Court leads to judicial activism and can be said that the constitutional court has become super body. On the other side, presence of the Constitutional Court expected to complement the government system of Indonesia, in accordance with the function can motivate the performance of other state institutions, in this case the legislator in order to establish better legislation. Abstrak: Mahkamah Konstitusi menjadi syarat penting bagi terwujudnya prinsip negara hukum dan demokrasi di Indonesia. Perubahan Konstitusi oleh Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat telah membagi kekuasaan kehakiman kepada Mahkamah Agung dan Mahkamah Konstitusi dengan kewenangan pengujian undang-undang terhadap Konstitusi. Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai Penjaga Konstitusi memiliki peran tersendiri dalam membangun budaya konstitusi di Indonesia. Komitmen terhadap konstitusionalisme merupakan budaya konstitusi yang khas yang juga akan mendinamisasi konstitusi itu sendiri. Komitmen terhadap UUD 1945 sebagai pembatasan kekuasaan dan jaminan hak konstitusional yang harus dilindungi oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi dengan kewenangan pengujian sebagai implementasi konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Budaya konstitusi yang dibahas dalam tulisan ini fokus pada pemahaman budaya konstitusi yang akan mempengaruhi pelaksanaan konstitusi oleh "lembaga formal negara", terutama dalam kaitannya dengan warga negara. Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam menguji undang-undang terhadap konstitusi telah menggunakan berbagai metode penafsiran Konstitusi untuk menegakkan hukum dan keadilan substantif. Dari beberapa putusan tampak bahwa penafsiran konstitusi yang dilakukan oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi merupakan perluasan dari pengertian UUD 1945 yang sudah ada atau bahkan mengubah konstitusi. Mahkamah Konstitusi mengarah pada judicial activism dan dapat dikatakan bahwa Mahkamah Konstitusi telah menjadi super body. Di sisi lain, kehadiran Mahkamah Konstitusi diharapkan dapat melengkapi sistem pemerintahan Indonesia, sesuai dengan fungsinya dapat memotivasi kinerja lembaga negara lainnya, dalam hal ini pembentuk undang-undang agar dapat membentuk peraturan perundang-undangan yang lebih baik.Kata Kunci: Judicial Review, Penafsiran Konstitusi, Budaya Konstitusi  

scholarly journals Pengawasan Pelaksanaan Otonomi Daerah

Wajah Hukum ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 146
Author(s):  
Mhd Ansori
Keyword(s):  
Central Government ◽  
Local Level ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Regional Autonomy ◽  
Historical Approach ◽  
Unitary State ◽  
The Government ◽  
Laws And Regulations ◽  
Regional Governments

Supervision is a part of the overall authority of the government, because at the last level the Central Government must be responsible for the whole administration, justifying the holding of supervision of all regional actions, because the integrity of the Unitary State must be maintained. Regional autonomy as autonomy for regional people and not "regional" autonomy in the sense of a particular region / territorial at the local level, if the implementation of regional autonomy is carried out by the Regional Government, that authority must be managed fairly, honestly and democratically. In administering the government, the central government uses the principles of decentralization, co-administration and deconcentration in accordance with the prevailing laws and regulations, while the regional governments in administering the government use the principles of decentralization and co-administration. The purpose of this paper is to find out, analyze the supervision of regional autonomy. The type of research used is normative juridical research, using a conceptual approach, a legislative approach and a historical approach.

scholarly journals Pengawasan Represif Pemerintah Pusat dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Daerah

Acta Comitas ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 119
Author(s):  
I Putu Dedy Putra Laksana
Keyword(s):  
Judicial Review ◽  
Central Government ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
Government Control ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Higher Law ◽  
The Ideal

