scholarly journals The Pages of History of the Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation

2022 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 122-129
Author(s):  
L. P. Morozov
Keyword(s):  
Forensic Science ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Scientific Community ◽  
Scientific School ◽  
60Th Anniversary ◽  
The Status ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Russian Federation

The author dedicates this article to the 60th anniversary of the Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation. He observes the “academic biography” of the Centre and the prerequisites for the emergence of its forensic scholarly tradition. The article also clarifies the features of the scientific school, whereby the scientific community of scientists of the Center received the status of a scientific school and the period of its occurrence.

scholarly journals THE ESTABLISHMENT, MODERN STATUS AND FURTHER DEVELOPMENT TENDENCIES OF THE INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION BETWEEN JUDGES AND EXPERTS IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 69-72
Author(s):  
Nikita E. Salganskiy ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Forensic Science ◽  
International Cooperation ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Further Development ◽  
Modern Status

This article is devoted to the problem of international forensic science cooperation of the Russian Federation. The paper reflects the main milestones in the history of interaction between domestic and foreign forensic experts, on the basis of their analysis, the trends of further development of cooperation in this area are determined.

Once again about experts, independent expertise, and expert councils

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 71-75
Author(s):  
MAXIM SAFONOV ◽  
◽  
MARAT BIKTIMIROV ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Research And Development ◽  
Expert Opinion ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Scientific Community ◽  
Scientific Research ◽  
Technical Expertise ◽  
State Support ◽  
The Status ◽  
Scientific Technical ◽  
The Russian Federation

The article examines the recent active public debate concerning the organization of expert activity in Russia. Along with terminological ambiguity in this area, there are significant issues related to the status of the expert, expert’s independence, and the general devaluation of expert opinion. The activity of expert councils formed under the executive authorities is subject to particular criticism both from the citizens and the state. At the same time, special attention is paid to the participation of the scientific community in the independent expertise of programs, projects, and decisions. In this connection, according to the results of the meeting of the Council on education and science, the list of instructions of the President of the Russian Federation provides for the introduction of amendments into the legislation concerning the concept “scientific (scientific-technical) expertise”. It is necessary to establish the criteria and mechanisms for this expertise, as well as the rules for monitoring and evaluating the effectiveness of budgetary allocations for state support of scientific research and development.

scholarly journals The Continuity of Traditions of Scientific School of the RFCFS in S.A. Smirnova’s Organizational, Scientific and Pedagogical Achievements

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 28-36
Author(s):  
E. V. Chesnokova
Keyword(s):  
Forensic Science ◽  
Scientific School ◽  
Social Transformations ◽  
Scientific Schools ◽  
Modern System ◽  
Forensic Institutions ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Political Economic ◽  
Current Stage

More than a 100-year history of the development of the forensic institutions in Russia demonstrates the objective link between the stages of the system’s evolution and the political, economic, and social transformations in the society. The continuity of scientific schools in the system of forensic expert institutions of the Ministry of Justice is shown on the example of S.A. Smirnova’s activity. Leading the modern system of forensic institutions, she is a talented organizer of innovative scientific research, a major administrator who cares for her team, creates and increases the material and technical base of forensic laboratories, the scientist who has influenced the recognition in the scientific school of the Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science in the scientific community, as well as a teacher who has brought up more than one generation of expert researchers. The set of achievements of the forensic science institutions team of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation marks the current stage in the development of forensic expertise based on continuity and deep respect for the traditions of the scientific school with a comprehensive modernization of the practical activities of the system.

scholarly journals On the development of the theoretical criminal law research school of the institute of legislation and comparative law under the government of the russian federation

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 84-89
Author(s):  
Oleg A. Stepanov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Comparative Law ◽  
Scientific Activity ◽  
Scientific School ◽  
Research School ◽  
History Of Development ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Government

The aim of the study is to examine the results of the activities of scientists representing the theoretical criminal law scientific school of the Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation since its establishment in 1923 up to the present time. Particular attention is paid to the scientific activity of M. N. Gernet related to his research in the field of criminology and prison science and the results of the work of his followers. In the conclusion we present the periodization of the history of development of theoretical criminal law scientific school of the Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation.

