scholarly journals Tinjauan Yuridis Peraturan Perundang-Undangan sebagai Ratifikasi Perjanjian Internasional

2016 ◽  
pp. 202-220
Author(s):  
Dewi Setyowati ◽  
Nurul Hudi ◽  
Levina Yustitianingtyas

This study aims to resolve problems that arise in connection with reconsideration of regulations ratification of the treaty. Can legislation on treaty ratification An overview held back, and how the legal consequences if there is a decision on the revocation of laws on ratification of the treaty in Indonesia. In order to solve these problems need to be supported by the research in the form of legal material. Research obtained through library research (library research) in libraries. From this legal research to achieve results that provide answers to existing problems, namely that the Constitutional Court only had authority to examine the material legislation and ratification of international agreements is not authorized to cancel the treaty. And the cancellation of a law the ratification of international treaties have no direct correlation to the bond Indonesia against international agreements canceled. Thus the State can withdraw from its attachment to an international agreement if the agreement is contrary to the destination country. If a treaty is not regulated the procedure of withdrawal, it can refer to the rules stated in the Vienna Convention of 1969.

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 202
Author(s):  
Dewi Setyowati ◽  
Nurul Hudi ◽  
Levina Yustitianingtyas

<em>This study aims to resolve problems that arise in connection with reconsideration of regulations ratification of the treaty. Can legislation on treaty ratification An overview held back, and how the legal consequences if there is a decision on the revocation of laws on ratification of the treaty in Indonesia. In order to solve these problems need to be supported by the research in the form of legal material. Research obtained through library research (library research) in libraries. From this legal research to achieve results that provide answers to existing problems, namely that the Constitutional Court only had authority to examine the material legislation and ratification of international agreements is not authorized to cancel the treaty. And the cancellation of a law the ratification of international treaties have no direct correlation to the bond Indonesia against international agreements canceled. Thus the State can withdraw from its attachment to an international agreement if the agreement is contrary to the destination country. If a treaty is not regulated the procedure of withdrawal, it can refer to the rules stated in the Vienna Convention of 1969.</em>


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-103
Author(s):  
Komang Sukaniasa

International agreements are agreements between international subjects that give rise to binding obligations in international rights, which can be bilateral or multilateral. Based on these opinions, an understanding can be taken that international treaties are agreements or agreements entered into by two or more countries as subjects of international law that aim to cause certain legal consequences. International agreements, whether ratified or through approval or acceptance or accession, or other methods that are permitted, have the same binding force as ratified international treaties established in the Ratification Law of International Treaties. Once again, it is equally valid and binding on the state. Therefore, the authors consider that the position of international treaties are not made in the form of the Ratification Act of the International Agreement but are binding and apply to Indonesia. Then Damos Dumoli Agusman argues that ratification originates from the conception of international treaty law which is interpreted as an act of confirmation from a country of the legal acts of its envoys or representatives who have signed an agreement as a sign of agreement to be bound by the agreement.


Author(s):  
Iryna Osmirko ◽  
Ivanna Maryniv

Problem setting. Due to the fact that the constitutional norms determine the status of an international treaty, the binding nature of which has been approved by the parliament as part of national legislation, it is important to study the temporal effect of international treaties, namely their retroactivity. In general, the Vienna Convention contains a provision according to which an international treaty has no retroactive effect in respect of the States which are parties to it, except where the intention to give retroactive effect to the treaty follows from the treaty itself or the agreements of its parties. These exceptions to the general rule indicate the non-absoluteness of the latter, so it is appropriate to study the factors that determine the existence of retroactive agreements, as well as controversial and controversial issues that arise in this regard. Analysis of recent researches and publications. Scholars such as S.N. Ivanov, RA Kalamkaryan, M.A. Kapustina, II Lukashuk, OV Pushnyak and others. However, this area needs further study and analysis, given the existence of exceptions to the general provision on the lack of retroactive effect of international agreements. Target of research. Тo consider the conditions under which an international treaty has retroactive effect, to investigate the factors influencing the decision to grant retroactive effect and the issues arising in connection with the retroactivity of international treaties. Article’s main body. This study examines the non-absoluteness of the provision on the absence of retroactive effect of international agreements. Among the reasons that encourage states to anticipate retroactive effect – the interpretive or additional nature of the international agreement or the need to resolve the situation that arose before its conclusion. It should be emphasized that some agreements have retroactive effect by virtue of their object, which provides this retroactive effect, as agreed by the parties, although not explicitly stated in the contract. It is also not uncommon for certain rights and obligations to arise not because of an international treaty that has not yet entered into force, but because of customary norms that are enshrined in it. Conclusions and prospects for the development. The principle of no retroactive effect of an international agreement is not absolute. In each case, the reasons for the application of retroactivity must be decided by a judicial authority in the process of interpreting the contractual obligations. An important role in the possibility of retroactive application of an international treaty is played by its object or the co-existing customary norms of international law and the principles recognized by civilized nations as binding.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Rafiq Abdillah Duyo

