scholarly journals Investigating the Roles of Implicit and Explicit Knowledge in the Production of Grammatical Errors

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Murniati Murniati
Keyword(s):  
Language Production ◽  
Explicit Knowledge ◽  
Second Language Learners ◽  
Implicit Knowledge ◽  
Production Test ◽  
English Grammar ◽  
Academic Texts ◽  
Grammaticality Judgment ◽  
Grammatical Errors

This research aims to investigate the role of implicit and/or explicit knowledge in the production of grammatical errors in academic texts. Explicit knowledge is defined as conscious and declarative knowledge used to monitor language production while implicit knowledge is defined as an intuitive knowledge which enables the second language learners to use the language spontaneously without any reflection (Zhang, 2015). The reasons why this research is conducted is due to the fact that the students are still producing errors even though they have learnt English since elementary school. The data is gained from the academic text written down by fifteen English department students studying in a university in Jakarta. It is analyzed by using two different measurements: (1) Delayed Grammatical Judgment Tests (GJT), and (2) Interview including Metalingual Comment to investigate the role of explicit knowledge in the production of grammatical errors. The other two measurements are also used; they are (1) Timed Grammaticality Judgment Test (TGJT), and (2) Oral Production Test (OPT) to investigate the role of implicit knowledge. The results show that 19.2% of grammatical errors are produced due to the implicit knowledge and 80.8% is due to explicit knowledge. Since the explicit knowledge plays an important role in producing the grammatical errors, it can be concluded that teaching English grammar for university students is still important. If possible, the English Grammar lessons should be given more rooms in the overall curriculum

Human Factors in Interactive Machine Learning: A Cybersecurity Case Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 1495-1499
Author(s):  
Mark H. Chignell ◽  
Mu-Huan Chung ◽  
Yuhong Yang ◽  
Greg Cento ◽  
Abhay Raman
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Human Factors ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Explicit Knowledge ◽  
Implicit Knowledge ◽  
Cyber Attacks ◽  
Transfer Data ◽  
Interactive Machine Learning

Cybersecurity is emerging as a major issue for many organizations and countries. Machine learning has been used to recognize threats, but it is difficult to predict future threats based on past events, since malicious attackers are constantly finding ways to circumvent defences and the algorithms that they rely on. Interactive Machine learning (iML) has been developed as a way to combine human and algorithmic expertise in a variety of domains and we are currently applying it to cybersecurity. In this application of iML, implicit knowledge about human behaviour, and about the changing nature of threats, can supplement the explicit knowledge encoded in algorithms to create more effective defences against cyber-attacks. In this paper we present the example problem of data exfiltration where insiders, or outsiders masquerading as insiders, who copy and transfer data maliciously, against the interests of an organization. We will review human factors issues associated with the development of iML solutions for data exfiltration. We also present a case study involving development of an iML solution for a large financial services company. In this case study we review work carried out on developing visualization dashboards and discussing prospects for further iML integration. Our goal in writing this paper is to motivate future researchers to consider the role of the human more fully in ML, not only in the data exfiltration and cybersecurity domain but also in a range of other applications where human expertise is important and needs to combine with ML prediction to solve challenging problems.

CONFLICTING EVIDENCE OF EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT KNOWLEDGE FROM OBJECTIVE AND SUBJECTIVE MEASURES

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 359-382
Author(s):  
Ryo Maie ◽  
Robert M. DeKeyser
Keyword(s):  
Explicit Knowledge ◽  
Implicit Knowledge ◽  
English Speakers ◽  
Subjective Measures ◽  
Full Account ◽  
Monitoring Task ◽  
Grammaticality Judgment ◽  
Conflicting Evidence ◽  
Incidental Exposure ◽  
Explicit And Implicit Knowledge

AbstractThis study is the first to compare objective and subjective measures of explicit and implicit knowledge under learning from incidental exposure. An experiment was conducted, during which L1 English speakers were trained on a semiartificial language, Japlish. A measure of explicit knowledge and a recently proposed measure of implicit knowledge (i.e., an untimed auditory grammaticality judgment and a word-monitoring task) were applied to gauge the two types of knowledge at two testing sessions, and their results were compared with those of subjective measures of awareness. Results revealed clear discrepancies between the two measurement approaches in terms of their sensitivity. In particular, while the subjective measures varied in identifying explicit and implicit knowledge of various Japlish constructions, the objective measures indicated that most of the knowledge was explicit, and development of implicit knowledge (measured by the word-monitoring task) was minimal, only manifested in detecting a case-missing violation at the delayed posttest. The results are discussed with reference to the current literature on explicit and implicit learning and knowledge, and it is concluded that the criterion of (un)awareness might not be by itself sufficient to provide a full account of L2 knowledge developed under incidental conditions.

