scholarly journals On the development of the theoretical criminal law research school of the institute of legislation and comparative law under the government of the russian federation

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 84-89
Author(s):  
Oleg A. Stepanov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Comparative Law ◽  
Scientific Activity ◽  
Scientific School ◽  
Research School ◽  
History Of Development ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Government

The aim of the study is to examine the results of the activities of scientists representing the theoretical criminal law scientific school of the Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation since its establishment in 1923 up to the present time. Particular attention is paid to the scientific activity of M. N. Gernet related to his research in the field of criminology and prison science and the results of the work of his followers. In the conclusion we present the periodization of the history of development of theoretical criminal law scientific school of the Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation.

scholarly journals Sports Criminal Law: Basis and Limits of Criminalization of Activities Related to Doping

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 28-35
Author(s):  
Aleksandr V. Fedorov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Comparative Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Government ◽  
Practical Conference

The article has been based on the theses of speeches of the author at the International Scientific and Practical Conference Sports in the National Law and International Law Dimension: Relevant Issues (April 4, 2018, the Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation) and is dedicated to the issues of sports criminal law related to the detection and investigation of basis of criminal activities connected with doping. It is concluded that criminalization of activities related to doping shall be based on their social hazard connected with the serious hazard of doping for the health of sportsmen. Within the context of establishment of criminalization limits for activities related to doping, articles of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation are analyzed, which set responsibility for inducement of sportsmen to use doping (substances or methods forbidden in sports) and the use of doping in relation to a sportsman (articles 230. and 230. of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation).

scholarly journals Eliciting the Truth.Dedicated to the 85th Anniversary of Professor Eduard Germanovich Bykov

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 84-88
Author(s):  
D. A. Atyakshin ◽  
V. V. Shishkina ◽  
S. E. Bykov ◽  
L. N. Antakova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Scientific Activity ◽  
Scientific School ◽  
Central Research ◽  
Medical Academy ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Government ◽  
Object Of Study ◽  
State Medical Academy

Eduard Germanovich Bykov, a famous Russian morphologist, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation, Honorary Professor of N.N. Burdenko Voronezh State Medical Academy (VSMA), a founder and leader of Voronezh school of histochemistry would have been 85 years old on June 10, 2021. A key issue of his scientific activity was careful selection of sample preparation protocols for histochem ical analysis in order to increase objectivity of differential diagnosis ofbiopsy material in vivo in clinical practice and to solve urgent problems of pathomorphogenesis of the whole range of diseases. Novelty and perspectives of the conducted research allowed Eduard Germanovich to become a scientific supervisor and consultant of a large number of dissertationists who performed their research in alma mater and in universities of other cities of the  USSR. From 1978 to 2008, Prof. Bykov was in charge of the Central Research Laboratory, N.N. Burdenko State Medical University,  organizing  work  of  laboratories  as  connecting  elements  between  fundamental  research  and  practical health  care.  Scientifically  based  methods  of  diagnosis,  therapy  and  rehabilitation  were  developed  an d  implemented into practical healthcare in the Central ResearchInstitute. Eduard Germanovich created Voronezh Scientific  School  "Human  Histochemistry.  Clinical  Histochemistry",  which  focused  on  preserving  the  vital  chemical characteristics of the object of study. Prof. Bykov was repeatedly awarded with certificates of honor from the University Administration and the Government of Voronezh Region for achievements in research, teaching and social work. In April 2010 he was awarded by the Russian Federation of Cosmonautics with Academician M.V. Keldysh medal for a significant contribution to the development of Russian cosmonautics. In 2011 Professor Eduard Bykov was awarded the title of "Honorary Professor" of N.N. Burdenko Voronezh State Medical Academy.

scholarly journals Constitution and Modernization of Legislation: Proceedings of the XV International School of Young Legal Scholars (Moscow, May 27 – June 5, 2020)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.Ya. Kapustin ◽  
I.I. Kucherov ◽  
S.A. Sinitsyn ◽  
A.I. Kovler ◽  
Yu.N. Kashevarova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Comparative Law ◽  
International School ◽  
International Union ◽  
A Value ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Government ◽  
Legal Understanding ◽  
First Time ◽  
Epidemiological Situation

Modern constitutional transformations, asserting a “value” legal understanding, actualize theoretical and practical problems of legislative regulation, serve as a prereq- uisite for rethinking the essence, role and significance of law in the life of society, and determine the formulation of a number of issues related, first of all, to the qualitative implementation of novelties. This collection reflects the diversity and depth of scientific discussions of the XV In- ternational school of young legal scholars on the topic “Constitution and modernization of legislation”, which was held by the Institute of legislation and comparative law under the Government of the Russian Federation in cooperation with the International Union of lawyers. In the context of a difficult epidemiological situation related to the spread of corona- virus infection, in order to protect the health of conference participants, the organizing Committee decided to hold the XV School remotely (by correspondence). For the first time, all its scientific events were held online. The participants had a unique opportunity to communicate with the direct developers of amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, present their reports in a new format.

