The Special Principle of Relativity and the Translation of Physical Laws

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rudolf Fullybright
Keyword(s):  
Drug Resistance ◽  
Special Theory ◽  
Physical Reality ◽  
Frames Of Reference ◽  
Theory Of Relativity ◽  
Principle Of Relativity ◽  
Electronic Motion ◽  
Successful Control ◽  
Physical Laws ◽  
And Control

Similarly to his special theory of relativity, Einstein's special principle of relativity extends beyond the limits currently known to it. Up to now, the principle has not been suspected to have the potential to translate laws. However, the principle holds an inherent capacity to translate physical laws and, in so doing, speeds up our understanding and control of physical reality. Such a translation of laws leads to the faster discovery of other laws, such as the Laws of Electronic Motion, characterizing the motion of electrons around the atomic nucleus, and the Third Law of Resistance, facilitating the successful control of drug resistance in medicine. The ability of the special principle of relativity to translate laws shines forth once the said principle is duly interpreted. This interpretation exposes a parallelism between experimental frames of reference and justifies the applicability of the laws of one frame of reference in other parallel frames of reference. This process opens the door to our faster discovery of the laws governing a multiplicity of frames parallel to a frame we already know the laws of. In practice, the interpretation of Einstein's special principle of relativity speeds up our understanding and capacity to control the physical reality we live in and, applied to biological organisms, points to the immediate step we have to take towards the successful control of drug resistance in medicine.

The Special Principle of Relativity and Biological Resistance Control

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rudolf Fullybright
Keyword(s):  
Control Measure ◽  
Human Life ◽  
Physical Phenomenon ◽  
Physical Reality ◽  
The Third ◽  
Principle Of Relativity ◽  
Successful Control ◽  
Third Law ◽  
Physical Laws ◽  
And Control

In a companion article, we have shown that Einstein's special principle of relativity holds more potential than has so far been understood. The ability of the principle to translate physical laws allows our faster understanding and control of physical reality. Derivation of the Third Law of Resistance, towards the successful control of biological organisms, is an example of such faster understanding and control of a physical phenomenon. Resistance in medicine has been worsening for 100 years now, and this phenomenon has eluded every control measure since, while resistance in agriculture displays similarly aggravating trends, both coming with serious economic and human life losses. Earlier analysis of resistance in the biological realm has shown that the process is governed by at least two laws: the First Law of Resistance conditioning its rise and the Second Law of Resistance conditioning its growth. Here, moving on from the interpreted Einstein’s special principle of relativity and the modified Newton's Third Law of Motion, we show that resistance is governed by a Third Law which conditions its termination. Application of the Third Law of Resistance to pathogens points to the immediate steps we need to take towards the successful control of resistance in medicine and agriculture.

scholarly journals Hypothesis of the Hidden Multiverse Explains Dark Matter and Dark Energy

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Alexandrovich Antonov
Keyword(s):  
Dark Matter ◽  
Dark Energy ◽  
Special Theory ◽  
Physical Reality ◽  
Theory Of Relativity ◽  
Special Theory Of Relativity ◽  
Hypercomplex Numbers ◽  
Distant Future ◽  
Parallel Universes ◽  
Quaternion Structure

There are currently a large number of Multiverse hypotheses, which are, however, non-verifiable, i.e. they can be neither confirmed nor refuted experimentally even in the distant future. In contrast, the hypothesis of the hidden Multiverse considered in the article is verifiable and therefore has a right to be called a theory. The theory uses the principle of physical reality of imaginary numbers discovered 500 years ago, including complex and hypercomplex numbers, as fundamental and proved by the author theoretically and experimentally. This principle has allowed revealing a number of serious mistakes in the special theory of relativity. An adjusted version of the special theory of relativity has been proposed and the theory of the hidden Multiverse has been developed on its basis. The Multiverse has been referred to as hidden, because parallel universes it contains are mutually invisible. The nature of their invisibility is explained in the article. It is shown that dark matter and dark energy are other universes of the hidden Multiverse apart from ours. Analysis of data from WMAP and Planck spacecrafts has shown that the hidden Multiverse has quaternion structure comprising four pairs of universes and antiverses (i.e., four pairs of matter and antimatter).