What About Fluency? Implicit vs. Explicit Training Affects Artificial Mini-Language Production

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Lichtman
Keyword(s):  
Second Language ◽  
Language Learning ◽  
Language Production ◽  
Explicit Knowledge ◽  
Second Language Learners ◽  
Explicit Instruction ◽  
Language Instruction ◽  
Training Condition ◽  
Explicit Training ◽  
The Impact

Abstract A great deal of research explores how implicit vs. explicit instruction affects second language learners’ grammatical accuracy, generally finding that explicit instruction increases accuracy. However, no research to date has examined the impact of implicit/explicit instruction on learners’ fluency. Additionally, nearly all the research has only tested adult learners, despite strong claims about the effects of age on implicit vs. explicit language learning. This study tests the impact of implicit or explicit training on children’s and adults’ performance with an artificial mini-language. After seven days of training, fluency, accuracy, and explicit knowledge were measured. Implicit groups became significantly more fluent than explicit groups. Adults were more accurate than children, but training condition did not significantly affect accuracy. Adults and explicit groups developed more explicit knowledge than children and implicit groups, with no interactions between age and training condition. This study is one of the first to show measurable benefits for implicit second language instruction over explicit instruction: both children and adults produce sentences more fluently after implicit instruction.

scholarly journals English Grammar and Thai University Students: An Insurmountable Linguistic Battle?

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 22
Author(s):  
Saksit Saengboon
Keyword(s):  
University Students ◽  
Recognition Test ◽  
The Other ◽  
Production Test ◽  
Main Research ◽  
English Grammar ◽  
Academic Texts ◽  
Research Questions ◽  
Grammar Knowledge ◽  
Thai University

This study aimed at investigating English grammar knowledge of a group of Thai university students. The three main research questions revolved around their knowledge of English grammar, the kinds of difficulties they had encountered in using the grammar as well as their perceptions of the roles of grammar in using English. The participants were administered two types of grammar test: one was the grammar production test (20 items), and the other was the grammar recognition test (40 items). The average scores of the tests were relatively low: 7.30/20 and 21.13/40, respectively. The interview results suggested that the participants viewed grammar as important in learning and using English effectively. They also reported that appropriate teaching of grammar was beneficial as long as the communicative use of the grammar was emphasized. Further, a thorough analysis of sentence structures, which was one of the foci of the lesson learned, helped them to gain a better understanding of English sentences, enabling them to read academic texts more effectively. In short, the participants believed that grammar was essential and was something that was not insurmountable albeit the low scores reported above.

The Effects of Recasts and Working Memory on the Development of Implicit and Explicit Knowledge

2016 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jieun Ahn ◽  
Youngkyu Kim
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Explicit Knowledge ◽  
Implicit Knowledge ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Elicited Imitation ◽  
Grammaticality Judgment ◽  
Causative Construction ◽  
Implicit And Explicit ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Experimental Group

AbstractThis paper aims to investigate the effects of recasts and working memory on the acquisition of Korean morphological causatives by advanced Chinese learners of Korean. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups: A experimental group and a control group. The experimental group received intensive recasts during task-based interaction, whereas the control group did not. The effects of recasts were measured by two types of tests: An elicited imitation test, as a measure of implicit knowledge, and an untimed grammaticality judgment test, as a measure of explicit knowledge. The findings are as follows. First, from the pretest to the delayed posttest, recasts facilitated the learners’ acquisition of causative construction by developing both their implicit and explicit knowledge. Second, the results of delayed posttests showed that recasts were more effective in aiding the development of implicit knowledge than explicit knowledge. Third, working memory was found to be a significant covariate in the facilitative effects of recasts on explicit knowledge; that is, it mediated the development of explicit knowledge via recasts as a significant individual difference factor. The effects of recasts were maintained even when the impact of working memory was controlled. (189 words)

Validity of new measures of implicit knowledge: Distinguishing implicit knowledge from automatized explicit knowledge

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 1229-1261 ◽  
Author(s):  
YUICHI SUZUKI
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Explicit Knowledge ◽  
First Language ◽  
Implicit Knowledge ◽  
Linguistic Knowledge ◽  
Monitoring Task ◽  
Grammaticality Judgment ◽  
Method Effects ◽  
Japanese Learners ◽  
Grammar Tests

