scholarly journals Pancasila sebagai Sumber Hukum dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Fais Yonas Bo’a
Keyword(s):  
Legal System ◽  
House Of Representatives ◽  
Legal Pluralism ◽  
New Order ◽  
The Reformation ◽  
National Legal System ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Binding Power ◽  
Laws And Regulations

Pancasila sebagai sumber segala sumber hukum sudah mendapatkan legitimasi secara yuridis melalui TAP MPR Nomor XX/MPRS/1966 tentang Memorandum DPR-GR Mengenai Sumber Tertib Hukum Republik Indonesia dan Tata Urutan Peraturan Perundang Republik Indonesia. Setelah reformasi, keberadaan Pancasila tersebut kembali dikukuhkan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 2004 yang kemudian diganti dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Pancasila sebagai sumber segala sumber hukum memberi makna bahwa sistem hukum nasional wajib berlandaskan Pancasila. Akan tetapi, keberadaan Pancasila tersebut semakin tergerus dalam sistem hukum nasional. Hal demikian dilatarbelakangi oleh tiga alasan yaitu: pertama, adanya sikap resistensi terhadap Orde Baru yang memanfaatkan Pancasila demi kelanggengan kekuasaan yang bersifat otoriter. Kedua, menguatnya pluralisme hukum yang mengakibatkan terjadinya kontradiksi-kontradiksi atau disharmonisasi hukum. Ketiga, status Pancasila tersebut hanya dijadikan simbol dalam hukum. Untuk itu, perlu dilakukan upaya-upaya untuk menerapkan Pancasila sebagai sumber segala sumber hukum dalam sistem hukum nasional yaitu: pertama, menjadikan Pancasila sebagai suatu aliran hukum agar tidak terjadi lagi disharmonisasi hukum akibat diterapkannya pluralisme hukum. Kedua, mendudukkan Pancasila sebagai puncak peraturan perundang-undangan agar Pancasila memiliki daya mengikat terhadap segala jenis peraturan perundang-undangan sehingga tidak melanggar asas lex superiori derogat legi inferiori.Pancasila as the source of all sources of law has obtained legitimacy legally through the Decree of the People’s Consultative Assembly Number XX / MPRS / 1966 on the Memorandum of the House of Representatives-Gotong Royong Regarding the Sources of Law and the Order of the Republic of Indonesia. After the reformation, the existence of Pancasila was re-confirmed in Law Number 10 Year 2004 which was subsequently replaced by Law Number 12 Year 2011 on Legislation Regulation. Pancasila as the source of all sources of law gives meaning that the national legal system must be based on Pancasila. However, now the existence of Pancasila is increasingly eroded in the national legal system. This is motivated by three reasons: first, the existence of resistance to the New Order that utilizes Pancasila for the sake of perpetuity of authoritarian power. Second, the strengthening of legal pluralism that resulted in legal contradictions or disharmony. Third, the status of Pancasila is only used as a symbol in law. Therefore, efforts should be made to implement Pancasila as the source of all sources of law in the national legal system: first, make Pancasila as a flow of law in order to avoid legal disharmonization due to the application of legal pluralism. Secondly, Pretend Pancasila as the top of legislation so that Pancasila have binding power against all kinds of laws and regulations so that it does not violate the principle of lex superiori derogat legi inferiori.

scholarly journals Konsep Pluralisme Hukum Khas Indonesia sebagai Strategi Menghadapi Era Modernisasi Hukum

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-36
Author(s):  
Fradhana Putra Disantara
Keyword(s):  
Legal System ◽  
Local Governments ◽  
Legal Pluralism ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Scientific Development ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
National Legal System ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Materials Used

The purpose of this legal research is to describe the concept of Indonesian legal pluralism or Indonesian legal pluralism in facing the era of legal modernization; as well as describing the Indonesian legal pluralism strategy in integrating customary courts into the national legal system. This legal research uses a statute approach and a conceptual approach. In this legal research, the primary and secondary legal materials used are inventoried in order to obtain proper legal review; and provides a conceptual analysis of the legal issues discussed. The results of the study stated that as a novelty concept; The concept of typical Indonesian legal pluralism provides equality for the enactment of state law, transnational law and customary law so that they can run together based on the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia in the era of legal modernization. Then, the concept of typical Indonesian legal pluralism can be used as a strategy to integrate customary justice into the national legal system through aspects of legal development. Thus, this research is expected to be useful theoretically; namely as a scientific development of customary law, and practical benefits; namely as a reference for drafting regulations on customary villages by local governments. Therefore, researchers recommend that the Indigenous Peoples Bill be a priority in the 2021 National Legislation Program (Prolegnas).