This research is aimed to analyse legal consequences of port enterprise regarding claim over negligence in loading and uploading services to expeditor to investigate how the responsibility is performed by PT. Pelabuhan Indonesia IV regarding the claim over negligence in loading and uploading services to the expeditor and what measures are taken by the port enterprise to settle the dispute. This is an empirical legal research that employed socio-juridical approach. Primary data was obtained by conducting interviews and observation, while the secondary data from library research that relevantly supports the issue observed. All those types of data will be analysed with descriptive and qualitative methods. The research result reveals that the implementation of the responsibility of PT. Pelabuhan Indonesia IV is restricted by law. As implied in Article 468 Paragraph (2), if the port enterprise could provide proof of being not guilty, in which the goods are damaged when shipped or forwarding, this damage is not the responsibility of PT. Pelabuhan Indonesia IV. The claim can be responded through non-litigation process in which negotiation may take place between two involved parties.


Author(s):  
Gede Marhaendra Wija Atmaja ◽  
Nyoman Mas Aryani ◽  
Anak Agung Sri Utari ◽  
Ni Made Ari Yuliartini Griadhi

The purpose of this study is to find out the position of the Constitutional Court which later? an understanding of the politic of International agreement law adopted by the Republic of Indonesia. This can be reviewed from the legal considerations that underlying the Constitutional Court Decision. It is a legal research that examines the laws and regulation related to Constitutional Court through several stages: elaborate textual studies, completing textual studies, analyzing legal materials and determine conclusions. The study shows that International and legalized agreement that has not been ratified are placed as part of national law and are used as a reference to enrich the reasoning horizon in interpreting the constitution. Law on the ratification of the International Agreement containing norms which are attachments and an inseparable part of the law, which in its existence as a law constitutes the authority of the Constitutional Court to examine its constitutionality. In this context, the constitutional Court embraced the politic law of monism with the primate of national law and the Constitutional Court embraced the politic law of dualism when examining the constitutionality of the law concerning the ratification of the International Agreement-in terms of subject matter. Tujuan dari kajian ini adalah untuk mengetahui sikap Mahkamah Konstitusi yang nantinya akan memberikan pemahaman tentang politik hukum Perjanjian Internasional yang dianut Negara Republik Indonesia. Hal ini dapat ditinjau dari pertimbangan hukum yang mendasari amar Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Artikel ini merupakan suatu penelitian hukum yang mengkaji Peraturan Perundang-undangan dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang ada dengan langkah-langkah melakukan studi tekstual, melengkapi studi tekstual serta melakukan analisis terhadap bahan hukum yang terkumpul dan menarik kesimpulan. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa Perjanjian Internasional yang telah disahkan maupun yang belum disahkan ditempatkan sebagai bagian dari hukum nasional dan dijadikan rujukan guna memperkaya cakrawala penalaran dalam menafsirkan Undang-Undang dasar. Undang-Undang tentang pengesahan Perjanjian internasional memuat norma yang merupakan lampiran dan bagian yang tidak terpisahkan dari Undang-Undang bersangkutan, yang dalam keberadaannya sebagai Undang-Undang merupakan kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi untuk menguji konstitusionalitasnya. Dalam konteks ini Mahkamah Konstitusi  menganut  politik hukum monisme dengan primat hukum nasional dan Mahkamah Konstitusi menganut politik  hukum dualisme saat menguji konstitusionalitas Undang-Undang tentang pengesahan Perjanjian Internasional dalam hal menyangkut pokok perkaranya.


