scholarly journals Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Numbered Heads Together dengan Strategi Worked-Example terhadap Kemampuan Penalaran Siswa

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monika Nurazizah ◽  
Cecep Anwar Hadi Firdos Santosa ◽  
Aan Subhan Pamungkas

The study aims to determine the influence of Numbered Heads Together learning model with worked-example strategy for the students's mathematical reasoning skills. This method of research was quasi-exsperiment with Nonequivalent design Pretest Posttest Control Group Design. The subject in this study was the X class of MIA 2 as the experimental class and X MIA 4 as the control class.  The instrument used is a test instrument of mathematical reasoning ability of students. Analysis of hypotheses data using t test, which is through the prerequisite test of normality and homogeneity. The results of this study, Numbered Heads Together learning model with worked-example strategy, have a better influence on reasoning ability than conventional learning models.

Numeracy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-48
Author(s):  
Nuralam Nuralam ◽  
Maulidayani Maulidayani

The mathematical concept learned in school require mathematical reasoning abilities. But the test results show the students’ mathematical reasoning ability is still relatively low. To overcome this problem, applied a learning model called Auditory Intellectually Repetition (AIR). AIR can develop mathematical reasoning abilities students through problem solving. The purpose of this study is to describe the mathematical reasoning abilty of students through the AIR learning model is higher than taught through conventional learning models.. The research design used was quasi experiment with pretest-posttest control group design. The populations in this study were all of the Eighth Grade Students of SMPN 1 Jantho and the samples taken were classes VIII-2 and VIII-1 by using the random cluster technique sampling. The data collected wasby using the mathematical reasoning ability test. The result of research through the right-hand t-test statistic test obtained 3.79 > 1.68 then accept Ha reject Ho. Therefore, it was concluded that the students’ mathematical reasoning ability learned through the AIR learning model were higher than those taught conventional learning models. Abstrak Konsep matematika dipelajari di sekolah memerlukan kemampuan penalaran matematis. Namun hasil tes menunjukkan kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa masih tergolong rendah. Salah satu alternatif membuat kemampuan penalaran matematis lebih baik melalui model pembelajaran Auditory Intelectually Repetition (AIR). Penelitian ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa yang diajarkan dengan model AIR lebih baik daripada siswa yang diajarkan dengan pembelajaran konvensional. Rancangan penelitian menggunakan quasi eksperimen dengan desain pretest-posttest control grup design. Populasi dalam penelitian seluruh siswa kelas VIII SMPN 1 Kota Jantho dan sampelnya kelas VIII-2 dan VIII-1 dipilih dengan teknik cluster random sampling. Data yangdikumpulkan dengan menggunakan tes kemampuan penalaran matematis. Hasil penelitian melalui uji statistik uji-t pihak kanan diperoleh thitung > ttabel yaitu 3,79 > 1,68 maka Ha tolak Ho. Disimpulkan bahwa kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa yang diajarkan dengan model AIR lebih baik daripada yang diajarkan denganpembelajaran konvensional.   Kata Kunci: Model Pembelajaran,  Model Air, Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis  


2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 80
Author(s):  
Serra Oktafoura Suminar ◽  
Rini Intansari Meilani

Model pembelajaran adalah salah satu faktor yang mempengaruhi prestasi belajar peserta didik di kelas. Artikel ini membahas hasil penelitian kuasi eksperimen yang ditujukan untuk mengetahui pengaruh model pembelajaran Discovery Learning dan model pembelajaran Problem Based Learning terhadap prestasi belajar 70 orang peserta didik sebuah SMK, pada Mata Pelajaran Korespondensi, kompetensi dasar mengidentifikasi prosedur pembuatan surat dinas. Dengan menggunakan non-equivalent control group design, hasil analisa data menunjukkan bahwa model pembelajaran Discovery Learning lebih cocok dalam meningkatkan prestasi belajar peserta didik dalam mempelajari kompetensi dasar mengidentifikasi prosedur pembuatan surat dinas, dibandingkan model pembelajaran Problem Based Learning. Dengan demikian, model pembelajaran Discovery Learning dapat menjadi salah satu alternatif bagi para guru Mata Pelajaran Korespondensi dalam meningkatkan prestasi belajar peserta didik pada mata pelajaran tersebut.Kata Kunci: Discovery Learning, Problem Based Learning, Prestasi Belajar THE INFLUENCE OF DISCOVERY LEARNING AND PROBLEM BASED LEARNING MODELS ON STUDENTS’ LEARNING ACHIEVEMENTTeaching and learning model is one of the factors influencing students’ learning achievements. This article discusses results of a quasi-experimental study which aims to investigate the influence of  discovery learning and problem-based learning models on learning achievements of 70 vocational high school students, in the subject of Correspondence (in the competence of identifying the procedure of writing official letters). Using non-equivalent control group design, results of data analysis show that discovery learning model is more suitable to improve students’ learning achievements in the competence of identifying the procedure of writing official letters, compared to problem based learning model. Thus, discovery learning is worth using by teachers of the subject to improve the learning achievements of their students in this subject. Keywords: Discovery Learning, Problem Based Learning, Learning Achievement