Concept of Single Civil Procedure Code: Suggestions of the Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Екатерина Ганичева ◽  
Ekaterina Ganicheva ◽  
Андрей Габов ◽  
Andrey Gabov ◽  
Мария Глазкова ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Comparative Law ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Access To Justice ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Legislative Activity ◽  
The Government

This publication is the result of collective discussion at the Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation of the Concept of a common code of civil procedure adopted in 2014. The article deals with the problem of harmonization of legislation governing the consideration of the various categories of cases within the jurisdiction of the courts of general jurisdiction and arbitration courts. Particular attention is paid to the problems of access to justice, coordination of legislative activity, taking into account the future prospects of unification of the rules and institutions governing the procedural arrangements of civil, administrative and criminal proceedings. The article describes the objective relationship between the development of an of procedural law and the law on the judicial system, which must be taken into account when solving problems to ensure the effective operation of the courts at all stages of trial and in all judicial instances. Certain problems that arose after the unification of the higher judiciary authorities are reviewed, recommendations aimed at improving the structure and organizational forms of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation are given.

scholarly journals The Pages of History of the Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation

2022 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 122-129
Author(s):  
L. P. Morozov
Keyword(s):  
Forensic Science ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Scientific Community ◽  
Scientific School ◽  
60Th Anniversary ◽  
The Status ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Russian Federation

The author dedicates this article to the 60th anniversary of the Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation. He observes the “academic biography” of the Centre and the prerequisites for the emergence of its forensic scholarly tradition. The article also clarifies the features of the scientific school, whereby the scientific community of scientists of the Center received the status of a scientific school and the period of its occurrence.

scholarly journals Legal regulation of relations between Spain and Russia in the area of adoption of Russian children by Spanish citizens

2020 ◽  
pp. 85-93
Author(s):  
Viktoriia Kuznetsova ◽  
Elena Kargovskaia
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Statistical Data ◽  
Scientific Research ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Systemic Analysis ◽  
History Of Development ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Historical Comparative ◽  
Spanish Legislation

This article conducts the analysis of legal regulation of relations between the Kingdom of Spain and the Russian Federation with regards to adoption of Russian children by Spanish citizens. The authors examine the history of development of bilateral Russian-Spanish cooperation; legal normative base, and procedure for the adoption of Russian orphans in the Russian and Spanish legislation. Statistical data is provided on the trends in adoption of Russian orphans by citizens of the Kingdom of Spain. The article employs the following methods of scientific research: historical, comparative-legal, statistical, and systemic analysis. The relevance of the selected topic is substantiated by the fact the for many years Spain demonstrates consistent interest in this question, ranking second among other countries that adopt children from the Russian Federation. At the same time, the legal and bureaucratic framework for realization of Russian-Spanish cooperation in this field requires improvements. The authors conclude that although the number of adopted Russian orphans by Spanish citizens has dropped in recent years, it is necessary to continue cooperation in this field by improving the existing legislation.

scholarly journals Criminal Liability for Knowingly Unlawful Sentence, Decision or Other Judicial Act

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 93-102
Author(s):  
Pavel Metelsky ◽  
Nadezhda Verchenko
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Prosecution ◽  
The Public ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Considerable Complexity

Introduction. The publication is devoted to the corpus delicti, provided for by Art. 305 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, which, being, in fact, a special type of official abuse, stands out as the direct object of a criminal assault and a special subject, since it can be committed exclusively by professional judges. The main features of the objective and subjective parties, qualifying signs of the offense are revealed, some problems that arise when applying this criminal law are outlined. Purpose. The goal is to analyze the design features of the crime and issues that arise when applying this rule. Methodology. The method of a formal legal analysis of the norms of the criminal law and theoretical provisions on problems directly related to the application of this rule was used. Results. The public danger of a criminal act that undermines the very foundations of justice is obvious, in connection with which it stands out as an independent crime by all the Russian Criminal Codes, starting in 1922, the history of criminal responsibility for its commission can be traced in our country in general since the 16th century. The current criminal law prohibition is characterized by considerable complexity, due to both the blanket nature of the disposition of the norm itself and the presence of discrepancies in the understanding of the signs embodied in it. Conclusion. The implementation of criminal liability for this crime involves the establishment of not only circumstances directly related to the corpus delicti that lie in the criminal law field. The subject of an infringement, a judicial act, must be subjected to procedural review without fail, after which, subject to the consent of the Higher Qualification Collegium of Judges of the Russian Federation, in fact, and the mechanism of criminal prosecution is “launched”. That is, a truly “multi-way” combination of actions is necessary, carried out in several stages, and the problem itself to some extent becomes interdisciplinary, going beyond only criminal law.

scholarly journals RUSSIAN INVESTIGATION AS VIEWED BY A HISTORIAN

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 3-10
Author(s):  
Aleksandr V. Fedorov ◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
18Th Century ◽  
Legal Aspects ◽  
Russian Society ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Russian Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
Low Efficiency