2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-128
Author(s):  
William Tetley

In this article, the author first describes the essentially civilian nature and origin of maritime law in the United Kingdom, the United States and Canada, a point unfortunately overlooked in the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in the Buenos Aires Maru case [1986] 1 S.C.R. 752, but recognized in the judgement of the same Court in Chartwell Shipping Ltd v. Q.N.S. Paper, [1989] 2 S.C.R. 683. The article touches briefly on the federal jurisdiction over maritime law in Canada, the dual jurisdiction of the Federal Court and the superior courts of the provinces in maritime matters and the mixed civilian / common law system in Quebec. Consideration is then given to the Constitution Act, 1867, as interpreted by the much-criticized Labour Conventions decision of the Privy Council [1937] A.C. 326. The decision held that although the power to conclude international treaties and conventions in Canada is vested in the federal government alone, the enactment of the domestic legislation required to secure the implementation of such international agreements is not an exclusively federal matter, but may be a question of either federal or provincial competence, depending on the subject matter of the treaty or convention concerned. The author then reviews the principal rules of statutory interpretation which are provided for by the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 1969. He points out that, notwithstanding Canada’s ratification of this Convention in 1970, Canadian courts still tend to apply traditional (and often narrow) techniques of statutory interpretation when called upon to construe treaty texts, rather than keeping the goals of the agreement and intent of the parties in view, as the Vienna Convention requires. He indicates, however, a more recent judicial trend towards a more liberal methodology, as evidenced in decisions like R. v. Palacios, (1984) 45 O.R. (2d) 269 (Ont. C.A.) The article concludes with a brief overview of the major statutory interpretation rules applied by Canadian courts in construing local laws and international agreements and some aids to such interpretation. Professor Tetley, as a last tribute, applauds what he sees to be the slowly emerging "general consensus" on statutory and treaty interpretation in Canada.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-52
Author(s):  
Dina Salsabila Heniasari ◽  
Lanni Agustin ◽  
Priskila Lambasa Septuagesima Siregar

Not all customer deposits will be guaranteed by the Deposit Insurance Corporation, meaning that customer deposits are only guaranteed by the Deposit Insurance Corporation for Rp. 2,000,000,000.00 (two billion rupiah). The establishment of the Deposit Insurance Corporation must basically be able to protect customer funds. This research aims to determine the process of accountability of returning customer deposits of liquidated foreign banks in Indonesia and the execution of assets of foreign banks in the context of returning customer deposits in Indonesia. The research used is legal research that analyzes library research, by analyzing through legislation, literature, and other reference materials related to the regulation of Foreign Banks. The results of this research explain that. With the existence of the Deposit Insurance Agency, if the foreign bank is liquidated, the institution will replace customer deposits and complete the liquidation process. When the liquidation process of the assets of the foreign bank branch office is insufficient, bank assets abroad will be executed if the head office does not want to be responsible for the obligations of its branch office in Indonesia by completing it at the ICSID convention arbitration body (International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes). Actually in taking assets abroad in the case of execution of assets that are overseas can be done if there are international agreements such as those carried out by the European Union by making an agreement on the European union convention on insolvency proccedings, this will facilitate the taking of assets in overseas


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-105
Author(s):  
I Made Widi Adi Peremana ◽  
A. A. Sagung Laksmi Dewi ◽  
Ni Made Sukaryati Karma

The study of this research is the submission of requests for reconsideration in criminal cases in the Indonesian legal system which became a polemic after the issuance of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 34 / XI-PUU / 2013 and Circular Letter of the Supreme Court (SEMA) Number 7 of 2014 concerning Submission of Reappeals in Cases Criminal. The research objectives to be achieved, in this case, are the regulation of legal reconsideration efforts in Indonesia and the procedure for submitting a request for review in the Indonesian system. Researchers use a normative juridical approach or library research or doctrinal legal research which can be interpreted as legal research by examining library materials and secondary materials. This study illustrates that the regulations for reconsideration in the legal system in Indonesia are based on various regulations, namely Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code, Law No. 3 of 2009 concerning the Supreme Court, Law no. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power, Circular Letter of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia No. 7 of 2014 concerning Review of Criminal Cases and Submission of Reconsiderations at this time refers to the provisions of the Circular Letter of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia No. 7 of 2014 concerning Reconsideration in Criminal Cases.  