The four basic errors of special theory of relativity and the solution offered by extended Galilean relativity

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shukri Klinaku
Keyword(s):  
Special Theory ◽  
Theory Of Relativity ◽  
Special Theory Of Relativity ◽  
Speed Of Light ◽  
Addition Formula ◽  
Principle Of Relativity ◽  
Galilean Relativity ◽  
Velocity Addition ◽  
Basic Equations ◽  
Tycho Brahe

Is the special theory of relativity (STR) a “simple” or “tricky” theory? They who think that it is a simple theory say (i) that its postulates are simple, that Nature is such, (ii) that the mathematics of STR is perfect, and (iii) that experiments support it. I consider its two postulates to be very true, whereas the mathematics of the STR has a shortcoming, and, as for the experiments, the question must be posed: which theory do they support best? The problem for STR lies in the transition from its postulates to its basic equations, i.e., Lorentz transformation and the velocity addition formula. The passage from the principle of relativity and the constancy of the speed of light to the basic equations of the STR is affected by four fundamental errors—three physical and one mathematical. Continuous attempts to reconcile these latent mistakes have made STR increasingly tricky. As a result, it is in a similar situation to Ptolemy's geocentric model after “improvements” thereto by Tycho Brahe. However, the “Copernican solution” for relative motion—offered by extended Galilean relativity—is very simple and effective.

Time and Invariance

Conceptus ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 37 (92) ◽  
Author(s):  
Friedel Weinert
Keyword(s):  
Quantum Mechanics ◽  
Special Theory ◽  
Physical World ◽  
Theory Of Relativity ◽  
Special Theory Of Relativity ◽  
Physical Processes ◽  
Classical Physics ◽  
Physical Laws ◽  
Do So

SummaryThe aim of this paper is to infer conclusions about the temporality of the physical world from central features of the measurement of time. In order to do so it makes a distinction between the passage of time and the measurement of the passage of time. Whilst the passage of time can be experienced on the basis of, say, chaotic processes, the measurement of the passage of time requires certain physical regularities. But regularity is not sufficient and it is important to highlight the connection between time, regularity and invariance in the measurement of time, especially with respect to classical physics, the Special theory of relativity and quantum mechanics. It is only after this connection has been clarified that the paper considers the dispute on whether the physical world is static or dynamic. As there are clearly both time-symmetric physical laws and time-asymmetric physical processes, the question is empirically underdetermined because the evidence is at present compatible with two incompatible views about the temporality of the physical world.

APORIE DI UNA NUOVA CONCEZIONE DELL'ETERE NEL MANOSCRITTO EINSTEINIANO DEL 1920

Nuncius ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 629-649
Author(s):  
GIORGIO JULES MASTROBISI
Keyword(s):  
Special Theory ◽  
Gravitational Theory ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Theory Of Relativity ◽  
General Theory Of Relativity ◽  
Special Theory Of Relativity ◽  
Principle Of Relativity ◽  
Classical Principle ◽  
Phenomenological Point

Abstracttitle SUMMARY /title The 1920 manuscript by Einstein entitled: Vorlesungen ber Relativittstheorie points out paradigmatically all the preparations of the Special Theory of Relativity, the importance and the role of this theory in the General Theory of Relativity, the passage from a "Special Theory of Relativity" to a "general" one, and the doubts and certainties of its inventor, all that from a point of view of one of the most important issues of the history modem science: the problem of Ether definition. Just the Ether Theory, filtered through H. A. Lorentz's Theory, becomes in Einstein an "Inertial case" of the Classical Principle of Relativity and then, losing all its mechanical qualities, becomes Gravitational Theory in H. Weyl's phenomenological point of view.

scholarly journals RELATIVISTIC LAW OF ENERGY CONSERVATION IN THE ASPECT OF COMPLEMENTARITY OF FORM AND CONTENT, AS A REFLECTION OF CHANGES IN SPACE (VOLUME) AND TIME

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (9(78)) ◽  
pp. 46-51
Author(s):  
A. Vitko A.
Keyword(s):  
Special Theory ◽  
The Body ◽  
Theory Of Relativity ◽  
Conservation Of Energy ◽  
Philosophical Interpretation ◽  
Quality Of Motion ◽  
Physical Laws ◽  
Space Volume