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 13-19
Author(s):  
Neneng Maryani ◽  
Karin Nurseptiani

This research is based on field findings, namely low interest in learning Indonesian, lack of teacher initiative to use varied learning models that cause students to become bored in following the learning process in Indonesian subjects. The purpose of this study is to find out the increased interest in learning Indonesian by comparing the RADEC (Read, Answer, Discuss, Explain, and Create) learning models and conventional learning. The research method used was Nonequivalent Control Group Design with a population of 173 students, and two sample classes namely class V as an experimental class totaling 28 students and class VI as a control class totaling 37 students. From the results by statistical data using SPSS version 24.0 for windows after the data are declared normally distributed and come from homogeneous samples through normality and homogeneity tests, it is known that the results of hypothesis testing using the Compare Means test with Independent Samples Test obtained sig = 0,000. Because the significance <0.05, it can be concluded that Ho is rejected, which means "There is a difference in the increase in interest in learning Indonesian by using the RADEC learning model compared to using the conventional model in SD Negeri Sukamaju, Pagerageung District, Tasikmalaya District". The score is in the interval 66.4 -70.1. Based on this, it can be concluded that the implementation of the RADEC learning model is quite successful in increasing interest in learning Indonesian compared to using conventional models. Suggestions that can be recommended based on the findings of this study include expected to be able to develop RADEC learning models that are collaborated with other learning techniques as an innovation to increase learning interest.


2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-57
Author(s):  
Amilda Amilda ◽  
Sulton Nawawi ◽  
Uci Minasari

The purpose of the study was to determine the effect of the application of learning model ofScience Technology Society (STS)  to the ability of understanding the concept of Biologystudents on the subject of VII grade ecosystem MTs Paradigma Palembang. The desain ofstudy used the design of the Nonequivalent Control Group Design with Quasi Experimentalmethod (quasi experiment). These sample included 35 students. Based on the results of theanalysis of students' concept of understanding shows that the implementation of learningusing the model of learning Science Technology Society (STS)  is better than theconventional learning model. It can can be seen from the calculation of the t-test showed ofstudents' concept of understanding sig t-value 0.000 < 0,05, then Ha accepted and H0 rejected.The result of analysis of the improvement of the average completeness of the conceptualunderstanding of the experimental class is 48.2% while the students 'understanding of thecontrol class is 29.2%, which means that the students' understanding of the concept of theexperimental class is higher than the understanding of the concept of the control class. This, itcan be concluded that the learning model of Science Technology Society (STS) around effecton understanding the concept of students of class VII MTs Paradigma Palembang


2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Putu Deli Januartini ◽  
Ketut Agustini ◽  
I Gede Partha Sindu

 AbstrakTujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui (1) pengaruh signifikan penggunaan model pembelajaran Think Pair Square dan Think Pair Share terhadap hasil belajar siswa, (2) hasil belajar yang lebih baik antara model pembelajaran Think Pair Square  atau  Think Pair Share, (3) motivasi belajar siswa, (4) respon siswa.Jenis penelitian ini adalah eksperimen semu dengan rancangan Post Test Only Control Group Design. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas X. Sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah kelas X1 dengan model Think Pair Square, kelas X3 dengan model Think Pair Share dan X5 dengan model Direct Instruction.Data hasil belajar dianalisis melalui uji prasyarat dengan hasil ketiga kelompok berdistribusi normal dan homogen serta uji hipotesis menggunakan Anova Satu Jalur dengan hasil terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan penggunaan model pembelajaran Think Pair Square, Think Pair Share dan Direct Instruction. Kemudian uji lanjut t-Scheffe dengan hasil terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar penggunaan model pembelajaran Think Pair Square, Think Pair Share dan Direct Instruction. Dilihat dari rata-rata hasil belajar maka disimpulkan model Think Pair Square lebih baik dengan hasil belajar lebih tinggi. Hasil analisis angket Think Pair Square diketahui respon sangat positif dan tingkat motivasi belajar sangat tinggi, Think Pair Share diketahui respon positif dan tingkat motivasi belajar sangat tinggi. Kata kunci:  Think Pair Square, Think Pair Share, Direct Instruction, hasil belajar, motivasi belajar, dan respon siswa. AbstractThe purpose of this study were to determine (1) the significant influence of the application of think pair square and think pair share learning model on student’s learning achievement, (2) better learning achievement between think pair square and think pair share learning model, (3) student’s motivation, (4) the student’s responses.The research was a quasi-experimental design experiment with post test only control group design. The population of study was all the students in grade X. The sample were as X1 class with the application of Think Pair Square learning model, X3 class with the application of Think Pair Share learning model, and X5 class with the application of Direct Instruction learning model.The data was collected by cognitive and psychomotor tests. The student’s learning achievement were analyzed by the prerequisite test with the results of the three groups at normal distribution and homogenous, and the hypothesis tested by One Way Anova which means there is a significant effect on the application of think pair square, think pair share, and direct instruction learning models. Then it was conducted a further test t-Scheffe with the results there are differences in the learning achievement between think pair square, think pair share, and direct instruction learning models. According to the average result we made a conclusion that Think Pair Square was better learning models with higher student’s learning achievement. The questionnaires results shows that Think Pair Square was very high positiveresponse and very high learning motivation, Think Pair Share was high positive response and very high learning motivation. Keywords :   Think Pair Square, Think Pair Share, Direct Instruction, learning achievement, learning motivation, and student response. 


Author(s):  
Isna Rafianti ◽  
Khairida Iskandar ◽  
Lilis Haniyah

Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh rendahnya hasil belajar matematika siswa di Indonesia. Hal ini disebabkan  oleh  beberapa  faktor,  diantaranya  adalah  rendahnya  kemampuan  pemahaman  konsep matematis dan didukung oleh rendahnya disposisi matematis siswa yaitu apresiasi terhadap pembelajaran matematika. Salah satu upaya untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis dan disposisi matematis siswa adalah dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran Search, Solve, Create and Share  (SSCS)  yang  menjadikan  siswa  mandiri,  aktif  dan  fokus  dalam  pembelajaran  matematika. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui peningkatan kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis dan disposisi matematis siswa dengan menggunakan model SSCS dalam pembelajaran matematika. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan desain non-equivalent control group design. Subyek penelitian ini adalah kelas VIII C (eksperimen) dan VIII D (kontrol) semester 2 SMPN 2 Kota Serang. Instrumen yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah soal tes kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis dan skala disposisi matematis. Data hasil penelitian ini dianalisis menggunakan uji normalitas, uji homogenitas, uji perbedaan rata-rata. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran SSCS lebih baik dari siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran konvensional. Disposisi matematis yang menggunakan model pembelajaran SSCS memiliki peningkatan yang lebih rendah atau sama dengan siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran konvensional. Dengan demikian model pembelajaran SSCS bisa diterapkan untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis namun kurang efektif dalam peningkatan disposisi matematis siswa SMP. Kata kunci: Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis, Disposisi Matematis, Model Pembelajaran Search, Solve, Create and Share (SSCS) ABSTRACT This research is motivated by the low mathematics learning result of students in Indonesia. This is caused by several factors, such as the low ability of understanding mathematical concepts and supported by the low mathematical disposition of students is the appreciation of mathematics learning. One of the efforts to improve the students' understanding of mathematical concepts and mathematical dispositions is by using Search, Solve, Create and Share (SSCS) learning model which makes students self-reliant, active and focused in learning mathematics. This study aims to determine the improvement of the ability to comprehend mathematical concepts and mathematical disposition of students by using SSCS model in mathematics learning. This research uses quasi experimental method with non-equivalent control group design. The subjects of this research are class VIII C (experiment) and VIII D (control) semester 2 SMPN 2 Serang City. The instrument used in this research is the ability to comprehend mathematical concepts and mathematical disposition scale. Data of this study were analyzed using normality test, homogeneity test, two-party test, and one-party test. The conclusion of this research is the ability of understanding mathematical concepts of students using SSCS learning model better than students using conventional learning model. While mathematical dispositions using SSCS learning models have a lower or equal increase with students using conventional learning models. Thus the SSCS learning model can be applied to improve the comprehension of mathematical concepts but less effective in improving mathematical disposition of Junior High School students.   Keywords: Ability  to  Understand  Mathematical  Concept,  Mathematical  Disposition,  Search,  Solve, Create and Share Learning Model (SSCS)


