Building Friendships Between Handicapped and Nonhandicapped Students: Effects of Cooperative and Individualistic Instruction

1981 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 415-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger T. Johnson ◽  
David W. Johnson

The effects of cooperative and individualistic learning experiences were compared on interpersonal attraction between handicapped and non-handicapped third-grade students. Forty students were assigned to conditions on a stratified random basis controlling for handicap, ability, sex, and peer popularity. Students participated in an instructional math unit for 25 minutes a day for 16 instructional days. Type of interaction within the instructional situation, interpersonal attraction, and frequency of interaction in a free-choice, postinstructional situation were measured. Three attitude scales were also given. The results indicate that cooperative learning experiences, compared with individualistic ones, promote more cross-handicapped interaction during instruction; promote interaction characterized by involving handicapped students in the learning activities, giving them assistance, and encouraging them to achieve; promote more cross-handicap friendships; and promote more cross-handicap interaction during postinstructional free-time.

1983 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 323-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger T. Johnson

A comparison was made of the effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning experiences on relationships between handicapped and nonhandicapped students and their self-esteem and perspective-taking ability. Fifty-nine students were assigned to conditions on a stratified random basis controlling for handicap, ability, and sex. Students participated in two instructional units for 60 minutes a day for 15 instructional days. Behavioral measures were taken for cross-handicap interaction during instruction and during daily free-time periods. The results indicate that cooperative learning experiences, compared with competitive and individualistic ones, promote more interpersonal attraction between handicapped and nonhandicapped students and promote higher self-esteem on the part of all students. Cooperation promoted greater perspective-taking ability than did competition.


2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-26
Author(s):  
Rizki Amalia ◽  
Karyanti Karyanti

This study aims to: (1) Know the learning activities of Mathematics class III students of SDN 3 Palangka Palangka Raya by using the Think Pair Share cooperative learning model Assisted by Visual Media. (2) Knowing whether or not there is an increase in Mathematics learning outcomes of third-grade students of SDN 3 Palangka Palangka Raya using Think Pair Share learning models Assisted by Visual Media. The research method used is Classroom Action Research (CAR) which seeks to solve or answer problems in learning. Subjects in this study were all third-grade students of Palangka Palangka Raya Elementary School 3, totaling 20 students divided into nine men and 11 women . Data collection techniques used are observation and tests. Data analysis techniques in this study are qualitative and quantitative. The results of this study indicate that: (1) Learning activities of third-grade students of SDN 3 Palangka Palangka Raya using Cooperative Learning models Think Pair Share Assisted by Visual Media more active with suitable criteria. (2) There is an increase in Mathematics learning outcomes by using the Think Pair Share cooperative learning model in third-grade students of SDN 3 Palangka Palangka Raya. The primary data learning outcomes reached an average value of 58 with classical data completeness of 25% and experienced an increase in the first cycle of an average value of 90 with a percentage of artistic data completeness of 100%.


2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 165
Author(s):  
Maidar Maidar

This study aims to determine whether there is an increased motivation to learn mathematics of third grade students of SDN 001 Pagaran Tapah Darussalam Rokan Hulu after application of cooperative learning model of quick on the draw. The problems of the research is "What type of cooperative learning model of application quick on the draw can Increase the motivation to learn mathematics 001 third grade students of SDN Pagaran Tapah Darussalam Rokan Hulu?" This research is a classroom action research conducted in SDN 001 Pagarah Tapah Darussalam. The subjects were students of class III is 31 students. Collecting the data in this study using sheets of observations made every meeting. Based on the results of this study concluded that using cooperative learning model of the type of quick on the draw can Increase the motivation to learn mathematics 001 third grade students of SDN Pagaran Tapah Darussalam Rokan Hulu.Keywords: cooperative quick on the draw, the motivation to learn math


2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Zerri Rahman Hakim

The objectives of this research were to determine: 1) Students’ learning activities in social studies after using Question Student Have (QSH) in Cooperative Learning Model, 2) Students’ learning outcomes in social studies after using Question Student Have (QSH) in Cooperative Learning Model. The method used in this research is Classroom Action Research (CAR) with Stephen Kemmis and Mc. Taggart Model which consists of four stages, namely planning, implementation, observation and reflection. This study was conducted by the researcher in two cycles. Instruments used in this research are observational sheet, interview, and test in the last cycle. From the analysis of the data, the researcher found that there is an improvement in students’ learning outcomes. On the basic value, there was only 43,33% students who achieve the learning mastery. In the first cycle, the students who achieve the learning mastery were increased, it was about 30% from the basic value, it reached 73,33%. On the second cycle, the student who achieve the learning mastery were increased about 26,70% from the first cycle, become 100%. The same thing also happened to the students' learning activities. In the first cycle, students’ learning activities is 71,42% and on the second cycle, students’ learning activities were incrased about 21,43% from the first cycle, become 92,85%. Based on the analysis of data of this study it can be concluded that the use of Question Student Have (QSH) in Cooperative Learning Model can improve students’ learning outcomes and learning activities fourth grade students of SDN Saga V in social studies.Keywords: social studies learning outcomes, cooperative learning QSH type.


2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 591
Author(s):  
Narko '

This research was motivated by lack of civics student learning outcomes. Low learningoutcomes are caused by: (a) students do not really follow civics and they talk to each othersawaktu teacher explains the lesson; (B) students are not active in learning; (C) if the teacherasking questions, very few students who answered; and (d) very few students were askedabout the learning that has not been understood, in addition to the learning activities in theclassroom dominated by teachers and children are much more powerful. This study aims toimprove learning outcomes civics through cooperative learning model NHT. This study is aclass action, which was conducted in 018 primary schools Ukui 1 Subdistrict Ukui. This studyfocused on students' learning outcomes data civics. Based on the results of the study revealedthat the civic education learning outcomes of students has increased. This is evidenced by:Improved student learning outcomes at the preliminary data the number of students who passare 15 students (50%), increasing in the first cycle increased to 26 students (87%) and incycle II further increased up to 27 students (90 %).


Author(s):  
Mukhammad Alfan Khakim ◽  
Maria Veronica Roesminingsih ◽  
Peter Njoroge Murigi ◽  
Agus Suprijono ◽  
Waspodo Tjipto Subroto

Relay Journal ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 360-381
Author(s):  
Gordon Myskow ◽  
Phillip A. Bennett ◽  
Hisako Yoshimura ◽  
Kyoko Gruendel ◽  
Takuto Marutani ◽  
...  

The distinction between Cooperative and Collaborative Learning approaches is not a clear one. Some use the terms interchangeably while others consider Cooperative Learning to be a type of Collaborative Learning. Still others clearly differentiate between them, characterizing Cooperative Learning as more highly structured in its procedures, involving a great deal of intervention by the teacher to plan and orchestrate group interactions. Collaborative Learning, on the other hand, presupposes some degree of learner autonomy-that groups can work effectively toward shared goals and monitor their own progress. This paper takes the view that the distinction between Cooperative and Collaborative Learning is a useful one and that both approaches can play valuable roles in fostering autonomous interaction. It argues that while Collaborative Learning formations may be the ultimate goal for teachers wishing to develop learner autonomy, Cooperative Learning is a valuable means for modeling the skills and abilities to help students get there. The discussion begins with an overview of the two approaches, focusing on their implementation in the Japanese educational context. It then presents seven highly structured Cooperative Learning activities and shows how they can be modified and extended over time to encourage more autonomous interaction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document