scholarly journals EKSISTENSI OTONOMI DESA PAKRAMAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF PLURALISME HUKUM

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anak Agung Istri Ari Atu Dewi
Keyword(s):  
Legal System ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Pluralism ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Legal Interpretation ◽  
State Law ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Local Regulation ◽  
Traditional Institution ◽  
The Republic

The purpose of this research is to discover the existence of autonomy of Desa Pakraman in legal pluralism perspective. Related with that purpose, there are two issues that will be discussed, first, how does the existence of the autonomy of Desa Pakraman in Indonesia’s legal system?,Second, how does the existence of the autonomy of Desa Pakraman in legal pluralism perspective?. The research method is normative legal research using statue approach, concept approach and analytical approach and law analysis by using legal interpretation. Based on the problems, the results of discussion are : first, the existence of the autonomy of Desa Pakraman within the Indonesia’s legal system has regulated in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, national and local Regulations. In the Constitution, specifically Article 18 B of paragraph (2), declare that the states recognizes Desa Pakraman and their traditional rights. In regulation of Law No.5 of 1960 concerning basic Agrarian Law (UUPA), regulation of Human Rights, and regulation of Desa (Village) are clearly recognize Desa Pakraman as traditional institution has traditional rights, one of it is the autonomy of Desa Pakraman. At the local regulation, autonomy Desa Pakraman has regulated in Local Regulation about Desa Pakraman. Second, that existence of autonomy Desa Pakraman in perspective legal pluralism is that the existence autonomy Desa Pakraman is a weak legal pluralism. In perspective weak legal pluralism the state law as a superior and the customary law as an inferior, its position in the hierarchy under State law. As a theory, the semi-autonomous social field from Sally Falk Moore perspectives that Desa Pakraman is semi-autonomous. Desa Pakraman has capacity to hold their village based on the customary law and outomaticly Desa Pakraman to be in framework of state law.

Navigating Diffuse Jurisdictions

2019 ◽  
pp. 98-120
Author(s):  
Helen Quane
Keyword(s):  
Legal System ◽  
Legal Pluralism ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Specific Reference ◽  
State Law ◽  
System P ◽  
The Status ◽  
Over Time

This chapter studies the jurisdictional boundaries between state and non-state law with specific reference to religious, or customary, law. The determination of these regulatory forms as state law depends on the extent to which they perform prescriptive, adjudicative, or enforcement functions. Indeed, the boundaries between state and non-state law are not as stable as they may appear, as they are liable to shift according to circumstances and over time. The chapter then argues that the issue of classification acquires resonance in cases where legal pluralism occurs as the character and scope of a state’s exercise of jurisdiction becomes far more ambiguous in such situations. This can create uncertainty about the jurisdiction of the respective systems, the status of norms from one system that are given effect in another, and how these norms should be interpreted and applied given their concurrent existence within more than one legal system.

scholarly journals POLITIK HUKUM KEWENANGAN KONSTITUSIONAL DEWAN PERWAKILAN DAERAH DALAM PROSES LEGISLASI PASCA PUTUSAN MK NOMOR 92/PUU-X/2012

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 365
Author(s):  
Anna Triningsih
Keyword(s):  
House Of Representatives ◽  
State Institution ◽  
The State ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Historical Approach ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Laws And Regulations