Numeracy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-149
Author(s):  
Rianti Rahmalia ◽  
Hajidin Hajidin ◽  
BI. Ansari

Mathematical communication skills of students are still relatively low. One learning model can improve students 'mathematical communication skills and at the same time students' mathematical disposition is the Problem Based Learning (PBL) model. The aim to be achieved is to find out the improvement of students 'mathematical communication skills and mathematical disposition using PBL models in terms of students' initial mathematical level. This research is an experimental research design with pretest posttest control group design. The research population was Grade VII students of SMP 9 Langsa. Students are grouped into two classes namely the experimental class and the control class randomly selected from eight parallel classes. The instrument used was a test of mathematical communication skills and a mathematical disposition questionnaire. Data analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA. The results showed that improving students 'mathematical communication ability and students' mathematical disposition by applying PBL learning models is better than students applying conventional learning models. There is no interaction between the PBL learning model with student level on mathematical communication skills and students' mathematical disposition. Abstrak Kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa masih tergolong rendah. Salah satu model pembelajaran dapat meningkatkan kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa dan sekaligus disposisi matematis siswa adalah model Problem Based Learning (PBL). Tujuan yang ingin dicapai ialah untuk mengetahui peningkatan kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa dan disposisi matematis menggunakan model PBL ditinjau dari kemampuan awal matematis siswa. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen dengan desain pretest postest control group design. Populasi penelitian adalah siswa kelas VII SMP Negeri 9 Langsa. Siswa dikelompokkan menjadi dua kelas yaitu kelas eksperimen dan kelas kontrol yang dipilih secara acak dari delapan kelas paralel. Instrumen yang digunakan tes kemampuan komunikasi matematis dan angket disposisi matematis. Analisis data dilakukan dengan menggunakan anova dua arah. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa peningkatan kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa dan disposisi matematis siswa dengan menerapkan model pembelajaran PBL lebih baik dari pada siswa yang menerapkan model pembelajaran konvensional. Tidak terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran PBL dengan level siswa terhadap kemampuan komunikasi matematis dan disposisi matematis siswa. Kata Kunci:  Komunikasi Matematis, Disposisi Matematis, Problem Based Learning  


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-47
Author(s):  
Nuvita Retna Sari ◽  
Faried Wadjdi ◽  
Massus Subekti