Constitutional Court Verdict Number 56 / PUU-XIV / 2016 have the potential to cause juridical implications in terms of carrying out control of the Regional Government. As for the purpose of this study is to analyze and find the ideal form related to the supervision of the Central Government in the formation of Regional Regulations after the issuance of the Constitutional Court Verdict Number 56 / PUU-XIV / 2016. The type of research used in this study is normative legal research. As for the implications after the issuance of the Constitutional Court Verdict Number 137 / PUU-XIV / 2016 on Central Government control in the formation of Regional Regulations namely; Contradictory to the Principles of the Unitary State, the Central Government Only has the Authority to Implement Preventive, Regional Regulations Can Only Be Applied for Judicial Review to the Supreme Court, Inhibit Central Government Policy on Deregulation, and Not in accordance with the Good Governance Principles. Whereas the conclusion is the central government can issue recommendations or recommendations to the regional government to immediately make an amendment to the regulation that is considered contrary to the provisions of the legislation higher law, public interest and decency, but if in a state of urgency the Central Government can become a defendant for judicial review of that Regional Regulation. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 56/PUU-XIV/2016 berpotensi menimbulkan implikasi yuridis terutama dalam hal pengawasan pembentukan Peraturan Daerah. Adapun tujuan studi ini adalah untuk menganalisis dan menemukan bentuk yang ideal terkait pengawasan Pemerintah Pusat dalam pembentukan Peraturan Daerah pasca diterbitkannya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 56/PUU-XIV/2016. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Adapun impilikasi pasca diterbitkannya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 137/PUU-XIV/2016 terhadap pengawasan Pemerintah Pusat dalam pembentukan Peraturan Daerah yakni; Bertentangan dengan Prinsip Negara Kesatuan, Pemerintah Pusat Hanya Berwenang Melaksanakan Pengawasan Preventif, Perda Hanya Dapat Dimohonkan Uji Materiil/Judicial Review Kepada Mahkamah Agung, Menghambat Kebijakan Pemerintah Pusat Tentang Deregulasi, dan Tidak Mencerminkan Prinsip Good Governance. Pemerintah pusat dapat menerbitkan anjuran atau rekomendasi kepada Pemerintah Daerah untuk segera mengadakan perubahan terhadap Perda yang dianggap bertentangan dengan ketentuan Peraturan Perundang-undangan yang lebih tinggi, kepentingan umum, dan kesusilaan, namun apabila dalam keadaan mendesak Pemerintah Pusat dapat menjadi Pemohon uji materiil terhadap Perda tersebut.

scholarly journals Karakter Final Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Melaksanakan Kewenangan Sesuai Pasal 24C Ayat (1) Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-119
Author(s):  
Zuhro Nuridahwati
Keyword(s):  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Final Decision ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Reformation ◽  
General Elections ◽  
Strategic Position ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
Main Center

The Constitutional Court is within the scope of the Judicial Power and occupiesa strategic position in the Indonesian constitutional structure. MK as one of the stateinstitutions that was born from the reformation in 1998. MK as a judicial institution hasa very important and strategic task, said to be the sole interpreter of the Republic ofIndonesia's state constitution. Article 24C paragraph (1), of the 1945 Constitution of theRepublic of Indonesia, the Constitutional Court has the authority to adjudicate at the firstand last level the final decision to review the law against the Constitution, to decide ondisputes over the authority of state institutions whose authority is granted by theConstitution, to decide upon the dissolution of parties politics, and decide upon disputesabout the results of general elections. The results of the study and analysis, the provisionsof the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and Law Number 24 Year 2003,found legal issues that become legal problems faced by the Constitutional Court, arerelated to their position, competence, and form of decisions, which often makes legalcertainty uncertain or absurd, and conflicts norm, it is very interesting to be studied as acentral theme of the dissertation. Understanding the Position, indicating the position anddegree of the Constitutional Court between state institutions and between the SupremeCourt and the Constitutional Court, while competency shows the competency boundarybetween the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court, which has attributie authority,first and foremost authority, born from the format of the government system and thedistribution of state power . Attributie authority as the first and main center forresponsibility and at the same time the basis of delegating authority in the form of delegatie.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document