Tax Experiment Development History and Modern Tendencies

Financial law ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 40-45
Author(s):  
Sergey M. Poryvkin ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Scientific Community ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Development History ◽  
The World ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Negative Factors

Tax experiments have been gaining popularity in the world in recent years. However, in most countries, as in the Russian Federation, there is no formally defined approach to experimental regulation. The process, results, and approach of many experiments are controversial in the scientific community. Based on history, it is possible to determine both the general elements of experiments and the attitude of governments to them, and the signs that influenced the effectiveness of such experiments. In most of the examples reviewed from several countries, the experiments were conducted using almost the same template. Based on the analysis of the history of individual tax experiments, the author draws conclusions about the presence of positive and negative factors common to different countries that affect the effectiveness of conducting, as well as the presence of modern problems and possible ways to solve them.

scholarly journals Cosmonaut’s Legal Status: Brief Professional Commentary

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-120
Author(s):  
Yuri Baturin
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Space Mission ◽  
Russian Government ◽  
The Status ◽  
History Of ◽  
Manned Space ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Model Contract

For the first time ever, the status of a cosmonaut of the Russian Fede-ration shall be treated not only through the review of the legislation or a separate regulatory act but also through the summarization of practical activity in the area of manned cosmonautics.The history of shaping a legal status of a cosmonaut has started since 1960. Over the first two decades of manned cosmonautics, four Regulations on cosmonauts of the USSR have been introduced and refined. However, for a quarter of a century in the Russian Federation, the practical space activities have been running without any instrument regulating the legal status of a cosmonaut. During the period 1992–2017, the preparation of the Regulation on cosmonauts in the Russian Federation was facing serious obstacles.The Regulation on cosmonauts of the Russian Federation approved by the Russian Government in 2017 has significant drawbacks and gaps. A list of challenges of the legal status of a cosmonaut to be addressed is provided. It is expected to supplement the Regulation on cosmonauts by new standards pertaining cosmonaut’s rights and obligations based upon space expertise.It is proposed to define the concept "cosmonaut" and cosmonaut’s job descri-ption using four components: speciality "cosmonaut", qualification "cosmonaut", position "cosmonaut" and profession "cosmonaut". Such approach differs from the logic of the applicable Regulation on cosmonauts 2017 where the cosmonaut’s job description shall be treated as a synonym of the cosmonaut’s professional activity.The need for availability of a Model Contract for execution of manned space mission and Model Contract for preparation to execution of manned space mission is rationalized; its content is provided in sufficient detail.It is proposed to introduce an international dimension into the legal status of a cosmonaut, and in doing so not only to use the whole array of rights and privileges of cosmonauts stipulated by the international law, but also to empower a cosmonaut to act as a representative of the State both at the overseas or international manned space object.The new regulatory acts, the need for which is given rationale in the article, will contribute to bridging gaps of legal regulation in the area of space missions in Russia between the western expertise and national practice of manned cosmonautics.

A New Step in the Study of the History of the Russian Prosecutor’s Office

2019 ◽  
pp. 94-98
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Russian Empire ◽  
Practical Significance ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Russian Empire ◽  
High Level ◽  
The University

The paper is a review on the textbook by A. V. Yeremin, «The History of the National Prosecutor’s office» and the anthology «The Prosecutor’s Office of the Russian Empire in the Documents of 1722–1917» (authors: V. V. Lavrov, A. V. Eremin, edited by N. M. Ivanov) published at the St. Petersburg Law Institute (branch) of the University of the Prosecutor’s office of the Russian Federation in 2018. The reviewers emphasize the high relevance and high level of research, their theoretical and practical significance. The textbook and the anthology will help the students increase their legal awareness, expand their horizons.

The Certainty of the Legal Status of Court Secretary and Court Clerk in Federal Courts

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 26-34
Author(s):  
E. V. Gerasenko ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
System Analysis ◽  
Civil Service ◽  
Federal Courts ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
Level Of Education ◽  
Additional Qualification ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Russian Federation

Employees of the federal courts' apparatus, in accordance with the current regulations, are public civil servants. In practice and in existing scientific research there is an approach to determining the legal status of this category of public servants through their duties, without specifying the specific requirements for candidates for the position to be filled. The purpose of this study is to define additional qualification requirements to be imposed on the applicant for the position of State Civil Service «Court Secretary» in court, in addition to those contained in the Federal Law «On State Civil Service of the Russian Federation» and orders of the Judicial Department of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. The tasks of this work are to study the theoretical foundations of the concept of «status of a State civil servant », to compare federal legislation, decrees of the President of the Russian Federation, decisions and other acts of ministries and departments in the field of the State civil service in the apparatus of federal courts; Justification for the need to include in the status of a public servant serving in the court apparatus additional requirements for the level of education. The methodological basis of the present study was the general scientific methods such as analogy, derivation, system analysis, as well as the private scientific methods: formal-logical, technical-legal and comparativelegal in their various combinations. The study concluded that it was necessary to distinguish the status of federal court staff according to the level of education required to replace a public civil service post, in particular the «Registrar of the Court».

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document