The article is dedicated to the famous Russian historian and legal expert Doctor of History Dmitriy O. Serov and a brief analysis of his studies concerning the establishment and development of the Russian law enforcement authorities in the first third of the 18th century: courts, prosecutor’s office, fiscal service, investigative authorities. Having started his scientific activities from studies of history of the spiritual life of the Russian society from the 17th to the 18th century, D.O. Serov then moved on to the legal aspects of history of the 18th to the 20th century, history of the personnel of the national government machine focusing on investigative authorities and was recognized in our country and abroad as one of the best experts of the Peter the Great’s epoch, specialist in history of the Russian law enforcement and judicial systems, leading scientist studying history of the Russian investigative authorities. D.O. Serov developed new areas of historical and legal research; identified, researched and introduced into scientific discourse many earlier unknown or briefly mentioned archive files including the Instruction to Major’s Investigative Chancelleries of December 9, 1717. The educational course History of the Russian Investigative Authorities was launched based on his research; a new professional holiday, the Day of an Investigation Officer of the Russian Federation, was introduced by Resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 741 of August 27, 2013 (July 25, the day of establishment of the first M.I. Volkonskiy investigative chancellery); some memorable dates of history of the national pre-trial investigation were introduced (including December 9, the Day of Establishment of Major’s Investigative Chancelleries). D.O. Serov justified that the Russian investigative authorities originated in the form of investigative chancelleries. The basis for acknowledgment of such chancelleries as investigative authorities is their characteristics as an independent permanent government authority, designated to investigate criminal cases on the pre-trial stage, being the only function of this authority. D.O. Serov’s research showed that the reason for a short life of such authorities was not their low efficiency. Quite the opposite, major’s investigative chancelleries were in advance of their time and turned out to be misfitting even for the reformed state mechanism of Russia.

scholarly journals RESPONSIBILITY FOR CAUSING HARM BY A HIGHLY AUTOMATED VEHICLE: STATE AND PERSPECTIVES

2019 ◽  
pp. 117-124
Author(s):  
A. I. Chuchaev ◽  
S. V. Malikov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Road Traffic ◽  
Legal Responsibility ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Automated Vehicles ◽  
General Terms ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Government ◽  
Definition Of

The paper describes the existing in Russia regulatory legal responsibility for causing harm by a highly automated (unmanned) vehicle (BTS). The most significant documents currently include: Convention on Road Traffic; Road Safety Strategy in the Russian Federation; «Roadmap» to improve legislation and eliminate administrative barriers in order to ensure the implementation of the National Technology Initiative for the «Avtonet». The main attention is given to the order of the Government of the Russian Federation, in which the first approaches to the regulation of the operation of highly automated vehicles are indicated, the actors responsible for the case of damage by the drone are highlighted. The principles of the functioning of the BTS and the degree of their autonomy are shown in general terms. The authors analyze the approaches in the domestic criminal law to the responsibility of persons managing BTS and the approaches developed in foreign countries in relation to the regulation of the operation of highly automated vehicles. The main approaches to the definition of a criminal law prohibition are indicated and the most important algorithms of criminalization of the considered act are highlighted. The structure of the federal law on the regulation of the use of vehicles equipped with an automatic control system in the territory of the Russian Federation is proposed.

scholarly journals Methodology of Chrono-Discrete Mono-Geography Comparative Law in the Study of Judicial Reforms in the Russian Empire and the Russian Federation

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 45-50
Author(s):  
V M Bolshakova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Comparative Law ◽  
Russian Empire ◽  
Scientific School ◽  
Judicial Reform ◽  
Basic Principles ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Russian Empire ◽  
Structure And Activity

The article proves the expediency of applying the methodology of chrono-discrete mono-geography comparative jurisprudence when studying judicial transformations in the Russian Empire and the Russian Federation. The author proves that the judicial reforms of Emperor Alexander II and the judicial transformations late XX - early XXI century in their totality represent a chrono-discrete phenomenon. Examines the basic principles of the scientific school of chrono-discrete mono-geography comparative jurisprudence as applied to the study of Russian judicial reforms in the Russian Empire and the Russian Federation. In the paper it notes that the judicial transformation as a phenomenon include items such as 1) conceptual framework, ideas of reform; 2) judicial institutions; 3) theoretical and practical problems of implementation; 4) results; compliance, what happened, what was intended by the reformers; 5) attitude of the legal community and the public to reform on the whole and its separate institutions. The essential core of any judicial reform are newly constructed or transformed its institutions. Speaking of chrono-discrete judicial institutions, the author proposes to divide them into classical and non-classical. The first is the Institute of magistrate’s court, the juries and the Institute of bailiffs and institute of appeal. To non-classical chrono-discrete institutions include prosecutors and the legal profession. As the main comparable problems, characteristic for the studied periods, the author sees 1) the reforms “from above”; 2) the issue of financial support for reforms; 3) personnel problems; 4) problem of implementation of judicial reforms in space and time; 5) constant and numerous adjustment of normative legal acts, regulating the structure and activity of the relevant judicial institutions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document