2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 497
Author(s):  
Agustina Merdekawati ◽  
Andi Sandi Ant. T. T

AbstractThis research aims to examine the positions of international law and the applicable principles regarding the issues of fulfillment of international obligations under ratified/acceded international agreements by Indonesia. Upon assessment, this research concludes that: Firstly, there are two main obligations that should be fulfilled by Indonesia in an international agreement and treaties, which is legal obligation and moral obligation. Secondly, practices shown that Indonesia’s commitments in fulfilling its international obligation are still not optimal, as a solution, it is recommended that future ratification of international agreement should include additional executorial / performance provision either in the form of Law or Presidential Regulation.IntisariPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana ketentuan hukum internasional mengatur persoalan kewajiban hukum negara terhadap pemenuhan perjanjian internasional yang telah diratifikasi/diaksesi dan untuk mengetahui bagaimana praktik yang Indonesia terkait pemenuhan kewajiban tersebut. Hasil pembahasan menunjukkan bahwa: Pertama, bahwa terdapat 2 kewajiban yang harus dilakukan oleh setiap negara pihak terkait dengan pemenuhan Perjanjian Internasional yakni kewajiban hukum dan kewajiban moral. Kedua, bahwa praktik pelaksanaan kewajiban pemenuhan Perjanjian Internasional di Indonesia masih kurang optimal dan sebagai solusinya dapat ditambahkan beberapa penegasan untuk pemenuhan berbagai kewajiban tersebut dalam bentuk penambahan klausula dalam produk pengesahan perjanjian internasional baik yang berupa Undang­Undang Ratifikasi maupun Peraturan Presiden.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 178
Author(s):  
Suradiyanto Suradiyanto ◽  
Dinny Wirawan Pratiwie

The purpose of this study is to review and analyze the legal consequences of acquisitions made on limited liability companies; and based on theconsiderations used by KPPU to determine that PT Nippon Indosari Corpindo, Tbk. Has violated Law Number 5 of 1999 .This research is normative legal research. Secondary data collection in library research is done by studying documents. The data analysis method used in this study is descriptive and analyzed qualitatively.The results of this study are: (1) Acquisition or Acquisition of Limited Liability Companies can also provide legal consequences affecting the Limited Liability Company. The legal consequences referred to in the Limited Liability Company are the legal consequences both institutionally, namely shareholders, employees, and third parties, as well as the legal consequences of certain parties, especially to third parties or creditors from the acquired limited liability company. In practice that has happened so far, the status of creditors' receivables in a limited liability company that has been acquired is the responsibility of the new Shareholders ; and (2) In the reading of the decision it was also explained that the reported party had acquired / taken over shares of PT Prima Top Boga on January 24, 2018, amounting to 32,051 shares (issuance of new shares) taken over by adding capital worth Rp31,499,722,800 , 00 (thirty one billion four hundred ninety nine million seven hundred twenty thousand eight hundred rupiahs) by Pt Nippon Indosari Corpindo, Tbk. After a long process, through the Merger Directorate, it was conveyed that based on the calculation of calendar days, notices of the takeover of shares of the PT Prima Top Boga company should be notified to the Commission no later than March 23, 2018. However, the reported report took place on March 29, 2018. In accordance with PP No. 57 of 2010 that the reported party is obliged to notify the Commission of the acquisition of shares no later than 30 (thirty) working calendar days from the date the juridically effective Business Entity, Business Entity Consolidation or Takeover of Company Shares are effective.  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document