  This study aims to determine the comparison of cooperative learning models with direct learning models on the learning outcomes of electrical circuit subjects of class X students at SMK Negeri 26 Jakarta. This research was conducted at SMK Negeri 26 Jakarta in November 2018 until January 2019. This Popolation  is class X TTL at SMK Negeri 26 Jakarta which consists of 3 classes. The research method used is true  experimental pretest posttest control group design. The sample was randomly determined by random sampling technique. It was obtained 2 classes namely X.TTL1 for experimental class using cooperative learning models and X.TTL 3  was used for experimental class using direct learning models and class X.TTL 2 was used for class testing question validity. The analysis technique used is the t test at a significance level of  Based on the results of the study it can be concluded that learning using the Cooperative Learning Model with cognitive assessment of 92.41 and psychomotor assessment of 88.98, while learning using the Direct Learning Model with cognitive assessment amounted to 92.21 and psychometric assessment of 88.21. The results of calculations with the t-test on cognitive assessment at the significance level α = 0.05 and df = 64 are tcount <  ttable(0.512 <1.6672) and the value of t-test calculated at the significance level α = 0, 05 and df = 64 is tcount < ttable (0.45 <1.6672) means that H0 is accepted, Ho is accepted so that it can be concluded that the comparison of learning outcomes of electrical circuits taught using cooperative learning models is not higher or equal  using direct learning model at SMK Negeri 26 Jakarta. ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbandingan model pembelajaran kooperatif dengan model pembelajaran langsung terhadap hasil belajar mata pelajaran rangkaian listrik siswa kelas X di SMK Negeri 26 Jakarta. Penelitian ini dilakukan di SMKN 26 Jakarta pada bulan November 2018 sampai Januari 2019. Populasi penelitian ini adalah kelas X TTL di SMK Negeri 26 Jakarta yang terdiri dari 3 kelas. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah True eksperimental Design Pretest–Posttest Control Group Design. Sampel ditentukan secara acak dengan teknik random sampling di dapat 2 kelas yaitu X.TTL 1 untuk kelas eksperimen I dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif dan X.TTL 3 digunakan untuk kelas eksperimen II dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran langsung serta Kelas X.TTL 2 digunakan uji validasi soal. Teknik Analisis yang digunakan yaitu uji t pada taraf signifikansi =0,05.Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan pembelajaran dengan menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif dengan penilaian kognitif sebesar 92.41 dan penilaian psikomotorik sebesar 88.98, sedangkan pembelajaran dengan menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Langsung dengan penilaian kognitif sebesar 92.21dan penilaian psikomotorik sebesar 88.21. Hasil perhitungan dengan Uji–t pada penilaian kognitif pada taraf signifikansi  = 0,05 dan = 64 adalah < (0.512 < 1.6672) serta diperoleh nilai Uji-t hitung pada taraf signifikansi =0,05 dan = 64 adalah>(0.45<1.6672) artinyaHo diterima sehingga dapat disimpulkan bahwa perbandingan hasil belajar rangkaian listrik yang diajarkan menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tidak lebih tinggi atau sama dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran langsung di SMK Negeri 26 Jakarta.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Regina Ayu Cahyaningrum . ◽  
Drs. Ignatius I Wayan Suwatra,M.Pd . ◽  
Mutiara Magta, S.Pd., M.Pd. .

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan kemampuan membaca permulaan antara kelompok anak yang dibelajarkan menggunakan model pembelajaran Make A Match dan kelompok anak yang dibelajarkan menggunakan model pembelajaran konvensional pada Kelompok B TK Gugus III Kecamatan Buleleng Tahun Pelajaran 2018/2019. Jenis penelitian ini adalah quasi eksperimen, dengan rancangan penelitian non equivalent posstest only control group design. Populasi ini adalah seluruh anak kelompok B yang ada di Gugus III Kecamatan Buleleng Tahun Pelajaran 2018/2019 yang berjumlah 238 orang anak. sampel penelitian ini yaitu anak kelompok B TK Widya Kumara yang berjumlah 19 orang anak sebagai kelas eksperimen dan anak kelompok B TK Rare Bali School yang berjumlah 17 orang anak sebagai kelas kontrol. Data yang diperoleh dianalisis menggunakan teknik analisis statistik deskripsi dan analisis statistik inferensial (uji-t). Berdasarkan hasil analisis data, diperoleh thitung 11,330 dan ttabel (pada taraf signifikansi 5%) =2,042. Hal ini berarti bahwa thitung> ttabel, sehingga dapat diinterpretasikan bahwa kemampuan membaca permulaan anak yang dibelajarkan menggunakan model pembelajaran Make A Match lebih tinggi dibandingkan kelompok anak yang dibelajarkan menggunakan model pembelajaran konvensional. Dengan demikian, model pembelajaran Make A Match berperan positif terhadap kemampuan membaca permulaan pada anak Kelompok B TK Gugus IIIKecamatan Buleleng Tahun Pelajaran 2018/2019. Kata Kunci : membaca permulaan, make a match. This study aims to determine differences in the ability of early reading between groups of children’s who were taught using the Make A Match learning model and groups of children’s who were taught using conventional learning models in Group B TK Gugus III Sub-District Buleleng Academic Year 2018/2019. This type of research is quasi-experimental, with a non-equivalent only control group design research design. This population is all group B children’s in Cluster III of Buleleng Subdistrict 2018/2019 Academic Year, which amounted to 238 children’s. The sample of this study was the children’s of group B, TK Widya Kumara, which numbered 19 children’s as the experimental class and children’s in group B, TK Rare Bali School, amounting to 17 children’s as the control class. The data obtained were analyzed using statistical analysis techniques description and inferential statistical analysis (t-test). Based on the results of data analysis, obtained tcount 11.330 and t table (at a significance level of 5%) = 2.042. This means that tcount> t table, so that it can be interpreted that the ability to read the beginning of the child being taught using the Make A Match learning model is higher than the group of children who are taught using conventional learning models. Thus, the Make A Match learning model plays a positive role on the ability to read the beginning in children;s Group B TK Gugus III District Buleleng Academic Year 2018/2019.keyword : read the start, make a match.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-32
Author(s):  
Sahabuddin Sahabuddin ◽  
Muhammad Yunus ◽  
Muhammad Nur

Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan tujuan untuk mengetahui adanya perbedaan motivasi dan hasil belajar peserta didik dengan membandingkan penggunaan model pembelajaran kooperatif team quiz dan TGT pada mata pelajaran IPS kelas IV di SD Negeri Lakkang. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah quasi experimental nonequivalent control group design. Teknik penentuan sampel pada penelitian ini menggunakan purposive sampling. Uji validitas butir soal berdasarkan penilaian para ahli (judgement expert) dan uji reliabilitas Cronbach Alpha. Teknik analisis yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini meliputi uji normalitas, uji homogenitas, uji keefektifan, uji perbandingan keefektifan model pembelajaran, dan uji keunggulan dengan menggunakan pengolahan SPSS versi 25.0. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa motivasi dan hasil belajar peserta didik yang menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif team quiz lebih tinggi dibanding dengan peserta didik yang menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif TGT. Hal ini ditunjukkan dengan hasil uji setelah perlakuan posttest dengan uji Manova. Data setelah perlakuan posttest dengan uji Manova menunjukkan bahwa nilai signifikansinya lebih kecil alfa (0,05) yaitu sebesar 0,001 sehingga H0 ditolak. Maka dari itu, dapat disimpulkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan rata-rata kemampuan kedua kelas terhadap motivasi belajar dan hasil belajar peserta didik setelah diberikan perlakuan. Dengan demikian, peserta didik yang menggunakan penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif team quiz memiliki rata-rata nilai posttest lebih tinggi yaitu 85,35 dibanding peserta didik yang menggunakan penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif TGT yang mempunyai jumlah rata-rata nilai posttest sebanyak 80,05. This research was conducted with the aim of knowing the differences in students' motivation and learning outcomes by comparing the use of the team quiz and TGT cooperative learning models in social studies subjects for class IV at SD Negeri Lakkang. The method used in this study was a quasi-experimental nonequivalent control group design. The sampling technique in this study used purposive sampling. The validity tes of the items based on the assessment of experts (expert judgment) and Cronbach Alpha reliability test. The analytical techniques of data used in this study include normality test, homogeneity test, effectiveness test, comparative test of the effectiveness of learning models, and superiority test using SPSS version 25.0 processing. The results showed that the motivation and learning outcomes of students who used the team quiz cooperative learning model were higher than those of students who used the TGT cooperative learning model. This is indicated by the test results after posttest treatment with the Manova test. The data after posttest treatment with the Manova test showed that the significance value was smaller than alfa (0.05), which was 0.001 so that H0 was rejected. Therefore, it can be concluded that there is a difference in the average ability between the two classes on learning motivation and student learning outcomes after the treatment was given. Thus, students who use the application of the team quiz cooperative learning model have a higher average posttest score of 85.35 than students who use the application of the TGT cooperative learning model who have an average posttest score of 80.05.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document