<p>Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2014 tentang Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat, Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat, Dewan Perwakilan Daerah, Dan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah (UU MD3) pasca putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) dinilai memiliki problem substantif/materil akibat materi muatannya bertentangan dengan Undang-Undang Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 (UUD NRI 1945), yang mengakibatkan kerugian konstitusional terhadap Dewan Perwakilan Daerah (DPD), meliputi dikuranginya kewenangan DPD untuk dapat mengajukan (Rancangan Undang-Undang) RUU, dikuranginya kewenangan DPD untuk membahas RUU dan dikuranginya kewenangan DPD dalam kedudukannya sebagai lembaga perwakilan daerah. Hal ini menunjukan bahwa pembentukan UU MD3 nyata-nyata tidak menghormati putusan MK yang diberi mandat UUD NRI 1945 sebagai lembaga penafsir dan penjaga konstitusi, dengan tidak menghormati, mematuhi, dan melaksanakan putusan MK ini menunjukkan ketidakpatuhan terhadap putusan lembaga negara yang telah ditunjuk konstitusi untuk mengawal kemurnian pelaksanaan konstitusi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode normatif menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan ( statute approach ), pendekatan konsep ( conceptual approach ), dan pendekatan historis ( historical approach ). Ketidaktaatan penyusunan UU MD3 pada putusan MK merupakan pengingkaran UUD NRI 1945 dan perkembangan ini merupakan langkah mundur reformasi. Pembentuk Undang-Undang, dalam hal ini, Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (DPR) dan Presiden harus segera melakukan perubahan UU Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan dengan berpijak pada rambu-rambu konstitusional Putusan MK Nomor 92/PUU-X/2012.</p><p>Law Number 17 Year 2014 on the People’s Consultative Assembly, House of Representatives, Regional Representatives Council, and the Regional House of Representatives (MD3 Law) after the decision of the Constitutional Court (MK) is considered to have a substantive problem due to the substance that is contrary to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (the 1945 Constitution), which resulted in the constitutional loss of Regional Representatives Council (DPD), including the reduction of DPD authority to propose draft bills, to discuss draft bills and the reduction in its authority as the regional representative institution. This shows that the drafting of MD3 Law is obviously not respecting the decision of the Court that is mandated by the 1945 Constitution as the interpreter and guardian institution of the constitutional, by not respecting, obeying and implementing MK’s decision which indicates non-compliance with the decision of the state institution that has been designated to guard the purity of the constitution implementation of the constitution. This study uses normative method with statute approach, conceptual approach and a historical approach. The noncompliance of the drafting of MD3 Law towards the MK’s decision is a denial of MK and this development is a step back of Reformation. The legislators, in this case, the House of Representatives (DPR) and the President should immediately amend the Law Number 12 Year 2011 on the Establishment of Laws and Regulations based on the MK’s Decision No. 92/PUU-X/2012. </p>

scholarly journals DUALISME HUKUM DI INDONESIA: Kajian Tentang Peraturan Pencatatan Nikah dalam Perundang-Undangan

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 109
Author(s):  
Muhammad Sodiq
Keyword(s):  
Legal Pluralism ◽  
Legislative Process ◽  
Political Factors ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Law ◽  
Laws And Regulations

The issue of registration of marriages in national law is the issue unresolved until now. The rule of marriagerecords in Indonesia there is the Law No. 1 1974 Article 2 paragraph (1), Article 2 paragraph (2) and KHI Article5, paragraph (1 and 2). Factors causing legal dualism is due to the dominance of the doctrine of scholars (politicalIslam) in the UUP legislative process, political factors Indonesian law, aspects of language UUP No. 1 of 1974has implications for the multi-interpretation and validity of a marriage dilemma also be recording the status ofmarriage. When UUP and understood inductively connected with the existing provisions, it appears there arediscrepancies, then there is still the possibility that a legitimate marriage records as a condition of marriage.Generally laws and regulations in Indonesia led to what is called the law of duality, this is due to legal pluralismin Indonesia. This paper examines the legal dualism in Indonesia, namely the marriage records in the UUPregulation No. 1 In 1974 and KHI.[Persoalan pencatatan perkawinan dalam hukum nasional adalah persoalan yang belum tuntas sampaisekarang. Peraturan pencatatan nikah di Indonesia ada dua, yaitu pada UU No. 1 Tahun 1974 Pasal2 ayat (1), Pasal 2 ayat (2) dan KHI Pasal 5, ayat (1 dan 2). Faktor penyebab dualisme hukum adalahkarena dominasi doktrin ulama (politik Islam) pada proses legislasi UUP, faktor politik hukumIndonesia, aspek kebahasaan UUP No. 1 Tahun 1974 berimplikasi pada multi-interpretasi keabsahansuatu pernikahan dan juga dilema akan status pencatatan nikah. Ketika UUP dihubungkan dandipahami secara induktif dengan pasal-pasal yang ada, nampak adanya ketidaksesuaian, maka masihada kemungkinan bahwa pencatatan nikah sebagai syarat sah suatu pernikahan. Secara umumperaturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia memunculkan apa yang disebut dualisme hukum, halini disebabkan oleh legal pluralism yang ada di Indonesia. Tulisan ini mengkaji tentang dualismehukum di Indonesia, yaitu adanya peraturan pencatatan nikah dalam UUP No. 1 Tahun 1974 maupunKHI.]

scholarly journals LEGAL MONITORING AS A TOOL FOR MODERNIZATION OF NATIONAL LEGAL SYSTEM OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Жанна Тлембаева ◽  
Zhanna Tlembaeva ◽  
Дана Турлыбек ◽  
Dana Turlybek
Keyword(s):  
Legal System ◽  
National Legal System ◽  
The Republic

scholarly journals Involvement of the Indonesian National Military (TNI) in Legislation about Anti-Terrorism:

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 63
Author(s):  
Satria Unggul Wicaksana Prakasa
Keyword(s):  
Legal System ◽  
Terrorist Attack ◽  
Armed Forces ◽  
New Order ◽  
Dual Function ◽  
Humanitarian Law ◽  
Law System ◽  
Research Problems ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Military