ABSTRACTAccumulating evidence suggests that time-pressured form-focused tasks like grammaticality judgment tests (GJTs) can measure second language (L2) implicit knowledge. The current paper, however, proposes that these tasks draw on automatized explicit knowledge. A battery of six grammar tests was designed to distinguish automatized explicit knowledge and implicit knowledge. While three time-pressured form-focused tasks (an auditory GJT, a visual GJT, and a fill in the blank test) were hypothesized to measure automatized explicit knowledge, three real-time comprehension tasks (a visual-world task, a word-monitoring task, and a self-paced reading task) were hypothesized to measure implicit knowledge. One hundred advanced L2 Japanese learners with first language Chinese residing in Japan took all six tests. Confirmatory factor analysis and multitrait-multimethod analysis provided an array of evidence supporting that these tests assessed two types of linguistic knowledge separately with little influence from the method effects. The results analyzed separately by length of residence in Japan (a proxy for the amount of naturalistic L2 exposure) showed that learners with longer residence in Japan can draw on implicit knowledge in the real-time comprehension tasks with more stability than those with shorter residence. These findings indicate the potential of finely tuned real-time comprehension tasks as measures of implicit knowledge.

scholarly journals ÉVALUER LES CONNAISSANCES IMPLICITES ET EXPLICITES EN FRANÇAIS LANGUE ÉTRANGÈRE PAR LES TESTS DE JUGEMENT DE GRAMMATICALITÉ : ANALYSE DES OUTILS ET PRÉSENTATION DES RÉSULTATS DE LA RECHERCHE

Neofilolog ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 205-221
Author(s):  
Wioletta A. Piegzik
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Language ◽  
Explicit Knowledge ◽  
Implicit Knowledge ◽  
Academic Environment ◽  
Research Results ◽  
Grammaticality Judgment ◽  
Implicit And Explicit

The aim of this paper is to evaluate implicit and explicit knowledge among Polish speaking students studying French as a foreign language in the academic environment. In the first part, we discuss a timed grammaticality judgment test (TGJT) as an instrument for measuring implicit knowledge and an untimed grammaticality judgment test (UGJT) as a tool for evaluating explicit knowledge and we propose solutions to sidestep some of the weaknesses of both these instruments which were observed in our research. The second part focuses on the presentation of the research results, leading to the conclusion that the group of students at A2 level develop implicit and explicit knowledge in a fairly balanced way

scholarly journals Daur ʻIlm al-Lugah an-Nafsī fī Taʻlīm al-Lugah al-ʻArabiyyah li Gair an-Nāṭiqīn Bihā

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-20
Author(s):  
Imam Wahyudi ◽  
Zainuri Zainuri
Keyword(s):  
Second Language ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Language Learners ◽  
Language Production ◽  
Second Language Learners ◽  
Native Speakers ◽  
Arabic Language ◽  
Teacher Factors ◽  
And Linguistics

Learning is a unit consisting of various factors that support each other. In learning Arabic, it is not only teacher factors and Arabic language material that must be considered, students as second language learners also need attention for the success of learning. The purpose of this article was to describe the role of psycholinguistics in learning Arabic for non-native speakers. Researchers used literature review to extract data from various sources. From the data obtained, it was known that the role of psycholinguistics in learning Arabic makes teachers able to understand the processes that occur in students when they listen, speak, read, or write. Psycholinguistics as an applied science between psychology and linguistics can be used to understand the behavior of second language learners, language acquisition, and language production and the processes that occur in it.

Effects of task repetition with written corrective feedback on the knowledge and written accuracy of learners with different prior knowledge of the structure

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 464-493
Author(s):  
Sima Khezrlou
Keyword(s):  
Prior Knowledge ◽  
Explicit Knowledge ◽  
Second Language Learners ◽  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
Linguistic Knowledge ◽  
Production Test ◽  
Task Repetition ◽  
Repetition Effects ◽  
Written Corrective Feedback ◽  
Metalinguistic Feedback

Abstract Previous task repetition studies have largely overlooked the second language learners’ development of linguistic knowledge as well as written accuracy. Furthermore, sufficient attention has not been paid to the role of written corrective feedback (WCF) in task repetition to reinforce attention to form. Moreover, studies exploring task repetition effects on learners with different prior knowledge of the target structure are rare. This study attempted to bridge these lacunas. Seventy-nine upper-intermediate learners in Iran were divided into four groups: task repetition with no feedback (TR), task repetition with metalinguistic feedback (TR+M), task repetition with direct feedback (TR+D), and task repetition with mixed direct metalinguistic feedback (TR+DM). All groups performed an error correction test that measured explicit knowledge, an elicited imitation test that tapped automatized explicit knowledge, and a picture-cued written production test that measured written accuracy. Participants performed a dictogloss task and received WCF before repeating the same task. Subsequently, they performed another dictogloss task with different content. Results revealed that the +Prior Knowledge learners in the TR+DM group gained explicit knowledge and proved slightly better than the TR+D regarding written accuracy. None of the groups, however, could develop automatized explicit knowledge.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document