The article contains a systematic presentation of the results of the expansion of the special theory of relativity by additionally taking into account mass and speed in the category of content, that is, the quality of the substance contained in the body and the quality of motion, as well as the volume (space of form) and time, that is, their quantity. The interrelationships of mass, energy and speed, that play the role of physical laws, are established, and their philosophical interpretation is given from the standpoint of complementarity is given. The relativistic law of conservation of energy has been derived in the aspect of complementarity of form and content, as a reflection of changes in space (volume) and time.

scholarly journals Special Relativity sans Lorentz Transformation (OR) Perceptional Relativity

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastin Patrick Asokan
Keyword(s):  
Special Relativity ◽  
Lorentz Transformation ◽  
Special Theory ◽  
Frames Of Reference ◽  
Theory Of Relativity ◽  
Special Theory Of Relativity ◽  
Inertial Frames

Abstract This paper shows that if we accept that there is no absolute perception of Reality and the same Reality is perceived differently by different observers, then a simple and straightforward explanation for the constancy of Light's speed in all inertial frames of reference is possible without any need for paradoxical Lorentz Transformation. This paper also proves that Lorentz Transformation, as incorporated in the Special Theory of Relativity, is conceptually flawed. This paper also points out the misconceptions regarding the claimed experimental verifications of Lorentz Transformation's predictions in the Hafele–Keating experiment and μ meson experiment. This paper concludes that Einstein's Special Theory Relativity can stand on its own merits without Lorentz Transformation.

scholarly journals BIBLICAL THESIS ABOUT CREATION “EX NIHILO” AND THE RELATIONAL PARADIGM OF PHYSICS

Metaphysics ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 57-64
Author(s):  
Archpriest Kirill Kopeikin
Keyword(s):  
Quantum Mechanics ◽  
Special Kind ◽  
Special Theory ◽  
Theory Of Relativity ◽  
Principle Of Relativity ◽  
Galilean Relativity ◽  
History Of ◽  
Entire History ◽  
Ex Nihilo ◽  
The Many

The biblical story begins with the story of the creation of the world out of nothing. In the context of theological tradition, creation means non-self-being; this is the reason for the constant variability of the universe. Biblical Revelation presupposes the assumption of a special kind of ontology of creation: nothing is self-existent, all being is relative and everything is relative to God. The entire history of natural science, starting with Galileo, shows that its development proceeded along the path of concretizing and expanding the field of applicability of the principle of the relativity of being: from Galilean relativity - to Einstein’s special theory of relativity - and, finally, to quantum mechanics - to the fact that one of the greatest physicists of the XX century academician Vladimir Fock called the principle of relativity to the means of observation. Considering quantum mechanics as the last natural link in this chain of realization of the principle of relativity in physics, we can, from the many alternative interpretations of quantum mechanics existing today, single out those that are organically consistent with the fundamental biblical principle of the relativity of being and consistently explain what is perceived as quantum paradoxes. This will allow you to take the next step towards comprehending the fundamental nature of reality.

Relativity and Cognitive Ethics

2019 ◽  
pp. 119-139
Author(s):  
Richard Sieb
Keyword(s):  
Free Will ◽  
Dimensional Space ◽  
Conscious Experience ◽  
Applied Ethics ◽  
Special Theory ◽  
Physical Reality ◽  
Space Time ◽  
Theory Of Relativity ◽  
Descriptive Ethics ◽  
Dimensional Space Time

Ethics originate from conscious experience. All categories of ethics (meta-ethics, normative ethics, applied ethics, descriptive ethics) are knowable only through conscious experience. Hence, conscious experience might be considered a meta-ethic (the origin and basis of all ethics). Conscious experience appears to us as a unified four-dimensional space-time continuum or field. A neural correlate for conscious experience modeled by Einstein's special theory of relativity has been found in the human brain. Conscious experience can be described and understood using relativistic physics. The principles of relativistic physics therefore influence ethics. Three universals emerge from relativity which mediate conscious experience and ethics: the laws of physics, the speed of light, and space-time intervals. The presence of these universals suggests that conscious experience (observed physical reality) is determinate (predictable). We do, however, have free will (choice), and this free will appears to be governed by ethics.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document