Changes in the international humanitarian legal system in a global context have shifted, as the first war identified with an inter-state ceasefire. Today, the war party is not only a state but also the aftermath of the 9/11 tragedy marked by non-state war actors, a terrorist attack. In Indonesia, the issue of terrorism becomes a serious concern after the first Bali Bombing, the second Bali Bombing, and other terrorist tragedies. Lately, the discourse of TNI involvement in the eradication of terrorism in Indonesia through the formation of the Anti-Terrorism Act. According to the issue, the research problems are (1) TNI's authority elements to combat terrorism in the Indonesian legal system; (2) the International humanitarian law system regulates the involvement of the military on combating terrorism. The results of the study are (1) after the fall of New Order regime in 1998, the dual function of ABRI (Indonesian Armed Forces during Suharto's era) had dissolved, and this implied the limited authority of TNI to maintain the unitary state of the Republic of Indonesia (NKRI) sovereignty at the border. The authority of the TNI on combating terrorism, following Act No.34, 2004 section 7 articles (3) about TNI, mentions that the fight against terrorism deals with criminal methods. Except for war aggression, related to terrorism that threatens the State sovereignty and not against terrorism that occurs in the community on the Anti-Terrorism Act. If TNI wants to be involved in combating terrorism, it must be following the 1945 constitution, of which terrorism is part of non-international armed conflict, in which the power of command is in the hands of the President.

Islamic Law in a National Legal System: A Study on the Implementation of Shari'ah in Aceh, Indonesia

2008 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 1-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hasnil Basri Siregar
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Central Government ◽  
National Policy ◽  
Legal Pluralism ◽  
National Government ◽  
Human Relationships ◽  
System A ◽  
National Legal System

AbstractThe implementation of shari'ah (Islamic law) in the province of Aceh in Indonesia was the consequence of a national policy of legal pluralism, effected in 2001 when the national government decided to give a special status and wide autonomy to this region. However, certain problems have arisen. One of these is whether the Islamic courts of justice have been conferred competence to deal with Islamic criminal law and if so, which judicial institution should deal with the matter. Another is the meaning and scope of mu'amalat law (the law dealing with human relationships). It also appears that the central government has permitted shari'ah to be implemented for political reasons.

scholarly journals Tanggapan Teologis Andreas A. Yewangoe Terhadap Otonomi Daerah di Indonesia Pada Era Reformasi

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 110-122
Author(s):  
Arthur Aritonang
Keyword(s):  
Public Space ◽  
Its Region ◽  
Religious Group ◽  
New Order ◽  
Local Autonomy ◽  
Regional Autonomy ◽  
Religious Law ◽  
The Reformation ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Method Approach

 This article examines deviations from the original purpose of the regional autonomy system in the Reformation era. Since the beginning, the local autonomy system was a response to a centralized government system during the New Order regime. The implementation of regional autonomy so that each region can regulate, develop, and advance its region. However, the spirit of regional autonomy has been distorted due to public policies' existence through a set of rules that impose religious law, which ultimately limits the development of other religions. In reality, regional / regency regulations with religious nuances clash with the Republic of Indonesia's existing constitution. This study uses the literature method approach, which focuses on the topic of regional autonomy as well as conducting interviews with national figures Andreas A. Yewangoe because his thoughts will be raised in responding to deviations from the original purpose of the formation of regional autonomy policies in Indonesia. In conclusion, Yewangoe gave a theological response so that matters of religious law were aimed at his religious group, not being forced to be applied in a heterogeneous public space to create democracy in Indonesia following the principles of humanity and justice for Indonesian people. 

scholarly journals EKSISTENSI DAN PENGATURAN KESATUAN MASYARAKAT HUKUM ADAT SEBAGAI SUBYEK HUKUM TATANEGARA

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Johan Erwin Isharyanto
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Constitutional Law ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
New Order ◽  
Governance Reform ◽  
The Republic

<p>In the era of independence, guided democracy, the new order, until the era of<br />governance reform in Indonesia tended to override the importance of diversity.<br />Power consolidation tends to deny the existence of customary law community units<br />and is usually accompanied by etatism tendencies. This article describes how the<br />existence and regulation of customary law community units as subjects of<br />Constitutional Law. The conclusion obtained is that the existence and regulation of<br />customary law community units as subjects of constitutional law in the legal system<br />of the Republic of Indonesia constitution is guaranteed and recognized based on the<br />provisions of Article 28 B paragraph (2) article and 28 I paragraph (3) of the 1945<br />Constitution, as well as in Article 6 UU no. 39 of 1999 concerning human rights</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document